From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 07:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 02:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468009] [gu-IN] : Sorting order for Gujarati needs small correction! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901020717.n027HNEI032725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468009 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-02 02:17:22 EDT --- Thanks!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 06:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 01:27:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] New: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Summary: port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: imsettings AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora The upcoming Xfce 4.6 version will be dropping the old mcs config setup in favor of a new xfconf framework. I am intending to import 4.6b2 into rawhide soon. It would be great if you could port the imsettings-xfce plugin to the new settings model. Some useful links: http://svn.xfce.org/index.cgi/xfce/xfconf/trunk/ http://mocha.xfce.org/~kelnos/xfconf/docs-current/ Happy to try and get more info or help from upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 03:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040336.n043aiW4013330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #29 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-03 22:36:42 EDT --- Can you try if this build fixes the problem ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1030934 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 19:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041938.n04JcpEV003261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-04 14:38:49 EDT --- Yes, the gtk2 package from comment #29 fixes the problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:21:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042121.n04LLWgl020305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #31 from Heiko Adams 2009-01-04 16:21:30 EDT --- I can confirm that the gtk2 package from comment #29 fixes the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 02:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050208.n0528VC1017529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-04 21:08:30 EDT --- Thank you for letting me know, Kevin. I'll work on this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468154] scim lock keyboard input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050704.n0574Cqo005171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468154 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 02:04:11 EDT --- I guess 2 helps with XIM (but would break deadkeys). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 07:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 02:10:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050710.n057Avst006548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-05 02:10:56 EDT --- I've tried too. it would be better than before. but I can still sometimes see the one-shot error dialog. it's ok next time as what you've fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 08:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050850.n058oaQn006604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-05 03:50:35 EDT --- Okay. will change the behavior to fall back to the conf filename with/without .conf if no such names in the list of SHORT_DESC then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 16:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051658.n05GwN1h019745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, tagoh at redhat.com Component|cups |paps AssignedTo|twaugh at redhat.com |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tim Waugh 2009-01-05 11:58:21 EDT --- This is a bug in the paps filter. When used as 'texttopaps' it is using zero margins by default instead of the advertised values. Additionally, when used as texttopaps it ought to use left and right margin values of 18 points, not 36. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 21:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: wqy-zenhei-fonts AssignedTo: fangqq at gmail.com ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fangqq at gmail.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 477044 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' '*.ttc' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately this script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: ? Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package (or subpackage): http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages ? our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package: ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_(2008-11-18) ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide (you can use the fontpackages package in F9 or F10 to test, but only submit changes to rawhide please). If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to create a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted by their packager and can serve as examples: ? andika-fonts ? apanov-heuristica-fonts ? bitstream-vera-fonts ? charis-fonts ? dejavu-fonts ? ecolier-court-fonts ? edrip-fonts ? gfs-ambrosia-fonts ? gfs-artemisia-fonts ? gfs-baskerville-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts ? gfs-bodoni-fonts ? gfs-complutum-fonts ? gfs-didot-classic-fonts ? gfs-didot-fonts ? gfs-eustace-fonts ? gfs-fleischman-fonts ? gfs-garaldus-fonts ? gfs-gazis-fonts ? gfs-jackson-fonts ? gfs-neohellenic-fonts ? gfs-nicefore-fonts ? gfs-olga-fonts ? gfs-porson-fonts ? gfs-solomos-fonts ? gfs-theokritos-fonts ? stix-fonts ? yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on: fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060212.n062CcqT009454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:15:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060215.n062FG4n031102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:15:15 EDT --- So what will imsettings-list show in that case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060244.n062i5O2002969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:44:04 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:49:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060249.n062n1s5015083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-05 21:49:00 EDT --- no plans to change it. guess better improving a help message in imsettings-start instead. actually current description of parameter doesn't clarify it would links to what imsettings-list shows. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 02:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060256.n062u092016407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-05 21:55:59 EDT --- So you are going the case-insensitive way or just wontfix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 07:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 02:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060726.n067QjvH000819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 02:26:44 EDT --- (note that the macros used in the new templates are integral part of the new guidelines) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060915.n069Fki4009606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-06 04:15:45 EDT --- I meant no plans to change imsettings-list but only update an interface for imsettings-start/stop/restart to a case-insensitive name or a filename with/without .conf. >From some discussion with you on IRC, I'm going to change imsettings-list like: * 1: /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim.conf (recommended) 2: /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/ibus.conf or * 1: scim.conf (recommended) 2: ibus.conf or whatever. and allow a filename with/without .conf suffix for imsettings-start/stop/restart then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 09:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060939.n069dBou026408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-06 04:39:10 EDT --- updated specs, It will be in tomorrows rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:14:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061014.n06AElbu001678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 05:14:46 EDT --- Thank you very much for looking at this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 16:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061609.n06G9Ckg016158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-06 11:09:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Here's what I found: > > ./lang/km_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > Packaged in khmeros-fonts-base, can be symlinked and required. But make sure that the khmeros-fonts packager converted to the new guidelines first > ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then > symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? > I'll then notify upstream. No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen? > ./lib/default.ttf - FreeSans - Copyleft, can be subpackaged, but it might be > packaged already, what's a good way to check? Is in the freefonts package, but it's better to require a dejavu variant when an app just wants a generic font without specific style needs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 22:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901062239.n06Mdb45030399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #3 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-06 17:39:37 EDT --- Bug 318071 deals with the same problem, but for Lohit Kannada. That bug was closed with the comment that a fix "is not possible in the current opentype framework." However the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm is able to render these combinations correctly. I hope Lohit Telugu and Lohit Kannada could be fixed to handle these combinations just like Pothana2000. BTW the gnome bug above says the problem isn't seen in Kannada, which isn't true. Just that the problem is less noticeable when compared to Telugu (since in Kannada the virama connects to the right of the first consonant anyway, unlike in Telugu where it connects to the top). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:26:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478914] warning dialog when logging in with jp106 layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070126.n071QHT8009474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478914 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|dialog when logging in with |warning dialog when logging |jp106 layout |in with jp106 layout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 01:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478914] dialog when logging in with jp106 layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070125.n071PL2o009257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478914 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, jmccann at redhat.com, | |rstrode at redhat.com Component|xkeyboard-config |gdm AssignedTo|peter.hutterer at redhat.com |jmccann at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-06 20:25:21 EDT --- Let me add that I think this only happens if the user initially (installs with and) uses a US keyboard and then switches to jp one later (and maybe vice versa). I discussed this a little with whot and he suggested that it might be an inconsistency with how gdm hands over the xkb data to gnome so reassigning to gdm for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 03:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070304.n0734ASs024049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |tagoh at redhat.com |ge.net | --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-06 22:04:10 EDT --- will work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 06:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 01:32:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070632.n076WXoI006361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-07 01:32:32 EDT --- What would you suggest subpackaging for this? I guess current subpackaging may be not sufficient for new policy. as per policy, I'm going to have: - VLGothic-fonts-common for docs etc. - VLGothic-fonts-gothic for VL-Gothic-Regular.ttf with Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts < 20081203-2 - VLGothic-fonts-pgothic or VLGothic-fonts-proportional-gothic for VL-PGothic-Regular.ttf with Obsoletes: VLGothic-fonts-proportional < 20081203-2 Does it make sense? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 07:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] New: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Summary: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #233257 +++ Description of problem: Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0C9D+U0CCA and U0C9D+U0CCB. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: 1. Every Time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gnome-character-map. 2. Select U0C9D followed by U0CCA followed by U0C9D followed by U0CCB. Actual results: As shown in the attached image Expected results: As shown by the following steps: 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. 2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp. 3. Enter the combination JoJO. Additional info: 1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358 also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada. 2. This is similar to earlier bugs: bug 231965 and bug 233257. Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 07:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070703.n0773KRI011728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #1 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 02:03:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328351) Incorrect rendering of U0C9D U0CCA U0C9D U0CCB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 07:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070739.n077dn5a018105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #10 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-07 02:39:48 EDT --- using zero margins instead of the advertised values? it should refers mergins from ppd or CUPS options though. Tim, can you explain why you conclude so? I don't remember why I did set 18 for left and right margins. I should had a look at texttops. or might be a default value from ppd for my printer and got confused possibly. Anyway I'll fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 08:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 03:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477127] RFE: Disable most language packs by default In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070830.n078USkj012673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477127 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:12:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070912.n079CvL8023394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-07 04:12:57 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:13:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070913.n079D0Pt023415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 09:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 04:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901070923.n079NSGL010623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-07 04:23:27 EDT --- Those other pages that were approved yesterday by FPC (minutes not posted yet) may also be relevant for VLGothic http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_(2008-12-22) You probably want to perform the naming changes at the same time. To change a srpm naming, the current procedure is to orphan the old package in rawhide, and post a review request with the new name (I'll approve it as a matter of course if you do so) This will be discussed this evening by FESCO, you may want to add some input here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/RenamingPackages As for the upgrade path, you have two choices: 1. If there is a clear mapping between the old packages and the new packages, use obsoletes inside the packages 2. If there is not use a compat package to garbage collect the old packages as has been done for dejavu in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071221.n07CLRAn019338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #12 from Tim Waugh 2009-01-07 07:21:27 EDT --- Fixed upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 12:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:18:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071218.n07CIlbH018541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|paps |system-config-printer AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |twaugh at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Tim Waugh 2009-01-07 07:18:46 EDT --- Oh, false alarm, sorry. I was comparing texttopaps and texttops incorrectly. When a PPD is specified it changes the behaviour, and I only specified a PPD when testing texttopaps. The problem is in system-config-printer which is advertising incorrect defaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 23:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901072309.n07N9Qxd012309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-07 18:09:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > ./lang/sm_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > > ./lang/to_utf8/fonts/default.ttf > > Arial Narrow, not OK. I can modify the source to strip this out, and then > > symlink to something, what would be a good replacement? > > I'll then notify upstream. > > No idea, maybe ask Jens Petersen? In fact Tongan and Samoan are already 100% covered by Dejavu (all families), so this is not only illegal, but totally unecesary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 02:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:28:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080228.n082SMVF028608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-07 21:28:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328431) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328431) github patch for upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080354.n083srA5010698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-07 22:54:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328434) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328434) Patch for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:55:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080355.n083t77C028674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |phuang at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 03:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 22:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080355.n083tksF028751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-07 22:55:45 EDT --- Attached patch for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080435.n084ZVaT003173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[kn_IN] Conjuct combination |[kn_IN] Conjunct |of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB |combination of U0C9D with |is rendering wrongly |U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering | |wrongly --- Comment #2 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 23:35:31 EDT --- Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf and U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf which show the correct conjuncts. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed need to be added/corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 04:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 23:51:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080451.n084pEOL020094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-07 23:51:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328437) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328437) Incorrect rendering of U0CAA U0CCA U0CAB U0CCA Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0CAA+U0CCA, U0CAB+U0CCA, U0CAA+U0CCB, and U0CAB+U0CCB as well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: 1. Every Time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gnome-character-map. 2. Select U0CAA followed by U0CCA followed by U0CAB followed by U0CCA. Actual results: As shown in the attached image Expected results: As shown by the following steps: 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. 2. Open http://kannadakasturi.com/includes/transliterate.asp. 3. Enter the combination poPo. Additional info: 1. The fonts from http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=56358 also show the glyphs like kannadakasturi.com instead of like Lohit Kannada. 