From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov  1 14:25:49 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:25:49 -0400
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811011425.mA1EPn3A002661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #38 from Baif <baif at pogolinux.com.cn>  2008-11-01 10:25:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #37)
> I'm afraid the part of the above config doesn't do the right thing what you
> said at least. "not_eq" affects all of fonts except you explicitly described
> there. it exactly overrides the global settings, regardless of whether or not
> the result is same. fontconfig config that the font package owns should have
> its specific config only. otherwise it should be modified in one fontconfig
> has.

Yes... You're right.
Because I don't know why without  the "not_eq"-s the rest of configs do NOT
work... 
I had mail the config to Caius Carlos CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>, hope he
could get it work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  2 01:59:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:59:21 -0400
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811020159.mA21xLhm001839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail |
                   |.com)                       |




--- Comment #24 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com>  2008-11-01 21:59:20 EDT ---
i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I
am still waiting for  a reply

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 05:28:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 00:28:24 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
In-Reply-To: <bug-468193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811030528.mA35SOTV015169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|UPSTREAM                    |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 00:28:23 EDT ---
So is it fixed in current rawhide now?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 06:16:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:16:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468985] scim-sayura require double space to
 enter space inbetween word
In-Reply-To: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811030616.mA36GusC000685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468985





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 01:16:55 EDT ---
I think it is fine to push sayura to f9 and let it obsolete scim-sinhala if you
like.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 07:50:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 02:50:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468193] Chinese fonts have changed file name
In-Reply-To: <bug-468193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811030750.mA37oYMB003109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468193





--- Comment #7 from Qiao <29551030 at qq.com>  2008-11-03 02:50:34 EDT ---
Yes, it have fixed and I test OK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 10:58:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:58:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811031058.mA3AwYIb005608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #3 from Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 05:58:33 EDT ---
Actually it would be brilliant to be able to use the Postscript Type 1 font in
/usr/share/cups/fonts/Courier* for this, but I'm not sure what is needed to
make that happen.

Obviously it won't have a complete UTF-8 glyph set, but with correct fontconfig
configuration I expect it will fall back to Nimbus Mono L/Liberation Mono for
those glyphs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 15:36:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:36:43 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811031536.mA3FahgA027897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Denis Dzyubenko <denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com




--- Comment #11 from Denis Dzyubenko <denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com>  2008-11-03 10:36:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Qt does load the input method plugin lazily when the focus moves to the input
widget first time.

Also, the original problem mentions a crash:

> Also 
> clicking exit on the scim icon owned by root (my guess) causes plasma and many 
> apps in KDE to crash.

That sounds like the application uses scim instead of scim-bridge. At least I
can reproduce a crash when using scim and closing the scim-panel tray icon, but
that doesn't happen with scim-bridge.

So it needs to be checked if qt applications use the same input method - it
might be that kdm uses scim and other qt apps use scim-bridge which might
explain multiple instances of scim.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov  3 23:53:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:53:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811032353.mA3NrUvP020412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #39 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 18:53:29 EDT ---
AFAIK, cjkunifonts shouldn't use any not_eq in its .conf file because this
might probably overrides global settings. The global settings are managed as
whole but not this package. Even it tested working we aren't appropriate to
include. Cheers.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 00:05:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:05:45 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040005.mA405jC6032222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626





--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 19:05:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Do not suggest that. it will breaks KDE preference. for F-9, you could just
> have "export GTK_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge" under /etc/kde/env/ for a workaround.
> it will be evaluated after xinput.sh and before bringing up KDE.

Why isn't xinput.sh sufficient for this in F9 currently?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 00:03:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:03:45 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040003.mA403j3u031668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |
         AssignedTo|than at redhat.com             |cchance at redhat.com




--- Comment #40 from Caius CHANCE <cchance at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 19:03:44 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=322378)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322378)
Modified .conf from Baif's.

(Reopened for Baif's proposed .conf)

I have slightly modified Baif's proposed .conf to using only "eq". This might
be able to reduce effects to global settings.

Welcome for more discussion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 01:33:26 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 20:33:26 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040133.mA41XQKU013179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626





--- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 20:33:25 EDT ---
Because that workaround is just needed for KDE only. modifying xinput.sh itself
affects to others and there are no way to know which desktop is currently
running.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 01:36:35 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 20:36:35 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040136.mA41aZrg013751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626





--- Comment #14 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-03 20:36:35 EDT ---
We do the similar thing for F-10, FYI.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 07:10:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:10:24 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040710.mA47AOjZ032557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #41 from Baif <baif at pogolinux.com.cn>  2008-11-04 02:10:24 EDT ---
I found it's not easy make all happy...

For QT4/KDE4 with my config in LANG=en_US.UTF8 on my PC, English fonts look
fine  , Chinese fonts look fine. But if the "not_eq"s have gone, the English
fonts would NOT with antialias, but why the GTK/GNOME apps would get the fonts
to be with "antialias"? 

It looks that the config does not effect the GTK/GNOME apps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 07:37:17 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 02:37:17 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040737.mA47bHwX003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680





--- Comment #42 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 02:37:16 EDT ---
Do you mean you think it is a Pango bug?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:00:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:00:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 112878] Munhwa CID-keyed fonts are not
	included
In-Reply-To: <bug-112878-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-112878-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040800.mA480CXc028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=112878


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DEFERRED
               Flag|needinfo?(jshin at i18nl10n.co |
                   |m)                          |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:13:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:13:45 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040813.mA48Dj44030576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail
                   |                            |.com)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:27:28 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:27:28 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt ignores QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040827.mA48RSqM011090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org,
                   |                            |rdieter at math.unl.edu,
                   |                            |than at redhat.com
          Component|imsettings                  |qt
             Blocks|                            |438943
         AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com            |than at redhat.com
            Summary|imsettings always starts    |Qt ignores QT_IM_MODULE
                   |input method in KDE         |
               Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 03:27:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> to clarify the issue, does scim work on apps?

Ah no, not in locale where it should not be running by default.


It seems qt now ignores QT_IM_MODULE so reassigning to qt.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov  4 08:57:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:57:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811040857.mA48v9xx016507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Qt ignores QT_IM_MODULE     |Qt always loads immodule
                   |                            |irrespective of
                   |                            |QT_IM_MODULE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:35:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:35:08 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469555] Gettext-devel depends on CVS
In-Reply-To: <bug-469555-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469555-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050035.mA50Z8Dr002550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469555


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 19:35:08 EDT ---
Ah that is for autopoint which moved to the base package.

Fixed in cvs so next build should get it.

Thanks for spotting and reporting it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:46:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:46:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
In-Reply-To: <bug-467016-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467016-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050046.mA50ki9h025995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:50:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:50:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050050.mA50oCqr004896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gbcox at bzb.us




--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 19:50:10 EDT ---
*** Bug 469515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:53:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:53:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050053.mA50rci2005572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|457635                      |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:51:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:51:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050051.mA50puTx005350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |457626




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:51:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:51:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050051.mA50psju005311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |468814




--- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 19:51:54 EDT ---
This is bug 468814 (rawhide) for F9.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 00:57:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:57:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467016] Dead keys are not rcognized as such
In-Reply-To: <bug-467016-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467016-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050057.mA50vDZc006548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467016





--- Comment #23 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-04 19:57:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Given comment 12 I don't know why you are blaming scim which hasn't really
> changed for f10: xorg-x11 or possibly imsettings sound more plausible suspects,
> but anyway...

I have my reasons to believe that it is not xorg-x11* (with possible exception
of XIM) but it might be imsettings -- difference between *im* tools is slightly
blurry for me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 06:26:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 01:26:18 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050626.mA56QIZr023045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 01:26:17 EDT ---
Tested this the other day: rpmlint is clean, but I can't get the font to render
default for ja on the desktop when I remove other Japanese fonts.  (Tagoh
mentioned some update to the font .conf file is needed.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 07:16:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:16:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050716.mA57G7Qo019788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 02:16:07 EDT ---
I don't know how you tested it though, this is a Mincho typeface, which is
similar to serif. so usually you don't see that on the desktop by default so
that most applications defaults sans-serif or monospace.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 08:29:49 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:29:49 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050829.mA58TniI029995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 03:29:48 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=322539)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322539)
a proposal patch

Tested an attached patch with the follow:

1. run kwrite with QT_IM_MODULE= XMODIFIERS=@im=none
2. run kwrite with QT_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge XMODIFIERS=@im=none
3. run kwrite with QT_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=none
4. run kwrite with QT_IM_MODULE=xim XMODIFIERS=@im=SCIM

the behavior of 1 is unpredictable though, it seems Qt uses xim and no IM works
as expected. 2, 3 and 4 works as expected. particularly in 2, the candidate
window exactly follows current position to appear, which is impossible with
XIM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 08:37:33 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:37:33 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050837.mA58bXq0031372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-05 03:37:32 EDT ---
I don't see how that patch helps, it only changes the fallback if QT_IM_MODULE
is not set, it doesn't change anything at all if QT_IM_MODULE is set. So it
looks clearly wrong to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 08:53:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:53:18 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050853.mA58rIO5001385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 03:53:17 EDT ---
No, in current code, it's set the value to QSettings with the different
namespace. so what Qt widgets is supposed to read immodule setting wasn't what
people expected with QT_IM_MODULE to use.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 08:57:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 03:57:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050857.mA58vFos002221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 03:57:14 EDT ---
FWIW case 1 in comment #4 isn't actually meaningful to confirm the fix for this
bug. sorry for confusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 09:27:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:27:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] Qt always loads immodule
	irrespective of QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050927.mA59RU4I018893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 04:27:29 EDT ---
Oh, wait. you're right. it's false alarm. need to investigate more.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 09:26:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:26:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050926.mA59Qsx6007838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
            Summary|Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya |[or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ
                   |font                        |for Oriya Inscript keymap




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 09:49:04 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:49:04 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811050949.mA59n4t8022584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|m17n-db                     |m17n-contrib
          QAContact|eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com    |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 10:11:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:11:41 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051011.mA5ABfob026953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Qt always loads immodule    |immodule selection behavior
                   |irrespective of             |is unpredictable without
                   |QT_IM_MODULE                |QT_IM_MODULE




--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 05:11:40 EDT ---
I was a bit confused. well, the patch itself isn't wrong since Qt selected xim
without QT_IM_MODULE on even Qt3 with immodule patch, also it looks like it's
supposed to work so. in the latest tree, imsettings is set an empty to
QT_IM_MODULE when IM is disabled so that it was predictable. but it seems not.
so I'd say it's still worth fixing Qt for the default behavior.

