From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 01:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 20:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] New: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Summary: Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: simos.bugzilla at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The Liberation fonts are missing the Greek Polytonic characters (Greek Extended Unicode group). In practical terms, the Greek Extended Unicode group is made of the Greek characters with a variety of accents (they are precomposed characters). This report is to track the process of adding support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 02:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] ibus-table : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010215.mB12FJ9G007984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |0.1.1.20081014-2.fc11 --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2008-11-30 21:15:19 EDT --- Modified in 0.1.1.20081014-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 02:40:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 21:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473665] scim-python : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812010240.mB12eTaU006055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473665 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version| |0.1.13rc1-3.fc11 --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2008-11-30 21:40:28 EDT --- Fixed in 0.1.13rc1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011535.mB1FZgao029626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Debian BTS 493218 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011536.mB1FaCBv029687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |Debian BTS 433743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 15:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473946] New: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473946 Summary: xgettext misinterprets \x escapes in Python Unicode strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gettext AssignedTo: petersen at redhat.com ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When trying to update po files in gajim, I got this error: [matej at viklef po]$ make update-po make gajim.pot make[1]: Entering directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' INTLTOOL_EXTRACT=/usr/bin/intltool-extract srcdir=. /usr/bin/intltool-update --gettext-package gajim --pot ./../src/common/config.py:180: warning: 'msgid' format string with unnamed arguments cannot be properly localized: The translator cannot reorder the arguments. Please consider using a format string with named arguments, and a mapping instead of a tuple for the arguments. ERROR: xgettext failed to generate PO template file. Please consult error message above if there is any. make[1]: *** [gajim.pot] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/matej/redhat/BUILD/gajim/po' make: *** [update-po] Error 2 [matej at viklef po]$ When I filed my ticket (which was closed as duplicate of http://trac.gajim.org/ticket/4166), I was told that it is actually bug in xgettext which has been already fixed in Debian (bugs.debian.org/433743 and bugs.debian.org/493218). I have no idea, whether they sent patches upstream. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gettext-0.17-8.fc10.i386 How reproducible: 100% -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 1 19:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812011933.mB1JXTxV018048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Ray Strode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gdm |anaconda AssignedTo|jmccann at redhat.com |anaconda-maint-list at redhat. | |com --- Comment #20 from Ray Strode 2008-12-01 14:33:28 EDT --- This sounds like an anaconda issue. This bug is all over the map though. Please make sure to file separate issues as separate reports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:24:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473663] scim-hangul : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020024.mB20OUJ4012653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473663 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-01 19:24:30 EDT --- Thanks. Should be fixed in scim-hangul-0.3.2-5.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:27:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473663] scim-hangul : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020027.mB20R0DU003619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473663 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444711] popup menu overlaps to the panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020046.mB20k5Fq006820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-01 19:46:04 EDT --- Huang Peng, do you want to update the patch to comment 6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:48:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457566] sending packets with wrong format on XIM_QUERY_EXTENSION_REPLY In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020048.mB20mdjG016454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457566 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-01 19:48:38 EDT --- Should be fixed in scim-1.4.7-24.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462820] [sd_IN] Sindhi Inscript keymap is not displayed with its own language category in scim toolbar. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020049.mB20nnbP016534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462820 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:08:16 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466657] Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020054.mB20stNh017349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466657 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:48:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 00:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 19:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452849] [xim] successively speedy Input -> freeze In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020054.mB20svmE017411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452849 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Bug 452849 depends on bug 466657, which changed state. Bug 466657 Summary: Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466657 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #41 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:28:09 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 01:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473664] scim : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020155.mB21teZj018051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473664 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-01 20:55:39 EDT --- Ok, my mistake I guess: the base package owns those directories but I see that is not sufficient for multilib. Should be fixed in cvs. Hitting a libtool error when building scim in dist-f11 buildroot. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=969790 (It builds ok for me locally under f10.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 02:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444711] popup menu overlaps to the panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020222.mB22MRh1022585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |phuang at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com |om) |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 04:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 23:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444711] popup menu overlaps to the panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020411.mB24BPEi019736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444711 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #10 from Huang Peng 2008-12-01 23:11:24 EDT --- I think both it and mine are OK. But I did not have time to test Tagoh's patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020636.mB26a6A3005299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cchance at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-02 01:36:05 EDT --- Can you confirm that this is now fixed in f10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 06:37:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020637.mB26bm5o015480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-02 01:37:46 EDT --- *** Bug 466404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 08:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 03:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812020848.mB28m7D4008317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Summary|iswpunct, iswdigit, |[bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, |iswalpha returns wrong |iswdigit, iswalpha returns |values for Bangla (Bengali) |wrong values for Bangla |characters |(Bengali) characters -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 2 18:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812021803.mB2I3ShB004206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Chris Lumens 2008-12-02 13:03:27 EDT --- As always, adding languages to anaconda requires the following: (1) What LANG= setting should we use for each? (2) What's the console font that should be used? (3) What's the console and X keyboard setting for each? (4) What packages contain the X font? (5) Are the font and keyboard settings complete and usable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 00:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030020.mB30K3nO018069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |than at redhat.com --- Comment #44 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:50:08 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 00:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030042.mB30gGto021777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-02 19:42:15 EDT --- Please kindly confirm if that is fixed: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 00:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] Greek letter m (U+03BC) blurriness in liberation sans regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030055.mB30t1Tl030003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|ugly greek letter m |Greek letter m (U+03BC) |(U+03BC) in liberation sans |blurriness in liberation |regular |sans regular -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 00:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:55:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] Blurriness of Greek letter m (U+03BC) in Liberation Sans Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030055.mB30tXGa023982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Greek letter m (U+03BC) |Blurriness of Greek letter |blurriness in liberation |m (U+03BC) in Liberation |sans regular |Sans Regular -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030116.mB31GT0H001963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:25:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030125.mB31PNoB031079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-02 20:25:22 EDT --- Parag did you forget to attach your patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 01:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:28:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030128.mB31SfhS005819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(simos.bugzilla at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-02 20:28:41 EDT --- Would you prefer to have 'Greek and Coptic Group' filled first? There are 45 chars to be worked. And the Greek Extended Group has approximately 100 chars to be worked. I am not from Greek so please let me know which group I should prioritize? Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 02:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030255.mB32tJpG021033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Simos Xenitellis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(simos.bugzilla at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #2 from Simos Xenitellis 2008-12-02 21:55:18 EDT --- Yes, filling up the Greek Unicode block would be great. We have updated the Greek layout (XKB) so that users can type these characters as well. The section for Coptic (U03E2..U03EF) can be skipped because Coptic users make use of the dedicated Coptic Unicode block (starts at U2C80). I am not aware of Coptic documents that use Coptic from the Greek&Coptic Unicode block. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 04:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030421.mB34Lanb031922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Parag 2008-12-02 23:21:36 EDT --- not exactly that I forgot to attach patch here. I just took reference from this bug 237060 about how requests should be added to Bugzilla for newer languages in anaconda where no input was provided in that bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 04:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 23:37:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812030437.mB34buic002053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #5 from Parag 2008-12-02 23:37:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325481) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325481) Mai_IN_and_Ne_NP_lang addition patch clumens, I have attached patch here. If information from patch is still not enough for criteria to add new language in anaconda then ask for required information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 3 15:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:08:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812031508.mB3F8tlq027252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #6 from Chris Lumens 2008-12-03 10:08:54 EDT --- Parag - yeah that's a good start, thanks. If you look at scripts/upd-instroot, you'll see (among other things) that we need to include the font packages and the font files themselves. Are there special fonts needed for these languages, or are they already part of a package we're including? Also, in the rhpl package you'll see the keyboard_models.py file which needs similar changes to what you've already done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 06:45:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 01:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468985] scim-sayura require double space to enter space inbetween word In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812040645.mB46jJM9017561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468985 --- Comment #9 from Danishka Navin 2008-12-04 01:45:18 EDT --- I have tested scim-sayura, it is working on Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 09:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 04:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] New: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Summary: Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: watchingman at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=325660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325660) cent sign incorrect cent sign shoud be a coressed capital "C". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 10:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] New: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Summary: [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: glibc AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: psatpute at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: drepper at redhat.com, jakub at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Chhattisgarhi language locale not available Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): glibc-2.9-2 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1.check /usr/share/i18n/locale/ 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chhattisgarhi_language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 10:14:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:14:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041014.mB4AEMQQ025191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-04 05:14:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325662) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325662) locale file for hne_IN Chhattisgarhi language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 10:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 05:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812041014.mB4AEppD017397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 22:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] Blurriness of Greek letter m (U+03BC) in Liberation Sans Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042205.mB4M5BsW018034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Nikos Asimakis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nikos.asimakis at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Nikos Asimakis 2008-12-04 17:05:10 EDT --- I tested version 1.04.93 and the problem with U+03BC is fixed. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 4 22:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 17:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 440173] No Qt immodule for Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812042253.mB4Mrp5n027757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440173 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-04 17:53:50 EDT --- We have scim-bridge-qt, so shall we close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 01:24:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050124.mB51Ogxw022786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #1 from san 2008-12-04 20:24:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325768) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325768) test case screeenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 01:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] New: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Summary: Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: watchingman at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=325767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325767) test case Package: ttf-liberation Version: HEAD (1.0.04.93) Severity: normal the character R (U+0052, Latin Capital LETTER R) appears ugly when using Liberation Sans in small pixelsize. fork the test case from Holger Levsen in Bug 473481, you can see this bug also exists in Liberation Sans Italic, Liberation Serif, Liberation Serif Italic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 01:27:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:27:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050127.mB51RMwT023425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #2 from san 2008-12-04 20:27:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325770) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) web sshot hightlight "R" in web page screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 01:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 440173] No Qt immodule for Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050151.mB51pQlK027308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440173 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2008-12-04 20:51:25 EDT --- Yeah. I agree to close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 03:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050328.mB53Sgq9011914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Ulrich Drepper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-04 22:28:41 EDT --- Fix up the patch: - the company name is Red Hat, not Redhat - you've copied all kinds of categories. For all categories which are identical with any of the other Indian locales, use copy "..." instead - add the "hne" language code in the lang_term field -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:29:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474127] [ta_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for tamil characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050429.mB54TWW4023397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474127 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:29:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474105] [or_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for oriya characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050429.mB54T0u3023350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474105 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:29:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474124] [ml_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for malayalam characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050429.mB54TgqN023428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474124 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473888] [mr_IN] [hi_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Devanagari characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050428.mB54SG1D023278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473888 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474119] [pa_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for gurumukhi characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050429.mB54TJZU017633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474119 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473898] [kn_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Kannada characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050428.mB54Sgwe017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473898 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473839] layout switcher doesn't work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050436.mB54amwv018996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473839 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473837] couldn't switch layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050436.mB54aMph024783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473837 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 04:58:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 23:58:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 448411] XFCE should require imsettings-xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050458.mB54wu1L028514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411 --- Comment #39 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-04 23:58:55 EDT --- Sorry for the delay here. This bug slipped off my radar. ;( >that should works originally by the condition in comps. my understanding is, >xfce needs to have a dependency of imsettings-xfce because yum doesn't pull in >imsettings-xfce on upgrading now. ok, so for new installs this works ok now, but for old installs where the user has upgraded it does not, as it doesn't pull in imsettings-xfce, as there is no dependency in place there. I guess that makes sense... >Actually in the above test case, imsettings-xfce was pulled in by yum >groupinstall japanese-support and the packages in japanese-support group is >available in the media. but not imsettings-xfce as well as xfce packages isn't >available. If xfce doesn't have a dependency of imsettings-xfce, one needs to >do yum groupinstall japanese-support anyway, which should be finished in the >usual upgrading already. that doesn't make sense. ok. I see what you are saying. I guess I will look at adding that dependency, but I am not entirely sure what Xfce package it should be on. