From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 13:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 08:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011335.n01DZeMA029768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 ?imon Luka??k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lukasim at atlas.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 12:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051249.n05CnO1t025198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 07:49:23 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-HTTP Short Description: HTTP client library for Haskell Owners: petersen Branches: F-10 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:07:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060207.n06276ML029767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:07:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Yes or maybe better in a separate small package that is required by ghc to make > it easier to update them. Yes good point - I have been thinking to move all packaging stuff to a separate package, say "haskell-packaging". > If it is turned on, then __find_requires is not used. According to this > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies > instead of rpmdeps maybe /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires should be used. I will ask > about this on fedora-devel. Ok thank you for all your explanations on this. :-) Additionally we would really like to automate the generation of C library buildrequires but that probably needs a bit more work with parsing cabal files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060229.n062TB91011810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:29:11 EDT --- Hmm, I still see the problem with ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11.i386 here. I don't think I have seen readline or editline working yet with ghci in 6.10.1. I got the impression that it is an upstream issue since I heard someone else mention it with another distro on irc, but it sounds like certain build environments may trigger it? I agree with Robin that it is strange that ghc is not linked to the line editing lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060237.n062bNmU013362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:37:23 EDT --- Looking at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/ghc/6.10.1/6.fc11/data/logs/i386/build.log I see some build errors related to the editline package but I don't if that relates to this. I remember even trying to build with readline locally did not help with this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:24:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070124.n071OvGF023813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-06 20:24:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 04:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070439.n074dkZP006989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 Bug 471003 depends on bug 470756, which changed state. Bug 470756 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 04:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 470756] Review Request: ghc-HTTP - Haskell HTTP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070439.n074djEF006957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-06 23:39:44 EDT --- Thanks again for the review. Package imported and built for f11. F10 build will follow later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 05:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 00:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 471003] Review Request: cabal-install - Haskell package utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070502.n0752bvQ025009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471003 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-07 00:02:36 EDT --- Dependencies are now in rawhide. Updating package for latest packaging macros. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal-install/cabal-install-0.6.0-2.fc10.src.rpm (please ignore the disttag - requires ghc in rawhide to build currently) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Wed Jan 7 16:54:12 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 11:54:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Update guidelines for using darcs based sources in packages Message-ID: <7f692fec0901070854j5d9fd99ax97ff8bc8ab09d643@mail.gmail.com> Hi List, (Packaging list, i'm double posting because i want you guys to see this, but please put further comments on the haskell list :) ) Because the macros, last i checked were for ghc 6.10.1, some of the packages i'm still working on will only compile from darcs. I've put together a tool to help with development of packages from darcs, and i'm looking for a standardized way to note which revision from darcs is being used. Darcs has two relatively canonical ways to refer to a package, with a hash and a timestamp. Internally this tool uses both. Judging from the different ways people note svn/git/other usage in fedora packages, i've put together a few recommendations that we can use for a standard. Keep in mind, my goal is to support darcs, so please be nitpicky about these details. Just keep in mind, this is easily bikesheddable, and all i want to do is support darcs based packages systematically. Normal Haskell Tarball name: %{hackage_name}-%{version}.tar.gz Output from darcs: %{hackage_name}-%{version}.%{timestamp_from_darcs}darcs.tar.gz Accesible from: darcs dist -d %{hackage_name}-%{version}.%{timestamp_from_darcs}darcs Timestamp accessible from darcs changes --xml-output --last=1 To note this in the rpm Normal Dist: 1%{?dist} Darcs Dist 1.%{timestamp_from_darcs}darcs%{?dist} I've attached a patch to the templates that puts in a placeholder to make it clearer how to do things. Note that in the timestamp i've added . and darcs systematically. Since the macro %dist includes the . prefix, as a matter of precedent, i've noted that we should just use the prefix and suffix in the %darcs macro as well. Also, the names of everything here is not so important. What's important is that i want to take a spec file that's been generated by cabal2spec, run it through a quick sed-like script that will append the correct darcs timestamp. Darcs doesn't make the timestamps that easily available, and i'm trying to automate a few things here. Cheers, Yaakov -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: templates.