2. This is similar to the earlier issue reported here. 3. Using the program from http://gfontview.sourceforge.net/ it is seen that there already are glyphs in the font named U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?] and U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?] which show the conjuncts like kannadakasturi.com. Only the mappings between the character combinations and the glyphs to be displayed seem to be incorrect. Hence I assume Lohit Kannada is at fault and not the other fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 05:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 00:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080527.n085R8Dv011489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(phuang at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #7 from Huang Peng 2009-01-08 00:27:07 EDT --- I think it is better to submit this patch to upstream at first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:22:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080722.n087MmwR029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 02:22:47 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 07:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 02:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901080736.n087aeNH031701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:21:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445621] index*.html files no longer needed? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081521.n08FLmgA018783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445621 Jason Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED CC| |jmtaylor90 at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Jason Taylor 2009-01-08 10:21:46 EDT --- Just checking to see where we are. Are these files something that we are in fact obsoleting or are they going to be around for a while? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081528.n08FSSJW020127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 Ken Dreyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com --- Comment #33 from Ken Dreyer 2009-01-08 10:28:26 EDT --- I tried with metacity-2.24.0-4.fc10.i386 gtk2-2.14.5-4.fc10.i386 the error only comes up for "Window Manager Tweaks", and only for about the first 60 seconds after logging in to Xfce. After that, the Window Manager Tweaks dialog appears fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081539.n08FdjwT006201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-08 10:39:44 EDT --- Ok, I'll check out the khmeros-fonts packaging, and use freefont. WRT ArialNarrow->Dejavu, how do I know which font file to use? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 15:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471927] Unexpected result from some APIs relates to X property In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081542.n08FgQ3R023677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471927 --- Comment #34 from Ken Dreyer 2009-01-08 10:42:25 EDT --- I timed it with "watch -n1 xfce-setting-show wmtweaks"... looks like it's actually only takes about 5 or 10 seconds until it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 19:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081939.n08Jdh9M014911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-08 14:39:42 EDT --- Just drop all fonts in the tongan and samoan packages, and use dejavu sans as the default app font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 22:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:22:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901082222.n08MMoBw016746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477408 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-08 17:22:49 EDT --- Waiting on 477408 for khmeros-fonts. I'll work on the rest in the mean time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 00:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090014.n090ExAk019551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 19:14:58 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 04:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090404.n0944P7l012124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-08 23:04:25 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090535.n095ZfJ5009383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #1 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 00:35:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328518) Liberation Mono Bold 1.04.93 with antialiasing off -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] New: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Summary: Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: cody at zone38.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=328517) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328517) Liberation Mono 1.04.93 with antialiasing on Description of problem: Though the hinting has been fixed in Sans Bold as of version 1.04.92, the letter "u" still has incorrect hinting in Mono Bold, an error that's quite noticeable in certain sizes on any system with bytecode hinting enabled. I'm attaching a screenshot from Ubuntu to demonstrate; of particular note are 9 point (the second line) and 12 point (the 5th line). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04.93 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090535.n095ZDeX021048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328517|Liberation Mono 1.04.93 |Liberation Mono Bold description|with antialiasing on |1.04.93 with antialiasing | |on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090601.n0961fvI019490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 01:01:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328522) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328522) Display of cent sign in Sans and Mono with bytecode hinting Hinting for ? is completely broken-- particularly in Mono. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090602.n0962DYv030504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cody at zone38.net --- Comment #8 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-09 01:02:12 EDT --- The hinting has not been adjusted for the new design of the ? sign - see attachment 328522 which I just posted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090605.n0965H6n020855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 06:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090650.n096orSM014365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper 2009-01-09 01:50:53 EDT --- Fedora 8 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-01-07. Fedora 8 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 11:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091132.n09BWOkG013523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #20 from Parag 2009-01-09 06:32:23 EDT --- any updates here or am I supposed to provide some more input? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:10:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091410.n09EALxD008750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:10:19 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. That will require you to perform the mkfontdir stuff manually and probably put the fonts.scale files in a separate subpackage. Given all the problems we have with core X fonts doing this or even dropping fonts.scale altogether for this package is not necessarily a bad thing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 14:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091420.n09EKmKd011055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 09:20:47 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:42:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091542.n09Fgs7M006947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-09 10:42:54 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. Behdad requested an end to all the variations around fontconfig caching, so he does not have to check every font package for fontconfig breakage. The %_font_pkg macro puts all this stuff in a single package he can easily audit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477968] Please enable translation submitting by Transifex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092344.n09NiLmR007029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Piotr Dr?g 2009-01-09 18:44:20 EDT --- Added to Transifex, thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] Translated to Brazilian Portuguese In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092358.n09NwAuQ009889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477968 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477968] Please enable translation submitting by Transifex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092358.n09Nw9WV009875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477968 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478503] Translated to Brazilian Portuguese In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092359.n09NxUtd010101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478503 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |piotrdrag at gmail.com Blocks| |436824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 13:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101354.n0ADskop032584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #45 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-10 08:54:43 EDT --- rdieter, kevin_kofler upstream, wontfix or cantfix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 15:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:03:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101503.n0AF3amU015778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #46 from Rex Dieter 2009-01-10 10:03:35 EDT --- shrug, upstream to trolltech would be the only sane way forward, imo. That would require someone who's experiencing this, and reproduce with a minimal test case. Any takers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 16:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479521] New: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Summary: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: pander at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ttf-liberation 1.04~beta2-2 from Ubuntu 8.10 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. retrieve font nama table ttx -d . -t name /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-liberation/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf 2. in python, read the XML file via doc = libxml2.parseFile('LiberationSans-Regular.ttx') Actual results: LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:27: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an ^ LiberationSans-Regular.ttx:69: parser error : xmlParseCharRef: invalid xmlChar value 1 Liberation is a trademark of Red Ht, Inc. registered in U.S. Patent an Expected results: Red Ht should be Red Hat, this is all right for the other TTF files in this package. Additional info: Please fix and push updated package downstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 208553] [ml_IN] font rendering in Qt applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101834.n0AIYhcm025616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208553 --- Comment #10 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-10 13:34:41 EDT --- Still an open issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJwLh015051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:57 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKYkt016174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:33 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJqo7014902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:51 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJaYj014522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:36 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJrjn014931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:52 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKJTJ015854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:19 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJcwH014565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:37 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJpqp014871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:50 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKZCu016205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:34 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJHmV014187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:17 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKjYk016404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:45 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFK4cc015469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:04 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKcYD016262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:37 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKIJW015832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:18 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKQr7016017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:25 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:20:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111520.n0BFKSCP016062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:20:28 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJG3t014153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:15 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJiPj014729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:43 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 15:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111519.n0BFJ5Vi013952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-11 10:19:05 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 01:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479521] Invalid character in ttf name table regarding copyright that crashes XML marshalling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120125.n0C1PqDr024237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479521 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 20:25:51 EDT --- updated in source repo rebuild tarball / zip https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.tar.gz https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:15:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120415.n0C4F7GA023533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #7 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 23:15:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328691) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328691) .spec w/ %_font_pkg but not buildable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120413.n0C4DJTa023099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-11 23:13:18 EDT --- I added: %_font_pkg -n uming -f *-ttf-arphic-uming*.conf uming.ttc in .spec file. Then it isn't buildable since then with errors: rpmbuild --define "_sourcedir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_spmake: *** [noarch] Error 1 ora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_builddir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_srcrpmdir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "_rpmdir /home/cchance/src/fedora/rpms/cjkunifonts/devel" --define "dist .fc11" --define "fedora 11" --define "fc11 1" --target noarch -ba cjkunifonts.spec 2>&1 | tee .build--.log ; exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]} error: line 142: Second %post Building target platforms: noarch Building for target noarch What would I need to do to get it work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120429.n0C4TLWs025673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-01-11 23:29:20 EDT --- already fixed in rawhide.http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=76447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 06:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120653.n0C6r9eV018811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 01:53:08 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#Where_is_the_rest_of_the_subpackaging_bits_in_spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#What_happened_to_the_fc-cache_scriptlets_listed_in_previous_guidelines.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_%28FAQ%29#The_templates_must_be_wrong.2C_rpm_crashes.21 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 08:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:26:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] New: [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Summary: [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: openoffice.org AssignedTo: caolanm at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: caolanm at redhat.com, jnavrati at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=328710) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328710) Screenshot for Bug with Red Line Description of problem: while making character bold, Text intermix few words. Gedit is working fine. Copy/Paste also have problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): openoffice.org-core-3.0.0-9.10.fc10.i386 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open oowriter 2. Copy Text from http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/business/story/2009/01/090111_satyam_meeting_ac.shtml 3. Paste in oowriter Actual results: Character inter-mix as shown in screenshot. Expected results: Should be distant enough. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 09:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477452] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120915.n0C9FmSK009497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477452 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-12 04:15:47 EDT --- You still have a (harmless but) useless fontdir define in your spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:16:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121016.n0CAGT0r022199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-12 05:16:28 EDT --- Could you attach a sample .odt of the problem, I want to be sure I'm looking at the same problem using the same font and fontsize. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121112.n0CBCbxr005236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 David Tardon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtardon at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from David Tardon 2009-01-12 06:12:36 EDT --- It looks like width of the ?? character is handled wrongly in some cases. When I make it bold, it's OK, but when I make bold at least one character on the right side of it, they overlap to some extent. Visual appearance of the character is not changed, but oowriter now seems to think it's narrower. The font is DejaVu Sans 12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121116.n0CBGWg6006172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 --- Comment #3 from David Tardon 2009-01-12 06:16:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328720) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328720) The text I'm playing with -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 13:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121328.n0CDSbfx000723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aalam at redhat.com) | --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-12 08:28:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328730) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328730) easiest example Looks like the font that gets used is Lohit Hindi, and it doesn't have a bold variant. So the artificial emboldening presumably is the cause of the problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:41:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130041.n0D0fuKd014553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-12 19:41:55 EDT --- Have you test on non Firefox (or similar like epiphany)? Firefox has pango. Also, please turn off anti-aliasing before testing. I could only fix hinting but not how pango operates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 00:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130056.n0D0u86F013349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-12 19:56:07 EDT --- Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph you feel is ugly? Personally I feel 'R' looks similar as other characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 01:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130147.n0D1leQS022319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-12 20:47:40 EDT --- Rahul what is the status of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130606.n0D663wU011790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:06:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #233257 +++ > > Description of problem: > Wrong Conjuct combinations are formed for U0C9D+U0CCA and U0C9D+U0CCB. > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > fonts-kannada-2.1.5-3.fc8 > > How reproducible: > 1. Every Time > > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Open gnome-character-map. > 2. Select U0C9D followed by U0CCA followed by U0C9D followed by U0CCB. > > Actual results: > As shown in the attached image > > Expected results: > > As shown by the following steps: > 1. Install http://kannadakasturi.com/font/brhknd.ttf. i tried this font it is not a valid unicode font all kannada characters are pasted on Latin Unicode positions, i doubt this is done for transliteration purpose There is no characters on Kannada unicode code point, so i think it will default show Lohit Kannada for Kannada character display -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:15:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130615.n0D6Fvnc013600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #6 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:15:57 EDT --- is this ISCII/ISFOC based fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130631.n0D6VFwP011615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #7 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:31:15 EDT --- tested same combination in F10 for gedit things working fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130635.n0D6ZfXr012336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |8 --- Comment #9 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:35:41 EDT --- mistakenly changed version from F8 to F10 reverting back -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 06:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130633.n0D6X2s2016280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #8 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 01:33:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328837) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328837) attachemnt showing unicode combination 0c9d-0cca-0c9d-0ccb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130740.n0D7eSTc028876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-13 02:40:27 EDT --- updates specs built is for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130801.n0D81UIp028185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #21 from Parag 2009-01-13 03:01:29 EDT --- Ping? Need to have this fixed before F11 Alpha freeze. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 09:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:14:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Character are inter-mix in Bold fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130914.n0D9EPhH016354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-13 04:14:25 EDT --- I'll take this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 10:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 05:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Glyphs overlap in artificially emboldened fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131019.n0DAJpKT025636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |OpenOffice.org 98024 Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Summary|[hi_IN] Character are |[hi_IN] Glyphs overlap in |inter-mix in Bold fonts |artificially emboldened | |fonts --- Comment #6 from Caolan McNamara 2009-01-13 05:19:50 EDT --- Fix checked in, will be in >= 3.0.1-15.2 unless upstream sees a massive flaw in the workaround -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131209.n0DC9UOe015857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Rahul Bhalerao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #10 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-13 07:09:30 EDT --- As Pravin said (Comment 5), the example font given is not a unicode/opentype font. Thus it is not possible to understand correct rendering required for the case. Please provide the correct screenshot of expected output. Also, as the EOL for f8 is already reached the bug cannot be filed against f8, please make so making version to 'rawhide'. Please update if the bug is present in the current version of the font and fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 12:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131242.n0DCgCb4023459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Bhalerao 2009-01-13 07:42:10 EDT --- The brhknd font mentioned is not a unicode/opentype font. Please provide correct screenshots instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 470592] unable to see/create non-ASCII utf-8 filenames in vfat USB stricks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140000.n0E000Ai015570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470592 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 00:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140048.n0E0mDfj024674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-01-13 19:48:12 EDT --- Akira, please forgive me if this is a stupid question: What is imsettings-xfce actually needed for? Doesn't imsettings store it's config and load it on startup? It is started automatically through the normal fdo autostart and can be configured through the the icon in the tray, so is this package really needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 01:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:51:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478669] port imsettings-xfce to new xfconf backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140151.n0E1ppCs028158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478669 --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-13 20:51:50 EDT --- That relies on xsettings to deliver IM configuration on demand for gtk+ applications at least and also uses the configuration in gconf that gnome-settings-daemon stored. which does take care of it on GNOME. since xfce has own xsettings manager and it doesn't support the key for immodule, we needed add-on to do that. If adding the key to xfconf upstream is reasonable, that would be good. but I guess they don't like gconf at all? Though I can put the configuration for xfce anywhere if you like. then xfconf just delivers it through xsettings. there shouldn't be additional dependencies there. Otherwise separate component like this would be good to manage/maintain it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:01:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462041] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140301.n0E31WVj017192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462041 Bug 462041 depends on bug 462038, which changed state. Bug 462038 Summary: Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 03:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140301.n0E31TIK017152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #15 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-13 22:01:27 EDT --- The problem seems to still exist with latest fontforge in F10 (fontforge-20080828-1.fc10). I have it and it makes fontforge totally unusable. I build an RPM for myself based on devel, removing the libspiro dependency, and everything worked fine (with a nicer font for the UI). Kevin, would you consider pushing the devel version to F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 04:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:51:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140451.n0E4prpQ006361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-13 23:51:53 EDT --- > Kevin, would you consider pushing the devel version to F10? Well, we have talked about doing that in the past, but we need to be very carefull. fontforge is used to build a number of fonts, so we need to make sure the version we push as an update will work to build all the fonts that use it to build in F-10. Otherwise they could be in a bad place if they need to update. Perhaps we could coordinate such a move on the fonts-sig list? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140612.n0E6CSoi020883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 --- Comment #8 from Shankar Prasad 2009-01-14 01:12:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328952) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328952) Screenshot of current and correct rendering Rahul, The above said rendering is there in Lohit-Kannada also. You can have look at the screen shot attached Shankar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 06:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:33:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140633.n0E6XGh0024305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-14 01:33:15 EDT --- built w/ macro used http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=78415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 07:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140702.n0E727Q9021160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #7 from san 2009-01-14 02:02:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hi, could I ask which part of the glyph you feel is ugly? Personally I feel 'R' > looks similar as other characters. please take a look for web sshot I committed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the same black as other strokes. I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 09:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901140957.n0E9vpEm001132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-14 04:57:50 EDT --- I agree with Kevin: while the problem sounds annoying it is probably safest not to update the fontforge version unless necessary. But by all means discuss on fedora-fonts-list - it would be good to have a firm policy on this. Font developers can hopefully use the build from rawhide in the meantime until F11 is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 12:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477690] libchewing multilib conflict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141240.n0ECeknY004972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477690 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 07:40:45 EDT --- libchewing-0.3.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchewing-0.3.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbZYU014887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:34 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477420] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbRVp014741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477420 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477421] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbTd7014770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:28 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477419] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbQNb014709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:25 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477405] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbAK0014420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:10 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477475] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcGdJ015658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:16 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477374] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaiBB014005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:44 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477403] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIb87L014374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:07 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477474] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcFWX015623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:15 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcRun015852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:27 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477437] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbfXM014977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:41 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc0nj015341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:59 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIcJEQ015715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc70t015466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:06 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbwXj015291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:57 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477451] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbvMh015267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:56 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477467] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141838.n0EIc9bk015509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:38:08 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141837.n0EIbJWd014589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:37:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 18:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141836.n0EIaV4i013807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-14 13:36:31 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: ? 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 ? 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142336.n0ENaA18008919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #4 from Qianqian Fang 2009-01-14 18:36:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329052) updated spec file for wqy-zenhei-fonts Let me know if this file makes sense to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 23:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142335.n0ENZ6Lu008706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #3 from Qianqian Fang 2009-01-14 18:35:05 EDT --- sorry for my delay in responding to this upgrade. I used to build all the packages from a FC6 machine, and it took me a while to set up everything on a F10 virtual machine. Now everything seems to be working fine. I have a problem to compile my package (for example, wqy-zenhei-fonts) with the new spec file (attached later): "make i386" complains about missing "wqy-zenhei-fonts-0.8.34" folder, which I assume it is the definition of %{_fontdir}, right? the upstream src file only extract a wqy-zenhei folder, as other font packages from wqy. they are not named based on fedora font packages. What do you suggest me to do to get around this? thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150304.n0F34CMA011846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 22:04:12 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.12-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update system-config-printer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 03:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150302.n0F32GpC011297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 22:02:15 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.12-8.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update system-config-printer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 08:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150828.n0F8SpWf008347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-15 03:28:50 EDT --- np, there are lots of packagers which have not started working on it yer 1. You do not need the %{_fontdir}/*.ttc line in %files 2. Do you actually need to declare the fonts in the legacy core fonts X11 system? If it's not 100% necessary life will be simpler without the fonts.scale bit 3. If you install multiple fontconfig file you must find an expression rpm accepts that can be used as argument to the -f call to %{fontconf} (generaly, using ?? or other rpm wildcards) Also please test with "fontpackages-*-1.14" from rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 23:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901152316.n0FNGHUF015631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #18 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-15 18:16:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329150) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329150) difference between F10 and F11 requirements of fontforge There is something weird going on with F-10's fontforge. Maybe it wasn't built all right or something. Running "rpm -q -R" on it doesn't even list libuninameslist! Attaching a file showing dependency differences between the output of rpm -q -R between what I built on my machine using devel branch of CVS and the latest F-10 rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 00:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:06:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160006.n0G06Q7Z009928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-15 19:06:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > please take a look for web sshot I committed > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which > > Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the > same black as other strokes. Could you kindly screenshot the R in non-Pango application? (such as gedit) > I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. Would you mind re-confirm in 'gnome-appearance-properties' which anti-aliasing is *off* please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 04:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477579] iok should default to map of current locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160405.n0G455Hx032169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477579 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-01-15 23:05:04 EDT --- fixed in iok-1.1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 04:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477581] iok should avoid resizing when changing maps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160408.n0G48mPv018394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477581 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-01-15 23:08:47 EDT --- I will still say that font size is not same across latin as well as Indic fonts, this bug will still be exist for even any Indic map and English map. Though I tried some different approach to draw keyboard in iok-1.1.0 which is in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 05:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and "Go To" window couldn't be inputted. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160519.n0G5JKjC011113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-01-16 00:19:19 EDT --- Yeah, the one in rawhide was built with pango/cairo/spiro support. That support was not available (Or didn't work) when the f10 fontforge was built, so that explains a lot of them. Not sure why libuninameslist isn't in there. :( thats odd. Can you see any ill effect from it? That might be one more reason to try and update f10's fontforge... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901160922.n0G9Mtfi004919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 --- Comment #1 from Shankar Prasad 2009-01-16 04:22:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329189) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329189) iok ui screenshot with kn-kgp with shift key enabled.mim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 09:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] New: [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 Summary: [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iok AssignedTo: pnemade at redhat.com ReportedBy: svenkate at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=329188) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329188) iok ui screenshot with kn-kgp.mim Description of problem: The Keymap kgp(kn-kgp.mim) showing the English characters in iok ui Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iok-1.1.0-1.fc11i386 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Install kn_IN support and Log in kn_IN locale 2.Start the iok 3.Click on Keymap->Open and select kn-kgp.mim from /usr/share/m17n/folder/ Actual results: Few keys are showing the English character Expected results: They should be mapped to appropriate kannada character Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161208.n0GC84Nj019883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #10 from san 2009-01-16 07:08:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329197) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329197) antialias use Subpixel option in Ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161206.n0GC6bEH019699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 san changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(watchingman at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #9 from san 2009-01-16 07:06:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329196) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329196) antialias use Grayscale option in Ubuntu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 12:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901161212.n0GCC0p9006135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #11 from san 2009-01-16 07:11:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > please take a look for web sshot I committed > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=325770) in which > > > > Letter "R" is marked with red color. the last stroke of "R" is gray not the > > same black as other strokes. > > Could you kindly screenshot the R in non-Pango application? (such as gedit) > > > > I enable slight hinting for Liberation Sans. > > Would you mind re-confirm in 'gnome-appearance-properties' which anti-aliasing > is *off* please? refer to comment 9 and 10. it seems antialias with subpixel enabled cannot get blurriness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:45:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162345.n0GNjhEG008236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:45:41 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update system-config-printer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-11136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:49:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162349.n0GNn2DZ009489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:49:02 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update system-config-printer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 02:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:19:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444814] Amharaic defaults to native input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170219.n0H2JMLY020366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444814 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:14:36 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-16 21:19:21 EDT --- I guess one way to fix this would be to split the gtk im modules off from the main gtk package, either as a single -immodules package, or if you want to be more finegrained, one subpackage per module. Then we can put those subpackages in the corresponding language support groups, and not install them by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 02:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170222.n0H2M6BV003000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:28:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-16 21:22:05 EDT --- putting "*" for xim would mean that _all_ locales would default to loading xim, even en or de. That has been discussed (and rejected) upstream before, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58201. I don't think we should work around multilib deficiencies in this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 05:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170552.n0H5qECo023359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #5 from Rajeesh 2009-01-17 00:52:13 EDT --- spec is updated, and Koji has built the rawhide packages successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 13:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 08:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171347.n0HDlZQm007777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 08:47:34 EDT --- FPC requested much stricter font package naming rules so some naming changes are in order too (sorry) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#fpc_renaming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171744.n0HHi0Gk000933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |svenkate at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:43:59 EDT --- That font isn't unicode-compliant. The correct rendering will be produced using the steps I gave, viz. entering the combination "JoJO" in the given webpage's text entry. However as I said in comment 2 the correct rendering is already available in Lohit Kannada as the glyphs: U0C9D_U0CCA.pstf U0C9D_U0CCB.pstf. Attachment 328837 from comment 8 doesn't match with the above 2 glyphs, so it looks like this bug isn't fixed yet. [Cc'ing Shankar Prasad since I suppose he will be able to verify this issue like he verified my update to bug 428427.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:51:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479100] [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171751.n0HHpQVF002428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479100 --- Comment #12 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:51:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329287) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329287) Screenshot of fontforge showing the correct glyphs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 17:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 428427] [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901171756.n0HHugfH018893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428427 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #9 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-17 12:56:40 EDT --- Please note that there already are glyphs in the font named: U0CAC_U0CCA.pstf [can be renamed to the more appropriate U0CAA_U0CCA.pstf?], U0CAB_U0CC3.abvs_U0CC0.psts [can be renamed to U0CAB_U0CCA.pstf?], U0CAA_U0CCB.pstf, and U0CAB_U0CCB.pstf, which show the correct conjuncts. Only some ligature rules in the font should be changed, like in the previous patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 20:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172055.n0HKt5vR002177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de --- Comment #13 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-17 15:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The problem seems to have been fonts.{scale,dir} files that weren't upgraded > when I upgraded from f8 to f9. After doing > > fc-cache /usr/share/X11/fonts/Type1 This does not help on my system. F9 (upgraded from F8), xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-6.fc9.noarch fontconfig-2.5.0-2.fc9.i386 fc-cache does not touch fonts.{scale,dir}, apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 21:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901172103.n0HL3hbx003769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-17 16:03:42 EDT --- fontconfig does not use fonts.{scale,dir}. They're only needed by the old brittle legacy deprecated X11 core font systems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 15:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:39:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181539.n0IFdPqF013510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #15 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-01-18 10:39:24 EDT --- Unfortunately, this "old brittle legacy etc." font system prevents, of all things, "fontforge" from launching. Is there any way to get "fontforge" to run? (The fontforge bug has been marked a duplicate of this one.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 18:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:42:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181842.n0IIgaLn012977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 13:42:35 EDT --- You can always try the rawhide fontforge version, it's supposed to use cairo and other modern stuff now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182121.n0ILLIjC011057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 16:21:17 EDT --- Some additional QA comments (appart from the naming issue) ? do not define a fontdir, use the %{_fontdir} provided by the fontpackages macro set ? I think you'll find out if you check the descriptions of the resulting packages that they are a bit redundant ? I'm almost certain Behdad would be horrified by all the legacy compat hackery cruft in this package. Please consider dropping some of it. Or at least move it to separate optional -compat packages ? Please do not include the same files in the two subpackages; the multi-fonts official spec templates provides a common subpackage for this kind of stuff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:40:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182140.n0ILepOW014227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-18 16:40:50 EDT --- Some QA comments: ? you should not include package names in descriptions; when the packages are renamed you get to fix all the descriptions ;) ? I feel it's a bit easier to read when the %_font_pkg are kept next to the corresponding subpackage declaration, but then I wrote the template ? for some reason yum does not want to update from smc-fonts-kalyani, but your spec look sane so it may be a yum bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 23:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182327.n0INRZvp001357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 01:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190119.n0J1J3Hf007768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 20:19:03 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 01:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190119.n0J1J1aj021186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 20:19:00 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 04:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:50:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190450.n0J4oDBD022013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-18 23:50:12 EDT --- built w/ new naming and splitting rules http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:06:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479974] useradd not accepting UTF8 string (unable to create username in local language/script) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190606.n0J66Efa001949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479974 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:13:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190613.n0J6Dugj002969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 01:13:56 EDT --- renamed and rebuilt with %_font_pkg macro http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 06:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190617.n0J6H9rN022621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Depends on| |253813 --- Comment #12 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 01:17:08 EDT --- updated in cvs tree, requested rel-eng for fedora 11 tree of new package name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 07:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190759.n0J7xMSB020032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 --- Comment #22 from Parag 2009-01-19 02:59:20 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 08:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:31:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190831.n0J8VPFQ012933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190920.n0J9Kw4w023399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|gtk2 |imsettings Version|10 |rawhide AssignedTo|mclasen at redhat.com |tagoh at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 04:20:57 EDT --- Moving this to imsettings since the solution suggested in the upstream bug was to use GTK_IM_MODULE=xim by default. Having said that: who is right, KDE or GNOME? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190921.n0J9LSEe004941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 09:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444814] Amharaic defaults to native input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190924.n0J9OnxR024204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444814 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-19 04:24:48 EDT --- Yeah sounds reasonable (or gtk2-extra-immodules). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 10:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:17:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 452938] gtk.immodule should fallback to im-xim.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191017.n0JAHaTV016836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452938 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #13 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-19 05:17:35 EDT --- What's the expected behavior here? do we want to use im-xim.so by default anyway? that's really up to xinput conf from IM packages and right now imsettings just exports envvar from it though. Or do you want imsettings to resolve multilib issue and set GTK_IM_MODULE=xim as needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 16:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:02:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473209] Please add Maithili and Nepali languages to language selection menu in anaconda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191602.n0JG273O026391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473209 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #23 from Chris Lumens 2009-01-19 11:02:06 EDT --- Since this doesn't require any new keyboard layouts defined, I believe it's all handled in the patch to anaconda that I just pushed. This should therefore be fixed in the next build of anaconda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480669] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: beland at alum.mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=329386) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329386) excerpts from yum output When installing baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* as part of the latest rawhide, I get a number of errors from yum, including a scriptlet failure. See attached log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191917.n0JJHAZ9020445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com Component|baekmuk-ttf-fonts |fontconfig AssignedTo|cchance at redhat.com |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 14:17:09 EDT --- Yes, fontconfig is broken in rawhide right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 19:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:18:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480669] baekmuk-ttf-fonts-* scriptlet failure during yum update In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191918.n0JJInS4001346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480669 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 14:18:48 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480512 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 21:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192123.n0JLNBku031051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 16:23:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ? for some reason yum does not want to update from smc-fonts-kalyani, but your > spec look sane so it may be a yum bug After spending ~ 3h trying to understand why smc-fonts would not update James Antill noticed there is a typo in the versions used in the obsoletes rules: The kalyani subpackage declares Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04-1.3 instead of Obsoletes: %{name}-kalyani < 04.1-3 James advises simplifying your release numbering. He also stated you owe him a cherry coke :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 23:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192346.n0JNkOOQ027847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 00:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200018.n0K0I1Ke001629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-19 19:18:00 EDT --- Some QA review: 1. the Microsoft font names are likely to be trademarked to hell, I hope someone checked with spot when they were added to the package description 2. the URL should probably be changed to the new fedorahosted Liberation homepage 3. Requires: %{name}-sans >= %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-serif >= %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-mono >= %{version}-%{release} is going to create a huge mess. You don't have any packages named %{name}-foo anymore, so package resolvers won't know what to do 4. If you want to create an upgrade path (good idea!) I suggest you do it in a compat package like dejavu, vera and mgopen. The advantage of a compat package is it has a different package name, so you don't mix past and present names, and is obviously going away someday, so people won't expect you to keep it forever For example the new vera spec includes: %package compat Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts < 1.10-9 Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %description compat This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to the new package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please do not reference it or depend on it in any way. [?] %files compat IIRC the empty %files is needed for rpm to create an empty subpackage 5. this is somewhat confusing, but you do not need for the common subpackage to be named foo-common-fonts. I realise I hadn't really explained this point, so I've added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F to the FAQ. You're not the first one to ask/make the mistake (though it's mainly cosmetical) 6. Liberation is a bit special. It has specific fontconfig rules in fontconfig itself to handle MS fonts substitution, so Behdad would like you not to include fontconfig files in your liberation package (but do add them to non-Liberation packages). Vera had the same treatment when it mattered and so our vera package does not include fontconfig rules either 7. you do not need to require fontpackages-filesystem in the font subpackages, they require the common subpackage and it requires in turn fontpackages-filesystem do all is going to be well 8. you do not need to repeat the License info in each subpackage, if you don't list it the value of the main License declaration is going to be inherited by subpackages (you can check by doing a less on the package files once they're built) (you should not need to repeat Group either but this problem has only be fixed recently in a rpm version not available on our builders) 9. you should not Obsoletes: %{name}-foo < %{version}-%{release} in your font subpackage, but Obsolete packages older than the particular version where the renaming occured. For liberation probably Obsoletes: %{name}-foo < 1.04.93-4 10. The summary of your serif package has a problem, Liberation serif is not a sans-serif font 11. someday you really need to build the ttf from sfds in %build. In the meanwhile at least use the -p flag when installing the ttf files install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} 12. what's the purpose of the cd ../ in the middle of %install? 13. you should probably create %{buildroot}%{catalogue} the same way the other directories were created at the beginning of %install And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:10:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200110.n0K1AY3d029148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:09:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200109.n0K19sDo011181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 01:12:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200112.n0K1CncL011945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE 2009-01-19 20:12:48 EDT --- Hi spot, what would be your comment about mentioning Microsoft's font name in liberation-fonts' descriptions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200218.n0K2Ipx0008352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-19 21:18:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk > today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too I'll refine the baekmuk first. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:50:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480512] fontconfig - fc-cache refuses to write caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200250.n0K2oXLV028877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480512 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 02:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200255.n0K2tSkI014698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 03:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200328.n0K3Su9T005071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #8 from Rajeesh 2009-01-19 22:28:55 EDT --- Ah, my bad! Will fix them all soon. I offer him a beer next time we meet ;-) Thanks Nicolas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 04:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:23:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480719] New: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazqueznet at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It would be nice if the ibus toolbar had the ability to expand to the left instead of the right when the IM is changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200502.n0K52bjW009972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200502.n0K52QB2009950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-01-20 00:02:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329421) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329421) iok ui screenshot with kn-kgp with shift key enabled.mim looks like something goes wrong in parser for kn-kgp.mim and that made not to parse V english key. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 05:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200536.n0K5aJsC015908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-01-20 00:36:18 EDT --- fixed now in iok-1.2.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 07:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901200713.n0K7D5tk014266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Bug 477373 depends on bug 253813, which changed state. Bug 253813 Summary: Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 10:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 05:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480750] New: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: yum update fails reporting liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts all require liberation-common-fonts, however, the package name appears to be liberation-fonts-common Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.04-93-5 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum update 2. 