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050529.mB55TsNJ028071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #325662|0 |1 is obsolete| | Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-05 00:29:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325801) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325801) locale file for hne_IN Chhattisgarhi language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:33:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:33:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050533.mB55XD7i002301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-05 00:33:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Fix up the patch: > > - the company name is Red Hat, not Redhat > > - you've copied all kinds of categories. For all categories which are > identical with any of the other Indian locales, use copy "..." instead done > - add the "hne" language code in the lang_term field sorry, i didnt understood exactly where to add this is it here? language "Chhattisgarhi" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:35:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050535.mB55ZSbi029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Ulrich Drepper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #325801|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 05:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 00:39:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050539.mB55dXoC029807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Ulrich Drepper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #5 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-05 00:39:32 EDT --- LC_ADDRESS has language information in it. hi_IN doesn't have the correct information either but we shouldn't create situations where we cannot add missing information. > sorry, i didnt understood exactly where to add this > is it here? > language "Chhattisgarhi" in LC_ADDRESS there are fields lang_term etc. Look at a locale like de_DE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:13:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050613.mB56DXJ0003102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(psatpute at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-05 01:13:32 EDT --- adding lang_term field giving me error LC_ADDRESS: terminology language code `hne' not defined is there anything else need to do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:17:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050617.mB56HWt1003855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #325801|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-05 01:17:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=325805) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325805) locale file for hne_IN Chhattisgarhi language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:26:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:26:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050626.mB56Qgss011451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-05 01:26:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > adding lang_term field giving me error > LC_ADDRESS: terminology language code `hne' not defined > is there anything else need to do That's expected. I've already changed it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050629.mB56TBO9005704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-05 01:29:11 EDT --- thats nice Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:28:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 448411] XFCE should require imsettings-xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050628.mB56SwnB005672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448411 --- Comment #40 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-05 01:28:57 EDT --- I think the langpack extension to yum that I am envisaging for F11 might be able to help with these input method package issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050645.mB56jd6q008356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Parag 2008-12-05 01:45:38 EDT --- For Maithili, defualt font set is from package lohit-fonts-maithili as seen in comps file. For Nepali, defualt font set is from package madan-fonts as seen in comps file. I am not sure yet about rhpl modification as I see only 4 Indic languages out of 11 got entry there and still rest have no entry for their keyboard. Will check on this and report new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 06:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050656.mB56uts9016176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |misek at tnet.cz Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA | --- Comment #24 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek 2008-12-05 01:56:54 EDT --- Too bad I'm hit by the same error, it appeared two days ago. Probably after gnome update????? The system is Fedora 10 with the last updates+updates-testing. I'm adding list what was updated since the last known working state (I'm sure it was working 2008-12-03 at 19:32:10). Dec 03 18:36:42 Updated: libtdb-1.1.1-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:43 Updated: libtalloc-1.2.0-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:47 Updated: 1:qt-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:03 Updated: 1:qt-x11-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-devel-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-mysql-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.11-1.20081119git65b956f.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:59 Updated: virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:01 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-59.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:02 Updated: docbook-utils-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Installed: spin-kickstarts-0.10.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Updated: docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:14 Updated: OmegaT-1.7.3_04-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:27 Updated: wine-core-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:28 Updated: wine-cms-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-capi-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-ldap-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:30 Updated: wine-twain-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:31 Updated: wine-nas-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:32 Updated: wine-tools-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:33 Updated: wine-jack-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:34 Updated: wine-esd-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-desktop-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:38 Updated: samba-winbind-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:43 Updated: samba-common-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:45 Updated: revisor-cli-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-gui-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:49 Updated: libsmbclient-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:54 Updated: revisor-comps-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:57 Updated: samba-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:10 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:11 Updated: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:41 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:45 Updated: shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:47 Updated: check-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:49 Updated: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:30 Updated: 2:gimp-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:33 Updated: sectool-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:34 Updated: loudmouth-1.4.3-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:37 Updated: system-config-printer-libs-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:39 Updated: libdiscid-0.2.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:42 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:01 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:02 Updated: 2:gimp-help-browser-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:05 Updated: 1:xmms-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:12 Updated: 1:grip-3.2.0-25.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:32 Updated: gtk2-devel-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:44 Updated: freeciv-2.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: dcraw-8.89-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: 2:vim-minimal-7.2.060-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:48 Updated: openvpn-2.1-0.29.rc15.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:55 Updated: 1:nfs-utils-1.1.4-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:01 Updated: netbeans-ide9-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:05 Updated: yum-3.2.20-4.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:08 Updated: netbeans-java2-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:09 Updated: netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:10 Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:11 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:16 Updated: system-config-network-tui-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:18 Updated: system-config-network-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:20 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:21 Updated: netbeans-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:24 Updated: system-config-printer-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:25 Updated: sectool-gui-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:26 Updated: check-devel-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: libgnome-devel-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: cdlabelgen-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:28 Updated: etherboot-roms-kvm-5.4.4-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:37 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:38 Updated: crontabs-1.10-25.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:39:15 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Updated: kmod-nvidia-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:08 Installed: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:10 Updated: PackageKit-yum-plugin-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-glib-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-udev-helper-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:16 Updated: PackageKit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: gnome-packagekit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: PackageKit-yum-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:41:10 Erased: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.5-113.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:42:12 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050710.mB57AhpI012660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-05 02:10:43 EDT --- My understanding is that PCs in India normally use/have a US keyboard, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:28:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050728.mB57SCQi015442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Flag| |needinfo?(peter.hutterer at re | |dhat.com) --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-05 02:28:11 EDT --- Is anyone here using scim? - I don't think this is a scim but happen to be proven otherwise... Peter, do you have any light on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:35:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050735.mB57Z7uI016835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 --- Comment #26 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek 2008-12-05 02:35:07 EDT --- No, and there are no scim packages installed on my machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 07:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 02:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050754.mB57sfwI025365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #9 from Parag 2008-12-05 02:54:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > My understanding is that PCs in India normally use/have a US keyboard, right? Yes. Normally US keyboard is used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 09:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 04:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812050937.mB59bdLM012554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |peter.hutterer at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 12:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051201.mB5C11b3007399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 13:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812051344.mB5DiC4j023527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dwalsh at redhat.com |khashida at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 5 21:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474916] New: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474916 Summary: Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: rohandhruva at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I installed Fedora 10 using the gnome livecd. While installation I selected the time zone as "Asia/Calcutta", and keyboard layout as US English. The installed system shows the output of locale as en_US.UTF8. Thinking that it must be some quirk, I used system-config-language and set the system language to "English (India)". However, even after rebooting, the output of locale remains en_US.UTF8. s-c-l shows the language set to "English (India)" even after reboot, but "locale" does not concur. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): system-config-language-1.3.2-3.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open s-c-l 2. Set language to "English (India)" Actual results: After reboot, all fields of locale still show en_US Expected results: They should show en_IN Additional info: Here is the output of locale: [rohan at fedora sysconfig]$ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= and some more useful output: [rohan at fedora ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="en_IN.UTF-8" SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" [rohan at fedora ~]$ cat /etc/environment [rohan at fedora ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 02:13:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 21:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812060213.mB62Dcup011075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-05 21:13:37 EDT --- Applied upstream. Will be in the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 12:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 07:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] New: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 Summary: Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_i d=644820&group_id=91920 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: translate-toolkit AssignedTo: dwayne at translate.org.za ReportedBy: dwayne at translate.org.za QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: roozbeh at gmail.com, dwayne at translate.org.za, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: >From the 1.2.1 release notes: Highlights: * A new tool, pretranslate, backported from trunk. Read more here: http://translate.sourceforge.netw/wiki/toolkit/pretranslate * New converter: The first testing releases of odf2xliff and xliff2odf as part of our project to make ODF files translatable with XLIFF files. Make sure you have at least Python 2.4 and an up to date version of lxml. ?http://translate.sourceforge.netw/wiki/toolkit/odf2xliff Bugfixes: * We now generate correct MO files on 64 bit systems (bug 575) * Properly handle DONT_TRANSLATE comments in Mozilla properties files (?bug 619) * Some fixes in the handling of Mozilla DTD files. * ?An option to optionally not use HTML tidy with po2html * Reliability improvements to statistics that should improve things for Pootle * Some tweaks for certain Indic languages to disable capitalisation checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 13:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 08:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061307.mB6D75Ko021671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 08:07:04 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 15:16:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061516.mB6FGKOj013201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-06 10:16:19 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:21:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061621.mB6GLnXh021913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Alexandre Oliva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br --- Comment #27 from Alexandre Oliva 2008-12-06 11:21:48 EDT --- Downgrading gtk2 and gtk2-devel to 2.14.4-3.fc10 restored dead keys to me. I'm going to clone this bug for gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 16:31:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] New: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Summary: Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gtk2 AssignedTo: mclasen at redhat.com ReportedBy: oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, misek at tnet.cz, mclasen at redhat.com, xgl-maint at redhat.com, oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br, phuang at redhat.com, peter.hutterer at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #467016 +++ Description of problem: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10, now in testing, breaks entry of characters with dead key combinations in gnome apps. It works just fine with 2.14.4-3.fc10, as in F-10 GOLD. Instead of the expected characters, you get nothing. It still works on non-gtk2 apps such as GNU Emacs, xterm, and konsole, in the same gnome session. I verified that it's specific to gtk2 by booting up rawhide (where the problem does not occur), sshing into the updated F-10 box, starting gedit there, duplicating the problem, downgrading to the GOLD gtk2, starting gedit again, and then having it all work again. Here's some information snipped from the original bug report: Having cs_CZ locale, I need dead-key working, because some of the letters in the Czech keyboard layout are not on the keyboard directly (e.g., ???). Unfortunately when entering these keys in the current Fedora Rawhide I get ?n?o?t instead. --- Additional comment from misek at tnet.cz on 2008-12-05 01:56:54 EDT --- Too bad I'm hit by the same error, it appeared two days ago. Probably after gnome update????? The system is Fedora 10 with the last updates+updates-testing. I'm adding list what was updated since the last known working state (I'm sure it was working 2008-12-03 at 19:32:10). Dec 03 18:36:42 Updated: libtdb-1.1.1-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:43 Updated: libtalloc-1.2.0-23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:36:47 Updated: 1:qt-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:03 Updated: 1:qt-x11-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-devel-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:qt-mysql-4.4.3-6.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:29 Updated: 1:xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.11-1.20081119git65b956f.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:37:59 Updated: virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:01 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-59.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:02 Updated: docbook-utils-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Installed: spin-kickstarts-0.10.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:04 Updated: docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-15.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:14 Updated: OmegaT-1.7.3_04-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:27 Updated: wine-core-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:28 Updated: wine-cms-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-capi-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:29 Updated: wine-ldap-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:30 Updated: wine-twain-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:31 Updated: wine-nas-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:32 Updated: wine-tools-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:33 Updated: wine-jack-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:34 Updated: wine-esd-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-desktop-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:35 Updated: wine-1.1.9-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 18:38:38 Updated: samba-winbind-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:43 Updated: samba-common-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:45 Updated: revisor-cli-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-gui-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:47 Updated: revisor-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:49 Updated: libsmbclient-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 18:38:54 Updated: revisor-comps-2.1.3-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 18:38:57 Updated: samba-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:10 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:11 Updated: 2:gimp-libs-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:41 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:45 Updated: shared-mime-info-0.51-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:47 Updated: check-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:33:49 Updated: 1:xmms-libs-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:30 Updated: 2:gimp-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:33 Updated: sectool-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:34 Updated: loudmouth-1.4.3-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:37 Updated: system-config-printer-libs-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:39 Updated: libdiscid-0.2.2-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:34:42 Updated: gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:01 Updated: libgnome-2.24.1-8.fc10.i386 Dec 03 23:35:02 Updated: 2:gimp-help-browser-2.6.3-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:05 Updated: 1:xmms-1.2.11-3.20071117cvs.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:12 Updated: 1:grip-3.2.0-25.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:32 Updated: gtk2-devel-2.14.5-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:44 Updated: freeciv-2.1.7-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: dcraw-8.89-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:46 Updated: 2:vim-minimal-7.2.060-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:48 Updated: openvpn-2.1-0.29.rc15.