As I've tested some cases, it looks good when explicitly set QT_IM_MODULE such
as:

1. only install scim-bridge-qt and run qt apps with QT_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge.
2. install uim-qt too and run qt apps with QT_IM_MODULE=scim-bridge and
QT_IM_MODULE=uim.

So updating the summary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 10:27:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:27:03 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051027.mA5AR3xP018983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Denis Dzyubenko <denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com




--- Comment #10 from Denis Dzyubenko <denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com>  2008-11-05 05:27:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=322539)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322539) [details]
> a proposal patch

Yep. Similar patch has already been applied to qt-4.5. See task
http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=207426

> Tested an attached patch with the follow:
> 
> 1. run kwrite with QT_IM_MODULE= XMODIFIERS=@im=none
> 
> the behavior of 1 is unpredictable though, it seems Qt uses xim and no IM works
> as expected.

I am not sure I can see the problem - what do you think should be the expected
behavior in this case? As for me falling back to xim make sense for me - in
this case complex input methods (like SCIM) won't be used but Compose key will
still work.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 10:40:19 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 05:40:19 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051040.mA5AeJSI021422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748





--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-05 05:40:18 EDT ---
m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 11:18:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 06:18:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051118.mA5BIooi028607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-05 06:18:50 EDT ---
agreed. when no QT_IM_MODULE is set, defaulting xim sounds reasonable to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov  5 15:35:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 10:35:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was
 disabled by uming fontconfig file.
In-Reply-To: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459680-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811051535.mA5FZovk017675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680


Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |baifcc at hotmail.com




--- Comment #43 from Baif <baifcc at hotmail.com>  2008-11-05 10:35:48 EDT ---
I'm not really understand the fontconfig with Pango and Qt.
But I think the default settings for Qt/KDE on Fedora is not as good as for
GTK/GNOME. And I really understand international for Qt is not as good as GTK.
:)

BTW: Why fonts for Qt/KDE with LANG=zh_CN.UTF8 had been change, which config
file will make this happen? Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 03:20:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:20:45 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811060320.mA63KjfU020103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 05:15:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 00:15:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811060515.mA65FYWN004869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 00:15:33 EDT ---
Qt/KDE guru, is this the expected behavior?

# ps -efww | grep qt
tagoh    28361 28219  9 13:45 pts/5    00:00:00 qtconfig-qt4
# lsof -p 28361 | grep inputmethods
qtconfig- 28361 tagoh  mem    REG      253,0    20924  819236
/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/inputmethods/libqimsw-multi.so
qtconfig- 28361 tagoh  mem    REG      253,0   106884  823166
/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/inputmethods/im-scim-bridge.so
qtconfig- 28361 tagoh  mem    REG      253,0    81208  823928
/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/inputmethods/libibus.so
qtconfig- 28361 tagoh  mem    REG      253,0   144476  822392
/usr/lib/qt4/plugins/inputmethods/libuiminputcontextplugin.so

QT_IM_MODULE has ibus at this moment. I expected to see libqimsw-multi.so and
libibus.so only there though. that might explains why we will see multiple scim
instance and scim process even though it's not a default IM.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 12:21:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:21:42 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061221.mA6CLgV7017682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #13 from Denis Dzyubenko <denis.dzyubenko at nokia.com>  2008-11-06 07:21:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> QT_IM_MODULE has ibus at this moment. I expected to see libqimsw-multi.so and
> libibus.so only there though. that might explains why we will see multiple scim
> instance and scim process even though it's not a default IM.

ah, you are right. Yesterday I've got a link describing this problem with a
patch to solve it: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398526#c5
Hopefully, this should be fixed for Qt 4.5.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 12:32:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:32:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061232.mA6CWUm2015094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-06 07:32:29 EDT ---
I think we should ship that patch in the Fedora qt package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 12:34:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:34:43 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061234.mA6CYhTH015354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 07:34:43 EDT ---
agreed. it would be really nice if we can get that issue fixed in Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:37:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:37:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061337.mA6Dbo9w027615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Bug 457626 depends on bug 468814, which changed state.

Bug 468814 Summary: immodule selection behavior is unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:37:48 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:37:48 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061337.mA6DbmNf027528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Ngo Than <than at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




--- Comment #16 from Ngo Than <than at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 08:37:47 EDT ---
it's fixed in qt-4_4_3-2_fc10. thanks

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:46:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:46:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061346.mA6DkCnn000588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:46:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:46:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061346.mA6DkF50000683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Bug 457626 depends on bug 468814, which changed state.

Bug 468814 Summary: immodule selection behavior is unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:47:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:47:11 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061347.mA6DlBHa029190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




--- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org>  2008-11-06 08:47:10 EDT ---
Always the usual: it should only be closed if it gets tagged f10-final.
Moreover, I think we should also push at least a F9 update. (Not sure about
F8.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:53:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:53:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061353.mA6DrooW002232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #18 from Ngo Than <than at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 08:53:49 EDT ---
as i know the problem does not show up in F8, so it doesn't make sense to push
a F8 update. We will do for F9-update too

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov  6 13:59:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:59:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811061359.mA6DxDsn003445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Ngo Than <than at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




--- Comment #16 from Ngo Than <than at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 08:59:12 EDT ---
it's fixed in qt-4_4_3-2_fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 00:24:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:24:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to
	im-xim.so
In-Reply-To: <bug-452938-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452938-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070024.mA70O75W024017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 19:24:06 EDT ---
I tested again and it still works for me.  Here is what I did:

1) install F10-Preview or rawhide x86_64
2) boot, login, and turn on scim with im-chooser
3) yum remove gedit.x86_64
4) yum install gedit.i386 (note scim-bridge-gtk.i386 is not installed)
5) run gedit and try to use scim (can't use xim)
6) sed -i -e s/"ko:ja:th:zh"/"*"/ /etc/gtk-2.0/*/gtk.immodules
7) run gedit again (xim works for scim)

(7) seems an improvement on (5)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:53:45 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:53:45 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468817] update libhangul to 0.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070253.mA72rjjR014643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468817


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-06 21:53:44 EDT ---
Reopen to modified since this will be an F10 update.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:54:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468817] update libhangul to 0.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72soQM012648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468817





--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-06 21:54:50 EDT ---
libhangul-0.0.8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libhangul-0.0.8-2.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 02:54:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:54:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468817] update libhangul to 0.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070254.mA72sDqD012531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468817


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 09:05:53 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 04:05:53 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811070905.mA795r91008527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pnemade at redhat.com




--- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-07 04:05:51 EDT ---
*** Bug 470162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 13:55:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:55:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811071355.mA7Dt6TT031565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-07 08:55:05 EDT ---
testing package available on http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/tests/469325/

"Courier" as the font name is used for texttopaps in this testing package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov  7 14:25:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:25:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459698] [ml_IN] Obsolete Malayalam patches
 in libicu-3.8.1-7.fc9
In-Reply-To: <bug-459698-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-459698-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811071425.mA7EPFGt008891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459698


Caolan McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov  8 00:38:17 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:38:17 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup -
 Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
In-Reply-To: <bug-446814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-446814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811080038.mA80cHmP020284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com)




--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2008-11-07 19:38:16 EDT ---
So its been over four months since I made my comments with no response.  I will
close this ticket soon if there is no further progress.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov  8 06:01:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:01:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466410] move ibus .engine files to m17n
In-Reply-To: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811080601.mA861wP9002439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466410





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-08 01:01:57 EDT ---
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9,m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9,m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov  8 06:02:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:02:00 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811080602.mA8620lU002465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748





--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-08 01:02:00 EDT ---
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9,m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9 has
been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9,m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9,m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 00:22:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:22:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090022.mA90MU65002860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-08 19:22:30 EDT ---
qt-4.4.3-2.fc10 looks good to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 00:23:26 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:23:26 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811090023.mA90NQ3V002917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-08 19:23:26 EDT ---
(package has been tagged f10-final now)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 15:24:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:24:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091524.mA9FOUMS007348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 10:24:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> i have mailed upstream since i am not a direct contributer to olpc . Anyways I
> am still waiting for  a reply

Please do not wait for OLPC to respond. Our packaging standards are higher than
theirs, any any font package that passed Fedora review will just the OLPC
package next time they rebase on a new Fedora version.

Just do the requested fixes, so we can have a clean Fedora package OLPC can be
referred to.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:00:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:00:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091600.mA9G09xM012465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814





--- Comment #22 from Gerald Cox <gbcox at bzb.us>  2008-11-09 11:00:08 EDT ---
Updated to qt-4.4.3-2.fc10 - my issue with duplicate SCIM icons has been
resolved.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:05:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:41 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G5fUV021427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #28 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:05:40 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323015)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323015)
font config configuration

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:05:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:05:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091605.mA9G564s021221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #27 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:05:05 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323014)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014)
spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 16:03:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:03:57 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811091603.mA9G3v3d020800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |alsadi at ojuba.org




--- Comment #26 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-09 11:03:56 EDT ---
Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora
as my first fedora package

we need 3 font packages
1. KACST
2. core
3. decorative
http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot
as you case see they are already split by upstream 
http://cvs.arabeyes.org/viewcvs/art/khotot/

KACST is not developed by Arabeyes thus they need its own super package
while core and decorative should be two subpackages of the same package

the core fonts are missing the best font which is simplified naskhi, which can
be downloaded from Araveyes fonts team leader and the designer of the fonts

http://www.khaledhosny.org/filebrowser

KACST's fonts are released under GPLv1
the decorative fonts are GPLv2 and the core fonts are OFL licensed

I'll attach my .spec file

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:22:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:22:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468618] A bit over-enthusiastic splitting
In-Reply-To: <bug-468618-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468618-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092122.mA9LMCDp027122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468618





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:22:12 EDT ---
BTW if the problem is that the current macros used in this package want to take
a single font file as argument, then the subpackaging macro I wrote in dejavu
yesterday could be used instead.

