[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 476483] Review Request: ghc-paths - library for information about ghc paths

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 17 01:42:24 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476483


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-12-16 20:42:23 EDT ---
Builds fine; rpmlint says:
  ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
which is true, and not a problem.

  ghc-paths.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
   /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5.a
  ghc-paths-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
   /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.1/ghc-paths-0.1.0.5/libHSghc-paths-0.1.0.5_p.a
which are normal for Haskell packages.

The only real complaint I have is that the module description doesn't make a
whole lot of sense.  I guess it must make sense if you understand Haskell
(which I don't); that's not really unheard of when it comes to specialized
modules for various languages, so I'm not going to worry about it.  Maybe you
can think of something more sensible.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  ea9e97425894e3dbd7915e00e107e2e7fc07b6e8293fd2dd66a813f0673cba10  
   ghc-paths-0.1.0.5.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  ghc-paths-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   ghc-paths-devel = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
   ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
   ghc-paths(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
  =
   /bin/sh
   ghc = 6.10.1

  ghc-paths-prof-0.1.0.5-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
   ghc-paths-prof = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
   ghc-paths-prof(x86-64) = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
  =
   ghc-paths = 0.1.0.5-1.fc11
   ghc-prof = 6.10.1

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED

The package review process needs reviewers!  If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list