From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 1 20:56:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811012056.mA1KuRaf025155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #28 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-01 16:56:26 EDT --- Jason, is there any more information you need from us before you can proceed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 00:24:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 19:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030024.mA30OXVx015065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 03:16:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030316.mA33GjST007619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-02 22:16:43 EDT --- An updated package would be good I guess... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 06:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030634.mA36Ywsv002999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 06:35:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030635.mA36ZLAp025038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 06:34:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030634.mA36YCQq024684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-03 01:34:12 EDT --- Okay I have an idea: perhaps for f9 we should just name the new ghc-prof-6.8.3 subpackage ghc683-prof instead to workaround this or maybe it is better to just add a dummy ghc682-prof package to keep yum quiet, otherwise we will break upgrades to f10 or need to update ghc for f10 to obsolete ghc683-prof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 07:27:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:27:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030727.mA37RMbN010357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-03 02:27:22 EDT --- Hopefully ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 should fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 07:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030732.mA37W8ok000382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 08:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030813.mA38DR1M006624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-03 03:13:27 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 08:13:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 03:13:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811030813.mA38DPZx006598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-03 03:13:24 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 16:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811031619.mA3GJTaI014412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-03 11:19:28 EDT --- Yes, I need an updated package to review. I have been away for a few days but I don't think I missed any notice of one being made available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Mon Nov 3 23:14:04 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:14:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 successfully moved from dist-f9-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates-testing by bodhi In-Reply-To: <1110555826.4411225753571213.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <205364339.4981225754044636.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Hi Haskell SIG, If you could please test this build before we push it to f9 update final that would be appreciated. Until the package reaches updates-testing mirrors you can grab it from http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/ghc/6.8.3/10.fc9/ The package is essentially the same as the the package currently in rawhide for f10, the only difference being the dummy ghc682-prof package designed to prevent bug 467893 (yum cycling between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof due to bad packaging). Cheers, Jens ps If you have packager status you should also be able to vote for the update (ie give it karma) in Bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, otherwise if I don't hear of any problems by the end of this week I will go ahead and request the push to updates final. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Koji Build System Subject: ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 successfully moved from dist-f9-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates-testing by bodhi Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Size: 3015 URL: From bos at serpentine.com Thu Nov 6 00:02:09 2008 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:02:09 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 successfully moved from dist-f9-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates-testing by bodhi In-Reply-To: <205364339.4981225754044636.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1110555826.4411225753571213.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <205364339.4981225754044636.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: > > If you could please test this build before we push it to f9 update final > that would be appreciated. > Works on my machine (TM). If you're running rawhide, there's a candidate build of GHC 6.10.1 now available: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68605 It mostly works, but ghci's editline/libedit support is busted, and I do not yet know why. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From petersen at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 02:04:25 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:04:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Fwd: ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 successfully moved from dist-f9-updates-candidate into dist-f9-updates-testing by bodhi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <186506237.566181225937065376.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > Works on my machine (TM). Thanks for testing and the karma: one more vote and it will go straight to updates-final (though it hasn't actually reached the updates-testing repo yet...). > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68605 Thanks - I think the f11 builds should work fine on f9 (and f10) too btw. > It mostly works, but ghci's editline/libedit support is busted, and I > do not yet know why. Yes I see that too (also with readline). Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060408.mA648puf025606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:08:50 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 6 04:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811060408.mA648ma5025573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-05 23:08:47 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Nov 9 06:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 01:08:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 468314] gtk2hs should be renamed ghc-gtk2hs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811090608.mA968Elb016401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468314 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-09 01:08:14 EDT --- Hmm thought I wrote some explanation above... Anyway this is to bring gkt2hs within line of the Fedora Haskell Packaging Guidelines. Fixed in rawhide for f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:22:52 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:22:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] haskell-sig pseudo-user in FAS In-Reply-To: <526482802.1151111226280010774.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <521965560.1151231226280172415.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> We now have a haskell-sig pseudo-user in the Fedora Accounts System to make it easier to track fedora haskell bugs. I am going to add it to the CC field of all the current haskell packages so that bugs will get CC to this list automatically and so will be seen by the SIG. This might be a good time to ask again if people feel we have too much bugzilla traffic on the list instead of email discussion. If people feel that way we could also make a fedora-haskell-bugs list for the bugzilla traffic. Thoughts? Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 01:35:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100135.mAA1Z1ZW012376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 02:10:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 239713] No PPC64 build of ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100210.mAA2AHVe012012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239713 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-09 21:10:15 EDT --- Seems gentoo are still working on ppc64: http://bugs.gentoo.org/206643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 02:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100230.mAA2UUGP015838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-09 21:30:29 EDT --- Here is on that actually builds in koji: had forgotten to specify ghc archs. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-2.fc9.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=923902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 03:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 189197] Review Request: gtk2hs - Haskell gtk2 binding (renamed to ghc-gtk2hs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100315.mAA3FQ0E031322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 10 03:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811100318.mAA3Ii3Y024756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Mon Nov 10 17:30:25 2008 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] haskell-sig pseudo-user in FAS In-Reply-To: <521965560.1151231226280172415.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <526482802.1151111226280010774.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <521965560.1151231226280172415.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <7f692fec0811100930m36c2c54eu3c32145bf6cc5d60@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: > This might be a good time to ask again if people feel we have too much bugzilla traffic on the list instead of email discussion. If people feel that way we could also make a fedora-haskell-bugs list for the bugzilla traffic. Thoughts? I don't mind the noise. -Yaakov From petersen at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 04:53:00 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:53:00 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] haskell-sig pseudo-user in FAS In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0811100930m36c2c54eu3c32145bf6cc5d60@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1486400464.1596051226379180847.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > > This might be a good time to ask again if people feel we have too > > much bugzilla traffic on the list instead of email discussion. If > > people feel that way we could also make a fedora-haskell-bugs list for > ? the bugzilla traffic. Thoughts? Also would you like cvs commits posted here too? Currently they are being rejected by mailman but we could easily fix that. Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsHCO023067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |471003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsGLC023030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |471003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 10:54:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:54:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111054.mABAsFJr023002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Blocks| |425882, 470756 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 05:54:14 EDT --- This requires ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP which are currently under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 13:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111352.mABDqDOp001857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-11 08:52:13 EDT --- I think the dependencies are backwards. Does this block ghc-zlib or is it the other way around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 15:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:44:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811111544.mABFim9R024705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #31 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-11 10:44:46 EDT --- OK, here are the links to the new packages: http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJMNw001204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471003 Depends on|471003 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJKHR001167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |471003 Depends on|471003 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 11 23:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811112319.mABNJJwP001141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|425882, 470756 | Depends on| |425882, 470756 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 18:19:18 EDT --- Oops thanks - made this depend on