I must admit I was thinking very hard about the un font packages when I wrote
them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:27:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:27:01 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092127.mA9LR1k9027786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:56:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:56:40 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092156.mA9LueQB007118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |besfahbo at redhat.com,
                   |                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com)




--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:56:39 EDT ---
Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass

1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
you still need spot to approve it and put it on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
referenced in release notes

(a wiki page template is available there
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_description_template )

3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
fonts should be in the 65-69 range
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists

Of course Behdad has the last say on this, so if you convince him to ok it I'll
let this pass.

4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).

5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
serif fonts to complete HanaMin
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names

6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in
their next release once you're happy with it

7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9

8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755)

9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same
order as in rpmdevtool's  spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it,
just take it into account for your next font package)

All in all this was a pleasant spec file to review and I'll have no problem
approving it once those little problems are taken care of

? NEEDINFO in the meanwhile

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 21:59:52 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 16:59:52 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from
	Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092159.mA9Lxqot032656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #29 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-09 16:59:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Created an attachment (id=323014)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323014) [details]
> spec file for arabeyes-fonts superpackage

Alsadi, as I stated on the list (and in this review) we do not do superpackages
in Fedora, so if you want to propose spec files you need to propose one spec
per font (ie 3 spec files), not a single spec that packages three different
upstream archives in one go

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov  9 23:12:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:12:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to
	im-xim.so
In-Reply-To: <bug-452938-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452938-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811092312.mA9NC7Iv020275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938





--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-09 18:12:05 EDT ---
I forgot to say that step (4) requires adding a i386 repo but any i386 gtk app
that supports immodules should be ok (ie not gtk-demo;).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 02:39:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 21:39:05 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100239.mAA2d5lJ024335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|tcallawa at redhat.com         |




--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-09 21:39:05 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Since nobody bites, I'll take this. First review pass
> 
> 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
> you still need spot to approve it and put it on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

See this
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 03:47:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:47:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 470760] update from F9 to F10 does not
 update scim-bridge package
In-Reply-To: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100347.mAA3lFEZ004519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470760


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |438943




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 03:46:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 22:46:42 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 470760] New: update from F9 to F10 does not
 update scim-bridge package
Message-ID: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: update from F9 to F10 does not update scim-bridge package

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470760

           Summary: update from F9 to F10 does not update scim-bridge
                    package
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: scim-bridge
        AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang at gmail.com
        ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, shawn.p.huang at gmail.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
updated syustem from F9 with updates applied to F10 rawhide.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.update scim-bridge package on F9 system to F10
2.
3.

Actual results:
scim-bridge should not be updated from scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9 to
scim-bridge-0.4.15-7.fc10

Expected results:
scim-bridge should be updated from scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9 to
scim-bridge-0.4.15-7.fc10

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 05:12:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:12:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100512.mAA5C9Jg021427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) |




--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 00:12:08 EDT ---
Thank you for taking a review for this package.

(In reply to comment #3)
> 1. you're packaging a font with a new license. While at first view it seems ok,
> you still need spot to approve it and put it on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts

I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe
License tag -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

> 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
> referenced in release notes

Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font

> 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
> fonts should be in the 65-69 range
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists
> 
> 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
> probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).

I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for
Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's
the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if
someone could helps me.

> 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
> serif fonts to complete HanaMin
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names

Fixed in the updated package.

> 6. please send your fontconfig file to hanazano upstream so it's included in
> their next release once you're happy with it

Sure.

> 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9

Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
hereafter?

> 8. please use the defattr suggested by guidelines %defattr(644,root,root,755)

Sorry, missed one. fixed.

> 9. it's a little easier to review a package when the fields are in the same
> order as in rpmdevtool's  spectemplate-fonts.spec (cosmetic, you can ignore it,
> just take it into account for your next font package)

Oh, wasn't aware of that. improved a bit in:

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 07:18:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:18:46 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100718.mAA7IkPX001710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(twaugh at redhat.com
                   |                            |)




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 08:20:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:20:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100820.mAA8KiTb012603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com)




--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 03:20:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)

> I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to describe
> License tag -
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html

If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts
use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway

> > 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> > and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
> > referenced in release notes
> 
> Just created: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font

Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I
must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake)

> > 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines states CJK
> > fonts should be in the 65-69 range
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists
> > 
> > 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
> > probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).
> 
> I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for
> Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's
> the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if
> someone could helps me.

Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff.

> > 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows it should use
> > serif fonts to complete HanaMin
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names
> 
> Fixed in the updated package.

Nope, the rule I referenced would have been

<alias>
  <family>HanaMin</family>
  <default>
    <family>serif</family>
  </default>
</alias>

The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
test.

The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after 
conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
before, so you can't use both in the same file :p

Thus I'd advise to
1. keep your original rule
2. add the one I just wrote
3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
4. test test test

> > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9
> 
> Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
> hereafter?

It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
Fedora 8 in un-supported.

> Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
> SRPM URL:
> http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-2.fc9.src.rpm

Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 09:44:28 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:44:28 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468814] immodule selection behavior is
 unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
In-Reply-To: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100944.mAA9iSct004943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814


Ngo Than <than at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 09:44:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:44:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100944.mAA9iUak005033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Bug 457626 depends on bug 468814, which changed state.

Bug 468814 Summary: immodule selection behavior is unpredictable without QT_IM_MODULE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468814

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 09:43:32 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:43:32 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811100943.mAA9hW0C028164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626





--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-10 04:43:31 EDT ---
qt-4.4.3-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt-4.4.3-2.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 11:47:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:47:16 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] some web-page rendering is broken
In-Reply-To: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101147.mAABlGoU027764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |stransky at redhat.com
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |




--- Comment #12 from Parag <pnemade at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 06:47:15 EDT ---
can we have this bug fixed in new xulrunner package built for F9 and F10
updates?
SRPM is available at
http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/firefox-3.0.x/xulrunner-1.9.0.2-6.fc10.src.rpm

I did koji scratch build also but not sure why it failed for x86_64 arch.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=924216

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 11:52:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:52:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101152.mAABqceS019543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) |




--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 06:52:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Nope, the rule I referenced would have been
> 
> <alias>
>   <family>HanaMin</family>
>   <default>
>     <family>serif</family>
>   </default>
> </alias>
> 
> The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
> test.

Doh, just referred the wrong thing.. :(

> The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after 
> conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
> before, so you can't use both in the same file :p

Ah, ok.

> Thus I'd advise to
> 1. keep your original rule
> 2. add the one I just wrote
> 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> 4. test test test

Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.

> 
> > > 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9
> > 
> > Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
> > hereafter?
> 
> It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
> Fedora 8 in un-supported.

I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
because it's going to be EOL'd soon. BTW just noticed that I can't see any
annotations on the template page. I had to do the view source to see. dunno if
it's a problem on my browser, or mediawiki's bug.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 12:16:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:16:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811101216.mAACGUe9001289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-10 07:16:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> > Thus I'd advise to
> > 1. keep your original rule
> > 2. add the one I just wrote
> > 3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
> > 4. test test test
> 
> Hmm, that seems not working. Sazanami Mincho is still used for Serif somehow.

Then does it work with 65? I thought I understood how fontconfig worked, but
maybe I'm just another confused user

> I meant in template file :) Though it may be not worth taking an effort for you
> because it's going to be EOL'd soon.

I'm rewriting all the templates anyway because of the number of multi-font
packages we've had to process lately

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 20:12:04 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 15:12:04 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433574] [non-English] ediff chokes on files
	with no final EOL
In-Reply-To: <bug-433574-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-433574-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811102012.mAAKC4lt024178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433574


Tom Coughlan <coughlan at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|coughlan at redhat.com         |dnovotny at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 10 23:02:25 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:02:25 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 465214] emacs should disable XIM by default
In-Reply-To: <bug-465214-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-465214-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811102302.mAAN2PU0001810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465214


Tom Coughlan <coughlan at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|coughlan at redhat.com         |
         AssignedTo|coughlan at redhat.com         |dnovotny at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 00:47:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:47:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request:
	arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110047.mAB0luuw008379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |Thabit-fonts from           |arabeyes-thabit-fonts
                   |Arabeyes.org                |




--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 19:47:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Hi, I have FAS account and I would love to co-maintain this package for fedora
> as my first fedora package

Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package.

> we need 3 font packages
> 1. KACST

kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 01:25:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:25:20 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 470760] update from F9 to F10 does not
 update scim-bridge package
In-Reply-To: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110125.mAB1PK6m014425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470760


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 20:25:19 EDT ---
spot already built an update and requested tagging.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=69078
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1017

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 04:00:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 23:00:21 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] some web-page rendering is broken
In-Reply-To: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110400.mAB40LgY017789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865





--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-10 23:00:21 EDT ---
Yes it would be very good to have this patch for fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 05:13:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:13:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 187090] scim-m17n needs to provide an ASCII
	input mode
In-Reply-To: <bug-187090-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-187090-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110513.mAB5DYWA029398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187090


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DEFERRED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 05:35:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:35:41 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110535.mAB5ZfAI022371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 00:35:41 EDT ---
This only seems to affect anaconda, so I don't see why this should be a
fontconfig issue.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 05:36:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:36:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110536.mAB5ac3G000543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anaconda-maint-list at redhat.
                   |                            |com
          Component|fontconfig                  |anaconda
         AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com         |anaconda-maint-list at redhat.
                   |                            |com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 07:44:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:44:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 428238] Printing failed for all Indic
 languages except Malayalam and Tamil language
In-Reply-To: <bug-428238-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-428238-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110744.mAB7i9u6014736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428238


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |CURRENTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 08:19:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:19:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468964] scim-python-pinyin db file too big!
In-Reply-To: <bug-468964-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468964-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110819.mAB8Jpvs022365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468964





--- Comment #1 from Huang Peng <shawn.p.huang at gmail.com>  2008-11-11 03:19:50 EDT ---
Python pinyin has 837442 phrases in database. scim-pinyin only has 160000
phrases. It is the main reason of this problem. And python pinyin use sqlite as
data engine. sqlite uses many space for creating index. It is very useful for
performance.
So this problem can not be fixed easily. :(

BTW, I created a squashfs contain the py.db. Its size is 39M.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 08:45:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:45:31 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] some web-page rendering is broken
In-Reply-To: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811110845.mAB8jVoY004752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|medium                      |high
           Severity|medium                      |high




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 10:48:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:48:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111048.mABAmuJs021852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 13:05:47 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:05:47 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111305.mABD5lfC014398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Subhransu Behera <arya.subhransu at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co
                   |                            |m)




--- Comment #6 from Subhransu Behera <arya.subhransu at gmail.com>  2008-11-11 08:05:47 EDT ---
Hi, as per community discussions, we think it will be good to have ZWJ and ZWNJ
in position 
z/Z respectively in Inscript keymap layout.