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:35:55 Updated: 1:nfs-utils-1.1.4-2.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:01 Updated: netbeans-ide9-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:05 Updated: yum-3.2.20-4.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:08 Updated: netbeans-java2-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:09 Updated: netbeans-apisupport1-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:10 Updated: kernel-firmware-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:11 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:16 Updated: system-config-network-tui-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:18 Updated: system-config-network-1.5.94-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:20 Updated: gnome-doc-utils-0.14.0-2.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:21 Updated: netbeans-6.1-10.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:24 Updated: system-config-printer-1.0.12-1.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:25 Updated: sectool-gui-0.9.2-2.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:26 Updated: check-devel-0.9.5-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: libgnome-devel-2.24.1-8.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:27 Updated: cdlabelgen-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:36:28 Updated: etherboot-roms-kvm-5.4.4-5.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:37 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:36:38 Updated: crontabs-1.10-25.fc10.noarch Dec 03 23:39:15 Installed: kernel-devel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:07 Updated: kmod-nvidia-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:08 Installed: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64-177.82-1.fc10.5.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:10 Updated: PackageKit-yum-plugin-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-glib-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:11 Updated: PackageKit-udev-helper-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:16 Updated: PackageKit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: gnome-packagekit-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:40:47 Updated: PackageKit-yum-0.3.11-3.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:41:10 Erased: kmod-nvidia-2.6.27.5-113.fc10.x86_64 Dec 03 23:42:12 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.7-130.fc10.x86_64 --- Additional comment from petersen at redhat.com on 2008-12-05 02:28:11 EDT --- Is anyone here using scim? - I don't think this is a scim but happen to be proven otherwise... Peter, do you have any light on this? --- Additional comment from misek at tnet.cz on 2008-12-05 02:35:07 EDT --- No, and there are no scim packages installed on my machine. --- Additional comment from oliva at lsd.ic.unicamp.br on 2008-12-06 11:21:48 EDT --- Downgrading gtk2 and gtk2-devel to 2.14.4-3.fc10 restored dead keys to me. I'm going to clone this bug for gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061701.mB6H1XdY028286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-06 12:01:30 EDT --- *** Bug 467016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 17:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 12:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812061701.mB6H1V3A028245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|needinfo?(peter.hutterer at re | |dhat.com) | --- Comment #28 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-06 12:01:30 EDT --- This doesn't make sense to clone this bug -- if you blame Gtk, then let's go there, but don't make us unnecessary bugs. Closing this as duplicate of bug 475008. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475008 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 20:56:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 15:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the latest release 1.2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062056.mB6Kunrs005277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:46:57 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #13 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-06 15:56:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Error: Missing Dependency: python-Levenshtein is needed by package > translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10.noarch (updates) python-Levenshtein has been pushed to f10 so this dependency is now solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 6 21:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 16:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812062135.mB6LZmEI014397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Alexandre Oliva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #29 from Alexandre Oliva 2008-12-06 16:35:47 EDT --- It doesn't make sense to assume that a bug filed two months ago is in any way related with the new bug that appeared 72 hours ago, that happens to display similar symptoms under completely different circumstances. That's why I created a separate bug, rather than reassign or close this one. I know very little about the original bug reported here; all I know is that it can't be the same bug as the one I and Vaclav ran into. So I'm reopening this, unless you, as the original reporter of this bug, can verify that it somehow is the same bug, or that it is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 05:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475061] New: bad menu entry Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: bad menu entry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475061 Summary: bad menu entry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora "iok" is not a very helpful menu entry. "Indic Onscreen Keyboard" is much better. A simple way to get there is to pass the --copy-generic-name-to-name option to desktop-file-install. While looking at the desktop file, Icon=iok.png will give you a warning from desktop-file-install. The correct way to specify the icon is to strip the extension: Icon=iok. The comment "Indic onscreen virtual keyboard for Indic Inscript maps." has some flaws: - it ends with a period - it repeats Indic - it repeats the generic name, more or less A better comment might be: "Enter Indic characters with a virtual keyboard" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 7 06:06:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:06:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] New: UI issues in iok Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: UI issues in iok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 Summary: UI issues in iok Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Some issues I noticed while I briefly looked at iok: - First a general issue: I believe it would be much more useful if iok would appear less like a normal unfocused application window, and more like some special desktop component. Ie, I would remove the window title and menubar, and maybe place the window at some fixed place, e.g. above the bottom panel (compare matchbox-keyboard). - It seems somewhat pointless to have an "Advanced Options" check menuitem with the sole purpose of hiding and showing another menu. Also, I wonder why you think that "Open" is less advanced than "Save". - The buttons are pretty hard to hit on a big screen,since they don't reserve any extra size beyond the dimensions of the character. (compare gnome-calculator, which does ensure that its buttons have reasonable size) - The entries in the combobox should be translatable language names, like "Assamese", not technobabble like "as-inscript". If you use the iso-codes package for this, you get translations of the language names for free. - The "Open" menuitem doesn't give any guidance as to what kind of file you are expected to open. I'd recommend to make that "Open keymap", add a filter to the filechooser that only shows .mim files, and opening the file chooser in the /usr/share/m17n directory. - "Save keymap" would be better if it opened a file chooser in save mode, and proposed a filename like 'modified-as-inscript.mim'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 01:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080107.mB817XR9008776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #30 from Peter Hutterer 2008-12-07 20:07:31 EDT --- I don't know what the issue is, but Comment #17 indicates that it's neither driver nor server (mind you, dead keys are processed in the client anyway). So one of you who sees the bug needs to be able to narrow down what causes the issue. If you experience the bug create a new user and test this user to ensure there's no stale settings that may trigger it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 02:16:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] New: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 Summary: Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: cchance at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: yshao at redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Because installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk, users who are using Gnome could not have it operates. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to gnome-terminal: alt-f2 > input 'gnome-terminal' 2. Login as root: input 'su -' 3. Yum install ibus: input 'yum install ibus' > input 'y' 4. Try to start ibus with im-chooser: input 'im-chooser' 5. Check results. Actual results: ibus is not usable on Gnome. Expected results: ibus is usable on Gnome. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 02:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 21:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080235.mB82Z6UH020893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 san changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 04:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 23:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080458.mB84wjb1012308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:38:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080538.mB85cf92018827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-08 00:38:41 EDT --- Checked. They are all aesthetic preference from the original author. Hence, they should not be bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080538.mB85ctP4016245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 05:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:54:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474916] Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080554.mB85sAje018536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474916 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(rohandhruva at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-08 00:54:09 EDT --- Hi Rohan, [rohan at fedora ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/i18n LANG="en_IN.UTF-8" It means s-c-l has doing its job can you try same once again, while login check the gdm selection i think it is still showing English(United States) and overriding s-c-l setting, change it to required and then try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080631.mB86VJF9024707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-08 01:31:18 EDT --- I tried to work on your demand, could you kindly have a look sample: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.sfd http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf Let me know if you are happy with that. So I could proceed changes on all included fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 06:49:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474916] Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080649.mB86n109029421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474916 Rohan Dhruva changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rohandhruva at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #2 from Rohan Dhruva 2008-12-08 01:49:00 EDT --- Thanks a lot, Pravin. The problem was indeed with GDM overriding my language preference. This resolves the bug :) Will you please help me in marking this bug as resolved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 07:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474916] Locale not set to en_IN even after selecting "English (India)" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080705.mB8754Cv032259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474916 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-08 02:05:04 EDT --- You are Welcome !! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 08:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080828.mB88SL0W013143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 08:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080827.mB88RT4Y012938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2008-12-08 03:27:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Some issues I noticed while I briefly looked at iok: > Thanks for having brief look. > - First a general issue: I believe it would be much more useful if iok would > appear less like a normal unfocused application window, and more like some > special desktop component. Ie, I would remove the window title and menubar, and > maybe place the window at some fixed place, e.g. above the bottom panel > (compare matchbox-keyboard). I will think about that as I saw its difflicult to close matchbox-keyboard once its started. Even then how can I provide features to save keymap,open keymap if I removed menubar? > > - It seems somewhat pointless to have an "Advanced Options" check menuitem with > the sole purpose of hiding and showing another menu. Also, I wonder why you > think that "Open" is less advanced than "Save". Sorry I confused here what you want to suggest. > > - The buttons are pretty hard to hit on a big screen,since they don't reserve > any extra size beyond the dimensions of the character. (compare > gnome-calculator, which does ensure that its buttons have reasonable size) The reason I removed specific size to button is that UI varies from language to language. Like telugu, Kannada characters are big in size so UI's size(height as well as in lenght) will vary as you change from Hindi inscript to Telugu inscript map. Will check gcalctool source to fix above issue. > > - The entries in the combobox should be translatable language names, like > "Assamese", not technobabble like "as-inscript". If you use the iso-codes > package for this, you get translations of the language names for free. Ok. So for standard installed inscript maps I will use Language names. How do you like to see then modfied keymaps for same language in combo box? > - The "Open" menuitem doesn't give any guidance as to what kind of file you are > expected to open. I'd recommend to make that "Open keymap", add a filter to the > filechooser that only shows .mim files, and opening the file chooser in the > /usr/share/m17n directory. Done. > > - "Save keymap" would be better if it opened a file chooser in save mode, and > proposed a filename like 'modified-as-inscript.mim'. What do you suggest if end user want to change as-inscript say 2 times and want to have those 2 copies? I actually confused where should modified keymaps go. Currently, as non-root user can't write to /usr/share/m17n, I am storing new/modified keymaps in $HOME/.m17n which is not good location as its hidden directory but iok is made to list keymaps in $HOME/.m17n directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 08:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 03:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475061] bad menu entry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812080828.mB88SDb7009925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475061 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag 2008-12-08 03:28:12 EDT --- Fixed all locally. Thanks for pointing above issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 10:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474526] [hne_IN] Chhattisgarhi language locale not available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081051.mB8ApsOO008555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474526 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:00:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081300.mB8D0CsQ032111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:00:12 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update translate-toolkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 13:10:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 08:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081310.mB8DA6vQ003964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-08 08:10:05 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update translate-toolkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 15:59:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812081559.mB8FxINg015641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-08 10:59:17 EDT --- > > > - First a general issue: I believe it would be much more useful if iok would > > appear less like a normal unfocused application window, and more like some > > special desktop component. Ie, I would remove the window title and menubar, and > > maybe place the window at some fixed place, e.g. above the bottom panel > > (compare matchbox-keyboard). > > I will think about that as I saw its difflicult to close matchbox-keyboard > once its started. Even then how can I provide features to save keymap,open > keymap if I removed menubar? I was thinking that you could add a button that brings up a configuration dialog. > > > > - It seems somewhat pointless to have an "Advanced Options" check menuitem with > > the sole purpose of hiding and showing another menu. Also, I wonder why you > > think that "Open" is less advanced than "Save". > > Sorry I confused here what you want to suggest. I wasn't clear. I think there is no point in having the "Advanced Options" menuitem if its sole purpose is to hide the other menu. Either just show the "Keys" menu always, or, if you want to make it more obvious that this is 'advanced' stuff, turn the "Advanced Options" menuitem into a submenu with those options. > The reason I removed specific size to button is that UI varies from language > to language. Like telugu, Kannada characters are big in size so UI's > size(height as well as in lenght) will vary as you change from Hindi inscript > to Telugu inscript map. > Will check gcalctool source to fix above issue. They don't have to be all the same size, but having a reasonable minimal size would be nice, since they are just too small to hit. > > - The entries in the combobox should be translatable language names, like > > "Assamese", not technobabble like "as-inscript". If you use the iso-codes > > package for this, you get translations of the language names for free. > > Ok. So for standard installed inscript maps I will use Language names. How do > you like to see then modfied keymaps for same language in combo box? I mostly care about the standard ones that will be there by default. For modified keymaps, you can either just show the basename of the file, or enhance the saving ui to ask for a name in addition to a filename. > > > > - "Save keymap" would be better if it opened a file chooser in save mode, and > > proposed a filename like 'modified-as-inscript.mim'. > > What do you suggest if end user want to change as-inscript say 2 times and > want to have those 2 copies? I actually confused where should modified keymaps > go. Currently, as non-root user can't write to /usr/share/m17n, I am storing > new/modified keymaps in $HOME/.m17n which is not good location as its hidden > directory but iok is made to list keymaps in $HOME/.m17n directory. Obviously, modified keymaps have to be stored in the users home directory somewhere. ~/.m17n seems a fine location for that. I don't think it is a problem that it is hidden. The important thing is that the files show up in the tool that they are made for, and you seem to have that covered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 8 21:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812082139.mB8LdqFi003447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #3 from David Hlacik 2008-12-08 16:39:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326199) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326199) "R" letter Same when using Subpixel smoothing and Bytecode interpreter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 01:05:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] Blurriness of Greek letter m (U+03BC) in Liberation Sans Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090105.mB915Hh5017340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-08 20:05:17 EDT --- Close as resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 02:00:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:00:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090200.mB920e2b019547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-08 21:00:40 EDT --- I have checked and the hinting tables (hinting instructions, fpgm, prep, maxp, cvt) are all existing in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 06:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090621.mB96LZhN014099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-09 01:21:35 EDT --- Updated: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 06:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090640.mB96eSrO010916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-09 01:40:27 EDT --- Built to rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=988575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 06:59:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 01:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090659.mB96xa53014432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(simos.bugzilla at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-09 01:59:35 EDT --- Taken away Coptic letters (U03E2..U03EF), it has 30 chars remains. 30 chars * 3 types * 4 styles = 360 glyphs. I don't think I could finish it alone timely. Could I know how many chars are needed to be filled, before Greek people could use this font? I can't promise how much I could do as I'm just 1 person. Let's try to prioritize it together. I have read the Greek Extended block. Also, how important for Greek Extended block to Greek people? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 07:05:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:05:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090705.mB975KoG021339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 08:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 03:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812090825.mB98P6AV003138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #5 from san 2008-12-09 03:25:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I tried to work on your demand, could you kindly have a look sample: > > http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.sfd > > http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf > > Let me know if you are happy with that. So I could proceed changes on all > included fonts. I check with the fonts from https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip, all fixed. Thanks. Here I put the reason to report the bug? 1) to follow the unicode reference: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00a2/index.htm 2) cent sign marked as acrossed C is more clear and easy to designate in small size. Liberation fonts will be the first choice for LGC. Thank you ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 9 14:05:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:05:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473842] Add Greek Polytonic support to Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812091405.mB9E5RJX006096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473842 Simos Xenitellis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(simos.bugzilla at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Simos Xenitellis 2008-12-09 09:05:26 EDT --- The current set of glyphs in Liberation should be sufficient to Greek users. Greek Polytonic and other Ancient characters should be useful to a. Scholars that study Classics and Ancient Greek (mostly Universities around the world) b. People that study Biblical Greek. For example, see http://www.nerdlets.org/category/greek/ c. Modern Greek replaced Greek Polytonic in 1981. There are people who continue to use Polytonic, as shown at http://www.polytoniko.org/ For a sample of users, see http://simos.info/blog/archives/639 As a priority, I would consider Greek Polytonic to be 'Low priority' (I can only change Severity in this Bugzilla, not Priority). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 02:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100233.mBA2Xk70000418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Noriko Mizumoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-trans-ja at redhat.com, | |noriko at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Noriko Mizumoto 2008-12-09 21:33:45 EDT --- This gives a critical impact on our end-user, since setting 'Disabled' mode actually shows up 'Permissive' and setting 'Enforcing' mode shows 'Disabled' with current release. With the latest commit on 3-Dec, these translation has been corrected. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvis&r1=1.24&r2=1.25 Could you please pick up revision 1.25 ja.po file and rebuild for next update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 02:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:39:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100239.mBA2dQQo001505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Noriko Mizumoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|khashida at redhat.com |dwalsh at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100443.mBA4hZFH027459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Pedro Matiello changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatiello at yahoo.com.br --- Comment #2 from Pedro Matiello 2008-12-09 23:43:35 EDT --- Same issue here. Downgrading to 2.14.4-3 fixed it. Using Brazilian keyboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 04:52:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:52:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100452.mBA4qrte029125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-09 23:52:52 EDT --- I need to know more details to do anything here. What exact keyboard layout are you using ? (setxkbmap -print output would be good) What key combination does not work as expected ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 07:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:14:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100714.mBA7EqBc015934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #4 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek 2008-12-10 02:14:51 EDT --- $ setxkbmap -print xkb_keymap { xkb_keycodes { include "evdev+aliases(qwerty)" }; xkb_types { include "complete" }; xkb_compat { include "complete" }; xkb_symbols { include "pc+us+cz(qwerty):2+inet(evdev)+level3(ralt_switch_for_alts_toggle):1+group(alts_toggle)+group(alt_shift_toggle)" }; xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc104)" }; }; And it seem that no death key combination works (for all caron and acute characters). For example: for ? I press "=" and "a" and the computer just beeps the same for capital R with caron ? I press "shift" + "=" key and "R" The behaviour is exactly the same as in #467016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 08:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] New: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Summary: Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Since VLGothic-fonts is upgraded to 20081203, I see many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment. Downloading to 20081029 works good. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11 (perhaps?) cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-10.fc11.noarch.rpm How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. For example, the following URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/policycoreutils/po/ja.po?root=elvis&r1=1.24&r2=1.25 Actual results: See attached -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 08:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:36:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100836.mBA8aLrC032137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 03:36:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326463) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326463) screenshot with VLGothic 20081203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 08:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:37:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100837.mBA8b6s9006890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 03:37:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326465) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326465) screenshot with VLGothic 20081029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 08:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:39:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812100839.mBA8dRix032473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 03:39:27 EDT --- Also with 20081203 the glyphs of arabic numerals frequently changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 10:59:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101059.mBAAxQNA030272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-10 05:59:25 EDT --- my rawhide box is broken now so I can't do any testing... so just guessing, is this issue gone if you do remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf or add testing for Chinese like: zh sans-serif AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing CN instead of preference alias? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:37:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101137.mBABbZZS005826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 06:37:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > is > this issue gone if you do remove /etc/fonts/conf.d/64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf It seems this works > or > add testing for Chinese like: > > > instead of preference alias? Would you tell me to what file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 11:40:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101140.mBABeNTl006416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #5 from Pedro Matiello 2008-12-10 06:40:22 EDT --- setxkbmap -print xkb_keymap { xkb_keycodes { include "evdev(abnt2)+aliases(qwerty)" }; xkb_types { include "complete" }; xkb_compat { include "complete" }; xkb_symbols { include "pc+br+inet(evdev)" }; xkb_geometry { include "pc(abnt2)" }; }; I couldn't do any of ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (and their uppercase version) by typing the signal (' ^ ` ~ ") followed by the letter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 13:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429480] translate-toolkit has broken deps in epel5 testing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101346.mBADkwsP002021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429480 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-12-10 08:46:57 EDT --- Build has been released which doesn't need python-enchant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 14:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 09:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101450.mBAEobOD024609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Daniel Walsh 2008-12-10 09:50:36 EDT --- Fixed in policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 and policycoreutils-2.0.60-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 16:34:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] New: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 Summary: iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: jonrob.one at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Currently the iok menu entry under the Applications > Accessories menu is simply "iok". Not very useful to anyone who doesn't know what this is already. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 10 Desktop Live CD Expected results: Should probably be something like "iok Onscreen Keyboard" Additional info: see: http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/desktop-application-menu.html.en -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 18:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101843.mBAIhgdR016414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-10 13:43:41 EDT --- policycoreutils-2.0.60-5.fc11 seems good. I cannot test policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 for now (I no longer have F-10 machine and policycoreutils-2_0_57-14_fc10 cannot be installed because F-10 uses python 2.5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101935.mBAJZAui028384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 19:38:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:38:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812101938.mBAJcimp029385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:00:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102000.mBAK0pwh027338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-10 15:00:50 EDT --- Behdad recently wanted to experiment with new syntax to deal with fonts that need locale-specific ordering. You should try to ping him to check if he hasn't a better fontconfig recipe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432887] Make anaconda set locale from the map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102022.mBAKMIRU007950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432887 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #23 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:06:55 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 10 20:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:28:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812102028.mBAKSQ3Z009548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 00:56:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] New: no sound in startdict Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: no sound in startdict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Summary: no sound in startdict Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i386 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: stardict AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: jianliang79 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, zhu at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I have installed WyabdcRealPeopleTTS sound library but stardict can't read words for me. Another abnormal thing about sound is that now I can't even hear the sound when the mouse pointer entering the buttons of stardict. I remember in the previous version I can hear a little sound when the mouse pointer entering one of the button of stardict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:01:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in startdict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110101.mBB111LC024590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(jianliang79 at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-10 20:01:00 EDT --- Hi, I don't know WyabdcRealPeopleTTS sound library, but could you play sound with that on your system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:08:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:08:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with the proper font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110108.mBB186Mu025827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982 --- Comment #13 from MATSUURA Takanori 2008-12-10 20:08:06 EDT --- Sometimes, font switching in pango is irresponsible?especially in alias fonts (serif, sans-serif, monospace). Firefox used to have the similar problem and has been fixed. http://bugzilla.mozilla.gr.jp/show_bug.cgi?id=5180 (Mozilla-gumi bugzilla; in Japanese) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339513 (bmo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110113.mBB1DoYn000598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-10 20:13:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Would you tell me to what file? Try to replace: sans-serif AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing CN in 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf with the above for sans-serif. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in startdict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110116.mBB1GWM5027226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 liang jian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jianliang79 at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #2 from liang jian 2008-12-10 20:16:32 EDT --- WyabdcRealPeopleTTS is an english speech library, it is composed of thousands of *.wav file. stardict can utilize this speech library to read words in english. Audio in my system works fine, I just can't hear any sound in stardict, is this something related to esound ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:19:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110119.mBB1JuIx027388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-10 20:19:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Behdad recently wanted to experiment with new syntax to deal with fonts that > need locale-specific ordering. You should try to ping him to check if he hasn't > a better fontconfig recipe. Aha. Cc'ing him. Behdad, do you have any idea to resolve a kind of locale-specific ordering issue in fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 01:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475907] New: duplicate autostart file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: duplicate autostart file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475907 Summary: duplicate autostart file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora you install both /etc/xdg/autostart/imsettings-applet.desktop and /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-imsettings-applet.desktop Thats one too many... it leads to imsettings applet showing up twice in the list of autostarted session apps. It does not actually cause to be started twice, so the problem is more cosmetic. But still, better to pick one location to avoid problems with the two copies getting out of sync, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 03:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:05:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475907] duplicate autostart file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110305.mBB35Yhh012072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475907 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-10 22:05:34 EDT --- Yes, it was ugly hack to disable xsettings stuff entirely for GNOME/Xfce only. it doesn't bring up twice right. but I'm trying to merge it once again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 04:25:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110425.mBB4PVNa000643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag 2008-12-10 23:25:31 EDT --- already reported same in bug 475061. Will fix this in next release as I don't want to build package for this single change now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432459] [te_IN] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110531.mBB5Vltn004850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432459 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432459] [te_IN] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110531.mBB5VPVj004805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432459 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #10 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 00:31:25 EDT --- it is fixed and working! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432605] [si_LK] No Translation for Applicaton In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110539.mBB5d89u012323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432605 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 00:39:08 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! system-config-display-1.0.51-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432460] [si_LK] Wrong Translation in Branch 2-12 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110538.mBB5cCKI005857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432460 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 00:38:12 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 05:37:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:37:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432458] [si_LK] Translation Error in File (2-12) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110537.mBB5bIU7005780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432458 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 00:37:17 EDT --- It is not yet fixed with current release package! gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:04:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431992] [ta_IN] Shortcut keys are not in English In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110604.mBB64tdV016332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431992 --- Comment #8 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:04:54 EDT --- Issue still present in following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 288901] [ta_IN] - Codepoint 0B83 showing wrong shape in Gtk applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110634.mBB6Yjkb020893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288901 --- Comment #7 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:34:44 EDT --- Bug Still exist in latest package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:46:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475938] New: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475938 Summary: [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: file-roller AssignedTo: caillon at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: caillon at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: While using file-roller in Punjabi (pa_IN.UTF-8), it was not showing translation, while package has Translated file Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): file-roller-2.24.2-1.fc10.i386 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. open termianl 2. export LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 3.file-roller Actual results: No Translated message in application Expected results: Should have, when rpm has Translated MO files Additional info: Tested lang: kn_IN, ja_JP, zh_TW, --- rpm -ql file-roller --- /usr/share/locale/af/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/am/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/as/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/az/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/be at latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bn_IN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/br/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/bs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/cy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/dz/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_CA/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/et/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/eu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/fur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ga/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/gu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/hy/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ku/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/lv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ml/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/mr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ne/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/nn/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/oc/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/or/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pa/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ps/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/rw/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/si/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sl/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sq/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr at ije/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sr at latin/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ta/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/te/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/th/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/ur_PK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/xh/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/file-roller.mo ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431991] [ml_IN] Shortcut keys are not in English In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110648.mBB6mnW8022929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431991 --- Comment #9 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:48:48 EDT --- Bug Still present with following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:51:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 423191] [ml_IN] combination is INCorrect with 0d30 [consonant+0d4d+0d30] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110651.mBB6p51l023488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 423191] [ml_IN] combination is INCorrect with 0d30 [consonant+0d4d+0d30] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110650.mBB6omSH017630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423191 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:50:47 EDT --- it is fixed and working fine with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432606] [kn_IN] No Translation for Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110654.mBB6skaY023904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432606 --- Comment #4 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:54:46 EDT --- Bug Still exist in following package system-config-display-1.0.51-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 06:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432457] [kn_IN] Translation Error in File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110659.mBB6xhDl024702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432457 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com Component|gtk+ |gtk2 AssignedTo|eng-l10n-bugs at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 01:59:42 EDT --- yes, it was gtk2 only bug and it is fixed already. Thanks gtk2-2.21.