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3397 bytes Desc: not available URL: From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Wed Jan 7 19:53:15 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Re: [Fedora-packaging] Update guidelines for using darcs based sources in packages In-Reply-To: <4964FDF3.2070008@gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0901070854j5d9fd99ax97ff8bc8ab09d643@mail.gmail.com> <4964FDF3.2070008@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7f692fec0901071153rac94084i816c52351e7c809b@mail.gmail.com> 2009/1/7 Toshio Kuratomi : > Yaakov Nemoy wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> (Packaging list, i'm double posting because i want you guys to see >> this, but please put further comments on the haskell list :) ) >> > Not subscribed to the haskell list and this isn't really a haskell > specific question.... Point taken, continuing discussion here. CC'ing haskell list though. > Four comments: > > 1) Why do we need to add this to the templates? All packages could > potentially be built from snapshots or built from releases. So I don't > see why the Haskell templates should be special. It's a special exception in this case. Many current releases of packages won't build under the ghc in rawhide. The tool i'm composing will make it very easy to track darcs and then switch to a final release once it's made. > 2) %darcs doesn't seem to be a good choice for macro name if it's > intended for use in the Haskell Guidelines. Perhaps this shouldn't be > part of the the Haskell Guidelines? Like i said before, please rename it. %darcs is a temporary name only, and i was looking for comments and suggestions. Would %darcs_timestamp be acceptable? > 3) The patch has two wrong Release lines, %{?darcs} should come before > %{?dist} but two of the patch hunks place it after. I'll send an updated patch, though you have made some good points to abandon this strategy. > 4) Why not use a datetime string like the guidelines currently have in > place? You could use something like: > DATESTAMP=date -u +'%Y%m%d' -d @`darcs-get-timestamp` > sed "s/%define darcs \"\"/%define darcs \"$DATESTAMP\"/" -i foo.spec This would be nice for inserting the proper defines. Actually, since this is python, i could probably script in a '-D' parameter to rpmbuild and mock as well. The tricky part is that there are three lines that also need to be edited, not just the %define line in the spec file. I have a couple of choices here: 1) Have fedora-devshell do something a bit weird and non-standard, that will leave a macro that may or may not make sense in the final submission to Fedora 2) Standardize a macro for those three lines, so that when i use #1, package reviewers and co-maintainers won't scratch their heads wondering what fedora-devshell is doing. Given #2, that's what i'm asking for. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: templates.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 3517 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 01:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130122.n0D1MGBR018021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-12 20:22:15 EDT --- I'm hitting this bug too (ghc-6.10.1-6.fc11.x86_64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130501.n0D51CmL027424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479795] Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130519.n0D5JSTW002768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 00:19:27 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1048685 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479795] Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130518.n0D5Im4e002677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:37:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130537.n0D5bR70006437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 00:37:26 EDT --- Koji build can't be done because happy and cpphs aren't in yet (but they have been submitted for review). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479797] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130543.n0D5hT0n002841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479797 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130557.n0D5vEbG005247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 05:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479795] Review Request: happy - A Parser Generator for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130559.n0D5x25f005418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479795 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 00:59:01 EDT --- Just kidding, this is already in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479797] Review Request: ghc-syb - Scrap Your Boilerplate In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130605.n0D65nkI006973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479797 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 01:05:48 EDT --- Just kidding, this is part of GHC apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C8bq008232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C79S008210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C6o2008187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6C5Hp008166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Depends on| |479799, 479796, 479793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130614.n0D6EFtS013026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|479793 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6CotN012863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:14:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130614.n0D6EGcO013047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|479800 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130612.n0D6Cnxt012841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |479793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130722.n0D7MK7m025379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130804.n0D84IuM028689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-13 03:04:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328843) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328843) cpphs.spec-1.patch Probably my bad for a bug in the current binlib template, but this needs to be a proper binlib package. Here is a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130807.n0D87gSX002169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-13 03:07:41 EDT --- I think Conrad realised already, but happy is already in fedora actually just for the benefit of other reviewers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130929.n0D9Tx7E014370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-01-13 04:29:58 EDT --- few questions 1) why URL still drafts url? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:53:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131753.n0DHroBk003649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 12:53:49 EDT --- Right, sorry. Still can't be built because cpphs isn't in yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 18:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:00:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131800.n0DI0f3d031549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-13 13:00:41 EDT --- Patch applied, with one minor correction (s/LICENSE/LICENCE/); new URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cpphs.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cpphs-1.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140026.n0E0QLls021113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-13 19:26:20 EDT --- Good questions: > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Yeah it is kind of a chicken'n'egg kind of situation. Actually I didn't follow the whole process of fontpackages wrt FPC (Fedora Packaging Committee) and the recent revision of the Fonts Packaging Guidelines: the files in the package are really part of the new Haskell Packaging Draft so it would probably make sense for them to be looked at by FPC as part of the Haskell Packaging Guidelines revision process. > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Hmm maybe the rpm macros and the templates should be separated then. There are more rpm bits (scripts) coming for dependency generation. I could move the spec templating part to haskell-packager: in the longer term we would probably like to rewrite/replace it with something in Haskell (like cabal2rpm). > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Yeah, before doing that I just wanted to put it out for discussion first. :) Currently it is really small though and I doubt any other non-derived distro would be interested in the templates anyway so I was half-naively thinking that it could even just live in pkg cvs but that would probably be frowned upon these days? > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Good point: I will change that. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:16:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140716.n0E7GQHl032357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 02:16:26 EDT --- Thanks for the update. For fun I tries to push it through http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/fedora-qa (though that is a little old now apparently). Here is my review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: [rpmlint] packages are clean [+] MUST: base name is ok and matches spec [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPL+ and LGPLv2+ [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8a7565ff3b2d7bdb594af4c10c594951 cpphs-1.6.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something else. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package contains code [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ghc-cpphs provides -devel for now [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added in the future. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Once the above file ownership issue is resolved I think I can approve this, but I will attach a small patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140720.n0E7KjRv000793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:22:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140722.n0E7Mf02001043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 02:22:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328957) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328957) cpphs.spec-2.patch - simplify summaries - move lgpl license file to ghc-cpphs - add html doc and some trivial cleanup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140729.n0E7TCf5025773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-14 02:29:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > ... > I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told you on IRC. > ... > [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. > > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. > > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something > else. Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a subpackage for the docs). > ... > I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added > in the future. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140810.n0E8ARSk001313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 03:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told > you on IRC. Strange - builds ok for me on f10 (and f11 mock) anyway. > > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by > > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines. > > > > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something > > else. > > Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a > subpackage for the docs). Right. Since ghc-doc is quite big I am leaning towards subpackaging for all libraries' docs generated by haddock. I guess in this case ghc-cpphs-doc say. Any other thoughts from the Haskell SIG? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140934.n0E9YER2028585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 04:34:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > 1) why URL still drafts url? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell Added a comment > 2) just a suggestion. How about using package name as haskell-packager? Still thinking on this - added a comment in spec - I need to look at some other packages for examples. > 3) Can it be possible to have all those Source files be tarred and released > with license file on fedorapeople currently till you get fedorahosted page? Done (but untested:) > 4) spec templates can be installed in /etc/rpmdevtools location instead to go > for some %{_datadir}/%{name} location. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140938.n0E9cFSW029479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 04:38:14 EDT --- I updated the templates in the draft haskell-packaging package to handle doc subpackages btw (haven't tested it though yet:). You could try http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm (though the cabal2spec will conflict with the one in ghc currently). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 07:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:52:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150752.n0F7qHhH001304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 16:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] New: Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Summary: Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy at hinegardner.