[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479793] Review Request: cpphs - A liberalised re-implementation of cpp, the C pre-processor

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 14 08:10:27 UTC 2009

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2009-01-14 03:10:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Done. (Or I guess, your patch does this.) Although rpmbuild complains as I told
> you on IRC.

Strange - builds ok for me on f10 (and f11 mock) anyway.

> > Hmm, /usr/share/doc/ghc/libraries is owned by ghc-doc but not required by
> > ghc-cpphs - looks like a oversight of the guidelines.
> > 
> > Wondering whether we should subpackage haddock docs for this or do something
> > else.
> Well, at any rate ghc-cpphs must depend on ghc-doc (or ghc-doc if we create a
> subpackage for the docs).

Right.  Since ghc-doc is quite big I am leaning towards subpackaging for all
libraries' docs generated by haddock.  I guess in this case ghc-cpphs-doc say.

Any other thoughts from the Haskell SIG?

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the Fedora-haskell-list mailing list