[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 14 07:29:12 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer <konrad at tylerc.org>  2009-01-14 02:29:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> ...
> I think better to move it to ghc-cpphs where it actually applies

Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told
you on IRC.

> ...
> [=] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
> Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by
> ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines.
> Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something
> else.

Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a
subpackage for the docs).

> ...
> I sent a message to the maintainer asking for the GPL license file to be added
> in the future.


Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list