From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 03:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010320.n813KrZR025436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 23:20:53 EDT --- Anyway thanks for picking up the haskell-platform - I hadn't been following and it is starting to make sense now. (In reply to comment #8) > Are they the same version? Good question - sure we need to keep the package in sync with haskell-platform. > Personally, i'd rather deliver as many libraries via > subpackages anyways. Hmm, well I thought about this too - weighing the effort of separate packages with the complexity of haskell-platform subpackages. Anyway we seems to have started going down the separate package path which which should be good and fine as long as we are careful to preserve version: I'll add a comment about haskell-platform in the spec file and suggest we do the same for all packages that form a part of Platform. (In reply to comment #9) > Is the tarball from hackage then? Some of the tarballs Bryan used came from the > platform tarball and for some reason did not checksum properly. It was the only > problem we found, and for the matter of speed, i let it slide, as the reviewer. That is a no-no really - either we use the hackage packages or the haskell-platform tarball I don't think we should mix them - presumably all haskell-platform packages are available as separate tarballs since haskell-platform also is distributed without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 03:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909010325.n813PVJ9014339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 23:25:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is the tarball from hackage then? Anyway yes it is: I just checked - please do so next time: I usually include the md5sum in the review. 948b5b20ff22fa81c6390b08d6af5104 HUnit-1.2.0.3.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 09:48:48 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:48:48 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Haskell Platform - which tarballs do we use? Message-ID: <7f692fec0909010248l168d426cr565a6adfd268402b@mail.gmail.com> Hey List, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 In this bug report, we came across a pretty much non critical issue, but important for people who like to track these things. For the haskell platform, there are two ways of getting the tarballs of the various packages. 1) We can get them from the haskell platform megatarball, or 2) we can get them from hackage. Question is, what do we do: 1) Pros: This is the actual haskell platform 1) Cons: The checksums don't always match It's harder put a URL in the spec file 2) Pros: There's a one stop shop for getting everything We don't need custom urls for things that are in the platform vs. things not in the platform, (in terms of the template in cabal2spec) 2) Cons: This is plausibly not the haskell platform My two cents are for option 2. My opinion is that if the checksums are not matching, then it's probably a bug in the haskell platform's release engineering. Comments? Yaakov From konrad at tylerc.org Tue Sep 1 14:33:19 2009 From: konrad at tylerc.org (Conrad Meyer) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 07:33:19 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Haskell Platform - which tarballs do we use? In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0909010248l168d426cr565a6adfd268402b@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0909010248l168d426cr565a6adfd268402b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200909010733.19370.konrad@tylerc.org> On Tuesday 01 September 2009 02:48:48 am Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > Hey List, > > *snip* > > For the > haskell platform, there are two ways of getting the tarballs of the > various packages. 1) We can get them from the haskell platform > megatarball, or 2) we can get them from hackage. Question is, what do > we do: > > *snip* > > My two cents are for option 2. My opinion is that if the checksums are > not matching, then it's probably a bug in the haskell platform's > release engineering. > > Comments? > > Yaakov I believe the benefits of option 2 over option 1 outweigh the advantages of using option 1 instead of option 2. Haskell platform is just a nice distribution of several packages which are officially released on hackage; we should go straight to upstream (hackage) for the tarballs. Regards, -- Conrad Meyer From bos at serpentine.com Tue Sep 1 16:20:50 2009 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:20:50 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Haskell Platform - which tarballs do we use? In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0909010248l168d426cr565a6adfd268402b@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0909010248l168d426cr565a6adfd268402b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > > My two cents are for option 2. My opinion is that if the checksums are > not matching, then it's probably a bug in the haskell platform's > release engineering. > That's what I ended up doing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 16:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909011650.n81Goe5J016742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #13 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-01 12:50:38 EDT --- Once I figured out that the checksums were different, I rolled the real RPMs that are now in rawhide from the original packages on hackage, not the platform tarball. So this won't arise again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 1 23:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 19:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 509281] failed to config ld-options for GLUT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909012357.n81NvCHj011776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509281 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-01 19:57:09 EDT --- Sven says latest GLUT no longer uses configure BTW. Also that ghc-GLUT was added to fedora recently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 2 00:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909020014.n820EirV028002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-01 20:14:43 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan :) I still feel like it is going to be hard to keep all the separate packages in sync and avoid accidental version bumps, etc and wonder if packaging the full haskell-platform package might not be easier maintenance-wise? We are still missing a lot of extralibs and platform packages anyway in Fedora. (This might be going over ground we already covered, but just wonder how you feel on it having started the separate packaging?