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, jeremy at hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Darcs in F-9 is 1.0.9 and in rawhide is 2.1.2. Upstream release 2.2.0 today. Please update F-9 F-10 and rawhide to this version. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.9-11.fc9 2.1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:15:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480422] New: ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480422 Summary: ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gtk2hs AssignedTo: bos at serpentine.com ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, bos at serpentine.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I installed ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext without gtkglext-devel installed. The %post script failed. Running it by hand produced this output: # ghc-pkg-6.8.3 update --auto-ghci-libs /usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/gtk2hs-0.9.13/gtkglext.package.conf Reading package info from "/usr/lib64/ghc-6.8.3/gtk2hs-0.9.13/gtkglext.package.conf" ... done. WARNING: unversioned dependencies are deprecated, and will NOT be accepted by GHC 6.10: base ghc-pkg: /usr/include/gtkglext-1.0 doesn't exist or isn't a directory (use --force to override) That directory doesn't exist unless gtkglext-devel is installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext-0.9.13-3.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Make sure gtkglext-devel is not installed. 2. Install ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext. Actual results: The %post script fails. Expected results: The %post script should succeed at building HSgtkglext.o. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 02:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901180252.n0I2qIct013814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 ChrisKalt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris at netpos.com --- Comment #5 from ChrisKalt 2009-01-17 21:52:17 EDT --- I'm also seeing this problem. I just compiled GHCi version 6.10.1 using Fedora 8. fwiw/ The previous GHCi version 6.6.1 does not have the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 03:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901180302.n0I32wbT000707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-17 22:02:58 EDT --- Chris: F-9 had 6.8.3 I believe and also did not have this issue. GHC moved from GNU readline to the BSD replacement library, editline, between 6.8.x and 6.10.x (someone correct me if I am wrong here). This seems to be the source of the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:17:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182117.n0ILHZMw010286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #42 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-18 16:17:30 EDT --- Ok, finally, and i should be alot more on top of this in the far reaching future (i think), i have some packages. SPEC:http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11.spec SRPM:http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-1.4.5-1.fc11.src.rpm This is more or less pretty much based on the latest template. It's being managed by fedora-devshell, which means getting hotfixes done should be fast. Note: AFAIK, we don't have the macros needed in F10 right now, so this only builds in rawhide. The SRPM is output from mock using rawhide. Once the macros are in F10, supporting it there should be trivial. I submit this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182227.n0IMRIRi009138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #7 from ChrisKalt 2009-01-18 17:27:17 EDT --- Conrad: You are correct about 6.8.3 on F-9. I just tried building GHC 6.10.1 on my laptop which has F-9, not unsurprisingly GHCi backspace is broken there as well. I'm still quite new to Haskell so a tad hesitant to roll up my sleeves enough to dig in there to fix this. Incidentally, my desire to move to 6.10 was prompted by the fact that I cannot build Takusen in any of the earlier releases. In an email exchange I had from Alistair Bayley last week he said he's currently working on the 6.10 build. So for now I'm sort of dead in the water awaiting community assistance on two issues. Since most my work in Haskell would target Databases and I really wanted to focus on using Takusen. ( I really am excited about Haskell however my optimism over how soon I could become productive is somewhat dampened if these sorts of problems in seemingly key components are so common. ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:33:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182233.n0IMXPqH010344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |9 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-18 17:33:24 EDT --- I already built 2.2.0 for rawhide on Friday. We can update f9 to darcs2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182236.n0IMaCxx024387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-18 17:36:12 EDT --- We just need to get ghc to start linking with editline (I don't know whether that's an upstream bug or something wrong in our build). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480422] ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182258.n0IMw0fY014603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480422 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-18 17:58:00 EDT --- Thanks for the report: basically in rawhide we now stopped building the .o files at install time but rather at build time so when this gets backported to F10 which should be soon this should get fixed. But you're right there should strictly be Requires(pre): gtkglext-devel, but probably just changing the current requires from gtkglext to gtkglext-devel would be enough. Will do that in the next builds for rawhide and then later F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480422] ghc-gtk2hs-gtkglext %post Requires gtkglext-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182259.n0IMxEFV028145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480422 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bos at serpentine.com |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182321.n0INLDY9032744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #9 from Robin Green 2009-01-18 18:21:13 EDT --- The workaround I'm using for the time being is: 1. Install haskell-mode into emacs 2. Run emacs 3. Open a Haskell source file 4. From the Haskell menu