The reason we want to go for it is because these keys are most frequently used
in English 
key-map and currently have no characters in them. It will be quite simpler for
the end user 
to use them in practice. 

Beside that, these keys are used in combination with halanth (U+0B4D), and the
current 
position of the same is 'd'. So it makes sense to have the JWZ/JWNJ in the
position of z/Z.

Can this issue be addressed and we can submit a patch for the next version?
Suggestions?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 13:20:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:20:21 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111320.mABDKLI9017776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(pnemade at redhat.co |needinfo?(mgiri at redhat.com)
                   |m)                          |




--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) <panemade at gmail.com>  2008-11-11 08:20:20 EDT ---
Thanks Subhranshu for your comment.
I would like to see comment from mgiri on issues asked by you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 13:26:04 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:26:04 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 470760] update from F9 to F10 does not
 update scim-bridge package
In-Reply-To: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-470760-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111326.mABDQ4uU029022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470760


Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa at redhat.com
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 08:26:04 EDT ---
scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc10 is tagged in f10-final.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 15:25:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:25:14 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request:
	arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811111525.mABFPERg009414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #31 from Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi at ojuba.org>  2008-11-11 10:25:13 EDT ---
> Unfortunately you have to be a packager in order to comaintain a package.
till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in
bugzilla

>> we need 3 font packages
>> 1. KACST
> kacst-fonts is already in fedora for a long time.
I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages
because we have 3 upstream packages
kacst: is from different author
while arabeyes-core and arabeyes-decorative have different license (the first
is GPLed and the second is OFL)

Nicolas Mailhot proposed that each font should be split into a different
package
so at least we need 3 different source rpms because we have three upstreams
they later can be split using some macro into final rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:10:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:10:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112310.mABNAcu7020672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Chris Lumens <clumens at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #7 from Chris Lumens <clumens at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:10:38 EDT ---
Jens - so, any idea what could be going on here?  I'm not exactly a font expert
so I'm at a bit of a loss as to what could be the cause of this problem.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:16:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:16:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 460865] [Indic] garbage Indic characters
 appearing instead of ascii
In-Reply-To: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-460865-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112316.mABNG6kV021989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460865


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |MoveUpstream
            Summary|some web-page rendering is  |[Indic] garbage Indic
                   |broken                      |characters appearing
                   |                            |instead of ascii




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:22:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:22:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request:
	arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112322.mABNMivo023481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #32 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:22:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> till I get that, I'll be pleased to help at least by attaching .spec files in bugzilla

Thanks.

> I meant to say we should have 3 separate packages
> because we have 3 upstream packages

Yep I think we all agree on this. :)

> they later can be split using some macro into final rpm

I think Nicolas was probably talking about subpackaging of upstream packages
when they provide multiple fonts/faces, yes.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:26:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:26:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112326.mABNQ7Ua003191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 18:26:06 EDT ---
I guess pango is not seeing the locale information somehow so it doesn't know
what CJK font to choose.

As I recall this regression started happening (very roughly) a week or more
before this bug was filed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 11 23:46:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:46:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452849] [xim] successively speedy Input ->
	freeze
In-Reply-To: <bug-452849-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-452849-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811112346.mABNkikw007636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452849





--- Comment #40 from James Ralston <ralston at pobox.com>  2008-11-11 18:46:41 EDT ---
Since I updated to libgxim-0.3.1-1.fc10 and imsettings-0.105.1-1.fc10, I
haven't been able to get Emacs to hang.

sangu, are you still seeing hangs?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 03:00:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:00:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120300.mAC30o5u003990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA




--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-11 22:00:50 EDT ---
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9, m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9, m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9
has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ibus-m17n m17n-contrib
m17n-db'.  You can provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9603

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 03:47:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:47:05 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120347.mAC3l5UU024506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-11 22:47:04 EDT ---
Sorry, my bad. it works after changing:

<test name="lang">
  <string>ja</string>
</test>

to:

<test name="lang" compare="contains">
  <string>ja</string>
</test>

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-3.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 07:13:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:13:20 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120713.mAC7DK3O018428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-12 02:13:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Sorry, my bad. it works after changing:
> 
> <test name="lang">
>   <string>ja</string>
> </test>
> 
> to:
> 
> <test name="lang" compare="contains">
>   <string>ja</string>
> </test>

Oh, right. didn't catch it sorry.

Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO
code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for
example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924)

(don't know if this is a big risk, I think this was a long-term fontconfig
plan, Behdad would know)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 08:03:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:03:14 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120803.mAC83EmB026627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 03:03:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Are there so many japanese locales out there you can not use the full ja-FOO
> code? Because this test will trigger on any locale that contains ja (for
> example javanese, if fontconfig ever moves to iso639-2 or iso15924)

No. maybe better testing "jp" or do you prefer ja-jp (or ja_jp? dunno) rather
than that?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 09:19:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:19:02 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811120919.mAC9J2ZR016346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #12 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-12 04:19:01 EDT ---
If there is only one japanese locale by all means just test on "ja-jp" (without
the contains bit). IIRC that was the locale format that worked for the Chinese
people.

However, as always with fontconfig, it's a good idea to test before pushing the
rules on users.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 20:55:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:55:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811122055.mACKtprC017540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #1 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2008-11-12 15:55:50 EDT ---
SRPM: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
SPEC: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.spec

make lint:
rpmlint translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
translate-toolkit.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/translate/search/indexing/test_indexers.py
0644
translate-toolkit.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/translate/convert/ical2po.py 0644
.... * 200+

>>>>I believe I can safely ignore those?

translate-toolkit.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency gettext-libs

>>>>I need libgettextpo.so from gettext-libs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 23:30:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:30:01 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811122330.mACNU1ij021970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|roozbeh at gmail.com           |dwayne at translate.org.za




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 23:43:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:43:46 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811122343.mACNhkHh024282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
            Version|8                           |rawhide
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
                 CC|                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
                   |                            |, petersen at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|roozbeh at gmail.com           |dwayne at translate.org.za
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |




--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 18:43:45 EDT ---
Reopening since python-Levenshtein is now in Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 12 23:46:23 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:46:23 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 177204] Review Request: translate-toolkit -
 A collection of tools to assist software localization
In-Reply-To: <bug-177204-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-177204-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811122346.mACNkNGx024951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177204


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dwayne at translate.org.za,
                   |                            |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
                   |                            |, petersen at redhat.com




--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 18:46:22 EDT ---
I approved dwayne's request to comaintain this package since there has been no
response from the packager owner (see also bug 427611, bug 315021, and bug
466608).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 01:08:33 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:08:33 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130108.mAD18Xtu004794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 20:08:32 EDT ---
Sure. Updated.

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-4.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 02:43:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:43:01 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130243.mAD2h136019545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-12 21:43:00 EDT ---
Fixed for me in anaconda-11.4.1.57-1.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 07:05:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:05:11 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468985] scim-sayura require double space to
 enter space inbetween word
In-Reply-To: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130705.mAD75Bxs030508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468985





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-13 02:05:10 EDT ---
scim-sayura-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scim-sayura-0.3.0-2.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 07:38:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 02:38:03 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811130738.mAD7c39t003406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Parag <pnemade at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(mgiri at redhat.com) |




--- Comment #9 from Parag <pnemade at redhat.com>  2008-11-13 02:38:03 EDT ---
I think in order to make uniform access of zwj/zwnj in inscript keymaps as
discussed in Indic Mashup meeting, we will go ahead with Shift+9 and Shift+0
for ZWJ, ZWNJ respectively.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 11:42:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:42:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131142.mADBgFcS009212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-13 06:42:14 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 11:42:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 06:42:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131142.mADBgCrg009180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-13 06:42:11 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 13:43:24 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:43:24 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445621] index*.html files no longer needed?
In-Reply-To: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131343.mADDhOxt012096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445621


Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|fedora-release-notes        |release-notes
            Version|9                           |devel
         AssignedTo|stickster at gmail.com         |relnotes at fedoraproject.org
            Product|Fedora                      |Fedora Documentation
          QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |kwade at redhat.com




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 13:44:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:44:22 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445621] index*.html files no longer needed?
In-Reply-To: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131344.mADDiMKU003009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445621


Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stickster at gmail.com




--- Comment #3 from Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com>  2008-11-13 08:44:21 EDT ---
Moving components so this doesn't get missed in F11 time frame.  Since it's not
hurting anything, it's not a disaster, but this content *is* obsolete and
really needs to be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 18:24:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:24:00 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131824.mADIO04R007695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-13 13:24:00 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 18:24:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:24:03 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811131824.mADIO3UN007721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-13 13:24:02 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 20:29:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132029.mADKTY7k031846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Andy Lindeberg <alindebe at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 21:12:29 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:12:29 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445621] index*.html files no longer needed?
In-Reply-To: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132112.mADLCT9F028165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445621





--- Comment #4 from Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com>  2008-11-13 16:12:28 EDT ---
Sorry, I forget, what appears in Firefox/Seamonkey when starting up offline? 
What is supposed to happen?