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 03:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030316.n833GhHE016971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 3 03:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 23:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909030316.n833G5cC003664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From shakthimaan at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 15:47:59 2009 From: shakthimaan at gmail.com (Shakthi Kannan) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:17:59 +0530 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] gnome-terminal with xmonad.hs Message-ID: Hi, I have setup myTerminal to 'gnome-terminal' in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, but, when starting xmonad on Fedora 11, it doesn't show up on pressing Alt+Shift+Enter on a Dell Vostro 1310 laptop. If I set it to xterm, and I open gnome-terminal from it, it does open. What could be the reason for this? I have xmonad-0.8.1-13.fc11.i586 installed. Appreciate any inputs in this regard, Thanks! SK P.S.: I hope this is the right mailing list for this query? -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 19:23:04 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 21:23:04 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] gnome-terminal with xmonad.hs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7f692fec0909031223s538c4dcbj6dbdb1f79c3561c9@mail.gmail.com> Greets, 2009/9/3 Shakthi Kannan : > Hi, > > I have setup myTerminal to 'gnome-terminal' in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, > but, when starting xmonad on Fedora 11, it doesn't show up on pressing > Alt+Shift+Enter on a Dell Vostro 1310 laptop. > > If I set it to xterm, and I open gnome-terminal from it, it does open. > What could be the reason for this? I have xmonad-0.8.1-13.fc11.i586 > installed. > > Appreciate any inputs in this regard, I heard you were looking for some help in #xmonad about this issue. Let's see if we can figure it out. Let's start with ~/.xsession-errors. Is there any info in there that seems to explain what might be going on? Another thing to do is add a line in your xmonad.hs config that on startup prints the PATH environment to the screen as well. If you can get xterm, you should be able to get gnome-terminal. I also presume you can load it in a regular gnome session from another window manager perfectly fine? -Yaakov From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 20:22:35 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 22:22:35 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] xmonad-bluetile Message-ID: <7f692fec0909031322t10994747l2fb09f8a4f1b433@mail.gmail.com> Hey List, I'm calling dibs on the xmonad-bluetile packages, meaning i've already started working on them. If they aren't done by the end of the weekend, they're fair game for anyone to take. -Yaakov From loupgaroublond at gmail.com Thu Sep 3 21:05:05 2009 From: loupgaroublond at gmail.com (Yaakov Nemoy) Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:05:05 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] xmonad-bluetile executable Message-ID: <7f692fec0909031405g700699bcp8d4f627175614be8@mail.gmail.com> Hey List, xmonad-bluetile has a binary xmonad which is a conflict with the package xmonad. Theoretically most xmonad configs should work with the branch anyways, but i'm skeptical. I'm debating renaming it xmonad-bluetile, and then enforcing alternatives. I will also try to convince upstream to change if we go this route. Any thoughts? Comments? -Yaakov From opensource at till.name Thu Sep 3 22:30:45 2009 From: opensource at till.name (Till Maas) Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:30:45 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] xmonad-bluetile executable In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0909031405g700699bcp8d4f627175614be8@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0909031405g700699bcp8d4f627175614be8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090903223045.GA4649@genius.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 11:05:05PM +0200, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: > xmonad-bluetile has a binary xmonad which is a conflict with the > package xmonad. Theoretically most xmonad configs should work with the > branch anyways, but i'm skeptical. I'm debating renaming it > xmonad-bluetile, and then enforcing alternatives. I will also try to > convince upstream to change if we go this route. Any thoughts? > Comments? Imho the clean way would be to make them both independently usable, i.e. rename it to bluetile and make it use ~/.bluetile/bluetile.hs or whatever, but not ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs, so that both can be used independently. Then both should have their own .desktop file, so a user can easily swith if he wants. I only read about bluetile today and never used it, but if I would test it, it would not want it to interfer with my xmonad config. Regards Till -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From shakthimaan at gmail.com Fri Sep 4 04:22:56 2009 From: shakthimaan at gmail.com (Shakthi Kannan) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:52:56 +0530 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] gnome-terminal with xmonad.hs In-Reply-To: <7f692fec0909031223s538c4dcbj6dbdb1f79c3561c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <7f692fec0909031223s538c4dcbj6dbdb1f79c3561c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi! --- On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Yaakov Nemoy wrote: | I heard you were looking for some help in #xmonad about this issue. \-- Yes. --- | Let's start with ~/.xsession-errors. Is there any info in there that | seems to explain what might be going on? \-- Sorry, should have provided the same to you earlier. === ~/.xsession-errors === imsettings information ========================== Is DBus enabled: yes Is imsettings enabled: yes Is GTK+ supported: no Is Qt supported: no DESKTOP_SESSION: xmonad DISABLE_IMSETTINGS: IMSETTINGS_DISABLE_DESKTOP_CHECK: DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS: unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-1SKtPnWsLe,guid=af7aba4a7f4d69a6ae8416fa4aa09693 GTK_IM_MODULE: scim-bridge QT_IM_MODULE: xim XMODIFIERS: @im=SCIM IMSETTINGS_MODULE: SCIM IMSETTINGS_INTEGRATE_DESKTOP: yes Failed to contact the GConf daemon; exiting. Failed to contact the GConf daemon; exiting. === END === --- | Another thing to do is add a line in your xmonad.hs config that on | startup prints the PATH environment to the screen as well. \-- Sorry, I am new to Haskell and xmonad. Could you please let me know on how to print the PATH environment on the screen? Thanks, SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com From shakthimaan at gmail.com Fri Sep 4 13:11:47 2009 From: shakthimaan at gmail.com (Shakthi Kannan) Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:41:47 +0530 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] gnome-terminal with xmonad.hs In-Reply-To: References: <7f692fec0909031223s538c4dcbj6dbdb1f79c3561c9@mail.gmail.com> <7f692fec0909040429o5f330201oc01c539efcbf6012@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi, --- On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: | gnome-terminal does open when run in Gnome environment. \-- Ok, got it to work from xmonad. Just had to start gconfd-2 first. Use the following in ~/.xmonad/xmonad.hs: === SNIPPET === -- main = do spawn "/usr/libexec/gconfd-2" spawn "gnome-terminal" xmonad defaults === END === SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 5 11:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 07:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909051156.n85BuZXU013155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #7 from Arun SAG 2009-09-05 07:56:34 EDT --- Any one interested in reviewing this package? Its open to all :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 09:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 05:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909060955.n869tY54013363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 T Sue-Ako changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tsueako at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from T Sue-Ako 2009-09-06 05:55:33 EDT --- I noticed the following messages when I downloaded http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm and began to build under my user id and also root: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, installing and using it in emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 11:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061137.n86BbntB029983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #9 from Arun SAG 2009-09-06 07:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I noticed the following messages when I downloaded > http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm > and began to build under my user id and also root: > > rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root > warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root > > other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, > installing and using it in emacs. Hi, Thanks for the review.You are getting the warnings as you don't have the user zer0c00l in your machine. Please build the src.rpm as normal user. 'rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm' works fine for me (no warnings). You can install resulted rpms using 'yum localinstall --nogpgcheck' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 11:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061154.n86Bscw6000405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #10 from Arun SAG 2009-09-06 07:54:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Another question, How did you built the binary rpms from the source rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 6 12:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909061248.n86Cms7P009837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #11 from T Sue-Ako 2009-09-06 08:48:53 EDT --- Running under my user id produces aforementioned user/group warnings, but does not seem to stop the creation of the rpms. i.e. rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Installing emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9GAaOw + umask 022 + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf haskell-mode-2.4.20090815 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/SOURCES/haskell-mode-2.4.20090815.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' (etc.) I had originally created the binary rpms in this manner: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild -bb rpmbuild/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec BTW, I ran this under both i686 and x86_64 machines with identical outcomes (i.e. successful outcomes in spite of warnings). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 7 02:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909070226.n872Q7Yc008464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-06 22:26:06 EDT --- I think those errors are normal and can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 07:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 03:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909110756.n8B7ux8Z023491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(oglesbyzm at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 03:56:58 EDT --- Not sure whats wrong, we talked to dev BSDv3 is correct, he made the change in svn next version will be updated correctly. http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 14:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111419.n8BEJRNh023127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #8 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 10:19:26 EDT --- Updated to include ghc-X11 and ghc-utf8-string as deps, also stopped making up groups. http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar-0.9.2-3.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 15:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111552.n8BFq6hT011511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #26 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 11:52:04 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft is in rawhide now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 11 17:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909111757.n8BHvRWm024469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-11 13:57:25 EDT --- Ok, this has all been done (and for quite a while), but keep in mind it doesn't build yet -- cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be updated to newer versions first. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 02:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522899] New: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522899 Summary: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy at hinegardner.org ReportedBy: cristian.ciupitu at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, jeremy at hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.2.1-3.fc11 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: yum info darcs-doc Actual results: Summary : David's advanced revision control system Server Expected results: Summary : Documentatio for David's advanced revision control system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 02:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522900] New: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522900 Summary: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: jeremy at hinegardner.org ReportedBy: cristian.ciupitu at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, jeremy at hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.2.1-3.fc11 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: yum info darcs-doc Actual results: Summary : David's advanced revision control system Server Expected results: Summary : Documentation for David's advanced revision control system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 02:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522900] Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120236.n8C2aKui005650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522900 Cristian Ciupitu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |EasyFix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120540.n8C5eCeI003535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 01:40:12 EDT --- ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 05:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120539.n8C5dlUh017866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 517197 depends on bug 517155, which changed state. Bug 517155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 01:39:46 EDT --- bos built this a while back: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129691 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120607.n8C67cM1007719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-12 02:07:38 EDT --- Hi, I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask submitter to go through 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join So You need to start reviewing other packages in http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html This will show you know packaging well and understands it. Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 06:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 02:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909120619.n8C6J1an024253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #14 from Arun SAG 2009-09-12 02:19:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Hi, > Hi, > I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask > submitter to go through > 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess > 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > So You need to start reviewing other packages in > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html sure. > This will show you know packaging well and understands it. > > Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more > packages. yes, i tried submitting new packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 but it was closed as duplicate as i didn't check http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/REVIEW.html before submitting. I reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121430.n8CEUY9n031567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERokf031048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Bug 460974 depends on bug 426752, which changed state. Bug 426752 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERnpJ031007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 426752, which changed state. Bug 426752 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121427.n8CERmbR030958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #35 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:27:44 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121429.n8CET9f1012853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:30:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121430.n8CEU2g5013082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121436.n8CEaeXS014340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:36:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - BuildRequires: ghc is redundant Is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 14:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 10:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121439.n8CEdCbO000448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 10:39:11 EDT --- I feel slightly uncomfortable having "two" xmonad's in fedora but I will do some testing to see how different they are: I wish the libraries of these two projects might merge at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 15:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121508.n8CF8QP0005364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12 11:08:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Is it? As far as I can see, it's automatically added as a dependency of ghc-gtk-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 15:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522899] Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121559.n8CFxOiK013691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522899 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 11:59:23 EDT --- fixing in next f12 build - thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 16:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522899] Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121600.n8CG0jqE028378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522899 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 12:00:43 EDT --- *** Bug 522900 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 16:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522900] Incorrect summary for the darcs-doc package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121600.n8CG0iOF028354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522900 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 12:00:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522899 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 16:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522953] New: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522953 Summary: update to darcs-2.3.0 stable cabal release Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: darcs AssignedTo: petersen at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, jeremy at hinegardner.org, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: darcs should be updated to 2.3.0 stable. Unfortunately this requires hashed-storage and haskeline to be added to fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 12 17:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909121753.n8CHr0TQ015358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-12 13:53:00 EDT --- It's a haskell package, and ghc is not included by default in Fedora (yet). It's so fundamental to all haskell packages that a little redundancy won't hurt. Especially considering that the gtk BR could go away. In some cases, it's also necessary to specify a particular version of GHC, which the gtk package might not do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 13 02:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 508729] Trouble to build kaya-0.5.2 on F-11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909130222.n8D2MLIY017444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508729 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Component|ghc |0xFFFF Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 22:22:20 EDT --- Thanks for packaging ghc-editline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 01:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140114.n8E1ETAu003616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-13 21:14:28 EDT --- Thanks for this - let's import the package! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bos at serpentine.com Mon Sep 14 03:17:34 2009 From: bos at serpentine.com (Bryan O'Sullivan) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:17:34 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] Need adding to the list Message-ID: Could whoever owns the list please whitelist bos at fedoraproject.org? I get bounces every time I do something in CVS. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 05:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140557.n8E5vNjA025804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-14 01:57:22 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=131820 cool! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 07:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140723.n8E7NwK4010165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |package/cgi CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 14 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909140810.n8E8AR49021199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-14 04:10:23 EDT --- Yes, I think you're right. It's probably better to leave BR as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 15 07:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:46:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909150746.n8F7kEiT004472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-15 03:46:13 EDT --- ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 02:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 22:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170259.n8H2xAZs012233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170304.n8H34wv3013106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170304.n8H34xDY013126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |523883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170313.n8H3DbDp023516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170319.n8H3JLDF015564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://hackage.haskell.org/ | |platform -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170316.n8H3GeaN015341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:16:40 EDT --- One small problem that needs addressing that that ghc-network-doc comflicts with ghc-doc currently since doc dirs are not versioned for the sake of haddock. Possible workarounds: 1) version docs here (simplest but will hide the html?) 2) version the docs in ghc (needs a ghc rebuild:() 3) drop the docs from ghc-doc (ditto) (The same will apply for ghc-time, which is yet to be submitted.