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 432457] [kn_IN] Translation Error in File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110700.mBB7019F019096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432457 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431990] [mr_IN] File menu Translation need to re-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110715.mBB7FIBw028131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431990 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:15:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:15:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431990] [mr_IN] File menu Translation need to re-check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110715.mBB7F3In021778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431990 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #13 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 02:15:02 EDT --- Bug is fixed in following package: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431989] [as_IN] low Translation stats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110716.mBB7GqHn028362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431989 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 07:16:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431989] [as_IN] low Translation stats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110716.mBB7Gct9028335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431989 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 02:16:37 EDT --- package has good Translation status (all menu/most dialog) with following pacakge: gedit-2.22.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110901.mBB91AC7008359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Eric Donkersloot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.donkersloot at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Eric Donkersloot 2008-12-11 04:01:09 EDT --- [ericd at vaiopro Desktop]$ setxkbmap -print xkb_keymap { xkb_keycodes { include "evdev+aliases(qwerty)" }; xkb_types { include "complete" }; xkb_compat { include "complete" }; xkb_symbols { include "pc+us(intl)+inet(evdev)+group(shift_caps_toggle)" }; xkb_geometry { include "pc(pc102)" }; }; I can confirm downgrading to gtk2-2.14.4-3.fc10.i386 fixes the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110942.mBB9gBYT017485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110942.mBB9g2Hr017412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:41:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 431988] [as_IN] Error in Translated file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110941.mBB9fdvJ017319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431988 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |VERIFIED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 04:41:38 EDT --- Issue is fixed in following package: gtk2-2.12.12-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429526] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110953.mBB9rMpS026391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429526 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 09:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429526] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812110953.mBB9r6ef026338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429526 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #8 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 04:53:05 EDT --- Bug is fixed, verified with following pacakge: lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:06:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 234280] [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111106.mBBB67o1010404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234280 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #12 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 06:06:06 EDT --- it is fixed with following package: lohit-fonts-punjabi-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 234280] [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111106.mBBB6KfQ003703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234280 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 253978] [bn_IN] [pango] - backspace changes independent indic characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111104.mBBB45bA003018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253978 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 06:04:04 EDT --- it is not yet fixed pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 11:14:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:14:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 228491] [hi_IN] Dependent Vowel (0952/0953/0954) are Render as Independenet vowel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111114.mBBBE4QE005139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228491 --- Comment #13 from A S Alam 2008-12-11 06:14:03 EDT --- it is not fixed yet with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:25:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 427944] firefox3 ja langpack seems broken In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111225.mBBCPEMY020986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427944 Martin Stransky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Martin Stransky 2008-12-11 07:25:13 EDT --- Works for me with the latest package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:42:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for ne_IN as well as ne_NP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812111242.mBBCg5BU024410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Perhaps hunspell-ne |Perhaps hunspell-ne |suffices for np_IN as well |suffices for ne_IN as well |as np_NP |as ne_NP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 11 12:41:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 07:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] New: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 Summary: Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for np_IN as well as np_NP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: hunspell-ne AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=326610) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326610) add an alias Description of problem: OpenOffice.org supports some locales not in glibc, one of these is np_IN Assuming that Nepali is spelt the same way in both India and Nepal, then the following patch would enable spellchecking for the Nepali (India) option in OOo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 00:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120014.mBC0EiKt023852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 19:14:42 EDT --- Matej, you still see this post F10 GA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 00:17:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120017.mBC0HD8e024540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-11 19:17:13 EDT --- Given comment 21 and the new gtk2 bug 475008, I reckon this can be closed now, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 228455] [gu_IN] Dependent Vowel is treated as Independent vowel (0AE2/0AE3) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120531.mBC5VO3W013260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228455 --- Comment #10 from A S Alam 2008-12-12 00:31:22 EDT --- Bug still exist with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:40:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 424701] [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120540.mBC5eY7Z014704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424701 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 05:40:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:40:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 424701] [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120540.mBC5eHJO014636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424701 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #8 from A S Alam 2008-12-12 00:40:16 EDT --- fixed with following package: pango-1.20.4-1.fc9 lohit-fonts-malayalam-2.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 06:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120643.mBC6hgHW012830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 01:43:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Would you tell me to what file? > > Try to replace: > > > sans-serif > > AR PL UMing HK > AR PL UMing CN > > > > in 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf with the above for sans-serif. Thanks. This seems to work for Japanese locale (I cannot test for Chinese locale because I don't use it and I don't know where to check...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 06:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:54:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120654.mBC6sc5S026007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-12-12 01:54:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326711) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326711) glyphs of arabic numerals By the way is it a different issue that the glyphs (especially the widths) of arabic numerals change according to contexts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 08:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:09:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for ne_IN as well as ne_NP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120809.mBC899qH026175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2008-12-12 03:09:09 EDT --- I am not sure how can one use ne_IN in OO.o. I see there is no langpack for Nepali also. how can I test ne_IN locale in OO.o? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 08:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120849.mBC8nrJc000693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-12 03:49:52 EDT --- will review this. Assigning review to me for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 09:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for ne_IN as well as ne_NP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812120905.mBC95pWR005652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-12-12 04:05:50 EDT --- What I mean is that under format->character->font and on the CTL font language drop-down Nepali (India) and Nepali (Nepal) are both listed. The ne_IN will be ticked and ne_NP one not at the moment with hunspell-ne installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:12:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 458428] [Indic] Firefox displays garbage Indic characters on parts of some English webpages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121112.mBCBCU75011411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458428 --- Comment #12 from Martin Stransky 2008-12-12 06:12:28 EDT --- *** Bug 460865 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 11:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] [Indic] garbage Indic characters appearing instead of ascii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121112.mBCBCSh5011369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Martin Stransky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:56:26 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #15 from Martin Stransky 2008-12-12 06:12:28 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 458428 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 17:09:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:09:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812121709.mBCH9XLj023733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 johannbg at hi.is changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johannbg at hi.is --- Comment #7 from johannbg at hi.is 2008-12-12 12:09:32 EDT --- *** Bug 476225 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 12 23:24:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812122324.mBCNOW7n031624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-12 18:24:31 EDT --- gtk2-2.14.5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk2-2.14.5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 09:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 04:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812130952.mBD9qbOp029356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #9 from Vaclav "sHINOBI" Misek 2008-12-13 04:52:37 EDT --- Great, that make the trick and everything works correctly for me after this update. Is it working for all so we should close it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 13 19:01:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812131901.mBDJ1bHn018672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-13 14:01:37 EDT --- Bodhi will close the bug automatically when the update is moved from updates-testing to updates. You can speed that up by giving a +1 in the bodhi request. Go to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk2-2.14.5-3.fc10 and add a "works for me" comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 14 15:21:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] New: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Summary: [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font Product: Fedora Localization Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Telugu [te] AssignedTo: kkrothap at redhat.com ReportedBy: arjunaraoc at googlemail.com QAContact: kkrothap at redhat.com CC: aalam at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Consonant+Virama+[Consonant+Virama]+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font. With Pothana2000 font, the rendering is correct. More details at this bug report. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=516947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 02:21:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150221.mBF2LmvX017117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 Paul Michael Reilly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmr at pajato.com --- Comment #12 from Paul Michael Reilly 2008-12-14 21:21:47 EDT --- FWIW, I've noticed that even after doing a yum remove on the imsettings package (and its dependencies) that I still have a problem with gnome-screensaver which is resolved by removing it and adding xscreensaver. I'm not sure why I see this issue but no one else seems to have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 03:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:21:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150321.mBF3LdGf010115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-14 22:21:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > FWIW, I've noticed that even after doing a yum remove on the imsettings package > (and its dependencies) that I still have a problem with gnome-screensaver which > is resolved by removing it and adding xscreensaver. I'm not sure why I see > this issue but no one else seems to have it. As I've mentioned it at the above comment, the root cause is either of a or b or c or d. but this issue may be not gone completely with one fix only. for example, if we have a fix for (a) only, you'll see "There settings cannot work with your current window manager (unknown)". a fix for (b) only, there may be a side-effect if xfwm4 requires xfce-mcs-manager working. a fix for (c) only or (d) only, there may be a side-effect so that there are still possibility that xfce-mcs-manager gets a window manager name from X property other than Xfwm4. I suppose this issue may be gone completely with fixes for (a) and (b). or if some one is sure there are no side-effects with a fix of (c) or (d), we could go with it. but I'm not familiar with Xfce. so need feedbacks from Xfce wizards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150504.mBF54QU4011932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 00:04:25 EDT --- Akira, thanks for investing the time to track this down this far. 3. imsettings-xim is running. it grabs same window id. thus, window id on _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is valid again. which isn't right. Have you confirmed that this is actually happening ? I'd be surprised if the X server recycled client ids that quickly, but it is of course possible... a. metacity doesn't delete _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK from the root window. it may be dangerous since the window id could be reused. Worth filing a bug about. b. invoking xfce-mcs-manager before xfwm4 may be not a good idea as long as it uses gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name(), because of caching the value. it's still likely to return "unknown" if no _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is set to the root window and it's being cached before running xfwm4. If things work as expected, you'll get a window-manager-changed signal in xfce-mcs-manager when xfwm4 starts up, so this shouldn't be a problem. But you'll of course have to expect the warning xfce_err (_("These settings cannot work with your current window manager (%s)"), wm_name); to trigger if you start xfce-mcs-manager earlier than xfwm4. And the manager needs to handle window manager changes correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150507.mBF577m7027759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 00:07:07 EDT --- Btw, a simple workaround might be to scrub _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK using xprop, first thing in your session startup, before anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:32:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:32:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150532.mBF5WEG7016944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #16 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 00:32:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326904) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326904) try to unset _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK Does this metacity patch make things work for you ? Note that this is only a best-effort patch, it will only help if metacity is shut down gracefully. If it is simply killed, it still leaves _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK behind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:40:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150540.mBF5er3q000990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #17 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 00:40:52 EDT --- Filed upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564561 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 05:38:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150538.mBF5cWqM017826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 00:38:31 EDT --- 1) Buildroot should be from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag 2) defattr usage should be %defattr(-,root,root, -) 3) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used use make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install 4) Also, in Changelog use %%post instead of %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150600.mBF60jmg021722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|unspecified |10 Component|Telugu [te] |lohit-fonts CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |petersen at redhat.com, | |rbhalera at redhat.com AssignedTo|kkrothap at redhat.com |rbhalera at redhat.com QAContact|kkrothap at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org Product|Fedora Localization |Fedora --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2008-12-15 01:00:45 EDT --- Changing Product to Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:05:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150605.mBF65gCG022709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-15 01:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Akira, thanks for investing the time to track this down this far. > > 3. imsettings-xim is running. it grabs same window id. thus, window id on > _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is valid again. which isn't right. > > Have you confirmed that this is actually happening ? I'd be surprised if the X > server recycled client ids that quickly, but it is of course possible... Yes, I have. it was surprised to me too. please try the simple testing code I'll attach later. > a. metacity doesn't delete _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK from the root window. it > may be dangerous since the window id could be reused. > > Worth filing a bug about. Sure. filed to Bug#476481 and upstream too (see reference in that bug). (In reply to comment #15) > Btw, a simple workaround might be to scrub _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK using > xprop, first thing in your session startup, before anything else. Yes, I did similar thing in a hook of XChangeProperty with LD_PRELOAD to track it down accurately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150612.mBF6Cegs006092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-15 01:12:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326906) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326906) simple test code % ./a.out opening a display: f23010 creating a window: 5c00001 destroying a window closing a display: 0 opening a display again: f23010 creating a window again: 5c00001 window id isn't sane enough destroying a window closing a display So window is is re-used in even same program. for more testing, run it some times. you'll get same window id until any applications grabs and keep running. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 06:33:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812150633.mBF6XmUH009397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |GNOME Desktop 516947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 10:39:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:39:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151039.mBFAd6GK005658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 05:39:05 EDT --- modified as per comments updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint on srpm gives ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:05:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151105.mBFB5Vcu029136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 06:05:31 EDT --- updated spec file http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir.spec updated srpm http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ttmkfdir/ttmkfdir-3.0.9-28.