choose "Start interpreter" You now have ghci running inside emacs and can edit lines. The history works differently - to recall a previous line, you click on it with the mouse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191101.n0JB1UHj026523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 06:01:29 EDT --- Turns out buildrequiring ncurses-devel helps to get the ghc editline package built and ghci line-editting is back. Should be fixed in ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 building now in rawhide. I think we can push it to f10-updates soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191119.n0JBJw2s030325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-19 06:19:57 EDT --- That is great news, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From miles at milessabin.com Mon Jan 19 15:38:40 2009 From: miles at milessabin.com (Miles Sabin) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:38:40 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? Message-ID: <30961e500901190738na269ae0p91e1048c258b285d@mail.gmail.com> Hi folks, Things seemed to be in a great deal of flux the last time I looked into starting to put together various Haskell packages. Have things settled down and are there now finalized Haskell packaging guidelines? Is it possible to follow these on F10 or is it necessary to either wait for backports from rawhide or switch to the rawhide toolchain? Oh, and what happened to cabal-rpm? I'd also be keen to know what packages are currently in progress so that I don't duplicate anyone else's efforts. I have the following rough and ready packages which I'd like to update and make some progress on submitting, agda-2.1.3-0.20080311.fc8 arrows-0.4-1.fc8 binary-0.4.1-1.fc8 goa-3.0-1.fc8 http-3001.0.4-1.fc8 oeis-0.1-1.fc8 plugins-1.1-0.20080311.fc8 quickcheck-2.0-1.fc8 stream-0.2.3-1.fc8 zlib-0.4.0.4-1.fc8 Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin tel: +44 (0)1273 720 779 mobile: +44 (0)7813 944 528 skype: milessabin From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Mon Jan 19 17:29:11 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? In-Reply-To: <30961e500901190738na269ae0p91e1048c258b285d@mail.gmail.com> References: <30961e500901190738na269ae0p91e1048c258b285d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7f692fec0901190929v196c3cd0r48c77c328e2a6071@mail.gmail.com> 2009/1/19 Miles Sabin : > Hi folks, > > Things seemed to be in a great deal of flux the last time I looked > into starting to put together various Haskell packages. Have things > settled down and are there now finalized Haskell packaging guidelines? > Is it possible to follow these on F10 or is it necessary to either > wait for backports from rawhide or switch to the rawhide toolchain? > Oh, and what happened to cabal-rpm? > > I'd also be keen to know what packages are currently in progress so > that I don't duplicate anyone else's efforts. > > I have the following rough and ready packages which I'd like to update > and make some progress on submitting, > The packaging guidelines have settled down alot. If possible, please use the command cabal2spec to generate your spec files following the guidelines. In order to do packaging run: yum --enablerepo=rawhide update ghc and this will enclude cabal2spec. Packages that already have review requests are easily searchable through bugzilla. I think the majority of your packages though are free for the taking. -Yaakov From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200351.n0K3pRwD028897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 22:51:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Templates and cabal2spec have been removed from ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 so this should now install. * Tue Jan 20 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.4-1 - move ghc_version back to templates for now - leave macros.ghc in ghc - require ghc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:52:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200352.n0K3qDG9029235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 22:52:13 EDT --- Still open to improvements to the name. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: haskell-packaging - RPM macros and spec templates for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200401.n0K41UsR013159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 23:01:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-packaging/haskell-packaging-0.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm * Tue Jan 20 2009 Jens Petersen - 0.4-2 - remove old todo comments about splitting and ghc dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200459.n0K4x5RF009032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-19 23:59:04 EDT --- http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cpphs.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cpphs-1.6-4.fc9.src.rpm Now with separate -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200742.n0K7gZu1018819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 02:42:34 EDT --- Thanks for the update. :) One last tweak: you can remove this line I think: Requires(postun): ghc = %{ghc_version} it is now taken care of by the doc requires(postun). With that the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:00:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200800.n0K80bN7021813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-20 03:00:37 EDT --- Ah, OK. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpphs Short Description: A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200810.n0K8AvSc023685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:51:34 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:51:34 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0901190929v196c3cd0r48c77c328e2a6071@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <2000297369.375261232441494074.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > The packaging guidelines have settled down alot. If possible, please > use the command cabal2spec to generate your spec files following the > guidelines. Yep I am planning to submit them to FPC for revision review very soon. > In order to do packaging run: > yum --enablerepo=rawhide update ghc > > and this will include cabal2spec. True until ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 which should appear in rawhide mirrors soon. cabal2spec and templates are being moved to a separate package (haskell-packaging) under review currently. (Still wondering about the name maybe we should just call the package cabal2spec instead?) Jens From petersen at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 08:54:59 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:54:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? In-Reply-To: <30961e500901190738na269ae0p91e1048c258b285d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <702150985.376861232441699969.