3. Actual results: yum reports missing dependencies Expected results: update succeeds Additional info: The liberation-fonts.spec file creates a package liberation-fonts-common, but liberation-{serif|mono|sans}-fonts have a dependency on liberation-common-fonts (i.e. comman and fonts reversed). The same applies for baekmuk-ttf-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201556.n0KFuR22006942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-01-20 10:56:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Hi spot, what would be your comment about mentioning Microsoft's font name in > liberation-fonts' descriptions? Yeah, I think this is fine. You should not use any trademark symbols here, but the way these trademarks are used is well within the realm of fair use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201601.n0KG1BfT007961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicholas Wourms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nwourms at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Nicholas Wourms 2009-01-20 11:01:10 EDT --- You switched back to the fonts-common package name but you forgot to change the Requires: to reflect this change. Do you even bother trying to install the packages after you make the changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 16:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201614.n0KGEotL010943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicholas Wourms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nwourms at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Nicholas Wourms 2009-01-20 11:14:49 EDT --- Please update the publican package to reflect this change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202306.n0KN6GSM014036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:06:16 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:04:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202304.n0KN4s8S013462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:04:54 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202344.n0KNiT8D021165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quentin at armitage.org.uk --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- *** Bug 480750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 23:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480750] liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901202344.n0KNiSPx021141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- fixed on rawhide *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477410 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 00:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210053.n0L0rZWw009428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Component|VLGothic-fonts |fontconfig Blocks| |446452 AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki at users.sourcefor |besfahbo at redhat.com |ge.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210135.n0L1ZNgZ017612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210134.n0L1Ywx1017148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210134.n0L1YNs0017034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Version|10 |rawhide Blocks| |446451 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:41:48 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210136.n0L1aDOn017771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:51:04 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210137.n0L1brI9018074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com Component|ibus-chewing |ibus-table --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-20 20:37:53 EDT --- This is still true for f10 and rawhide right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:49:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210149.n0L1ngmT011918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #3 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 20:49:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329524) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329524) test fix, post auto-hinting applied with fontforge Could you please check if this .ttf has 'u' fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:47:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210147.n0L1lvV8011753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 20:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Would you mean the pixel on bottom left corner? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210150.n0L1o3aN020246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cody at zone38.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:27:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210227.n0L2RcTk028766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #5 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 21:27:37 EDT --- Still broken, but in a different way. See attachment 329526. For what it's worth, the "u" is OK in version 1.03 of the font - can the hinting be copied from that version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210227.n0L2R8jY028593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cody at zone38.net) | --- Comment #4 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 21:27:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329526) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329526) Appearance of auto-hinted "u" in Liberation Mono -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210250.n0L2oLLE024361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #6 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 21:50:20 EDT --- I have checked again. The hinting instructions and cvt are totally same between ver 1.03 and current version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210251.n0L2pZOn001482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 02:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 471833] use lowercase input-method names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210253.n0L2rkvd024972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471833 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-20 21:53:45 EDT --- tried the above idea and facing an issue for XIM. imsettings doesn't manage xinput conf for XIM directly but accessing through xim.conf to get the right thing for current locale. the above idea makes harder to see which legacy XIM server will be used really. that may makes sense at some point that one is surely enabling XIM though. displaying SHORT_DESC too may be good perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:00:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210300.n0L30Oc6026485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:00:23 EDT --- Weird. No idea what would be causing that. I may have to play with it in FontForge some myself to see what might be causing this quirk... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210315.n0L3F5mP006258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:15:04 EDT --- I have triaged on my Fedora 10 and Liberation Mono Bold looks fine (attached screenshots). Since I didn't have problem on my OpenOffice, I currently have no idea about this yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210316.n0L3GajU006583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:16:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329532) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329532) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:17:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210317.n0L3HFnR030457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:17:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329535) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329535) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210320.n0L3KESW031161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:20:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329537) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329537) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:19:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210319.n0L3JCnY006986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #11 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-20 22:19:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329536) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329536) screenshot w/ fix sample -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:22:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210322.n0L3MrLx031974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #13 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:22:53 EDT --- It looks fine with hinting turned off on my system too; same if I set fontconfig to use auto-hinting. Only if I use bytecode hinting (which is enabled by default in Ubuntu) does it look "wrong". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210346.n0L3kRLj013489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #15 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:46:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329539) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329539) Screenshot of fix from attachment 329538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210344.n0L3ipY7012868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #14 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:44:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329538) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329538) fixed by copying hinting from "u" in v1.03 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 03:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:48:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479371] Broken hinting on "u" in Liberation Mono Bold In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210348.n0L3m59R013724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #16 from Cody Boisclair 2009-01-20 22:48:04 EDT --- I fixed it by using Edit -> Copy From -> TrueType Instructions to copy the "u" character from version 1.03 to 1.04. The font file itself is in attachment 329538, and a screenshot of how the fixed version appears under bytecode hinting is in attachment 329539. Feel free to adopt this patched version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 05:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210519.n0L5JmUA029989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 00:19:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329544) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329544) waterfall shows R is displayed nicely -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 05:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210521.n0L5LGxx030579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #13 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 00:21:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329546) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329546) oowriter shows R is displayed nicely 6px-18px -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 05:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480889] New: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480889 Summary: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: wtogami at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Blocks: 446451 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ibus defines hotkeys for Next engine (and Previous engine), which can easily be triggered by mistake. I suggest doing the same as we did for scim and only enabling it by default on Chinese desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] New: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 Summary: [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: using Fresh kde4 session, I have two ibus icons on my desktop and one ibus icon was out of tray. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11.i386 How reproducible: Everytime during login Steps to Reproduce: 1. run kde session (fresh if you can by remove ~/.kde/) 2. 3. Actual results: 2 icons are there and only one dock in system tray Expected results: 1) Should it not be only 1 icon per session? Additional info: 1) I have 1 X session running on my mission 2)ps -auxx|grep ibus Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.7/FAQ aalam 3649 0.0 0.6 11200 6628 ? S 11:34 0:00 python /usr/bin/ibus aalam 3708 0.0 0.7 12468 7944 ? S 11:34 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus/daemon/ibusdaemon.py aalam 3711 0.0 0.7 12224 7500 ? S 11:35 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus/gconf/main.py aalam 3712 0.2 2.4 73312 24956 ? S 11:35 0:02 python /usr/share/ibus/ui/gtk/main.py aalam 3713 0.0 0.4 15772 4056 ? S 11:35 0:00 /usr/bin/ibus-x11 --kill-daemon aalam 3739 0.0 0.7 12592 7812 ? S 11:35 0:00 python /usr/share/ibus-m17n/engine/main.py pa:jhelum root 4192 0.0 0.0 4484 716 pts/2 S+ 11:47 0:00 grep ibus 3) kdebase-4.1.96-1.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210656.n0L6uJS3008951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-01-21 01:56:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329555) only one working with application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] [kde session]ibus systray icon 2 icons in desktop and one is not dock in system tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210655.n0L6tYns018131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-01-21 01:55:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329554) two icon on desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] anaconda fails to parse 3 letter locale with python 2.6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210709.n0L79U37020448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475938] [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210737.n0L7bfoj016967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475938 --- Comment #1 from A S Alam 2009-01-21 02:37:40 EDT --- ping pls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475938] [ALL LANG] Application is not running any languages/locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210751.n0L7psqR028637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475938 --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-01-21 02:51:54 EDT --- working fine with rawhide (file-roller-2.25.1-5.fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:15:39 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433512] need a yum plugin to auto-install langpacks for kde, openoffice, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210915.n0L9FdT2004802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433512 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 04:15:38 EDT --- Bill recently posted an initial prototype to fedora-devel-list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg00882.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433512] need a yum plugin to auto-install langpacks for kde, openoffice, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210912.n0L9C0JZ004039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433512 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:07:24 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433512] need a yum plugin to auto-install langpacks for kde, openoffice, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210916.n0L9Gt7A005161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433512 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 04:16:53 EDT --- *** Bug 475127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475127] Installation of ibus doesn't include installation of ibus-gtk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210916.n0L9GsGl005125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475127 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 04:16:53 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 433512 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 09:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] [kde] ibus systray icon is not updated like toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210949.n0L9nBSN021872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Blocks| |446452 Summary|[kde session]ibus systray |[kde] ibus systray icon is |icon 2 icons in desktop and |not updated like toolbar |one is not dock in system | |tray | --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 04:49:10 EDT --- There is one icon in the panel tray and one part of the ibus toolbar. However both should show same status: reproduced comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 18:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:24:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433512] need a yum plugin to auto-install langpacks for kde, openoffice, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211824.n0LIOewK013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433512 --- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham 2009-01-21 13:24:38 EDT --- Re: the duplicated bug, the plugin wouldn't work for that as it's currently written, as it's only for adding packages where the language code is part of the package name. It doesn't handle all conditional cases in comps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212130.n0LLU0Mj011352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:47 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLTlLY022162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:46 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLTi5v022117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:43 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLT6jN021980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:04 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 468553] Defaut margins don't seem to be used for text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212138.n0LLcYhQ026210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468553 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:38:33 EDT --- system-config-printer-1.0.13-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:29:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212329.n0LNTQvk020381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-21 18:29:25 EDT --- Some comments on http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts.spec?revision=1.1&view=markup 1. you do not need those in the -common subpackage or the fonts subpackages. Put them in the -compat subpackage only Conflicts: fonts-chinese <= 3.03-9.fc8 Obsoletes: fonts-chinese < 3.03-13 Obsoletes: ttfonts-zh_CN <= 2.14-10, ttfonts-zh_TW <= 2.11-28 2. your Obsoletes: %{name}-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 should be changed to Obsoletes: cjkunifonts-uming < 0.2.20080216.1-16 since your package %{name} is now cjkuni-fonts (same for ukai and compat) Didn't see anything else obvious, of course testing the upgrade path yourself once the package is built is the best way to catch problems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 23:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:32:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] fc-cache install errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212332.n0LNWBUW021264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:19:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 433512] need a yum plugin to auto-install langpacks for kde, openoffice, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220019.n0M0JtqS018298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433512 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:19:54 EDT --- Yep sure, but I think it could be expanded with some work to cover most required cases. (I just followed up belatedly to your original post on fedora-devel-list too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 00:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220059.n0M0xeuF024904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 19:59:38 EDT --- I wonder if comment 7 is not due to the removal of ibm-type1 fonts from fedora? * Mon Jan 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway - 7.2-6 - IBM refused to relicense ibm-type1 fonts with permission to modify, so they were dropped (bugzilla 317641) Maybe fontforge needs to be patched to use another font, or that already fixed? (Runs for me anyway with F10 and rawhide.