ghc-zlib and ghc-HTTP reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:06:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120006.mAC06OEH011434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-11 19:06:23 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan. Perhaps the review should target f11 now since we have ghc-6.10.1 in dist-f11. But that is up to Jason really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 00:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120008.mAC08sJi000616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #33 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-11-11 19:08:53 EDT --- I'm easy. I'll be pushing a nearly-zero-day update of ghc 6.10.1 for f10 if I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:59:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120259.mAC2x0or013159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:59:00 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc gtk2hs haddock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 02:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120258.mAC2wwkP003112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-11 21:58:57 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc gtk2hs haddock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Wed Nov 12 04:22:17 2008 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] haskell-sig pseudo-user in FAS In-Reply-To: <1486400464.1596051226379180847.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <7f692fec0811100930m36c2c54eu3c32145bf6cc5d60@mail.gmail.com> <1486400464.1596051226379180847.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <7f692fec0811112022v3a825fa9r71885206dae387b8@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: >> > This might be a good time to ask again if people feel we have too >> > much bugzilla traffic on the list instead of email discussion. If >> > people feel that way we could also make a fedora-haskell-bugs list for >> ? the bugzilla traffic. Thoughts? > > Also would you like cvs commits posted here too? > Currently they are being rejected by mailman but we could easily fix that. I get them via the CVS commits mailing list. I have them filtered to not be marked as read unlike the bulk of them. I don't know any other mailing list that does include CVS commits, though some groups like fas_git will send you git commits on a separate mailing list. -Yaakov From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 12 07:48:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811120748.mAC7mcDP024302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #34 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-12 02:48:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > I'm easy. Basically the package looks pretty good to me now, my only comment is that we need requires for all the install scripts I guess. Because of not needing haddock09 those would also look easier with dist-f11 in koji # for ghc-pkg and haddock Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} (they need to be versioned for ghc-pkg) > I'll be pushing a nearly-zero-day update of ghc 6.10.1 for f10 if I can. (It might be better to wait a little longer I think for ghc-6.10.1 to stabilise and also after seeing how much work it was updating f9 to ghc-6.8.3, but let's see how we go.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 13 19:22:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811131922.mADJME8e018831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-13 14:22:12 EDT --- One remaining question: if ghc library packages in the future do grow a runtime component, that will imply not only that this package grows a -devel subpackage but that anything which build against it has to change to having a build dependency on the -devel package. That could be avoided now in a couple of ways, but I don't know whether the possibility of ghc supporting shared libraries is sufficiently remote that its not worth it. The simplest way is for this package to provide ghc-zlib-devel and for other packages to BuildRequires: that. In any case, I'll leave that up to you folks. You will definitely need some extra dependencies for the scriptlets. I think there's one that's not listed above in comment 34; you'll need Rerquires(postun): haddock for the %ghc_reindex_haddock script. I'm not sure what is required for the register.sh and unregister.sh scripts although I suspect the above list should do it. We definitely need to get the full list of dependencies into the guidelines. Currently I think the haddock ones are missing. Or am I confused and is haddock somehow brought in by ghc? rpmlint output: ghc-zlib.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/zlib-0.5.0.0/libHSzlib-0.5.0.0.a ghc-zlib.x86_64: E: devel-dependency zlib-devel ghc-zlib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-zlib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/zlib-0.5.0.0/libHSzlib-0.5.0.0_p.a I agree that the above are all acceptable and expected. * source files match upstream: 20e067cfbec87ec062ac144875a60e158ea6cf7836aac031ec367fcdd5446891 zlib-0.5.0.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. (library for ghc -> ghc- prefix) * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. X Scriptlet dependencies are mostly missing. final provides and requires: ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ghc-zlib = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 ghc-zlib(x86-64) = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 = /bin/sh ghc = 6.8.3 haddock09 zlib-devel ghc-zlib-prof-0.5.0.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm ghc-zlib-prof = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 ghc-zlib-prof(x86-64) = 0.5.0.0-1.fc10 = ghc-zlib = 0.5.0.0 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 00:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811140050.mAE0oGeB014336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #36 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-13 19:50:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > One remaining question: if ghc library packages in the future do grow a runtime > component, that will imply not only that this package grows a -devel subpackage > but that anything which build against it has to change to having a build > dependency on the -devel package. That could be avoided now in a couple of > ways, but I don't know whether the possibility of ghc supporting shared > libraries is sufficiently remote that its not worth it. The simplest way is > for this package to provide ghc-zlib-devel and for other packages to > BuildRequires: that. In any case, I'll leave that up to you folks. That is a very good suggestion and I think we should adopt that, since ghc is moving to support shared libraries. > We definitely need to get the full list of dependencies into the guidelines. > Currently I think the haddock ones are missing. Or am I confused and is > haddock somehow brought in by ghc? ghc-6.10.1 includes a version of haddock now, but ghc-6.8.3 does not. (Hence my suggestion to do the review against ghc-6.10.1, but it is not yet in rawhide, just dist-f11.