[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library.

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Dec 22 11:51:33 UTC 2008

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #38 from Till Maas <opensource at till.name>  2008-12-22 06:51:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Ok thank you very much that looks very useful: it is quite a bit change to our
> packaging so I think I would like to leave the automatic dependency scripts for
> the next update of the guidelines after this one, if that is ok - that will
> give us a bit more time to test and play with them.  


> Presumbly ghc should own those scripts?

Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make
it easier to update them.

> > I am not yet sure, what the impact of
> > %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
> > is for ghc packages.
> Naive question: what would be the consequence of leaving
> _use_internal_dependency_generator turned on?  Turning off also disables all C
> library dependency checking?  Anyway from what you say we can tweak the scripts
> to do the write thing.

If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used.
According to this
instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask
about this on fedora-devel.

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list