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 01:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:14:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220114.n0M1EjEW008040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream AssignedTo|than at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-21 20:14:43 EDT --- Caius, could you do that, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 02:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477373] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220227.n0M2RRIP008839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|cjkunifonts |cjkuni-fonts --- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 21:27:26 EDT --- changed to cjkuni-fonts because of new naming rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466850] The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220313.n0M3DbEZ030175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com Component|ibus |ibus-table Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466850] The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220320.n0M3KPXS031939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 --- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-21 22:20:25 EDT --- Contacted upstream (acevery at gmail.com) and modified in upstream repo now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 03:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:57:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480289] [kn_IN] For kgp keymap in the user interface, English characters shown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220357.n0M3v8BT026458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480289 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-01-21 22:57:07 EDT --- fixed package is in rawhide now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475063] UI issues in iok In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220401.n0M41wsF008065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475063 --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-01-21 23:01:58 EDT --- With iok-1.2.0 release, button sizes are now good to be hit using mouse. About making iok remove window titlebar and menubar, I will think on it later on as we also need keymap customizing features in same iok window interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] New: ibus causes pidgin to crash Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus causes pidgin to crash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 Summary: ibus causes pidgin to crash Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10.x86_64 ibus-anthy-0.1.1.20080912-1.fc10.x86_64 pidgin-2.5.4-1.fc10.x86_64 LANG=en_US.utf8 ibus IM causes pidgin to occasionally crash. Happens unpredictably it is difficult to reproduce on demand. We need good reports with full debuginfo crash dumps and what you were doing at the time of the crash. debuginfo-install pidgin ibus bug-buddy http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/pidgin-bugreport.txt Here is an incomplete crash dump. Sadly I did not have ibus*debuginfo installed at the time. Will have more complete dumps later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220459.n0M4xeG4004888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 04:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] New: Tracker for ibus bugs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tracker for ibus bugs Alias: ibus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Summary: Tracker for ibus bugs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n, Tracking Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: wtogami at redhat.com, yshao at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is a tracking bugs for all iBus issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 06:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220632.n0M6WLTA003879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #9 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-22 01:32:20 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:27:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] ibus causes pidgin to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220727.n0M7RGgE000722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220727.n0M7RFla000693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481095, 481093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480719] [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n8Bo005024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n4K6004937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480889] ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n96J005040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480889 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220751.n0M7pSri005743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466430, 466844, 466850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220751.n0M7pTQO005789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466871] ibus engine setup should merge "started" and "preload" configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n7iY005006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466871 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466857] [rfe] ibus should have config option to allow turning off the toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n6pL004976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466857 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n5On004958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480891] [kde] ibus systray icon is not updated like toolbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n9Cm005060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480891 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466850] The Cang Jie 5 mapping table varies from the one in scim-tables especially on punctuation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220751.n0M7pUSM005810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466850 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466430] Feature request: Wildcard (*) for key combination on cangjie5. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220751.n0M7pTeq005768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466430 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 07:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 02:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220749.n0M7n3cH004910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466232, 466852, 466857, | |466859, 466871, 480719, | |480889, 480891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:06:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220806.n0M86Vh3009072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 08:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:05:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901220805.n0M85o30022595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ibus |i18n AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |eng-i18n-bugs at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 11:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:22:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479974] useradd not accepting UTF8 string (unable to create username in local language/script) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221122.n0MBM3w2023779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479974 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pvrabec at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221319.n0MDJT9w019343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 --- Comment #7 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-22 08:19:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > This is still true for f10 and rawhide right? Yes. Submitted to upstream and merged into upstream's repo. The patch is not in f10 and rawhide yet, atm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 14:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] New: S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 Summary: S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: system-config-language AssignedTo: psatpute at redhat.com ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: psatpute at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: S-c-language crashes while installing new language with traceback zero division error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): system-config-language-1.3.2-3.fc10.noarch How reproducible: install new language support, occurred once Steps to Reproduce: 1. select new language, click ok 2. let new language install in the next dialog Actual results: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/system-config-language/gui_progress.py", line 101, in callback pct = amount/float(total) ZeroDivisionError: float division error: python callback > failed, aborting! Expected results: S-c-language not crashing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 18:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477458] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221817.n0MIHJLK031976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477458 --- Comment #9 from Rajeesh 2009-01-22 13:17:18 EDT --- Updated the SPEC with all the changes suggested. Packages are built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 21:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:44:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222144.n0MLihFX017661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-22 16:44:43 EDT --- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf/fonts.scale from install of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-16.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts-2.2-13.fc11.noarch Your -common subpackage needs to obsolete baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] New: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240 Summary: iso-codes updates for Serbian locales Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: iso-codes AssignedTo: caillon at redhat.com ReportedBy: miloskomarcevic at netscape.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: caillon at redhat.com, pnemade at redhat.com, fedora-trans-sr at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Please update iso-codes information for Serbian locales using the attached po files which correct numerous mistakes, most importantly pertaining to some aspects of the related Gnome bug. Have tried sending these upstream to the relevant people maintaining these at the Translation Project with no response so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:31:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] iso-codes updates for Serbian locales In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222331.n0MNVZnK009095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240 --- Comment #1 from Milos Komarcevic 2009-01-22 18:31:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329754) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329754) iso-codes updates for Serbian locales -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:33:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466859] Dynamic order of candidate frequency. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222333.n0MNXhHG009416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466859 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222335.n0MNZXI0024823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |1 AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-22 18:35:32 EDT --- Then please move the bug to rawhide :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:37:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222337.n0MNb1UG010255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|1 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 23:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481068] bitmap-fonts needs updating to revised packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901222339.n0MNdqgH010621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481068 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446452 |446451 Summary|fc-cache install errors |bitmap-fonts needs updating | |to revised packaging | |guidelines --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-22 18:39:51 EDT --- Fontconfig got fixed but the package still needs updating to the new macros I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:03:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] New: no autologin for liveuser after logging out Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: no autologin for liveuser after logging out https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 Summary: no autologin for liveuser after logging out Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n, Regression Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gdm AssignedTo: jmccann at redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: jmccann at redhat.com, rstrode at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: No sure if it is intentional but with current gdm in rawhide after liveuser logs out, autologin is not available at gdm login: which makes it hard to change language or keyboard settings - specially if liveuser got autologged in and actually had wanted to change language or kbd initially. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gdm-2.25.2-2.fc11 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. login as liveuser in live rawhide spin 2. logout 3. try to change lang/kbd Actual results: 3. no autologin so hard to change lang/kbd specially if one does not know "Other... -> liveuser". Expected results: autologin to be available as in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 05:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230541.n0N5f8qd014836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Golita Yue changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gyue at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Golita Yue 2009-01-23 00:41:07 EDT --- install pidgin-2.5.3-1.fc10.i386 can input Chinese by ibus in QQ chat window. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 06:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230600.n0N60Jcl001785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 --- Comment #4 from Gong Han 2009-01-23 01:00:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > install pidgin-2.5.3-1.fc10.i386 > can input Chinese by ibus in QQ chat window. I'm using pidgin-2.5.4-1.fc10.i386 if the message appears first automatically (popup message, such as Qun message and user offline message), the Chinese input method will not be able to be called. But, If I open a QQ chat window first manually(without any popup offline messages), I can input Chinese. (they fixed this.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 06:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230641.n0N6fh3g009253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |477918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 06:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477918] ibus can't be called in pidgin only if open a QQ protocol chat windows first. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230641.n0N6fgRp009229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477918 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|pidgin |ibus Blocks| |481098 AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |phuang at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Warren Togami 2009-01-23 01:41:41 EDT --- I am going to guess that this is an ibus bug, especially if SCIM does not have the same problem. (Does it?) Reassigning to ibus, especially since there is no way I will be able to solve this myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 07:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:41:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230741.n0N7fKMa021080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(jreznik at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-23 02:41:19 EDT --- its working fine at my end, it crashing while selecting which language? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 09:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479974] useradd not accepting UTF8 string (unable to create username in local language/script) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230914.n0N9EkVE023472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479974 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-23 04:14:46 EDT --- reported to upstream https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=311367&group_id=30580&atid=411478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 09:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:12:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479974] useradd not accepting UTF8 string (unable to create username in local language/script) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901230912.n0N9COA3023128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479974 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-23 04:12:24 EDT --- the problem in present in good_name function its check for ascii characters if (!*name || !((*name >= 'a' && *name <= 'z') || (*name >= 'A' && *name <= 'Z') || (*name >= '0' && *name <= '9') || *name == '_' || *name == '.')) return 0; while (*++name) { if (!( (*name >= 'a' && *name <= 'z') || (*name >= 'A' && *name <= 'Z') || (*name >= '0' && *name <= '9') || *name == '_' || *name == '.' || *name == '-' || (*name == '$' && *(name + 1) == '\0'))) return 0; but if we input U+0915, it UTF-8 = E0 A4 95 since E0 it is not valid, useradd not adding username saying its invalid username -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 12:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 07:11:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481279] New: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 Summary: Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: quentin at armitage.org.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Attempting yum update of baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common fails sating conflict against baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts 2.2.13 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.2.15 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.yum update 2. 3. Actual results: Reports conflict eror described above Expected results: Successful update Additional info: in the %package -n %{fontname}-fonts-common section of the .spec file, should there be an obsoletes %{fontname}-common-fonts < 2.2.13(or is it 2.2.14 - common-fonts was last in version 2.2.13). I also noticed that when I had 2.2.13 installed, there was a baekmuk-fonts-common version 2.2.10 still installed, and presumably that should have been obsoleted by a previous update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 15:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231539.n0NFdFlx029612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jreznik at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-01-23 10:39:14 EDT --- Hmm, I can't reproduce it now too after uninstalling language support (Greek) and installing it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 01:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240127.n0O1RRlK010619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #7 from han pingtian 2009-01-23 20:27:26 EDT --- hi, The error messages mentioned in comment #3 and #5 seems disappears, right? But still no sound in stardict. It seems that the gnome_sound_play() in src/desktop.cpp, play_wav_file(), doesn't play the wav files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:11 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmBG9026455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmpfb026608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 11:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241148.n0OBmPPk026523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 15:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241524.n0OFOqLr001025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-01-24 10:24:52 EDT --- Ok, so I can 100% reproduce it while selecting Czech language support and s-c-language is used for first time. Checked on to different installations from KDE Live F10 CD. So sorry for misleading by Greek, it's Czech, I wasn't sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:17:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] New: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Summary: Symbol U+0431 looks blurry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: sergei at regolit.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=329915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329915) The difference before old and new glyph. Description of problem: Symbol U+0431 (russian letter ???) looks bad since revision 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. In that revision glyph's shape was altered but hint instructions were not. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Render string containing symbol "?" with antialiasing turned on and compare with revision before 877cd82cc8ef4b7f9f1b3645ad0dd54efe60e3fb. Actual results: Expected results: Normal shape is expected. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 19:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241927.n0OJRob0008141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Stolyarov 2009-01-24 14:27:50 EDT --- The font is Libertion Sans. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 20:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481279] Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242054.n0OKs48Y022999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 --- Comment #1 from Christopher Beland 2009-01-24 15:54:03 EDT --- This is apparently part of the packaging changes requested at bug 477332. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242118.n0OLIOS8027545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quentin at armitage.org.uk --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 16:18:23 EDT --- *** Bug 481279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 21:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481279] Missing obsoletes statement for %{fontname}-common-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242118.n0OLINPe027512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481279 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-24 16:18:22 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 477332 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:59:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251859.n0PIx5jr019141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 13:59:04 EDT --- I think I have a fix to this problem (but not compatible with the latest .sfd format in use at http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd) and some justification for it. I hope someone can fix the font correspondingly. I am put up with an old Mandriva distro with pango-1.10.0-3mdk and fontforge-1.0-0.20050809.1mdk. I used the Lohit Telugu font extracted from lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm and the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm. For comparing the fonts, I created .sfd's using the above fontforge (which cannot create or open the latest .sfd format). I extracted the sources for pango-1.10.0-3mdk and added a few debug messages and observed the difference between the messages produced while rendering "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d" for the 2 fonts (pasting the combination into the font selection dialog for gvim while Pothana2000 is selected and then selecting Lohit Telugu). The debug messages show a "haln" substitution that is performed only for Pothana2000 and not Lohit Telugu. The entire sequence of substitutions for Pothana2000 is: ya + ra + halant + halant (Pango-reordered) --blwf-> ya + below-base-ra + halant --blws-> ya + wide-below-base-ra + halant --haln-> ya-halant + below-base-ra. The way Pothana2000 differs from Lohit Telugu is two-fold. First, the below-base forms are shown with "gproperties 0x8" in the messages as opposed to "gproperties 0x2" which corresponds to the opentype glyph class "mark" as opposed to "base glyph." >From Pothana2000.sfd: ChainSub: coverage 0 1 'blws' 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Coverage: 25 RaOttuWide1 RaOttuMiddle1 BCoverage: 114 Jha Ya ... 1 SeqLookup: 0 'L005' EndFPST ... StartChar: RaOttuWide1 ... GlyphClass: 4 ... EndChar ... StartChar: RaOttuMiddle1 ... GlyphClass: 4 ... Substitution: 0 65534 'L005' RaOttuWide1 ... Ligature: 0 1 'blwf' Ra Halanth EndChar >From Lohit-Telugu.sfd: ChainSub: coverage 0 0 'blws' 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 Coverage: 16 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf BCoverage: 5 U0C2F 1 SeqLookup: 0 'L321' EndFPST ... StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.blwf ... GlyphClass: 2 ... Substitution: 0 65534 'L321' glyph495 ... Ligature: 0 0 'blwf' U0C30 U0C4D EndChar ... StartChar: glyph495 ... GlyphClass: 2 ... EndChar Second, the ligation rules for halanth say all marks of other types according to the "MarkAttachClasses" should be ignored. >From Pothana2000.sfd: MarkAttachClasses: 11 ... "MarkClass-10" 7 Halanth ... StartChar: YaHalanth ... GlyphClass: 3 ... Ligature: 2560 1 'haln' Ya Halanth ... EndChar (Note 2560 = 0xa00, i.e. all marks of types other than type 10 -- which happens to be called MarkClass-10 and includes just the halanth -- should be ignored) >From Lohit Telugu.sfd: StartChar: U0C2F_U0C4D.haln ... GlyphClass: 2 ... Ligature: 0 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D ... EndChar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:31:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251931.n0PJVhZO005681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #5 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 14:31:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329950) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329950) Debug statements added to my local version of pango I have attached the diff for pango-1.10.0-3mdk to better understand the debug messages that show the processing of the two fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 19:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251940.n0PJem0m007259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #6 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-25 14:40:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329951) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329951) Debug messages produced by my local version of pango Actually we don't need various "MarkAttachClasses" to fix this bug. We can just make the ligation rules for "haln" say all types of marks should be ignored (using "8" instead of "2560" above) while applying the rule, and ensure that all below base forms are flagged as "mark." This is sufficient for ya + wide-below-base-ra + halant --haln-> ya-halant + wide-below-base-ra. I made the following change to Lohit-Telugu.sfd and created a new lohit-te.ttf from that. The modified font renders "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d" correctly: --- /tmp/orig/Lohit-Telugu.sfd 2009-01-24 18:10:48.000000000 +0530 +++ /tmp/Lohit-Telugu.sfd 2009-01-26 00:08:06.000000000 +0530 @@ -33780,7 +33780,7 @@ 760 170 760 170 760 243 c 1,99,-1 760 243 l 1,13,14 EndSplineSet -Ligature: 0 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D +Ligature: 8 0 'haln' U0C2F U0C4D EndChar StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.haln Encoding: 420 -1 420 @@ -36649,7 +36649,7 @@ StartChar: U0C30_U0C4D.blwf Encoding: 464 -1 464 Width: 0 -GlyphClass: 2 +GlyphClass: 4 Flags: W AnchorPoint: "Anchor-0" -324 -56 mark 0 Fore @@ -39468,7 +39468,7 @@ StartChar: glyph495 Encoding: 499 -1 499 Width: 0 -GlyphClass: 2 +GlyphClass: 4 Flags: W AnchorPoint: "Anchor-0" -492 -51 mark 0 Fore The attachment contains the debug messages my pango modification produces for Pothana2000, Lohit Telugu, and my modified Lohit Telugu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 04:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481534] New: scim-bridge 0.4.15.2 available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim-bridge 0.4.15.2 available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481534 Summary: scim-bridge 0.4.15.2 available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: scim-bridge AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: upstream has released 0.4.15.2. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108454&package_id=185651 FYI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 04:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481535] New: scim 1.4.8 available Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: scim 1.4.8 available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481535 Summary: scim 1.4.8 available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: scim AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: upstream has released scim 1.4.8. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=108454&package_id=117128 FYI -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 11:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261149.n0QBnU7i006239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480902 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:18:03 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476427] [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262218.n0QMI3cx028173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476427 --- Comment #7 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-26 17:18:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330034) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330034) untested patch for Lohit-Telugu.sfd I hand edited http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd for my suggested changes and a few more changes and created the attached patch. The changes made are: 1. Every "GlyphClass:" line is fixed to reflect if the glyph is a "mark" (4) or a "ligature" (3). [For the specific issue at hand, changing "GlyphClass:" for all below base forms ("*.blwf" & glyphs got by substituting those, "glyph471," "U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws" & "glyph473") is enough.] 2. Lookup flags of "Above Base Substitutions in Telugu lookup 1" and "Halant Forms in Telugu lookup 317" is changed from 0 to 8 to ignore marks. [For the specific issue at hand, the second change is enough.] 3. What seem to be typos in "Ligature2:" lines are fixed -- "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" -> "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" and "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C24 U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" -> "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F U0C30_U0C4D.blwf." [These are of course unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to "Ligature2:" lines for the glyphs "U0C38_U0C24_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws" and "U0C37_U0C1F_U0C4D.blwf_U0C30_U0C4D.blwf.blws."] 4. What seem to be erroneous "akhn" rules for consonant sequences without halanths -- "U0C38 U0C24 U0C30 U0C40" -> "U0C38_U0C4D.haln U0C24_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf" and "U0C37 U0C1F U0C30 U0C40" -> "U0C37_U0C4D.haln U0C1F_U0C40.abvs U0C30_U0C4D.blwf." [These are also unrelated to this bug. The modifications are to "Ligature2:" lines for the glyphs "U0C38_U0C24_U0C30_U0C40.akhn" and "U0C37_U0C1F_U0C30_U0C40.akhn." The new sequences I have put are inspired by the "akhn" rules fixed in step 3 above.] The extra changes in 1 and 2 allow better rendering for rendering engines that do not position the base consonant and the matra immediately next to each other. E.g. before the change in http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango?limit_changes=100&view=revision&revision=2107 Pothana2000 rendered consonant + "ai-matra (0x0C48)" correctly as it ignored the intervening "ai length mark (0x0C56)" when combining the consonant with the "e-matra (0x0C46)." These changes will allow Lohit Telugu to also handle this case with renderers other than pango. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 22:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 429901] [te_IN] upon joined character the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262229.n0QMTg1Z018980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429901 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-26 17:29:41 EDT --- Using ZWJ as in bug 451203 for the combination "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d", pango uses the character sequence "U+0c2f U+0c4d U+0c30 U+0c4d U+200d" as is instead of the reordered sequence "U+0c2f U+0c30 U+0c4d U+0c4d." With the former sequence the glyphs added are "U+0c2f+halanth below-base-U+0c30 U+200d" whereas with the latter we get "U+0c2f below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" followed by substitution of below-base-U+0c30 with a wider glyph due to the context of U+0c2f. Now the rendering of "U+0c2f wide-below-base-U+0c30 U+0c4d" can be fixed as suggested in bug 476427 to get "U+0c2f+halanth wide-below-base-U+0c30" which isn't possible with ZWJ. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:31:00 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262331.n0QNV0mu000829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-26 18:30:59 EDT --- Which package are the gnome_sound_play() in src/desktop.cpp and play_wav_file() located? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 00:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270039.n0R0dsNk024686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-26 19:39:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Your -common subpackage needs to obsolete baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80378 Obsoletes: baekmuk-ttf-common-fonts < 2.2-17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 02:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] ibus causes pidgin to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270257.n0R2vipx011025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami 2009-01-26 21:57:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330056) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330056) pidgin crash backtrace pidgin-2.5.4-1.fc10.x86_64 ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10.x86_64 imsettings-0.105.1-2.fc10.x86_64 1. Disconnect and reconnect imsettings. 2. Start pidgin. 3. Pop-up a dialog window to chat with anyone. 4. Crash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 03:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] ibus causes pidgin to crash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270335.n0R3Z7FP030873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093 --- Comment #2 from Warren Togami 2009-01-26 22:35:07 EDT --- Ugh, reconnecting doesn't definitively allow this problem to be reproducible. It seems to happen after login (but not all the time). Several GTK+ applications like pidgin or gramps crash while popping up certain dialog windows. Then something else unknown seems to change state and thereafter it no longer crashes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270526.n0R5QcSD012430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #1 from bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp 2009-01-27 00:26:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330063) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330063) xsession-errors xsession-errors when firefox start failed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] New: Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 Summary: Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem:Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.input method change from scim to ibus 2.reboot 3.after login,select 'application'-'system-tool'-'gnome-terminal' or 'application'-'internet'-'firefox' Actual results:sometimes application start failed. Expected results: Additional info:It is not generated every time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270528.n0R5Smgv019154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #330063|xsession-errors |xsession-errors.txt filename| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270530.n0R5U7di013124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #330063|application/octet-stream |application/text mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 05:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:32:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270532.n0R5Wv5k013504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #330063|application/text |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] setlocale failed to set 3 letter locale (anaconda fails to parse 3 letter locale with python 2.6) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270737.n0R7bhKG009324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Summary|anaconda fails to parse 3 |setlocale failed to set 3 |letter locale with python |letter locale (anaconda |2.6 |fails to parse 3 letter | |locale with python 2.6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 07:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 02:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270747.n0R7lpDP005628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rranjan at redhat.com Summary|setlocale failed to set 3 |[hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale |letter locale (anaconda |failed to set hi_IN as well |fails to parse 3 letter |as mai_IN languages. |locale with python 2.6) | --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-01-27 02:47:51 EDT --- Okay So I got some more in depth information about this bug. A simple setlocale program fails to set for hi_IN as well as mai_IN locale but setlocale can set any other indic language. When I check for output of "locale -a| grep hi" i got nothing on my rawhide machine. same for mai language. But for other indic languages translations as well as setlocale() works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270820.n0R8KHm8012180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-01-27 03:20:17 EDT --- Just checked build.log of glibc-2.9.90-2.fc11 => http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/glibc/2.9.90/2/data/logs/i386/build.log and found ========================= Adding hi_IN Adding hne_IN incomplete set of locale files in "hi_IN" incomplete set of locale files in "hne_IN" ============================ so something gone wrong while adding hne_IN locale in usptream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270827.n0R8RQ4h013336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 --- Comment #5 from Parag 2009-01-27 03:27:25 EDT --- Just found that actually hne_IN was already successfully present in previous glibc build. So this now looks upstream issue. Ohh found some more messages in build.log for other indic languages incomplete set of locale files in "as_IN.utf8" incomplete set of locale files in "bn_BD" incomplete set of locale files in "mai_IN" Sorry for not writing all my observations in single comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 08:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270850.n0R8oNHS017828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 --- Comment #6 from Parag 2009-01-27 03:50:22 EDT --- Reported upstream now. http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9791 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 09:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:42:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481535] scim 1.4.8 available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901270942.n0R9gDYZ028321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481535 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |karsten at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-27 04:42:12 EDT --- I updated cvs to 1.4.8, but still can't build with libtool2. See eg: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1085410&name=build.log Karsten, any ideas about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 10:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:37:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481156] S-c-language crashes while installing new language - zero division error In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271037.n0RAbvJC013741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481156 --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-27 05:37:57 EDT --- no props, yeah it is giving above mentioned error i am checking for that thanks for filing bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 11:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475904] no sound in stardict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271125.n0RBPPwm017851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475904 --- Comment #9 from han pingtian 2009-01-27 06:25:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Which package are the gnome_sound_play() in src/desktop.cpp and play_wav_file() > located? They are in stardict package. They are functions of stardict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 13:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] New: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Summary: description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: man-pages-ja AssignedTo: tagoh at redhat.com ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In : bash-3.2-29.fc10.i386 bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 LANG=C man bash says: ----------------------------------------- source: ...... When bash is not in posix mode, the current directory is searched if no file is found in PATH. ----------------------------------------- However with man-pages-ja-20081015-1.fc10, man bash says (in ja_JP): ----------------------------------------- source: ...... bash ? posix ????????????PATH ????????? ?????????????????????????????? ----------------------------------------- This is quite opposite. Actually with bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11: ----------------------------------------- $ rpm -q bash bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11.i386 $ ls -al eval.sh -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 323 2009-01-27 21:59 eval.sh $ sh -c ". eval.sh" sh: line 0: .: eval.sh: file not found ----------------------------------------- i.e. in posix mode source in sh does not search for the current directory any more -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271614.n0RGEkqG022542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 --- Comment #2 from bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp 2009-01-27 11:14:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330105) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330105) backtrace when crash gnome-terminal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271637.n0RGbWSH001693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bucchie73 at kba.big | |lobe.ne.jp) --- Comment #3 from bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp 2009-01-27 11:37:31 EDT --- The problem does not occur when I return it to SCIM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 16:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] iso-codes updates for Serbian locales In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271653.n0RGr2iD006589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Aillon 2009-01-27 11:53:01 EDT --- Has this been submitted to iso-codes upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 20:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481240] iso-codes updates for Serbian locales In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901272000.n0RK0Ycg019663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481240 --- Comment #3 from Milos Komarcevic 2009-01-27 15:00:34 EDT --- I have on several occasions tried contacting local community members who are more involved with Debian/Ubuntu and responsible for maintaining this through the Translation Project, but had no response so far. I understand you might prefer not to carry and maintain patches, so how do we forward this request upstream? Maybe just send them directly to pkg-isocodes-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 01:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280112.n0S1CM8m004014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp Flag|needinfo?