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170318.n8H3IrtB024439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:18:52 EDT --- With this users can just "yum install haskell-platform" and have a fully functional haskell devel env. Not sure if this will qualify fedora as the first distro to fully support haskell-platform officially? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170325.n8H3PJq6025716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 03:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 23:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170325.n8H3PIat025696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com Blocks| |523883 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-16 23:25:18 EDT --- This package is also part of haskell-platform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 08:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909170800.n8H803EB018297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-17 04:00:02 EDT --- ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171106.n8HB6n2K028787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2009-09-17 07:06:48 EDT --- any more unofficial reviews you done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 17 11:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909171114.n8HBEKZq015736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #16 from Arun SAG 2009-09-17 07:14:19 EDT --- No, But i started packaging emacs-goodies http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec Will do more reviews in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180104.n8I14Drw022369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-17 21:04:11 EDT --- Thanks, Zach I hope Yaakov is still interested in this now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180101.n8I11vP4022094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-17 21:01:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be > updated to newer versions first. Heh - the former two are your packages. ;-) Anyway I just built cpphs-1.9 and hscolour-1.15 for f12. Will do ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.1.4 shortly after the new cpphs is in the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 01:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180109.n8I19IPQ000940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #16 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-17 21:09:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be > > updated to newer versions first. > > Heh - the former two are your packages. ;-) > Anyway I just built cpphs-1.9 and hscolour-1.15 for f12. Well, yes, I need to update my packages too :). > Will do ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.1.4 shortly after the new cpphs is > in the buildroot. Ah, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 08:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909180854.n8I8sJ9U030923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #28 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 04:54:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Thanks, Zach > > I hope Yaakov is still interested in this > now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;) A) we need this for bluetile too, were i hooked on it 2) I still use xmonad, bluetile is just for newbs, and imo does it right. D) Can the review go forward please or is there something you all need from me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181140.n8IBeWnS023541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 07:40:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 11:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181140.n8IBeigv003484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 07:40:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 12:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181234.n8ICYbkT003170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-18 08:34:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 18 19:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909181958.n8IJw0Q9010237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-18 15:57:59 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ghc-cgi.src: W: strange-permission cgi-3001.1.7.1.tar.gz 0600 Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 19 00:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909190014.n8J0Ehpg031352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-18 20:14:42 EDT --- ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200920.n8K9KQA1005260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-20 05:20:23 EDT --- Sure, it's all good - just wanted to clarify your intentions and think we also did that on irc. Didn't want to end up with a "dead" package here. :) Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint output Please fix: ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: invalid-license BSD3 ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: strange-permission xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz 0777 ghc-xmonad-contrib-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-xmonad-contrib library. (need a line break) Waived: ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/xmonad-contrib-0.8.1/libHSxmonad-contrib-0.8.1_p.a [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [=] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. See above rpmlint [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 03f74fda270aca759407787da73e50d9 xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Please fix the 3 rpmlint issues before importing to CVS. Package is APPROVED by petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Sep 20 09:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909200926.n8K9Q7rV023174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-20 05:26:07 EDT --- For reference here is the cabal2spec-diff output (on my copy of a fixed spec file) --- ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec 2009-09-20 19:01:57.000000000 +1000 +++ ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec.cabal2spec 2009-09-20 19:16:54.000000000 +1000 @@ -8,58 +8,35 @@ Name: ghc-%{pkg_name} Version: 0.8.