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:16:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151116.mBFBGpje013260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 06:16:50 EDT --- package built successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999153 rpmlint only complained ttmkfdir.src: W: no-url-tag But I see that there is already comment as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream Can you build this package in rawhide now? Once its built I will approve review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476511] New: scim bad file descriptor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim bad file descriptor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476511 Summary: scim bad file descriptor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: scim-bridge AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: chanueting at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: "scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor" is shown in the log. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): scim-1.4.7-35.fc10 (i386) scim-bridge-gtk-0.4.15-8.fc10 How reproducible: Every time. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Boot up a machine with scim installed. 2. 3. Actual results: I can see this message in message log: localhost scim-bridge: An exception occurred at selecting the sockets: Bad file descriptor At the same time, there are increasing number of scim-bridge process those obtain many memory. Expected results: There should not be increasing of memory usage. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:28:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476511] scim bad file descriptor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151128.mBFBSU6K015186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476511 chanueting changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 11:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:39:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151139.mBFBdwp9002811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-15 06:39:57 EDT --- Done built it for rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=999184 Thanks for completing merge review of ttmkfdir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 12:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151234.mBFCY45d027677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-15 07:34:03 EDT --- What needs to be traiged here, that you moved this back to NEW? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151314.mBFDEXqI022037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-15 08:14:33 EDT --- Thanks for building package. APPROVED This Merge-Review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:30:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465214] emacs should disable XIM by default In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151330.mBFDUoV0026334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465214 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:27:08 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 13:34:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:34:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151334.mBFDYaAU009981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|dnovotny at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 14:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151430.mBFEUWvO022753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |VERIFIED --- Comment #33 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-15 09:30:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Matej, you still see this post F10 GA? No, I don't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:41:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151541.mBFFfirt007867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #20 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 10:41:44 EDT --- Does my metacity patch solve your problem ? If yes, I'll put it in our Fedora packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 15:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151547.mBFFlNOg025459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #11 from Andy Lindeberg 2008-12-15 10:47:23 EDT --- Nothing needs to be triaged, but the bug is not assigned to anybody. As such, it belongs in NEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 16:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151657.mBFGvxVT007460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-15 11:57:59 EDT --- Sorry, it doesn't -- please take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow (note, that this is the official FESCO approved, workflow). If you need distinguish between ASSIGNED == "triaged, and the next destiny of the bug is up to maintainers" and "actually somebody works on it", I would suggest to use ON_DEV for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 17:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151727.mBFHRRA5013649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-15 12:27:27 EDT --- metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 18:03:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812151803.mBFI3D44021091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Andy Lindeberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #13 from Andy Lindeberg 2008-12-15 13:03:13 EDT --- And yet it is interesting to note that there are *zero* Fedora anaconda bug reports in ON_DEV. Either this means that nobody is working on anything, or the "official FESCO approved workflow" doesn't actually reflect the reality of how bugs get sorted. It should be fairly obvious which of these is the case. So now the question is whether to abide by the official documentation, or to go with the system that the rest of the people I work with actually use. I'd be inclined to choose the latter in any case unless there was a really compelling argument against it, and that's ignoring the fact that in /this case/ specifically, it's more helpful to this bug report for it to be marked as NEW rather than ASSIGNED - /because/ the general interpretation is that ASSIGNED means "Somebody is working on this bug", those bugs get less attention from everybody but their assignees. For bugs that are /actually/ being worked on that's not a problem, but for bugs that are still listed as assigned to anaconda-maint-list, it can drastically reduce turnaround time. In contrast, bugs marked as NEW are more likely to be looked at by non-assignees, increasing the likelihood of a response, quick fix, or assignation for fixing. In addition, having checked with clumens, that workflow is based around releasing updates, which we don't do. It is, therefore, flawed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 15 21:15:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in startdict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812152115.mBFLFYq1009951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 han pingtian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hanpingtian at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from han pingtian 2008-12-15 16:15:33 EDT --- I reach the same problems on x86_64. And I gets some warning messages from the log: Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: ALSA sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c:781: BUG? (oss_period_size >= 16) Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: Pid: 5518, comm: stardict Not tainted 2.6.27.7-134.fc10.x86_64 #1 Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: Call Trace: Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] snd_pcm_oss_change_params+0xbc5/0xd8b [snd_pcm_oss] Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] snd_pcm_oss_get_active_substream+0x34/0xab [snd_pcm_oss] Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] snd_pcm_oss_set_channels+0x70/0x87 [snd_pcm_oss] Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] snd_pcm_oss_ioctl+0x51b/0xc6d [snd_pcm_oss] Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] vfs_ioctl+0x2a/0x78 Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] do_vfs_ioctl+0x24d/0x26a Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] sys_ioctl+0x55/0x7a Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Dec 16 05:02:08 localhost kernel: The pid 5518 is the pid of stardict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 00:59:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160059.mBG0x7bN014978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|VERIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:13:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160213.mBG2DULR010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #14 from Matej Cepl 2008-12-15 21:13:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > specifically, it's more helpful to this bug report for it to be marked as NEW > rather than ASSIGNED - /because/ the general interpretation is that ASSIGNED > means "Somebody is working on this bug", those bugs get less attention from No, it isn't and it actually never officially was (take a look for example at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#assigned -- this text is there like forever). The problem with your interpretation is, that it doesn't take into account work of bug triagers, who if this stays in NEW, will hit this bug again and again and will switch it to ASSIGNED because there is nothing to triage here. I totally understand that this is some work for you, but unfortunately, there are 4063 NEW bugs in Fedora bug triagers are struggling with, so I don't see any way how to change our ways easily. > In addition, having checked with clumens, that workflow is based around > releasing updates, which we don't do. It is, therefore, flawed. OK, then I would please ask you to suggest how to move your bugs out of the NEW -- we can certainly help you, if there is a need to sift through a lot of bugs or something like that, but really NEW bugs should go away. Please, catch me on IRC or anything, if you need to discuss it more. Best, Mat?j Cepl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160256.mBG2uNLi017623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #22 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-15 21:56:22 EDT --- Unfortunately no. I've installed metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10 and there are still _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK property in root window before imsettings-xim running say - just put "xprop -root | grep _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK" line before bringing up imsettings-xim in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/50-xinput.sh. Does this mean metacity shut down with the unexpected way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 02:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:59:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160259.mBG2x3c3017930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #23 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 21:59:02 EDT --- Yeah, it probably means that metacity was just killed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 03:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160301.mBG31vsp018791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #24 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 22:01:57 EDT --- And just to be clear, the basic problem in all of this is that im-settings stuff is started outside the user session. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 03:19:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160319.mBG3Jx2H006507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #25 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-15 22:19:58 EDT --- This isn't imsettings specific issue as per comment #8 and comment #12. this issue is still there even if imsettings moves back behind window manager. assuming applications will grabs different window id or _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK on the root window without window manager running is really bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 03:42:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160342.mBG3gX06026745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alindebe at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #15 from Parag 2008-12-15 22:42:32 EDT --- Why this bug gets moved back to NEW state whereas I have provided all required inputs here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160412.mBG4ClRb016209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-15 23:12:46 EDT --- I think it would probably be better for the anaconda team to search for unassigned bugs than using state for that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=exact&email1=anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com&product=Fedora&bug_status=NEW,ASSIGNED,NEEDINFO,MODIFIED (143 Fedora bugs) You can of course narrow down more with &component=anaconda (142 bugs!) and more usefully &version={rawhide,10,..} (23, 82, 32, 5 bugs respectively). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?product=Fedora&component=anaconda&bug_status=NEW,ASSIGNED,NEEDINFO,MODIFIED to see all open Fedora anaconda bugs, etc. Probably good to bookmark and document on your wiki pages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:19:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160419.mBG4JJ5G000335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #26 from Matthias Clasen 2008-12-15 23:19:18 EDT --- Sure, but kill wm;...start a bunch of other X apps;... start another wm is not exactly the typical sequence. In most cases, the wm should be the first X app started in the user session. Anyway, I'll look at making GTK+ handle this a little better. But not tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:24:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160424.mBG4OtOG001185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 --- Comment #3 from Parag 2008-12-15 23:24:54 EDT --- Just to update I am working on fixing issues reported in this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160431.mBG4V11E002612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:31:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225766] Merge Review: fonts-KOI8-R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160431.mBG4VJMf019507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225766 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 04:32:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812160432.mBG4WnjI019664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 16:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:51:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161651.mBGGpqVt020024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|alindebe at redhat.com, | |anaconda-maint-list at redhat. | |com, clumens at redhat.com | AssignedTo|anaconda-maint-list at redhat. |clumens at redhat.com |com | --- Comment #17 from Chris Lumens 2008-12-16 11:51:51 EDT --- Parag - I see there's a special keyboard layout for Nepali (see /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/np), and that all the Indic languages have their layouts in /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/in as variants. However, there is no variant for Maithili in that file. Should I go ahead and use us for the keyboard layout as you indicated, or is another layout more appropriate? That's the last bit of information required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 17:06:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161706.mBGH6J5S004885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(razvan.sandu at mobe | |xpert.ro) --- Comment #21 from Chris Lumens 2008-12-16 12:06:17 EDT --- R?zvan - can you please attach the error you are seeing in comment #19, point (7)? It's hard to tell what's going on or what needs fixing without that piece of information. I'd also like to note that I took care of the keymap problem from way back in comment #6 as well as verified the /etc/sysconfig/keyboard setting that anaconda writes out. If there are now additional bugs you're running into, I'd really like to close this one out and start with a new bug that describes the new issues. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 19:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812161912.mBGJCSvs013778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117 R?zvan Sandu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(razvan.sandu at mobe | |xpert.ro) | --- Comment #22 from R?zvan Sandu 2008-12-16 14:12:26 EDT --- Hello, Chris, Let's be systematic: ;-) 1. For issues in comment #6, they seem to be solved in Fedora 10; they are still present on all my CentOS 5.2 machines, so I've opened bug #472176 on RHEL. IMHO, this should not be treated as a RFE for RHEL 5.2, but as a fix for a bug affecting Romanian language support. Particularily annoying is the absence of *at least one font* with correct Romanian UTF-8 characters in the *default* install of RHEL/CentOS 5.2 - such as the pair terminus-font-console/terminus-font-x11 .rpm packages. These should be automatically installed and used when Romanian language support is requested, at any time. 2. For issues in comment #19: I've hit them during upgrading some of my machines via preupgrade. Since these upgrades ended, I have to prepare a purposely crafted test machine to reproduce this - I'll do that voluntarily. But since the crash occurs in a transitional phase, followed by a forced reboot, please let me know where exactly these events are logged (the screen output is pretty quick and I cannot copy the error message by hand or cut&paste it in a regular text file). Thanks a lot, R?zvan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:17:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:17:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465214] emacs should disable XIM by default In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162317.mBGNHY4W031181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465214 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |dnovotny at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:17:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162317.mBGNHOur030892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |dnovotny at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162319.mBGNJ0eU013055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(cchance at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-16 18:18:59 EDT --- This seems already applied upstream, I am gonna go ahead and close this now. If you spot any problems with it, feel free to reopen or file a new bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 16 23:22:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812162322.mBGNMkiQ013993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:03:26 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-16 18:22:45 EDT --- Caius: Can you confirm it's SCIM causing this issue? Also, can you try the 20081215 version I just built in rawhide? Where should we go from here with this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 00:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170050.mBH0o7It029740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #9 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-16 19:50:06 EDT --- I've turned SCIM off on F10 and prob still exists. I don't have rawhide on hand atm so need to prep that before triage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 02:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170225.mBH2PrbZ030935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at jima.tk Component|stardict |alsa-oss AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |jima at jima.tk Summary|no sound in startdict |no sound in stardict Flag| |needinfo?(jima at jima.tk) --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-16 21:25:52 EDT --- Hi alsa-oss maint., Just wondering if this is alsa-oss bug? as first line of error log mentioned? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 04:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:36:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170436.mBH4a7ZA020723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #18 from Parag 2008-12-16 23:36:06 EDT --- Yes. you are correct that we have xkb layouts already. But no one like to input in his locale at time of installation. people in India and so Nepal used to give input in English Characters only. So I request you to please go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 04:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170449.mBH4nxg0001808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-16 23:49:59 EDT --- moving to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:32:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170632.mBH6Wef5017171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-17 01:32:39 EDT --- % The "digit" class must only contain the BASIC LATIN digits, says ISO C 99 % (sections 7.25.2.1.5 and 5.2.1) because of this we cant add our indic digit in digit class, but we can add indic digits in outdigit category as done in fa_IR http://www2.open-std.org/jtc1/SC22/WG20/docs/n608.txt b) outdigit - why is this required and how is it different from "digit" "digit" classifies all digits, while "outdigit" classifies the values used for outputting. This keyword is needed to determine the characters used for outputting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 06:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226506] Merge Review: ttmkfdir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170654.mBH6sgZa008859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226506 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 07:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 02:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812170700.mBH70jCU010399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Behdad Esfahbod changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(besfahbo at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Behdad Esfahbod 2008-12-17 02:00:44 EDT --- I had an idea but I tested quickly and it didn't work. I'll think about it again. I have some other ideas about how to fix the CJK issues in fontconfig. I'm currently working on fontconfig. I'll see if I get to those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:44:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files with no final EOL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172344.mBHNisNZ029820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 18:44:53 EDT --- Still happens with emacs-22.3 but seems to be fixed upstream in trunk (aka emacs23). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 17 23:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812172346.mBHNkQGZ030397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 18:46:24 EDT --- Right I don't think we should be using non-US xkb layouts for Indic languages by default - they do not support ascii input normally afaik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:11:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180011.mBI0BpfH002751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-17 19:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > b) outdigit - why is this required and how is it different from > "digit" > > "digit" classifies all digits, while "outdigit" classifies the > values used for outputting. This keyword is needed to determine > the characters used for outputting. Just do it as fa_IR locale does it. It's the correct way: - define the digits usiing outdigits - provide an input mapping using the new map "to_inpunct" - provide additional information like thousands separators and decimal points using the "to_outpunct" map Why that you'll automatically get support for input and output of the additional number format. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474011] Broken keyboard switching in GDM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180012.mBI0Cq4X024780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474011 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] After upgrade fedora 9 -> 10 via yum GDM uses wrong keyboard layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180022.mBI0MILL026548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 19:22:17 EDT --- Looks similar to bug 474011. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0cHrN031636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:38:16 EDT --- gtk2-2.14.5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475008] Dead keys are broken in gtk2 apps with gtk2-2.14.5-2.fc10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0cKaU008798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475008 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 00:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:38:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180038.mBI0cj7G008949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-17 19:38:44 EDT --- metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update metacity'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:50:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180450.mBI4osWH011899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:50:54 EDT --- Not sure how to help with getting ibus-gtk installed by default - maybe again a task for a yum langpack type plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180450.mBI4o7ex020646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:50:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > only use gtk or XIM sorry I meant qt not gtk here -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:49:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180449.mBI4nb87020247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:49:37 EDT --- Hmm, but in principle one might want to only use gtk or XIM so I think it should be separated and anyway ibus-gtk needs to be multilib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:52:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180452.mBI4qNbU011995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 00:35:11 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:52:22 EDT --- It would be good to backport this to f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:53:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467048] Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180453.mBI4rxRZ012059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467048 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:53:23 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:53:59 EDT --- Can we close this now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465430] ibus sends invalid packet with XIM_GET_IC_VALUES_REPLY In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180455.mBI4tw0W021436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465430 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:30:28 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-17 23:55:57 EDT --- Assuming this is fixed - please reopen if there is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 04:54:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466085] ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180454.mBI4svm7021066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466085 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:39:14 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467048] Discarding the key events and same output regardless of the key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180520.mBI5K1GO016020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467048 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-18 00:20:00 EDT --- Yes, we can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:21:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461905] ibus always sends XIM_FORWARD_EVENT with same_screen = False In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180521.mBI5LLNK016531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461905 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:02:06 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-18 00:21:20 EDT --- Looks fine to me now in f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:22:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:22:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466085] ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180522.mBI5MIpm025681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466085 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:20:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:20:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465425] ibus-setup window too narrow to show engine's start and preload checkboxes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180520.mBI5KLKm025393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465425 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:30:08 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-18 00:20:20 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466085] ibus-setup isn't GNOME HIG compliance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180524.mBI5O7ab016732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466085 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-18 00:24:06 EDT --- That looks better now though, I guess it would be better have a review from desktop team later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 05:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465553] Language selection should affect keyboard layout too In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180527.mBI5RRWW017365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465553 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180700.mBI70JMg008196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 02:00:19 EDT --- ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 07:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:55:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180755.mBI7tj02017525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 02:55:44 EDT --- for rawhide build, rpmlint on binary RPM gave system-config-language.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/firstboot/modules/language.py /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_gui.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/system-config-language/yumhelpers.glade system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/language_backend.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/system-config-language/system-config-language.py 0644 system-config-language.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided locale_config ===> Looks Ok Rest looks as per packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 08:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 226461] Merge Review: system-config-language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180816.mBI8Gl0o011282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226461 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:26:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180926.mBI9QNxh024211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327310|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180923.mBI9NP7I023581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:23:24 EDT --- I am not able to verify upstream source as source URL is not working. Not sure what we can do where upstream is no longer available for older packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:25:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:25:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180925.mBI9PhnM001252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:25:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327310) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327310) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 09:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812180927.mBI9RCba024345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-18 04:27:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327312) This is modified spec file for fonts-ISO8859-2.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 11:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181149.mBIBn2D0028186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #5 from liang jian 2008-12-18 06:49:01 EDT --- hi, I have a new clue to this problem. When I start stardict from terminal, I saw the following lines among the log messages: Expression 'parameters->channelCount <= maxChans' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 924 Expression 'ValidateParameters( outputParameters, hostApi, StreamDirection_Out )' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 1142 Expression 'parameters->channelCount <= maxChans' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 924 Expression 'ValidateParameters( outputParameters, hostApi, StreamDirection_Out )' failed in 'src/hostapi/alsa/pa_linux_alsa.c', line: 1142 maybe this will help to solve this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:47:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181247.mBIClPMj007976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #11 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-18 07:47:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327320) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327320) patch created against glibc devel branch This patch will add modified i18n CTYPE in bn_IN, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra characters in punct group, it will solve that problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 12:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181253.mBICr645002298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #12 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-18 07:53:06 EDT --- unlike fa_IR , Bengali script doesn't have separate thousands separators and decimal points (uses latin one only) if no issues with this, i will add same 'bn_IN CTYPE' in other indic locale also (with outdigit) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 13:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181311.mBIDBLEe013314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Runa Bhattacharjee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itsjamil at gmail.com Summary|[bn_IN] [as_IN] iswpunct, |[bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] |iswdigit, iswalpha returns |iswpunct, iswdigit, |wrong values for Bangla |iswalpha returns wrong |(Bengali) characters |values for Bangla (Bengali) | |characters --- Comment #13 from Runa Bhattacharjee 2008-12-18 08:11:20 EDT --- Adding Jamil Ahmed, the Fedora bn coordinator to the bug and modified the summary. The bn_BD locale file would also need to be modified in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 15:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:03:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812181503.mBIF3IEI004083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-18 10:03:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > This patch will add modified i18n CTYPE in bn_IN, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra > characters in punct group, it will solve that problem This is wrong. Don't copy i18n. You'll have to use reorder_after. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 23:11:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:11:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182311.mBINBoha021762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 18 23:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812182342.mBINgbhl031932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-18 18:42:37 EDT --- Two parts might need to be updated: - recognize '*' as special character and avoid its direct input. - sqlite query (or multi queries with regex to filter) for results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 05:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190529.mBJ5T6FX015050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2008-12-19 00:29:05 EDT --- Rahul, Can you apply new spec in rawhide with excluding -f to fc-cache as its not needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 06:09:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190609.mBJ69rfN020806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|After upgrade fedora 9 -> |GDM uses wrong keyboard |10 via yum GDM uses wrong |layout after switching back |keyboard layout | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-19 01:09:52 EDT --- Here is another example: Steps to Reproduce: 1. boot F10 Live 2. login with default US layout as liveuser 3. set a passwd for liveuser 4. logout 5. input passwd in US layout 6. select Nepal keyboard 7. click on Login 6. input text 7. logout 8. switch to US layout and login again 9. input text 10. logout and login again in US Actual results: 9. input in app is still in Nepali even though US 10. seems no way to bring desktop kbd layout back to US even though gdm itself respects kbd setting for passwd Expected results: 9. should be US ascii input 10. desktop kbd layout to follow gdm setting consistently -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 07:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:05:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476871] GDM uses wrong keyboard layout after switching back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190705.mBJ75XFL003538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476871 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-19 02:05:33 EDT --- This is now reproducible in gdm-2.25.2-2.fc11 too fwiw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:45:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:45:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475061] bad menu entry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190945.mBJ9j19B021634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475061 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Parag 2008-12-19 04:45:00 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide iok-1.0.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 09:43:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475982] Perhaps hunspell-ne suffices for ne_IN as well as ne_NP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812190943.mBJ9hikR028029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475982 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Parag 2008-12-19 04:43:44 EDT --- Fixed and built in rawhide. hunspell-ne-20061217-3.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 19 16:12:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:12:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812191612.mBJGCing010323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #15 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-19 11:12:43 EDT --- Oops, it's LC_CTYPE, forget what I wrote. If the changes affect all languages using the values you're changing, then just change the i18n file. There is no reason to assume this file is correct for non-Latin languages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 20 17:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:07:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora After more than a month of consultation, feedback and tweaking new font packaging guidelines have been approved by FESCO. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Package maintainers must now convert their packages in rawhide to the new templates. The following packages have already been converted in rawhide and can serve as examples if the templates published in the fontpackages-devel package are not clear enough: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts FPC and FESCO were not consulted on splitting or renaming packages, nevertheless the new templates make it fare easier to manage subpackages, so you're strongly encouraged to split your packages along font family lines. A mandatory rule about splitting will probably be submitted for approval before the F11 release. Further information on fonts packaging changes will be published on fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: culmus-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:24:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: kacst-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:31:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:31:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: jomolhari-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski at post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski at post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: madan-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:32:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lklug-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: paktype-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:33:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:33:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: thaifonts-scalable AssignedTo: petersen at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sarai-fonts AssignedTo: sundaram at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: sundaram at redhat.com, pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:38:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: sazanami-fonts AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: samyak-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:41:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: tibetan-machine-uni-fonts AssignedTo: mgarski at post.pl ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: mgarski at post.pl, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:39:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, psatpute at redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:42:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:42:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-extra-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil at get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: smallvil at get9.net, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: un-core-fonts AssignedTo: smallvil at get9.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, smallvil at get9.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:43:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vBXR004184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:10 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210055.mBL0tCR6001108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:55:12 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:55:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210055.mBL0tsWG002095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:55:54 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210056.mBL0uJUi002893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:56:19 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:56:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210056.mBL0u49P002333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:56:03 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0v30d003970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:03 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0v1Jb003925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:00 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:56:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210056.mBL0uLOA002950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:56:21 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0v2eq003946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:01 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:56:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210056.mBL0uHgX002832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:56:17 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210055.mBL0tvWl002169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:55:56 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:55:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210055.mBL0tEWT001168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:55:13 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:56:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210056.mBL0uid7003559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:56:43 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vKYI004403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:20 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vXiE005114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:33 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vepw005398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:39 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vNBc004545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:23 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 00:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:57:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210057.mBL0vZ7o005202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com Blocks| |477044 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-20 19:57:34 EDT --- [Since the bot made a mess of the text here it is again in properly indented form.] This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:35:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210835.mBL8ZRBL032149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:35:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:35:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210835.mBL8ZOg4013327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:35:24 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474989] Upgrade Translate Toolkit to latest 1.2.1 release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210841.mBL8fB6s015256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474989 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:41:11 EDT --- translate-toolkit-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210846.mBL8k9Qp003516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 08:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 03:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812210846.mBL8k7HP016981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-21 03:46:06 EDT --- ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhq17020593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:51 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhtX8020674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:55 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 21 21:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812212143.mBLLhscX020638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-12-21 16:43:53 EDT --- [This is a simplified version of the message sent to every package maintainer that ships TTF/OTF/Type1 fonts in Fedora.] Our font packaging guidelines have now changed. New font package submissions must now be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/fontpackages ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) has been submitted for FPC and FESCO approval today. The new templates should make the creation of font packages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager in fedora-devel and can serve as examples: ? abyssinica-fonts ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? nafees-web-naskh-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts The new spec templates have been designed to be easy to update to from the previous guidelines, and to remove complexity from font packages. To help new package creation the fontpackages-devel package has been made available in Fedora 9 and 10. If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 03:59:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:59:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220359.mBM3xo1w029238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cchance at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-21 22:59:48 EDT --- Can you test the latest build in rahide when you have time, Caius? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 05:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:39:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477127] RFE: Disable most language packs by default In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220539.mBM5dSdq011930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477127 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477127] RFE: Disable most language packs by default In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220628.mBM6SI98019320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477127 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-12-22 01:28:17 EDT --- I think and petition again that langpacks be subpackaged and not all installed. There really is no reason why all users are forced to download the full set of langpacks. For F11 I want to make a yum langpacks plugin should take care of getting langpacks installed automatically for a particular language - so then the previous argument against subpackaging that the user's langpack might not get installed would no longer hold. Please do consider this again for F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220633.mBM6XhCD002707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cchance at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #11 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-22 01:33:42 EDT --- It worked on my rawhide (F10 + yum update to rawhide), on 22 Dec 2008. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477579] New: iok should default to map of current locale Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok should default to map of current locale https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477579 Summary: iok should default to map of current locale Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: iok currently defaults to "English" irrespective of the locale. It should default to the map of the current locale if it exists. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.9 Steps to Reproduce: 1. LANG=hi_IN.UTF-8 iok Actual results: starts up in English Expected results: should default to Hindi map. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:46:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477581] New: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477581 Summary: iok should avoid resizing when changing maps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When one switching keyboard map iok tends to change size a fair bit. It would be better if it allowed for the character size and avoided resizing itself as far as possible. Steps to Reproduce: 1. run iok and switch map Actual results: window resizes each time map is changed Expected results: window size to stay fixed. Additional info: I know some Lohit fonts for example are larger than others, but at least should try to avoid resizing when switching between English and Indic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477583] New: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477583 Summary: add Alt, Esc, Fn, etc to iok Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: iok is currently missing Alt, Esc and Fn function keys: feel it would be good to add them. It could also be configurable if some people feel that not all users need them in India. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:54:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220654.mBM6s2Es022840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 06:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812220652.mBM6qf8q022760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 11:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 06:55:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221155.mBMBtfZU007137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #327320|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-22 06:55:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327634) Patch created against glibc devel branch This patch will modify i18n CTYPE, as i18n CTYPE has Indic matra characters in punct group, it will solve that problem, also it will add outdigit class in all indic locale -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 16:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812221603.mBMG3rf3020411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 11:03:52 EDT --- In reply to comment #11. It worked with SCIM? Or without? Or both? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 22:25:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] New: libchewing multilib conflict Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libchewing multilib conflict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 Summary: libchewing multilib conflict Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: libchewing AssignedTo: dchen at redhat.com ReportedBy: phil at fifi.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: dchen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: yum install libchewing.i386 libchewing.x86_64 yeilds: file /usr/share/chewing/fonetree.dat from install of libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10.x86_64 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libchewing-0.3.2-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 23:33:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222333.mBMNX53s017903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #13 from Caius CHANCE 2008-12-22 18:33:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) Both. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 23:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222347.mBMNlNWs004533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state. Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 22 23:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812222347.mBMNlLCo004497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-12-22 18:47:21 EDT --- Excellent. I am going to go ahead and close this then... Feel free to reopen if it happens again or file a new bug. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 07:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230725.mBN7P0VV018183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #3 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-12-23 02:25:00 EDT --- Fixed. /usr/share/chewing/fonetree.dat is moved to %{_libdir}/chewing Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 07:24:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230724.mBN7OaJF018141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-23 02:24:36 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 23 07:24:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 02:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812230724.mBN7OVGC032665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-23 02:24:31 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241843.mBOIhZCf002504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:43:34 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update libchewing'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11767 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 24 18:42:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812241842.mBOIgc70002342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-24 13:42:38 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libchewing'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11762 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 06:04:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 01:04:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812250604.mBP64uJc003628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2008-12-25 01:04:56 EDT --- should be fixed in sazanami-fonts-0.20040629-5.20061016.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 25 12:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 07:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] New: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Summary: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: hansgong at 126.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iBus 0.1.1.20081023 Pidgin 2.5.2-6.fc10 How reproducible: In Gnome. Steps to Reproduce: 1.install ibus, ibus-pinyin 2.open pidgin with a QQ account auto started 3.open a chat window of qq(either Qun or buddy is ok), then focus text box. 4.press key shout cuts for calling ibus pinyin input method. Actual results: ibus will not be callable in pidgin, but if you open a msn or any other protocol chat window first, it works. Expected results: ibus input method will be callable under any chat window start-up sequence. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 02:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260225.mBQ2PZvR013489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stu at nosnilmot.com, | |wtogami at redhat.com Component|ibus |pidgin AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Huang Peng 2008-12-25 21:25:34 EDT --- I also found pidgin has similar problem with SCIM. So I think it is a bug of pidgin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 03:15:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 22:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260315.mBQ3F4qt003563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 --- Comment #2 from Gong Han 2008-12-25 22:15:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I also found pidgin has similar problem with SCIM. So I think it is a bug of > pidgin. are you Chinese? As my experience, this issue doesn't exist in ubuntu 8.04. but I forget the current version of pidgin in ubuntu LTS. Chinese: ??ubuntu????????????????????xchat????????????????????xchat????????????????????? ????????????????? ????????pidgin?????pidgin ?fc10??????????????????????????bug??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 08:22:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260822.mBQ8MJ9C031649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #6 from Gong Han 2008-12-26 03:22:18 EDT --- This is a very annoying issue. I can't live with a dic which is not able to play sound. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 08:19:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812260819.mBQ8Jw7P031128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 Gong Han changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |high CC| |hansgong at 126.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:21:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477968] New: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968 Summary: Please enable translation submitting by Transifex Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: piotrdrag at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Using Transifex for translations of iok would be a good idea. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/FAQ#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3F_.28.23add-transifex.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 17:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477968] Please enable translation submitting by Transifex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261721.mBQHLX8x023324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |436824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 26 19:16:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812261916.mBQJGJAw021207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 Heiko Adams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |heiko.adams at mymail.ch --- Comment #28 from Heiko Adams 2008-12-26 14:16:17 EDT --- Installed metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10 from updates-testing but this does not solve this problem. The problem is still present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 27 07:22:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812270722.mBR7MS93024923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-27 02:22:27 EDT --- iok-1.0.9-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iok-1.0.9-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 13:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 08:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301305.mBUD5fBS013039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #2 from Ravi Chandra 2008-12-30 08:05:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327959) The screen shot of the problematic telugu script See the attached jpeg image to know why the problem occurs. Seems to be appearing when the user types consonant+consonant+^ key combination....... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 16:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301650.mBUGoX9f020705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #17 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-30 11:50:31 EDT --- I've applied the patch to the upstream cvs. It'll be in the next rawhide build. This means all these similar BZs opened can then be closed, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 17:07:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:07:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812301707.mBUH78ea007320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Ulrich Drepper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |drepper at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 23:07:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-30 12:07:07 EDT --- Pravin, is this assertion correct? If yes, this should be an easy fix, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302340.mBUNegHJ002622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-12-30 18:40:41 EDT --- iok-1.0.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 30 23:40:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475818] iok menu entry does not follow GNOME HIG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812302340.mBUNeiwF002646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475818 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 03:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:33:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] New: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Summary: Translated to Brazilian Portuguese Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: taylonsilva at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Translated to Brazilian Portuguese. The .po file is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 03:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:34:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] Translated to Brazilian Portuguese In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310334.mBV3YKY9009517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 --- Comment #1 from Taylon 2008-12-30 22:34:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=327989) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=327989) Brazilian portuguese translation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] Translated to Brazilian Portuguese In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310513.mBV5DTQY008073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Parag 2008-12-31 00:13:28 EDT --- thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:34:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310534.mBV5Yc1E011087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:34:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > I've applied the patch to the upstream cvs. It'll be in the next rawhide > build. This means all these similar BZs opened can then be closed, right? Yes :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:41:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310541.mBV5fCqZ012498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #20 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:41:10 EDT --- *** Bug 473898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:41:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473898] [kn_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Kannada characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310541.mBV5fBcH012473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473898 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:41:10 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310540.mBV5e9Ob029808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:40:07 EDT --- *** Bug 473888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:40:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473888] [mr_IN] [hi_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Devanagari characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310540.mBV5e8Xn029779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473888 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:40:07 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:41:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474105] [or_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for oriya characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310541.mBV5fvLq012657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474105 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:41:56 EDT --- Thanks Manoj for your inputs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310543.mBV5h4LZ030280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #21 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:43:02 EDT --- *** Bug 474105 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:45:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310545.mBV5jt4j031038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #24 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT --- *** Bug 474119 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310544.mBV5ilqN030573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #23 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:44:45 EDT --- *** Bug 474117 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:43:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310543.mBV5hmdm030428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #22 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:43:47 EDT --- *** Bug 474107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:43:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474105] [or_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for oriya characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310543.mBV5h2wI030251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474105 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:43:02 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474119] [pa_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for gurumukhi characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310545.mBV5jsw0031009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474119 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:45:54 EDT --- This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:48:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474127] [ta_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for tamil characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310548.mBV5mwgO031667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474127 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT --- Felix Thanks for your input This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 feel free to reopen if any problem *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:47:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310547.mBV5lW0x031473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #25 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT --- *** Bug 474124 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:48:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310548.mBV5mxi1031699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #26 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:48:57 EDT --- *** Bug 474127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 05:47:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474124] [ml_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for malayalam characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310547.mBV5lVdP031440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474124 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 00:47:31 EDT --- Thanks for you input This bug was opened for language specific information and testing, all the work and discussion happened on bug 466912, patch is now upstreamed. closing as a duplicate of 466912 feel free to reopen if any problem *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 466912 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 06:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:00:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310600.mBV60OAU015836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #27 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 01:00:24 EDT --- Thanks for making patch upstream. feel free to reopen if any problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 09:35:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310935.mBV9ZcJT017682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 04:35:27 EDT --- sorry, i was waiting for foss.in collation workout, thought will get some more inputs there and then will fix it together. its over and no more inputs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 09:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812310946.mBV9kSKn004721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2008-12-31 04:46:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328000) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328000) patch created against glibc devel branch for Gujarati Collation fix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 31 14:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:58:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200812311458.mBVEwVT5029224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 --- Comment #6 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-12-31 09:58:31 EDT --- Patch is applied upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.