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 14 20:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811142018.mAEKI6PV025850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #37 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-14 15:18:04 EDT --- That is a bit confusing; I didn't realize that haddock was moving into ghc, and unfortunately "rawhide" won't actually be rawhide for some time and while I can do build testing in koji its tough to do any actual install testing unless I work against static-repos. Unfortunately download speeds from there are so terribly slow that it takes me hours to init a buildroot. Let me see what I can come up with. So if I understand correctly, for ghc-6.10.1 the scriptlet dependencies should just be: Requires(pre): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} And the "Requires(post): haddock09" bit can go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Nov 15 16:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811151621.mAFGLdgC030522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-15 11:21:36 EDT --- OK, I can verify that the package installs into a fresh dist-f11 buildroot with the dependencies as above and the package tweaked to build against ghc-6.10.1. So where are we? Basically, you tell me what you wnat to do. I guess at this point I'd say to just target ghc-6.10.1, drop "Requires(post): haddock09", add the -devel provide and we're good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:25:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170425.mAH4PLdv012993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-16 23:25:21 EDT --- Sounds good Jason: BTW I already added the -devel Provides to PackagingDrafts Haskell templates last week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Nov 17 04:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811170427.mAH4RXN1006091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-16 23:27:33 EDT --- I mean https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell/LibraryOnlyTemplate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 18 19:50:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 472106] New: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472106 Summary: Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ghc AssignedTo: bos at serpentine.com ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, bos at serpentine.com, loupgaroublond at gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Fedora 9 has ghc 6.8.2; rawhide has 6.8.3. Upstream has released 6.10.1. Not a high priority thing (I don't *need* anything explicitly from 6.10.1) but it's good to track upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 05:38:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:38:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 472106] Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190538.mAJ5cuUF015592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472106 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-19 00:38:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Fedora 9 has ghc 6.8.2; rawhide has 6.8.3. Upstream has released 6.10.1. The ghc-6.8.3 update for f9 has just been pushed I believe so should be available from your fedora mirror soon. ghc-6.10.1 has already been built for f11 (you can pull if from koji if you are impatient) and will appear in post-f10 rawhide soon. > Not a high priority thing (I don't *need* anything explicitly from 6.10.1) but > it's good to track upstream. We will probably do an update for f10 to ghc-6.10.1 later: Bryan has built a package in koji too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190605.mAJ65c52021152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|197974 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190624.mAJ6OjpA023715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-19 01:24:44 EDT --- Yaakov, when you think you will have time to continue this package review or would you like me to post an updated package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 06:31:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 472106] Newer stable version of ghc released (6.10.1) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811190631.mAJ6Vh0A023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472106 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-11-19 01:31:42 EDT --- Great, thanks. Sounds like you are very much on top of things :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEn7ui026798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:49:06 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEn4kk026771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-11-19 09:49:04 EDT --- ghc-6.8.3-10.fc9, gtk2hs-0.9.13-3.fc9, haddock-2.0.0.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:49:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 469484] Upgrade path: ghc EVR higher in F8 than F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEnBt7026829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469484 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 19 14:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 467893] Yum update cycles between ghc-prof and ghc682-prof In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEn9dL022215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467893 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Mon Nov 24 07:53:22 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:53:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] guidelines install scripts In-Reply-To: <909890000.2086951227511853690.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <67751886.2088031227513202623.