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} -Summary: Third party extensions for xmonad +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library Group: Development/Libraries -License: BSD +License: @LICENSE@ URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/%{pkg_name} Source0: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/%{pkg_name}/%{version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # fedora ghc archs: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-devel = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-devel BuildRequires: ghc, ghc-rpm-macros %if %{with doc} BuildRequires: ghc-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-doc %endif %if %{with prof} BuildRequires: ghc-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-prof = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-prof %endif %description -Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc-%{ghc_version}. - -Third party tiling algorithms, configurations and scripts to xmonad, -a tiling window manager for X. - -For an introduction to building, configuring and using xmonad -extensions, see "XMonad.Doc". In particular: +This package provides the Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc. -"XMonad.Doc.Configuring", a guide to configuring xmonad - -"XMonad.Doc.Extending", using the contributed extensions library - -"XMonad.Doc.Developing", introduction to xmonad internals and writing -your own extensions. %package devel Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library Group: Development/Libraries +Provides: ghc-%{pkg_name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-devel -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-devel %description devel This package contains the development files for %{name} @@ -73,13 +50,9 @@ Requires: ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-doc -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-doc %description doc -This package contains development documentation files for -the %{name} library. +This package contains development documentation files for the %{name} library. %endif @@ -89,9 +62,6 @@ Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc-prof = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-prof -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-prof [BTW I plan to reverse the diff output in the next cabal2spec since that makes more sense now.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220208.n8M28LdW004749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-21 22:08:20 EDT --- Thanks, Bryan, for the review. I will add a workaround for the doc conflict. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-network Short Description: Haskell network library Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 02:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220211.n8M2BSnk006129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-21 22:11:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 09:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909220945.n8M9jlqN011199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-09-22 05:45:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-xmonad-contrib Short Description: Third party extensions for xmonad Owners: ynemoy petersen bos Branches: F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 22 16:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909221636.n8MGa4CH012480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-22 12:36:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230754.n8N7sDpQ013923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 03:54:12 EDT --- imported and built yesterday -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 07:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909230754.n8N7sEgY013955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523884, which changed state. Bug 523884 Summary: Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 20:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232056.n8NKuxEE016784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-23 16:56:58 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ghc-cgi.src: W: strange-permission cgi-3001.1.7.1.tar.gz 0600 $ rpmlint ghc-cgi-prof-3001.1.7.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm ghc-cgi-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-cgi-devel ghc-cgi-prof.i586: W: no-documentation ghc-cgi-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/cgi-3001.1.7.1/libHScgi-3001.1.7.1_p.a The error is expected, and not a problem. Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232330.n8NNUA0V017681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 19:30:09 EDT --- Thanks, bos, for continuing to push on haskell-platform for f12. We're nearly there. :) I'll fix the tarball permissions before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 23 23:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909232331.n8NNVk8W006202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-23 19:31:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-cgi Short Description: Haskell library for writing CGI programs Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 04:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240423.n8O4NwJg005968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-24 00:23:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240738.n8O7c2L2013111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523104, which changed state. Bug 523104 Summary: Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240738.n8O7c1Te013081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 03:37:59 EDT --- Package imported and building http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1703007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 07:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 03:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909240746.n8O7k7fl002903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-24 03:46:06 EDT --- Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-time/ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Fixed the doc conflict with ghc-doc like for ghc-network with versioned ghcdocdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 11:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241111.n8OBBbK9015966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG 2009-09-24 07:11:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Hi, > any more unofficial reviews you done? I reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 17:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909241715.n8OHF11J012914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-24 13:15:00 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm ghc-time.src: W: strange-permission time-1.1.2.4.tar.gz 0600 Normal, expected errors: $ rpmlint ghc-time-prof-1.1.2.4-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm ghc-time-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-time-devel ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-time-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/time-1.1.2.4/libHStime-1.1.2.4_p.a Other generated RPMs are fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242200.n8OM05uT022638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-24 18:00:01 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Sep 24 22:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909242232.n8OMWwfG002410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-24 18:32:58 EDT --- The BuildRequires for this package are incorrect. It should fail before the %build stage due to unmet dependencies, but instead I get a build-time failure: Configuring haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2... Setup: At least the following dependencies are missing: HTTP ==4000.0.6, cgi ==3001.1.7.1, editline ==0.2.1.0, fgl ==5.4.2.2, network ==2.2.1.4, zlib ==0.5.0.