Because of my findings (below), I wonder if this content truly is obsolete.

Currently, in Fedora 9:

* Seamonkey defaults to /usr/share/doc/HTML/index.html
* Firefox loads "start.fp.o" from cache, in my instance the CSS is missing
** The CSS is pulled via HTTP
** If switched to work offline, it throws an "Address not found" error
*** This is actually an ugly experience, v. throwing up the index*.html files
** When switched back to work online, it shows the start.fp.o (without CSS)
** What does it do when the cache is empty?  Haven't been able to test that.
*** E.g., Ctrl+Shift+r(eload) continues to pull up the CSS-less start page

So, for every instance where there is not an Internet connection, the
experience is ugly for the user.  I understand that the original intention of
start.fp.o was that it would take care of the 80% situation, most people would
be connected, etc.  But this is an ugly 20% to leave behind.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 13 22:01:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:01:22 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811132201.mADM1MOa004631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-13 17:01:21 EDT ---
(22:32:08) nim-nim: tagoh3: your first fontconfig rule for hanazo is now fine
(22:32:20) nim-nim: tagoh3: but the second one is still reversed
(22:32:26) nim-nim: tagoh3: you need
(22:32:32) nim-nim:   <alias>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     <family>[fontname]</family>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     <default>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:       <family>[genericname]</family>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:     </default>
(22:32:32) nim-nim:   </alias>
(22:32:59) nim-nim: with   [fontname]=HanaMin
(22:33:16) nim-nim: and [genericname]=serif

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 00:32:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:32:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445621] index*.html files no longer needed?
In-Reply-To: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-445621-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140032.mAE0W7e2011432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445621





--- Comment #5 from Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com>  2008-11-13 19:32:07 EDT ---
This is probably not an issue that Docs should be deciding, but as I recall,
when we knew that Firefox was going to change behavior some time back, the
winning argument was that we shouldn't work extra hard to make people who are
offline think they're not.

I guess you could make a case for a fallback start page that says "You're
offline," but someone would have to do some targeted testing to make sure that
page didn't persist to the point it was misinforming the user.

I'd like to know what the cacheless situation is, but I'm not in a position to
test tonight...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 02:01:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:01:20 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140201.mAE21Kla012348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #15 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-13 21:01:19 EDT ---
Doh! I should have a look carefully more.. Thanks for catching this up!

Hopefully this would be a final review for hanazono-fonts.

Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-5.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 09:42:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:42:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811140942.mAE9gDTi026565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tagoh at redhat.com
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-14 04:42:11 EDT ---
This one looks good, thank you for your persistence. You can now continue the
font package integration process, starting here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a
Please do not forget the comps and wiki parts.

Reassigning the bug to you since my part is done.

APPROVED

PS Do not forget to subscribe to the low-traffic fedora-fonts-list, since
Fedora 11 packaging changes are being discussed there right now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 10:37:26 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:37:26 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141037.mAEAbQG4004641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #17 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-14 05:37:26 EDT ---
Thanks for the review, Nicolas.

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: hanazono-fonts
Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
Owners: tagoh
Branches: devel F-10 F-9 F-8
InitialCC: fonts-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 12:53:41 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:41 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468985] scim-sayura require double space to
 enter space inbetween word
In-Reply-To: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECrf9K013846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468985





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-14 07:53:40 EDT ---
scim-sayura-0.3.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 12:53:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468985] scim-sayura require double space to
 enter space inbetween word
In-Reply-To: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468985-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECrh9e013869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468985


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 12:53:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECrcUj001719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |ON_QA




--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-14 07:53:37 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update translate-toolkit'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9677

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 12:53:35 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:53:35 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141253.mAECrZF5001617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ON_QA




--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-14 07:53:35 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update translate-toolkit'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9677

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 14 14:59:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:59:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811141459.mAEExUI1002122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325


Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(twaugh at redhat.com |
                   |)                           |




--- Comment #5 from Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat.com>  2008-11-14 09:59:28 EDT ---
Yes, works fine in that package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 09:55:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:55:08 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471732] New: Explicit uid 39 requested by
 Canna even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file
Message-ID: <bug-471732-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471732

           Summary: Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna even Canna user is
                    NOT listed within uidgid setup file
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: medium
         Component: Canna
        AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: ovasik at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
Canna claims explicit uid 39 without listing Canna user within oficial uidgid
file. This could cause troubles when uid 39 is already in use on the system. Is
there any need for that explicit uid 39? If so, it should have been requested
to be added into uidgid file in setup package(no such requested filled in
bugzilla so far).

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. See /usr/share/doc/setup-*/uidgid

Actual results:
No Canna user within uidgid file

Expected results:
Canna user within uidgid file OR Canna user WITHOUT explicit uid request.

Additional info:
Just for your info, I'm setup package maintainer and there is very few number
of uid/gids left under 100. Recently was requested to add audio and video group
to Fedora, I have chosen two gid numbers - and one of those was 39 ... so
without my initiative and google search for possible usage of this uid/gid it
would have been taken without any warning and canna will be no longer running
correctly. Please let me know if this explicit requirement is really needed
(and canna user should be added to uidgid file - or if that uidgid number could
be used (and explicit number uid 39 could be removed from canna))

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 15 19:38:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:38:40 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811151938.mAFJceIs016275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |471754




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 05:41:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:41:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] New: scim-bridge crash when
	converting ichioku to Kanji
Message-ID: <bug-471778-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778

           Summary: scim-bridge crash when converting ichioku to Kanji
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 9
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: high
          Priority: medium
         Component: anthy
        AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: masaki.chikama at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
 The scim-bridge gets segv when conveting kanji from ???? to ??.

>scim-bridge[2242]: segfault at 31 ip 001a7656 sp bf9644a0 error 4 in libanthydic.so.0.1.0[1a1000+3f000]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
scim-bridge-0.4.15-8.fc9.i386
anthy-9100e-3.fc9.i386

How reproducible:
anlways

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Turn on IME 
2. input ????
3. hit space (convert to kanji)

Actual results:
 scim-bridege died

Expected results:
 get ??

Additional info:
 The same problem reported on Debigan.
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505776

 There is some analysis about the problem by maintainer(?). (in Japanese) 
 http://www.daionet.gr.jp/~knok/diary/?11161129

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 06:27:05 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:27:05 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting
	ichioku to Kanji
In-Reply-To: <bug-471778-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471778-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811160627.mAG6R53Z015761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778


CHIKAMA Masaki <masaki.chikama at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|high                        |medium




--- Comment #1 from CHIKAMA Masaki <masaki.chikama at gmail.com>  2008-11-16 01:27:05 EDT ---
Removing history file of anthy (rm ~/.anthy/) , the problem disappeared.
There is some additional condition to reproduce the problem.
I'll down the severity.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 08:19:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 03:19:21 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471778] scim-bridge crash when converting
	ichioku to Kanji
In-Reply-To: <bug-471778-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471778-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811160819.mAG8JLAV008523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471778





--- Comment #2 from CHIKAMA Masaki <masaki.chikama at gmail.com>  2008-11-16 03:19:20 EDT ---
I found a reproducable step.

1. echo 'ADD "INDEPPAIR" S"?" S"??"' > ~/.anthy/last-record2_default.utf8
2. start new scim (or reboot system)
3. turn on IME
4. input ????
5. hit space (convert to kanji)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 15:21:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 10:21:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 446814] Review Request: emacs-lookup -
 Emacsen interface to look up dictionaries
In-Reply-To: <bug-446814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-446814-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811161521.mAGFLpCM007770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446814


Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
             Blocks|                            |201449
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG
               Flag|needinfo?(tagoh at redhat.com) |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 16 20:16:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:16:02 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811162016.mAGKG2XG022633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|fedora-cvs?                 |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-16 15:16:01 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 02:11:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:11:22 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471732] Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna
 even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file
In-Reply-To: <bug-471732-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471732-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170211.mAH2BMsd016832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471732


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NOTABUG




--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-16 21:11:21 EDT ---
That issue has been fixed since FC-6. it no longer requests the explicit
uid/gid.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 03:58:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:58:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] support lowercase input-method
	names with NAME variable
In-Reply-To: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170358.mAH3wckr001485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|summary lowercase           |support lowercase
                   |inputmethod names with a    |input-method names with
                   |NAME variable               |NAME variable




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 03:57:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:57:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] New: summary lowercase inputmethod
 names with a NAME variable
Message-ID: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME variable

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833

           Summary: summary lowercase inputmethod names with a NAME
                    variable
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: imsettings
        AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
It would be nice if imsettings used a NAME variable in xinput files to carry a
lowercase name of input-methods.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. imsettings-list
2. imsettings-start SCIM
3.

Actual results:
1. list SHORT_DESC name which is often mixed or uppercase.

Expected results:
1. list input-method names in lowercase.
2. able to start scim with "imsettings-start scim", etc

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 04:18:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 23:18:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170418.mAH4I6S1011818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #19 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-16 23:18:05 EDT ---
Thanks. built and updated comps and wiki as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 08:33:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:33:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170833.mAH8XCZH017208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |FAILS_QA




--- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2008-11-17 03:33:11 EDT ---
I've pulled 1.2.0-1 as it had problems on non-i386 platforms as python-psyco is
only available on i386.