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Hi, So I have been thinking a bit more about the install scripts in the guidelines, since there seems to me to be no good reason to run ghc-pkg and gen_contents_index more than once per rpm transaction. (Perhaps we should even recommend subpackaging ghc packages.) But I thought I would just ask here once before committing and building the change below to make sure I am not missing something: --- ghc-rpm-macros.ghc 23 Oct 2008 08:31:20 -0000 1.8 +++ ghc-rpm-macros.ghc 24 Nov 2008 07:30:44 -0000 @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ %{nil} %ghc_preinst_script \ -[ "$1" = 2 ] && %{pkg_libdir}/unregister.sh >&/dev/null || : \ %{nil} %ghc_postinst_script \ @@ -48,11 +47,10 @@ %{nil} %ghc_preun_script \ -%{pkg_libdir}/unregister.sh >&/dev/null \ +[ "$1" = 0 ] && %{pkg_libdir}/unregister.sh >&/dev/null \ %{nil} %ghc_postun_script \ -[ "$1" = 1 ] && %{pkg_libdir}/register.sh >& /dev/null || : \ %{nil} %ghc_reindex_haddock \ Summarizing: %ghc_preinst_script and %ghc_postun_script should not been needed since ghc_postinst_script runs "ghc-pkg update". And %ghc_reindex_haddock only needs to be run in %post not %postun. Jens ps We probably also need to think a bit of how to handle indexing with different haddock versions: gtk2hs.darcs requires haddock-2.4 to build docs, so we can't index with it unless we rebuild ghc with haddock-2.4 - we could just skip %ghc_reindex_haddock for gtk2hs for now though, but probably need to ressurrect haddock in rawhide for gtk2hs docs. From tom at moertel.com Mon Nov 24 15:47:36 2008 From: tom at moertel.com (Tom Moertel) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:47:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] guidelines install scripts In-Reply-To: <67751886.2088031227513202623.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <67751886.2088031227513202623.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <492ACC98.70301@moertel.com> Jens Petersen wrote: > Summarizing: %ghc_preinst_script and %ghc_postun_script should not been needed since ghc_postinst_script runs "ghc-pkg update". This change seems reasonable to me. If you want to test the corner-case that the old preinst/postun logic was added to handle, try the following: 1. Install a Haskell-flavored RPM that uses the new install scripts. 2. In the spec file for that RPM, bump the Release (but leave everything else the same) and rebuild the RPM. 3. Update (rpm -Uhv) to the new release of the RPM. 4. Check to see that the package is properly registered w/ GHC. More background on the original problem: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-haskell-list/2008-August/msg00009.html Cheers, Tom From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 02:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250203.mAP236m9031615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 21:03:05 EDT --- Few minor tweaks to bring package in line with latest updated draft revised guidelines. The package is now equivalent to generating with the cabal2spec script being adding in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:20:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:20:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250320.mAP3KXEI005691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:20:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? Yes, probably not, but I think actually the -prof subpackage should not require the main package (just ghc-prof), so it would be possible to install -prof alone. Does that change anything? I am adding a little shell script called cabal2spec in ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11 which generates a ghc library spec files for a hackage tarball argument from cabal-lib-template.spec. It could also generate ghc-zlib.spec with build_doc and build_prof switches. See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/ghc/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250337.mAP3bvXv015949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:37:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=324561) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=324561) ghc-zlib.spec-2.patch Update to ghc-6.10.1 and latest draft revised guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 03:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250341.mAP3fZ37016748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-24 22:41:34 EDT --- Built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=949251 with ghc-6.10.1-4.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 04:37:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250437.mAP4b4ZZ026122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #44 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-11-24 23:37:01 EDT --- The opinion from the legal folks is that even if a srpm creates subpackages that are not related in name or dependency chain, it is still only necessary to include the license file in one of them. It's been discussed, however, and it's also not a blocker if that's really what you want to do. Honestly I would suggest that any templates or automated tools not have %files lists with duplicated files so that less experienced packagers don't get the impression that it is necessary to duplicate the license file or acceptable in general to have duplicate entries in %files lists. I believe that with the patch in comment 42, this package is fine, and I'm happy to see this through. APPROVED I guess we need another guideline update to handle the changed scriptlets, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Nov 25 06:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:27:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811250627.mAP6RPkb004703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-25 01:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Honestly I would suggest that any templates or automated tools not have %files lists with > duplicated files so that less experienced packagers don't get the impression > that it is necessary to duplicate the license file or acceptable in general to > have duplicate entries in %files lists. Right - I will remove it. > I believe that with the patch in comment 42, this package is fine, and I'm > happy to see this through. Thanks for reviewing the first new haskell library package. :-) > I guess we need another guideline update to handle the changed scriptlets, though. Yep. Planning to rework the text, then rfc, and submit to FPC again for review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:06:02 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:06:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Packaging guidelines and macros update In-Reply-To: <2023057844.3176341227678842689.