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 00:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250051.n8P0psLi026686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 07:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909250751.n8P7pccN020867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-25 03:51:37 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-time Short Description: Haskell time library Owners: petersen Branches: devel InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Sep 25 16:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909251612.n8PGCcCR003917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-09-25 12:12:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Sep 26 16:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909261643.n8QGhMhU030300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-26 12:43:22 EDT --- We have until the 29th to get this in for the F-12 beta freeze. Let's go! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 00:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280025.n8S0Pm5U022837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-27 20:25:47 EDT --- Thanks - imported and building in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 00:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280025.n8S0PnEo022867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bug 523883 depends on bug 523886, which changed state. Bug 523886 Summary: Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 02:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280241.n8S2fnsw004574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-27 22:41:47 EDT --- Thanks for testing. Now that we have all the haskell-platform packages in dist-f12 I rebuilt HTTP and cgi for the new network package. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Sep 28 2009 Jens Petersen - 2009.2.0.2-2 - add all the buildrequires (#523883) - create ghcpkgdir since metapackage - nothing in bindir Built for me in koji just now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1712315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 03:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280342.n8S3gVS5011635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #5 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-09-27 23:42:29 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm haskell-platform.src: W: strange-permission haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2.tar.gz 0600 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ~ $ rpmlint haskell-platform-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-devel-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-doc-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ ghc-haskell-platform-prof-2009.2.0.2-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm haskell-platform.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haskell-platform-devel haskell-platform.x86_64: E: no-binary ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib ghc-haskell-platform-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-haskell-platform-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the haskell-platform library. ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-haskell-platform-devel ghc-haskell-platform-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. I think that the package summary and description need fixing, since they're currently boilerplate and haskell-platform is different than other Haskell packages. Other errors and warnings are generally fine. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. Yes. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Yes. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Yes. Subject to the minor edits at the beginning of this review, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 04:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280456.n8S4uQ3d031222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-28 00:56:24 EDT --- Thanks Bryan and congratulations - looks like we have reached the goal! I'll fix the rpmlint before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 05:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280512.n8S5CWH0014383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-28 01:12:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: haskell-platform Short Description: Standard Haskell distribution Owners: petersen, bos Branches: devel F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280616.n8S6GX18026025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 02:16:32 EDT --- ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 06:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280626.n8S6Q9pe027454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-28 02:26:08 EDT --- ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Sep 28 07:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909280709.n8S79agI026182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Alexey Kuznetsov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ak at axet.ru -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290955.n8T9tKhm023043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-29 05:55:18 EDT --- cvs admin done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 09:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909290955.n8T9tr94023193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-29 05:55:53 EDT --- package imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291006.n8TA6Bmq000467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 06:06:10 EDT --- ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 10:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523883] Review Request: haskell-platform - Standard Haskell distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291017.n8TAHNsI027421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523883 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 06:17:22 EDT --- ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HTTP-4000.0.6-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523884] Review Request: ghc-network - Haskell network library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291422.n8TEM7G0020506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523884 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:22:06 EDT --- ghc-network-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523886] Review Request: ghc-time - Haskell time library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291430.n8TEUSnW024044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523886 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:30:27 EDT --- ghc-time-1.1.2.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291438.n8TEcT9h027492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 10:38:26 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Sep 29 14:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909291438.n8TEcZhT027547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-8.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Sep 30 01:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 523104] Review Request: ghc-cgi - Haskell library for writing cgi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200909300136.n8U1aYdo031031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523104 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-29 21:36:33 EDT --- ghc-cgi-3001.1.7.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.