[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 19 18:24:26 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366


Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |chitlesh at gmail.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh at gmail.com>  2009-12-19 13:24:22 EDT ---
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matches the base package emacs-%{name}
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. 
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
- MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least i686.
- MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires.
- MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. Emacs-haskell-mode does not
have
any.
- MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the
dynamic linker's default paths. Emacs-haskell-mode does not have any.
- MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable
- MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
- MUST: Permissions on files are set properly.
- MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in
detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: There are no Large documentation files. Emacs-spice-mode does not have
any.
- MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If
it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present.
- MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries 
- MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix 
- MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives
- MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
- MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 

SHOULD Items:

 - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i686.
 - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
 - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. 

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list