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> > Is it possible to follow these on F10 or is it necessary to either > wait for backports from rawhide or switch to the rawhide toolchain? I am planning to do F10 backport builds in the near future. :) In the meantime please use the rawhide builds on f10 as Yaakov suggested. > Oh, and what happened to cabal-rpm? Not sure - it may still reincarnate? :) > agda-2.1.3-0.20080311.fc8 > arrows-0.4-1.fc8 > binary-0.4.1-1.fc8 > goa-3.0-1.fc8 > oeis-0.1-1.fc8 > plugins-1.1-0.20080311.fc8 > quickcheck-2.0-1.fc8 > stream-0.2.3-1.fc8 I don't think these have been submitted yet. > http-3001.0.4-1.fc8 > zlib-0.4.0.4-1.fc8 These two are already in rawhide and will be backported. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Haskell has a link to open haskell reviews. Hope that helps, Jens From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479803] Review Request: cabal2spec - generates spec files for Haskell packages (was: haskell-packaging) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200916.n0K9Gcxc004103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: cabal2spec |haskell-packaging - RPM |- generates spec files for |macros and spec templates |Haskell packages (was: |for Haskell |haskell-packaging) --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 04:16:37 EDT --- I think now it makes more sense to name the package after the script itself (currently cabal2spec). Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Noarch: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.4-3.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From petersen at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 09:28:51 2009 From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:28:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] RFC: revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines In-Reply-To: <1122468587.378731232443079594.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1800541320.379841232443731650.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Hi, I would like to solicit comments on the revised Haskell Packaging Guidelines, which have been updated and fixed a fair bit since the initial draft was first approved. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Haskell cabal2spec which packages the latest packaging templates and generates spec files from haskell packages is currently under review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479803. The new draft has been used successfully to review several packages now recently and older packages are mostly up-to-date with them too. If there are no obvious serious flaws then I would like to submit the revision to Fedora Packaging Committee for review. Thank you, Jens Petersen From miles at milessabin.com Tue Jan 20 17:22:39 2009 From: miles at milessabin.com (Miles Sabin) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:22:39 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? In-Reply-To: <2000297369.375261232441494074.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <7f692fec0901190929v196c3cd0r48c77c328e2a6071@mail.gmail.com> <2000297369.375261232441494074.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <30961e500901200922g1d1a577bv92171f49d0471550@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: > True until ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 which should appear in rawhide mirrors soon. > cabal2spec and templates are being moved to a separate package (haskell-packaging) under review currently. Ahh ... so maybe I shouldn't have updated again just now ... no more cabal2spec. Is there any ETA for the separate package to appear in rawhide? Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin tel: +44 (0)1273 720 779 mobile: +44 (0)7813 944 528 skype: milessabin From konrad at tylerc.org Tue Jan 20 20:40:42 2009 From: konrad at tylerc.org (Conrad Meyer) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:40:42 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] The Haskell packaging current state of play? In-Reply-To: <30961e500901200922g1d1a577bv92171f49d0471550@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0901190929v196c3cd0r48c77c328e2a6071@mail.gmail.com> <2000297369.375261232441494074.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <30961e500901200922g1d1a577bv92171f49d0471550@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200901201240.43391.konrad@tylerc.org> On Tuesday 20 January 2009 09:22:39 am Miles Sabin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jens Petersen wrote: > > True until ghc-6.10.1-7.fc11 which should appear in rawhide mirrors soon. > > cabal2spec and templates are being moved to a separate package > > (haskell-packaging) under review currently. > > Ahh ... so maybe I shouldn't have updated again just now ... no more > cabal2spec. Is there any ETA for the separate package to appear in > rawhide? > > Cheers, > > > Miles You can grab the package from http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/cabal2spec-0.4-3.fc10.noarch.rpm . -- Conrad Meyer From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 21:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202116.n0KLGaEp002205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-20 16:16:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202256.n0KMuIa2012100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202256.n0KMuJl1012129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 Bug 479796 depends on bug 479793, which changed state. Bug 479793 Summary: Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 22:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202254.n0KMsXCI020147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479793 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-20 17:54:32 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210015.n0L0FNuP026847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 19:15:22 EDT --- Now that cpphs is done, maybe you update this to the latest templates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:37:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210037.n0L0batd030522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451877 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 19:37:35 EDT --- I started a comment long ago (which was then lost by a browser crash or restart)... Basic summary is most (all) haskell programs shipped can run now in enforcing. However there have been a number of path changes that should probably be updated in selinux-policy. I can help to do that. Currently the changes needed are being done for that at install time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210653.n0L6r1ce017493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210651.n0L6pvXe017370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 01:51:56 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210725.n0L7PL3c014460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 02:25:20 EDT --- Also: darcs-2.2.