I'll push as new 1.2.0-2 with the following patch shortly:


@@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ Requires:       python-enchant
 Requires:       python-iniparse
 Requires:       python-Levenshtein
 Requires:       python-lxml
+%ifarch i386
 Requires:       python-psyco
+%endif
 Requires:       python-vobject

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:16:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:16:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170916.mAH9GplC024893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 04:16:05 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:37:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:37:00 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170937.mAH9b0rk019625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 04:37:00 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:36:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:36:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170936.mAH9aweQ019601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 04:36:57 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:52:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:52:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request:
	arabeyes-thabit-fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-461139-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170952.mAH9qwEq031078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139





--- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:52:57 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:53:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:02 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean
	TrueType Fonts
In-Reply-To: <bug-466193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466193-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r2o1031163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193





--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:53:01 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 09:53:01 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 04:53:01 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts -
 Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org
In-Reply-To: <bug-462711-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-462711-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811170953.mAH9r1Ui031125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711





--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>  2008-11-17 04:53:00 EDT ---
Ping?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 10:10:28 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:10:28 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171010.mAHAASsd025491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED




--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-17 05:10:28 EDT ---
Fixed in paps-0.6.8-8.fc{8,9,10,11}.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 10:13:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:13:16 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171013.mAHADGB6002367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 05:13:16 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/paps-0.6.8-8.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 10:12:40 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:12:40 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171012.mAHACeM1002303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 05:12:39 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/paps-0.6.8-8.fc10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 10:13:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:13:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171013.mAHADwLB002474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-17 05:13:57 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/paps-0.6.8-8.fc8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 13:23:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:23:02 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429480] translate-toolkit has broken deps
	in epel5 testing
In-Reply-To: <bug-429480-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-429480-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171323.mAHDN2pQ028515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429480





--- Comment #6 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2008-11-17 08:23:01 EDT ---
New build without python-enchant completed on EL-5

http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=773

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 13:21:29 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:21:29 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429480] translate-toolkit has broken deps
	in epel5 testing
In-Reply-To: <bug-429480-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-429480-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171321.mAHDLTrT028258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429480


Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




--- Comment #5 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne at translate.org.za>  2008-11-17 08:21:29 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Well, python-enchant needs enchant to build, which is not branched for EL-5.
> That's the reason python-enchant is not built.

It seems that enchant has been built but python-enchant remains unbuilt.

For now I've removed the dependency in translate-toolkit see:

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/translate-toolkit/EL-5/translate-
toolkit.spec?r1=1.12&r2=1.13

The consequence is that spell checking in the pofilter tests will not work. The
Toolkit already handles a missing python-enchant, so no problems expected.

We can reenable python-enchant support when EL-5 packages get built.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 18:20:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:20:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] New: imsettings causes window
	manager confusion in Xfce
Message-ID: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: imsettings causes window manager confusion in Xfce

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927

           Summary: imsettings causes window manager confusion in Xfce
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: imsettings
        AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


If the imsettings and imsettings-xfce packages are installed xfwm4 settings are
confused and don't think xfwm4 is the window manager. 

1. Install imsettings-xfce
2. yum groupinstall XFCE
3. login and choose Xfce as your desktop. 
4. right click on the desktop
5. choose settings manager
6. choose either "Window Manager" or "Window Manager Tweaks". 
7. You will get a message:

"These settings cannot work with your current window manager (imsetting-xim)"

The code in xfwm4 hasn't changed in years here. It does: 

    wm_name = gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name (gdk_screen_get_default
());
    if (g_ascii_strcasecmp (wm_name, "Xfwm4"))
    {
        xfce_err (_("These settings cannot work with your current window
manager (%s)"), wm_name);
        return;
    }

Is imsettings changing the gdk default window manager somehow?

Removing imsettings causes everything to work as normal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 18:25:18 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:25:18 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] imsettings causes window manager
	confusion in Xfce
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171825.mAHIPIXZ007084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927


Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |che666 at gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Rudolf Kastl <che666 at gmail.com>  2008-11-17 13:25:18 EDT ---
i can reproduce that on current rawhide. actually if you start the same setting
application: xfce-setting-show in the gnome session it would return the correct
property 

"These settings cannot work with your current window manager (metacity)"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 17 18:37:27 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:37:27 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471732] Explicit uid 39 requested by Canna
 even Canna user is NOT listed within uidgid setup file
In-Reply-To: <bug-471732-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471732-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811171837.mAHIbRPp009336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471732





--- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik <ovasik at redhat.com>  2008-11-17 13:37:26 EDT ---
Ah, sorry, my fault, it seems I accidently looked to very old spec file when
browsing web. So will use that uidgid pair in rawhide , thanks for quick
response.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 04:32:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] imsettings causes window manager
	confusion in Xfce
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180432.mAI4WVrk014688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-17 23:32:30 EDT ---
Hmm, strange. I can reproduce here too though, X property looks sane:

$ xprop -root | grep _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK(WINDOW): window id # 0x1e00062
$ xprop -id 0x1e00062 | grep _NET_WM_NAME
_NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) = 0x58, 0x66, 0x77, 0x6d, 0x34

Property is certainly set Xfwm4 but it complains me "There settings cannot work
with your current window manager (imsettings-xim)" as you said. however
imsettings definitely doesn't touch that property at all. I'm not really sure
where Xfwm4 gets it from.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 09:04:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:04:43 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] imsettings causes window manager
	confusion in Xfce
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180904.mAI94hTB002472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927


Mario Schugowski <mario at mediatronix.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mario at mediatronix.de




--- Comment #3 from Mario Schugowski <mario at mediatronix.de>  2008-11-18 04:04:43 EDT ---
same Problem here. I can reproduce the Bug in 32Bit and 64Bit Environment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 09:21:33 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:21:33 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180921.mAI9LXAG020536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mclasen at redhat.com
          Component|imsettings                  |gtk2
         AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com            |mclasen at redhat.com
            Summary|imsettings causes window    |Unexpected result from some
                   |manager confusion in Xfce   |APIs relates to X property




--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-18 04:21:32 EDT ---
Okay, I've tracked down this issue and the problematic code was in gtk+. gtk+
uses XGetWindowProperty to obtain the value assigned to certain X property. it
specifies an offset and a length of value in X property. in man page, that
says:

long_length
        Specifies the length in 32-bit multiples of the data to be retrieved.

And the problematic code in gtk+ does give G_MAXLONG as long_length. it will
causes an overflow to negative. then it returns the unexpected result.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 09:23:19 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:23:19 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811180923.mAI9NJHV008456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-18 04:23:18 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323868)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323868)
proposed patch

confirmed a fix with this patch. it contains fixes for similar problematic
code.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 18 23:32:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:32:31 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] New: ibus-gtk cannot be installed
	multilib
Message-ID: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146

           Summary: ibus-gtk cannot be installed multilib
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: ibus
        AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
ibus-gtk requires libibus-gtk.so which is in the main ibus package.  ibus.i386
and ibus.x86_64 conflict therefore ibus-gtk.i386 cannot be installed on the
x86_64 system and ibus-gtk cannot be used with 32bit applications.

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora on x86_64
2. Try to install ibus-gtk.i386

Actual results:
2. conflict between ibus.i386 and ibus.x86_64

Expected results:
2. libibus-gtk should be packaged in a package which can be installed multilib
(e.g. ibus-libs).

Additional info:
Additional problem is that currently ibus is multilib not ibus-gtk which is
wrong.
(It seems only ibus-x11 is linked to libibus-gtk.so.0.)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 02:35:46 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:35:46 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed
	multilib
In-Reply-To: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190235.mAJ2ZkMT013138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146





--- Comment #1 from Huang Peng <phuang at redhat.com>  2008-11-18 21:35:46 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=323990)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323990)
Make ibus multilibable.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 02:37:16 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:37:16 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed
	multilib
In-Reply-To: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190237.mAJ2bGQq013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146


Huang Peng <phuang at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #2 from Huang Peng <phuang at redhat.com>  2008-11-18 21:37:15 EDT ---
Hi Jens,

I created a patch to make ibus multiliable. I moved ibus-x11 & libibus-gtk.so
to ibus-gtk package. Do you think it is OK?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 03:42:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:42:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed
	multilib
In-Reply-To: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190342.mAJ3gpVn027940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |
                   |om)                         |




--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-18 22:42:50 EDT ---
I think you should only move libibus-gtk to ibus-gtk and keep ibus-x11 in the
main package which does not need to be multilib.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 08:40:03 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:40:03 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 472146] ibus-gtk cannot be installed
	multilib
In-Reply-To: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-472146-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811190840.mAJ8e3PE011274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472146


Huang Peng <phuang at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |MODIFIED




--- Comment #4 from Huang Peng <phuang at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 03:40:02 EDT ---
fixed in ibus-0_1_1_20081023-2_fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 11:50:50 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:50:50 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] support lowercase input-method names
In-Reply-To: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191150.mAJBoo3l019054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833


Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|support lowercase           |support lowercase
                   |input-method names with     |input-method names
                   |NAME variable               |




--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 06:50:49 EDT ---
I'd rather prefer just dealing with it as case-insensitive string, because that
way could be easily set to the unrelated name and it would makes confused.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:45:42 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:45:42 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191445.mAJEjg7U025676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:45:42 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update translate-toolkit'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9693

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:45:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:45:39 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191445.mAJEjdmr025648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|FAILS_QA                    |ON_QA




--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:45:39 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update translate-toolkit'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9693

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:46:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEkpO2021618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:46:51 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:46:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:46:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191446.mAJEks2E021637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:47:07 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:47:07 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191447.mAJEl7JT026164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:47:07 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:49:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEnwsM027066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748





--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:49:57 EDT ---
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9, m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9, m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9
has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:50:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:50:11 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466410] move ibus .engine files to m17n
In-Reply-To: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191450.mAJEoB59022713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466410


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:49:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:49:55 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466410] move ibus .engine files to m17n
In-Reply-To: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466410-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191449.mAJEntPt022347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466410





--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:49:54 EDT ---
ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-3.fc9, m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc9, m17n-db-1.5.3-1.fc9
has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:50:13 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:50:13 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191450.mAJEoDCv022745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 14:56:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:56:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811191456.mAJEu6ro025455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA




--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-19 09:56:05 EDT ---
qt-4.4.3-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qt'.  You can provide feedback
for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9780

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 19 23:31:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:31:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811192331.mAJNVuZE032154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin at tummy.com>  2008-11-19 18:31:55 EDT ---
Matthias: any chance this could go out as a F-10 0 day update? At least to
updates-testing? 

Or is this too invasive a fix?

