[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 23 18:53:42 UTC 2008

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tibbs at math.uh.edu
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-12-23 13:53:41 EDT ---
My advice would be to simply not attempt multiple library versions.  If you
find yourself in a case where you have to maintain something backrevved, you're
already lost to a certain degree.

This package looks fine to me.  rpmlint says:
  ghc-HTTP.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
  ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
  ghc-HTTP-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package 
which are all normal for Haskell packages.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   ghc-HTTP-devel = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc-HTTP(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc = 6.10.1

   ghc-HTTP-prof = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc-HTTP-prof(x86-64) = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc-HTTP = 3001.1.5-1.fc11
   ghc-prof = 6.10.1

* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* scriptlets OK (ghc package registration and documentation indexing)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list