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darcs-2.2.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:24:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210724.n0L7OJF9023298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 02:24:19 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210819.n0L8JN5Z001755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #43 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 03:19:20 EDT --- Thanks Yaakov, will try to take a look at it soon. (The bug will soon have its first birthday so hope it can be resolved soon.:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 08:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:24:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210824.n0L8OHxh026087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 03:24:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > Note: AFAIK, we don't have the macros needed in F10 right now, so this only > builds in rawhide. The SRPM is output from mock using rawhide. Once the macros > are in F10, supporting it there should be trivial. Ok, finally I built ghc-6.10.1-7.fc10 for F10. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79616 Unfortunately still need to update haddock and gtk2hs before it can be pushed to F10 updates. (With the number libs going in fedora now I suspect it is going to get harder and less common to backport ghc going forward but let us see.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211606.n0LG6vU6003421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #45 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-21 11:06:53 EDT --- Glad to know it builds for you too. When will the review be done? Even if we don't backport all these packages, this can still go in rawhide. Also, i see you made some changes to the templates. I'm gonna have to actually update the package once the templates hit rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211647.n0LGlQRQ024771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-01-21 11:47:26 EDT --- Updated; see: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghc-haskell-src-exts.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghc-haskell-src-exts-0.4.8-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212128.n0LLS7SL021660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:28:06 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update darcs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:36:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212136.n0LLakCr025355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:36:46 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update darcs'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0827 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:26:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220026.n0M0Q4rC031872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:26:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Even if we don't backport all these packages, this can still go in rawhide. Well assuming ghc-6.10.1 reaches f10-updates then no problem to create an F-10 branch for ghc-X11. > Also, i see you made some changes to the templates. I'm gonna have to actually > update the package once the templates hit rawhide. Better to do that now IMHO: perhaps I should have left cabal2spec in ghc longer but I wanted the review package to be installable - I would appreciate more testing while we are proposing the revision to FPC. I am not anticapating any major changes until we add the ghc requires deps scripting for rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220335.n0M3ZTPx022136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-21 22:35:28 EDT --- Let's pick this one up too SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Only builds in rawhide for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:34:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220334.n0M3Y5NV002072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #17 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-01-21 22:34:04 EDT --- Let's pick this up again. SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/xmonad-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Currently, this only compiles on rawhide, so get your rawhide builders ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 03:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:40:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] New: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Summary: libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: libedit AssignedTo: debarshi.ray at gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: jeff at ocjtech.us, debarshi.ray at gmail.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: libedit requires ncurses and reflecting that libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libedit-2.11-1.20080712cvs.fc10 Steps to Reproduce: This is causing a problem for ghc (Haskell compiler) when trying to link its editline library which is linked to libedit. Actual results: $ rpm -q --requires libedit | grep ncurses libncurses.so.5()(64bit) $ rpm -q --requires libedit-devel | grep ncurses $ Expected results: libedit to require ncurses-devel. Additional info: I note that libedit-20090111-3.0 was also released upstream. I am happy to fix and update the package if you don't have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 06:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:02:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230602.n0N62pAN018711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|debarshi.ray at gmail.com |jeff at ocjtech.us --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-01-23 01:02:50 EDT --- I've added ncurses-devel as a requirement for libedit-devel and issues builds/updates. Updating to libedit-20090111-3.0. I'm less sure about. I know it's a ways off but perhaps it'd be better to wait and put 3.0 into