Thoughts?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 02:09:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:09:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names
In-Reply-To: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811200209.mAK296ld019837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833





--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 21:09:06 EDT ---
(Maybe an alternative to NAME would be just using the filename with .conf?)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 02:07:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:07:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names
In-Reply-To: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471833-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811200207.mAK27sE8019735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|support lowercase           |use lowercase input-method
                   |input-method names          |names




--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-19 21:07:53 EDT ---
I would rather take NAME as the default and use SHORT_DESC to override it in
im-chooser: then imsettings-list will show lowercase names and it will be more
consistent IMHO.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 21:59:26 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:59:26 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466490] A non-offline IRC accounts in
	Pidgin stops SCIM
In-Reply-To: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811202159.mAKLxQ4Z021807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466490


Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?




--- Comment #10 from Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com>  2008-11-20 16:59:25 EDT ---
I have seen this behavior during F-9, but I am unable to reproduce it on F-10
with pidgin-2.5.2-1.  Are you using pidgin-2.5.2?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 20 23:10:20 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:10:20 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466490] A non-offline IRC accounts in
	Pidgin stops SCIM
In-Reply-To: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811202310.mAKNAKuh030262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466490


Yao Ziyuan <coolspeech at hotmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?                   |




--- Comment #11 from Yao Ziyuan <coolspeech at hotmail.com>  2008-11-20 18:10:19 EDT ---
i think someone planted a weird bug deep in fedora which causes various weird
behaviors. for another example, when i move my mouse on one of the three GNOME
menus (Applications, Places, System), the GNOME Terminal launcher icon on the
same panel will automatically be brightened. i'm using ubuntu + Aurora Leopard
BSM theme now and it's a lot more normal...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 21 01:32:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:32:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811210132.mAL1WsH0020008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com>  2008-11-20 20:32:53 EDT ---
I agree that using LONG_MAX here seems like a bad idea. 

But it seems not sufficiently explained how imsettings-xim manages to trigger
this problem here.

Do we actually get a BadValue error ? 

Also needs to be filed upstream, too.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:50:15 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:50:15 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468817] update libhangul to 0.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221650.mAMGoFLH028318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468817





--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:50:15 EDT ---
libhangul-0.0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:48:06 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:06 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGm6wF027662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:48:06 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:48:04 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:04 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGm47N027636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:48:03 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:50:17 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:50:17 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468817] update libhangul to 0.0.8
In-Reply-To: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468817-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221650.mAMGoHjA028334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468817


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:48:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGm9a8027682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:48:11 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:48:11 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221648.mAMGmBaf023193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:51:53 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:51:53 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466748] [or_IN] Needed ZWJ & ZWNJ for Oriya
	Inscript keymap
In-Reply-To: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466748-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221651.mAMGpreG028825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466748





--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:51:52 EDT ---
m17n-contrib-1.1.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. 
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:58:49 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:58:49 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221658.mAMGwnoT030508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608





--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:58:48 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:58:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:58:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221658.mAMGwpF6026687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:58:51 EDT ---
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 22 16:58:14 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:58:14 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 469325] Default font is too heavy in
	texttopaps
In-Reply-To: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-469325-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811221658.mAMGwEoS026554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469325





--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-22 11:58:13 EDT ---
paps-0.6.8-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 23 19:59:53 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:59:53 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466490] A non-offline IRC accounts in
	Pidgin stops SCIM
In-Reply-To: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466490-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811231959.mANJxrYX020446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466490


Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |INSUFFICIENT_DATA




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 07:14:38 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:14:38 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 430887] Add dependency on python-Levenshtein
In-Reply-To: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-430887-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811240714.mAO7Ec5s002676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430887





--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 02:14:37 EDT ---
You need to push python-Levenshtein to updates too with bodhi for f10.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 07:17:49 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:17:49 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466608] Update translate-toolkit to the
	latest release 1.2
In-Reply-To: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466608-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811240717.mAO7Hn5x007847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466608


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|NEXTRELEASE                 |




--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 02:17:49 EDT ---
Error: Missing Dependency: python-Levenshtein is needed by package
translate-toolkit-1.2.0-3.fc10.noarch (updates)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Mon Nov 24 23:16:29 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:16:29 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts -
 Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font
In-Reply-To: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-468823-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811242316.mAONGTqD003806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823





--- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-24 18:16:28 EDT ---
Probably be good to add i18n-team too to initialcc next time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 25 09:08:02 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:08:02 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811250908.mAP982an029225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 04:08:01 EDT ---
Hmm, just putting a debugging message to see what happens with
XGetWindowProperty in gtk+ made it working. also with -3, I can't reproduce
this issue with "Window Manager Settings" from the menu. but "Window Manager
Tweaks" introduces the above error. I have no idea to reproduce this though, I
saw "There settings cannot work with your current window manager
(gnome-screensaver)" too.

FWIW no BadValue error.

Assuming the man page describes it correctly, it doesn't says prop_return will
be NULL when something went wrong. so maybe should check if actual_type_return
and actual_format_return is the expected value and nitems_return is more than
0, also bytes_after_return is 0?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Tue Nov 25 12:46:44 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:46:44 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811251246.mAPCkiNv004112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927





--- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 07:46:43 EDT ---
For more information:

Sorry, the above was false alarm. and it races something. I've added the below
code to see what value XGetWindowProperty returns in
gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name():

diff -pruN gtk+-2.14.4.orig/gdk/x11/gdkevents-x11.c
gtk+-2.14.4/gdk/x11/gdkevent
s-x11.c
--- gtk+-2.14.4.orig/gdk/x11/gdkevents-x11.c    2008-10-17 13:06:37.000000000
+0
900
+++ gtk+-2.14.4/gdk/x11/gdkevents-x11.c 2008-11-25 19:40:42.000000000 +0900
@@ -2719,6 +2719,7 @@ gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name (
                               &type, &format, 
                               &n_items, &bytes_after,
                               (guchar **)&name);
+g_print("%d: 0x%x, %d, %ld, %ld, %s\n", getpid(),
screen_x11->wmspec_check_wind
ow, format, n_items, bytes_after, name);

           gdk_display_sync (screen_x11->display);

And this appears in .xsession-errors:

21550: 0xe00003, 8, 14, 0, imsettings-xim

pid 21550 is xfce-mcs-manager, which is reporting it. and imsettings-xim
certainly owns window id 0xe00003, which was created as a communication window
between client and server in XIM. there are no code to modify _NET_WM_NAME nor
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK in imsettings-xim though. and gtk+ has only code to
modify _NET_WM_NAME. and window manager modifies _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK.
actually just running X server and imsettings-xim doesn't create
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK on the root window.

Since this issue doesn't appear in metacity, I'm a bit suspecting xfwm4 behaves
around it differently. looking at xfwm4 now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 06:19:55 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:19:55 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260619.mAQ6Jt0T016493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626





--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org>  2008-11-26 01:19:54 EDT ---
qt-4.4.3-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems
still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 06:19:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:19:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 457626] Scim runs multiple instances
In-Reply-To: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-457626-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260619.mAQ6Jwq9008066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457626


Fedora Update System <updates at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 08:15:10 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:15:10 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 372151] /etc/sysconfig/i18n locale settings
 not propagating into X session
In-Reply-To: <bug-372151-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-372151-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260815.mAQ8FANs008612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372151





--- Comment #72 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 03:15:08 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 09:27:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:27:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429104] scim-anthy (kanji/kana) input
	regression
In-Reply-To: <bug-429104-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-429104-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811260927.mAQ9RYDe007729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429104





--- Comment #14 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 04:27:34 EDT ---

This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 8.  It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained.  At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '8'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life.

Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that 
we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life.  If you 
would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it 
against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this 
bug to the applicable version.  If you are unable to change the version, 
please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events.  Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

The process we are following is described here: 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 10:51:31 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:51:31 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429104] scim-anthy (kanji/kana) input
	regression
In-Reply-To: <bug-429104-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-429104-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261051.mAQApV05030678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429104


Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Wed Nov 26 18:56:33 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:56:33 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 372151] /etc/sysconfig/i18n locale settings
 not propagating into X session
In-Reply-To: <bug-372151-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-372151-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811261856.mAQIuXHM019886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=372151


Bill Nottingham <notting at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 01:37:00 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:37:00 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270137.mAR1b0tb012516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|RAWHIDE                     |




--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 20:37:00 EDT ---
Not sure if I tested well enough, or what happened, but this is back in
f10-final unfortunately. :-(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 01:45:54 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:45:54 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270145.mAR1jsgi028607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982


Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 02:46:56 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:46:56 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270246.mAR2kudB007226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 21:46:55 EDT ---
Yeah my bad I retested anaconda-11.4.1.57-1 and it was broken too.

Actually testing more I realise this is not a new bug: it affects Chinese fonts
in F8 and F9 anaconda too.
Now in F10 Chinese is ok but Japanese broken instead - presumably the
fontconfig default priorities changed that.
But this needs to be fixed by some kind of lang tagging or locale setting in
anaconda.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 02:55:12 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:55:12 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 467982] anaconda doesn't render glyphs with
	the proper font
In-Reply-To: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-467982-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270255.mAR2tCBB009023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467982





--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 21:55:12 EDT ---
> it affects Chinese fonts in F8 and F9 anaconda too.

I meant Chinese installs (they get Japanese glyphs appearing when they exist).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 04:17:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:17:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] New: Please add Maithili and Nepali
 languages to language selection menu in anaconda
Message-ID: <bug-473209-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209

           Summary: Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language
                    selection menu in anaconda
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: anaconda
        AssignedTo: anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, anaconda-maint-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Description of problem:
Maithili and Nepali languages are not available in the anaconda menu at install
time. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-11.4.1.62-1.i386.rpm

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start Fedora installation
2. Proceed to the step that asks you to choose the language to use in the
install process


Actual results:
Maithili and Nepali languages are not in the list

Expected results:
Maithili and Nepali languages should be in the list

Additional info:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 06:31:43 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:31:43 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs
	relates to X property
In-Reply-To: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-471927-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811270631.mAR6Vhun014580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10




--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-26 00:31:26 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

--- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh at redhat.com>  2008-11-27 01:31:42 EDT ---
I got a trick. the scenario is:

1. metacity runs on gdm. and metacity is set an own window id to
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK.
2. the desktop session is going to start without restarting X server. and
metacity is gone. but _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is still there, with invalid
window id.
3. imsettings-xim is running. it grabs same window id. thus, window id on
_NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is valid again. which isn't right.
4. xfce-mcs-manager is running before xfwm4. and the unexpected window id is
set to GDK_SCREEN_X11 (screen)->wmspec_check_window. it's cached during the
instance is alive. so gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name() always returns
the unexpected name.


