[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 488404] Review Request: pony - Can I have a pony?

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488404


Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lkundrak at v3.sk




--- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak at v3.sk>  2009-03-05 06:00:37 EDT ---
Seriously -- please think for a while -- what value does this bring to users
apart from growing the repositories a bit and thus making yum a bit slower? :)

Here's some random points to consider:

1.) Does this comply with the "code not content" rule?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content

Yes, I know there's a wrapper there, which probably classifies this as "code",
still I'm inclined to think it's role in the package is rather marginal.

2.) Doesn't this duplicate existing features?
"fortune" package seems to do something roughly similar. Why not use it?

3.) Does this comply with our licensing guidelines?
The ponnies file doesn't have licensing information.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.