rawhide once it switches over to F12 development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230719.n0N7JWa9016263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230719.n0N7JVfV016238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Version|rawhide |10 Blocks| |478466 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-23 02:19:31 EDT --- Thanks, Jeff, appreciate the fast response. :) I'll move this to F10 so that it can closed when the update gets pushed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230748.n0N7mPJ6005368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-23 02:48:24 EDT --- Jeff Collie kindly finished libedit so building ghc-6.10.1-8.fc11. Will wait for libedit f10 update to build new ghc for f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:59:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230759.n0N7xC6j007152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2009-01-23 02:59:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I've added ncurses-devel as a requirement for libedit-devel and issues > builds/updates. Thanks for helping out. > Updating to libedit-20090111-3.0. I'm less sure about. I > know it's a ways off but perhaps it'd be better to wait and put 3.0 into > rawhide once it switches over to F12 development. Looking at the following ChangeLog entry, it does not look like that big a change in the library even though the soname has changed. I am inclined to wait till Alpha is out and then evaluate the effect on all dependent packages, and if possible push out an update before Beta. ---- 2009-01-11 Jess Thrysoee * version-info: 0:28:0 * all: sync with upstream source. MAJOR.MINOR version is now 3.0. This is due to NetBSD changing time_t and dev_t to 64 bits. It does not really effect this package. * configure.ac: Remove '--enable-debug' configure flag. The autoconf way to control flags is by specifying them when running configure, e.g. 'CFLAGS="-O0 -g" ./configure' ---- What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240239.n0O2drBr025042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:39:53 EDT --- libedit-2.11-2.20080712cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libedit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0922 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:40:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240240.n0O2ealU011832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:40:36 EDT --- libedit-2.11-2.20080712cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libedit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 03:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 481252] libedit-devel should require ncurses-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240302.n0O32ffr030037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481252 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2009-01-23 22:02:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Looking at the following ChangeLog entry, it does not look like that big a > change in the library even though the soname has changed. I am inclined to wait > till Alpha is out and then evaluate the effect on all dependent packages, and > if possible push out an update before Beta. After the Alpha is out should be OK. Only the minor revision of the soname changed so there shouldn't be any broken dependencies if we push it - I did a test mock build of 3.0 but I didn't install it. There's around 80 days until the final release so that should be plenty of time to shake out any problems, when I first commented I didn't realize that we had that long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 17:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:54:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251754.n0PHsU4b020931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 --- Comment #47 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-01-25 12:54:25 EDT --- Jens, if Yaakov is working on it, do you (or Till) want to take over the review? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 16:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 451877] unconfined_execmem_exec_t needed for several GHC-built Haskell binaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261646.n0QGkLPW023309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451877 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Walsh 2009-01-26 11:46:20 EDT --- What are the paths? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 478466] ghci does not handle backspace correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290150.n0T1o7AT009540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478466 --- Comment #13 from ChrisKalt 2009-01-28 20:50:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Turns out buildrequiring ncurses-devel helps to get the ghc editline package > built and ghci line-editting is back. > Would you have a suggestion on how to accomplish this using Fedora 8 and building with the ghc-6.10.1 source download? I'm not familiar with how to do this. -- thanks for any advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292301.n0TN1VQr006720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292301.n0TN1SQf031495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:01:27 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 480358] Version of darcs in Fedora is old; needs update. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292306.n0TN6Wfo001040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480358 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:06:32 EDT --- darcs-2.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426751] Review Request: ghc-X11 - A Haskell binding to the X11 graphics library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311051.n0VAp9fo015248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426751 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/pac | |kage/X11 --- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:51:05 EDT --- Yaakov if you want to update/merge in the latest changes from http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/cabal2spec/ I am happy to take over the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479796] Review Request: ghc-haskell-src-exts - Library for Manipulating Haskell source In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311056.n0VAuM75016196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479796 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:56:22 EDT --- This looks ready for review. I will try to do that soon unless someone else takes it first. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.