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1353418649.3177011227679562166.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Bryan O'Sullivan" wrote: > I've got an outline of the new documentation process here: : > I also did a drive-by update of some other parts of that page, but > it's somewhat out of date compared to the hacking that Jens and I > have been doing lately. Thanks Bryan. I finally got round to editing and revising the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell and I am finally reasonably happy with them. Perhaps we can leave them a week or two for the rest of the SIG to hopefully scrutinise them and then submit the revision to FPC for review and approval of the revision. Now that ghc-zlib has been approved it should hopefully be easier this time. As you probably noticed by now I have moved the .spec templates directly into the ghc package and provided a primitive shell script called cabal2spec to generate .spec files out of Cabal hackages: when there are no dependencies they should build basically without change and be compliant with the guidelines: so that makes it trivial now to create new cabal rpm packages. Obviously in the long run we should rewrite the script in Haskell (I was being lazy and have written more shell script recently than Haskell :-(), or use cabal-rpm if it can be made compliant to the guidelines for Fedora (I sent submitted a first patch for that long along now while we were discussing the original guidelines...). ghc-6.10.1-5.fc11 is the latest build, has the script and templates and works fine on F10 (and F9 I expect). Once we sort out gtk2hs-docs for F10 we could update F10 to 6.10.1 I think. We can also backport the templates and script to ghc-6.8.3 if it is worth doing. Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Nov 26 06:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811260656.mAQ6uxl1017059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-26 01:56:58 EDT --- For completeness here is the final package: Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-zlib Short Description: Haskell compression and decompression library Owners: petersen bos Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 02:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270242.mAR2gSSM006181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #47 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-11-26 21:42:27 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:01:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270801.mAR81eup029737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #23 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-27 03:01:37 EDT --- Ping? Btw, there's an updated X11 package out there, 1.4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Nov 27 08:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811270811.mAR8BiCR031477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny 2008-11-27 03:11:42 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 00:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280024.mAS0OVYj011338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-27 19:24:30 EDT --- I can update the submission but we need to get ghc-X11 reviewed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 01:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:53:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280153.mAS1rX3P023913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 425882, which changed state. Bug 425882 Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 01:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280153.mAS1rV35023873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-27 20:53:28 EDT --- Thanks. ghc-zlib-0.5.0.0-2.fc11 has been built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 03:19:46 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:19:46 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Packaging guidelines and macros update In-Reply-To: <2118878447.49091227842257968.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <323731483.49221227842386116.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> ----- "Jens Petersen" wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell > and I am finally reasonably happy with them. Actually there is one more thing I would like to change if there are no objections. I would like to rename %ghc_postinst_script to %ghc_register_pkg and %ghc_preun_script to %ghc_unregister_pkg. I attach a little patch which shows the changes needed to macros.ghc and the templates. I will try to test the scenarios Tom brought up, before we submit a revision of the guidelines to the Packaging Committee for review. Jens -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ghc-macros-revise.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1980 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 05:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280554.mAS5sU7M028882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-28 00:54:30 EDT --- - don't include license file in -prof subpackage Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-HTTP/ghc-HTTP-3001.1.4-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 06:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200811280611.mAS6B3x2014867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2008-11-28 01:11:00 EDT --- I hear Yaakov is busy with his studies, so let me take over the submission: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11/ghc-X11-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm (requires f11 rawhide to build) Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=955786 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Fri Nov 28 06:56:58 2008 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:56:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] guidelines install scripts In-Reply-To: <1318886295.54141227853889433.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1015092116.431227855418766.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Thanks Tom, > If you want to test the corner-case > that the old preinst/postun logic was added to handle, try the following: Okay I tried this and it looks ok for me with the revised macros. I had to fix an another error in the original macros while testing though though caused by using "&&" without "|| :" instead of "if" in %preun. Luckily no released shipped packages have used it yet, since it breaks package updating. Jens