There are some points:

a. metacity doesn't delete _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK from the root window. it
may be dangerous since the window id could be reused.
b. invoking xfce-mcs-manager before xfwm4 may be not a good idea as long as it
uses gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name(), because of caching the value.
it's still likely to return "unknown" if no _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK is set to
the root window and it's being cached before running xfwm4.
c. or using gdk_x11_screen_get_window_manager_name() in xfce-mcs-manager may be
not a good idea.
d. or caching the value in GdkScreen may be not a good idea.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Thu Nov 27 16:41:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:41:21 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450061] [ro] Create (U+0218..021B,
 2011) glyphs in Lat2-Terminus16.
In-Reply-To: <bug-450061-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-450061-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811271641.mARGfLSj004323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450061


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10

R?zvan Sandu <razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro




--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 21:23:04 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:01:57 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:01:57 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] New: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC)
 in liberation sans regular
Message-ID: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481

           Summary: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans
                    regular
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
               URL: http://bugs.debian.org/506469
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: liberation-fonts
        AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: holger at layer-acht.org
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


From: "Nikos Asimakis" <nikos.asimakis at gmail.com>
To: submit at bugs.debian.org
Subject: ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in liberation sans regular
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:54:11 +0200

Package: ttf-liberation
Version: 1.04.92-1
Severity: normal

After updating to version 1.04.92-1 the character ? (U+03BC, GREEK
SMALL LETTER MU) appears ugly
when using Liberation Sans.

When using Liberation Sans Bold, Italic and all the variants of
Liberation Serif and Mono, ? appears OK.

You can see the problem in GNOME Character Map, when using Liberation
Sans as GNOME's default
application font and in Firefox.

I am attaching a small html to demonstrate the problem:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
  "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
  <title>Liberation Fonts Test</title>
</head>
<body>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;">
  Liberation Sans<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Sans Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Sans Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Sans;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Sans Bold Italic<br />???</p>
  <hr />
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;">
  Liberation Serif<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Serif Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Serif Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Serif;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Serif Bold Italic<br />???</p>
  <hr />
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;">
  Liberation Mono<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;">
  Liberation Mono Bold<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Mono Italic<br />???</p>
  <p style="font-family:Liberation Mono;font-weight:bold;font-style:italic;">
  Liberation Mono Bold Italic<br />???</p>
</body>
</html>

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=el_GR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages ttf-liberation depends on:
ii  defoma                       0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f

ttf-liberation recommends no packages.

ttf-liberation suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:02:39 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:02:39 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in
	liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281902.mASJ2dnF002516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481


Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    External Bug ID|                            |Debian BTS 506469




--- Comment #1 from Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>  2008-11-28 14:02:38 EDT ---
orignally filed as http://bugs.debian.org/506469

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:39:58 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:39:58 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in
	liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281939.mASJdwx4008363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-28 14:39:58 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325034)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325034)
test case

I am attaching testcase as attachment, but I am not sure what the reporter
means -- the letter looks to me roughly same in any Liberation font I have
(liberation-fonts-1.04.90-1.fc10.noarch).

Switching to ASSIGNED so that developers have responsibility to do whatever
they want to do with it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:44:08 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:08 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in
	liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJi8u1014252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-28 14:44:07 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325035)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325035)
sshot

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:44:21 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:44:21 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in
	liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281944.mASJiLZY014293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 19:48:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 14:48:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali
 languages to language selection menu in anaconda
In-Reply-To: <bug-473209-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473209-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811281948.mASJmUaM015081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209


Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |mcepl at redhat.com




--- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl <mcepl at redhat.com>  2008-11-28 14:48:30 EDT ---
There is nothing to triage here.

Switching to ASSIGNED so that developers have responsibility to do whatever
they want to do with it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 20:08:37 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 15:08:37 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473481] ugly greek letter m (U+03BC) in
	liberation sans regular
In-Reply-To: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473481-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811282008.mASK8b1I013337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473481





--- Comment #4 from Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>  2008-11-28 15:08:36 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=325036)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325036)
this is how it looks here...

this is how it looks here...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Fri Nov 28 21:04:34 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 16:04:34 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466117] [ro] system-config-language should
 set correct default entry in /etc/sysconfig/keyboard
In-Reply-To: <bug-466117-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-466117-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811282104.mASL4YIK022266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466117


Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |10




--- Comment #18 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list at redhat.com>  2008-11-25 22:40:00 EDT ---

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10
development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

--- Comment #19 from R?zvan Sandu <razvan.sandu at mobexpert.ro>  2008-11-28 16:04:33 EDT ---
Hello,


I'm able to confirm that this bug about inconsistent settings in the
/etc/sysconfig tree is still present in the *official* release of Fedora 10,
somewhere between preupgrade and anaconda.


Please follow the following steps to verify (I've experienced this personally
on a number of machines running F9):


1. Take a pre-F10 Fedora system (stock install), in default runlevel 3;

2. Using the standard tools in Gnome's System menu, configure the keyboard for
Romanian. The file /etc/sysconfig keyboard will now contain the line:

KEYTABLE="ro_win"

3. Using preupgrade-cli, ask system to upgrade to "Fedora 10 (Cambridge)";
official repositories content as in the state of November 28, 2008.

4. First stage of preupgrade will perform smoothly.

5. Reboot.

6. After reboot, preupgrade will try to start anaconda.

7. Just before the first graphics screen, upgrade will exit unexpectedly
(system will offer the possibility to reboot); the presence of "ro_win" in the
above line, which is now "unknown", is explicitly invoked as the reason of
failure;

8. Reboot system, entering in the the old version of distro (functional).

9. Modify system's keyboard setting to "English (US)", using the standard tools
in the System menu;

10. Reboot again; try to resume preupgrade.

11. Upgrade will fail again, for the same reason as in step 7.


Thanks,
R?zvan

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 18:12:22 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:12:22 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 441796] new gdm needs translation updates
In-Reply-To: <bug-441796-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-441796-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811291812.mATICMIU002080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441796


Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi




--- Comment #9 from Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi>  2008-11-29 13:12:21 EDT ---
If at all possible, please pull in updated translations from GNOME SVN. I'm
using the Finnish translation (fi.po) and the po file shipped with Fedora 10's
gdm-2.24.0-12.fc10.i386 has only 182 messages when
http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/gdm.HEAD/gdm.HEAD.fi.po has 241 messages.

There's also a translation bug fixed in the current fi.po. "Restart" was
translated incorrectly into Finnish as "Restart GDM". That has been fixed in
GNOME SVN.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 18:19:53 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:19:53 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473616] New: gcin : Unowned directories
Message-ID: <bug-473616-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: gcin : Unowned directories

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473616

           Summary: gcin : Unowned directories
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: gcin
        AssignedTo: candyz0416 at gmail.com
        ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, candyz0416 at gmail.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> gcin-1.4.2-4.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/lib/menu

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 18:18:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:18:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473615] New: ibus-table : Unowned
	directories
Message-ID: <bug-473615-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473615

           Summary: ibus-table : Unowned directories
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: ibus-table
        AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> ibus-table-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/engine
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons

=> ibus-table-additional-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch
(rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons

=> ibus-table-chinese-0.1.1.20081014-1.fc10.noarch (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/ibus-table
/usr/share/ibus-table/tables
/usr/share/ibus-table/icons
/usr/share/ibus-table/data

Note: It might be necessary to only add them to the main package.

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 20:26:09 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:26:09 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473663] New: scim-hangul : Unowned
	directories
Message-ID: <bug-473663-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: scim-hangul : Unowned directories

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473663

           Summary: scim-hangul : Unowned directories
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: scim-hangul
        AssignedTo: petersen at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> scim-hangul-0.3.2-4.fc9.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim/hangul

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 20:27:36 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:27:36 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473664] New: scim : Unowned directories
Message-ID: <bug-473664-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: scim : Unowned directories

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473664

           Summary: scim : Unowned directories
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: scim
        AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: petersen at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com,
                    fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> scim-libs-1.4.7-35.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/lib/scim-1.0
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0
/usr/lib/scim-1.0/1.4.0/IMEngine

Note: It may be necessary to include directories in multiple
packages.

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sat Nov 29 20:28:30 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:28:30 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473665] New: scim-python : Unowned
	directories
Message-ID: <bug-473665-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: scim-python : Unowned directories

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473665

           Summary: scim-python : Unowned directories
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: low
         Component: scim-python
        AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com
        ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


One or more directories are not included within this
package and/or its sub-packages:

=> scim-python-pinyin-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/data

=> scim-python-xingma-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables

=> scim-python-xingma-cangjie-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables

=> scim-python-xingma-erbi-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables

=> scim-python-xingma-wubi-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables

=> scim-python-xingma-zhengma-0.1.13rc1-1.fc10.i386 (rawhide-development-i386)
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa
/usr/share/scim-python/engine/XingMa/tables

Note: It may be necessary to include directories in multiple
packages.

[...]

Further information:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



From bugzilla at redhat.com  Sun Nov 30 09:45:51 2008
From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:45:51 -0500
Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473664] scim : Unowned directories
In-Reply-To: <bug-473664-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
References: <bug-473664-269801@bugzilla.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <200811300945.mAU9jpLp004126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com>

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473664


Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp




--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2008-11-30 04:45:50 EDT ---
Umm... currently I don't understand why this happened...

Actually I pointed out this issue on the merge review (bug 226395 comment 7)
and it is fixed in 1.4.5-10:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/scim/devel/scim.spec?revision=1.79

However this change seems reverted on 1.4.7-2:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/scim/devel/scim.spec?r1=1.95&r2=1.94&diff_format=u

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.