(bucchie73 at kba.big |needinfo+ |lobe.ne.jp) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 02:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280252.n0S2qtTL026834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Michal Jaegermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal at harddata.com Severity|medium |high --- Comment #1 from Michal Jaegermann 2009-01-27 21:52:54 EDT --- That tidbit is messing up seriously quite a chunk of a startup and surely a lots of stuff "out in the field". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 04:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280439.n0S4dgud017202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution|UPSTREAM | --- Comment #28 from Parag 2009-01-27 23:39:40 EDT --- Pravin, I looked into patch and found that changes that were proposed in patch causes those locales not to work with latest glibc build. I found following locales not working with glibc-2.9.90-2.i386 as_IN bn_BD hi_IN hne_IN mai_IN Actually, above patch made localedef to report following error "circular dependencies between locale definitions" We need to fix this as soon as possible as F11 Alpha already got 5 locales missing now. Can you also look into this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 04:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280441.n0S4fwMh012989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476773 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 05:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280500.n0S50NLM021457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aalam at redhat.com, | |psatpute at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Parag 2009-01-28 00:00:23 EDT --- This bug is appearing because of modification done in hi_IN locale which is fix for bug 466912. Once bug 466912 fix issues in hi_IN this bug will get fixed automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] New: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 Summary: ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-m17n AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Ibus dose not allow to type key input with combination of Control+Alt keys. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-m17n-0.1.1.20081013-4.fc11.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. copy attached hi-test.mim file to /usr/share/m17n 2. start ibus 3. select hi-test.mim and try to use combination written in keymap file. Actual results: key combination C-A- is not working Expected results: key combination C-A- should not working Additional info: Attached sample hi-test.mim file to work on this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:19:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482789] ibus-m17n should process key input Control+Alt+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280619.n0S6JbEd031745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482789 --- Comment #1 from Parag 2009-01-28 01:19:36 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330196) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330196) sample keymap file to work on this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280704.n0S74Nc2014078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #29 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-28 02:04:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330199) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330199) Will solve circular dependencies between locale definitions mr_IN, hi_IN, bn_BD, bn_IN and as_IN -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:03:07 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481535] scim 1.4.8 available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280703.n0S737gG008365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481535 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC|karsten at redhat.com | Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-28 02:03:07 EDT --- I found a patch in gentoo to use system libltdl. built for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280707.n0S77UVU009421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #30 from Pravin Satpute 2009-01-28 02:07:29 EDT --- Parag, thanks for notifying this bug it created big problem, above patch will solve this problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280719.n0S7JL1W017026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Severity|high |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280735.n0S7ZwtW020523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Flag| |needinfo?(sergei at regolit.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-28 02:35:57 EDT --- https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/browser/trunk/src/LiberationSans-Regular.sfd has hinting instructions within U+0431. afaik, only hinting is affected by hinting instructions. Which software have you used to generate screenshot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 07:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280736.n0S7aUVc014992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480885] [hi_IN] [mai_IN] setlocale failed to set hi_IN as well as mai_IN languages. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280801.n0S818Cp025224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480885 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466912 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:01:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280801.n0S81AZr025271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |480885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:23:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 435051] thunderbird .desktop file has no translations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280823.n0S8Nun3023974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435051 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi --- Comment #4 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2009-01-28 03:23:54 EDT --- Any chances of fixing this for F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280835.n0S8ZhOk032401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #48 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-28 03:35:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330210) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330210) Screenshot with rawhide and qt-4.4.3-13.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 08:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280850.n0S8oK9E029646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 bucchie73 at kba.biglobe.ne.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|low |medium Flag|needinfo+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] New: ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 Summary: ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang at redhat.com ReportedBy: danishka at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: phuang at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: As most of our community use scim-sayura we need the ibus support for the scim-sayura. It would be really nice fi we can add it do F11 release. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 09:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 482803] ibus doesn't support for the scim-sayura In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280952.n0S9qpLh016674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482803 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 14:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281406.n0SE61qo011309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-01-28 09:06:00 EDT --- khmeros-fonts, moodle updated in rawhide accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466912] [bn_IN] [bn] [as_IN] iswpunct, iswdigit, iswalpha returns wrong values for Bangla (Bengali) characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281551.n0SFpCGA027124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466912 --- Comment #31 from Ulrich Drepper 2009-01-28 10:51:11 EDT --- I applied the patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481098] Tracker for ibus bugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281706.n0SH6b0N011696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481098 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |481693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 17:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481693] Application start failed (after input method change to ibus) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281706.n0SH6bEL011676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481693 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com Blocks| |481098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281958.n0SJwFCV000805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Sergei Stolyarov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sergei at regolit.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Sergei Stolyarov 2009-01-28 14:58:14 EDT --- I used gimp 2.6.3 from Debian. But this symbol looks blurry in all programms. Afaik hints should be rewritten if glyph's shape changed. At least fontforge shows message this when changing any glyph with hints that hints will be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 21:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282135.n0SLZr7i021265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-28 16:35:52 EDT --- This one seems ok in the few tests I ran, let's close -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:38:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290038.n0T0cnbD029876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-28 19:38:49 EDT --- Updated again in sazanami-fonts-0.20060629-6.20061016.fc11 for new naming rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:58:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts make default in chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290058.n0T0wtds000800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 00:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:59:43 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] make wqy-zenhei-fonts default in @chinese-support group In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290059.n0T0xh9X000880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Summary|wqy-zenhei-fonts make |make wqy-zenhei-fonts |default in chinese-support |default in @chinese-support |group |group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:02:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459452] [gettext] rpmlint error: no-ldconfig-symlink on reloadable_libintl.so In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290102.n0T12ZRY001735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459452 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, tmz at pobox.com, | |ville.skytta at iki.fi, | |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Component|gettext |rpmlint Version|10 |rawhide AssignedTo|petersen at redhat.com |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:49:02 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 456666] msghack doesn't check for mandatory cmd line params In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290107.n0T17PqX002472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456666 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dchen at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:36:01 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 01:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 456666] msghack doesn't check for mandatory cmd line params In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290107.n0T17aDr029601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456666 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:24:35 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290624.n0T6OZG3022101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 Yu Shao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |426223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 06:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 01:28:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290628.n0T6SPU2023098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |482976 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 435051] thunderbird .desktop file has no translations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290742.n0T7gVxl011492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435051 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 02:42:29 EDT --- Seems upstream rejected shipping desktop files for branding reasons. Can we just use the desktop from Ubuntu say for fedora's thunderbird? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444711] popup menu overlaps to the panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290755.n0T7tt3x007399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 473664] scim : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290758.n0T7wkTU014698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473664 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466842] Hundred scim-gtk-panel instances... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290757.n0T7vwFV014635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466842 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 22:50:36 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 02:57:57 EDT --- Perhaps you could try removing the scim engines for the languages that you do not need and see of that makes any difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:10:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Glyphs overlap in artificially emboldened fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292310.n0TNA15E010595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:10:00 EDT --- openoffice.org-3.0.1-15.2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:10:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 479624] [hi_IN] Glyphs overlap in artificially emboldened fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292310.n0TNAbN4011069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479624 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466876] An IOException occurred at scim_bridge_client_imcontext_set_cursor_location In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292318.n0TNIGCX013362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466876 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481534] scim-bridge 0.4.15.2 available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292317.n0TNHGDt013238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481534 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 18:17:16 EDT --- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:50:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] Please convert thaifonts-scalable to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292350.n0TNoeUe012121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert to new font |Please convert |packaging guidelines |thaifonts-scalable to new | |font packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 00:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300030.n0U0Uc2H019477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cchance at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 19:30:38 EDT --- I could lower the ranking of uming (Chinese fonts) by increasing the number of the .conf file. Which side would you prefer to make the changes? VL Gothic, Uming, or fontconfig? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 00:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300043.n0U0hukX021563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 01:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300132.n0U1WeKP005176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 20:32:39 EDT --- The Japanese problem seems to be with Sans: eg if one switches the desktop application font to Monospace then VLGothic is used correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300220.n0U2KPaQ013998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-29 21:20:25 EDT --- I'm still trying to have a better name for subpackage. I'm quite not sure if we should treat a proportional designed gothic typeface as different font family name to gothic typeface. if we do, which name could we recognize as a family name? is "pgothic" a common sense for that as it's named? or should we have "proportional-gothic" as a family name? I impressed "proportional-gothic" is too long. if you have any suggestion, it would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:21:40 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300221.n0U2Lesi014267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Many chinese glyphs on |Japanese desktop defaulting |Japanese environment |to Chinese fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483181] New: msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483181 Summary: msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: i686 URL: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?25437 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: gettext AssignedTo: petersen at redhat.com ReportedBy: sflaniga at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used in regex Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.17-4.fc9 How reproducible: About 15 out of 16 runs. Steps to Reproduce: 1.echo a=b | msggrep -P -K -e '^a$' Actual results: Segmentation fault (15/16 runs) or no matches (1/16 runs) Expected results: One matching string Additional info: May be connected to https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?25437. (My locally compiled gettext-0.17 doesn't segfault, but never returns the expected matches.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:50 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300237.n0U2boPn017252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Regression --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-29 21:37:50 EDT --- Reverting to fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 also fixes the problem, so this really does look like a fontconfig regression or change of behaviour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 02:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300239.n0U2dj5R010370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |476774 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483181] msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300311.n0U3Bnxm023815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483181 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|i686 |All Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] [thaifonts-scalable] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300319.n0U3JKFx018292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Please convert |[thaifonts-scalable] Please |thaifonts-scalable to new |convert to new font |font packaging guidelines |packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:23:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466844] Preedit buffer remains after focus-out / focus in. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300323.n0U3NvaT019453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466844 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-01-29 22:23:56 EDT --- I think it is rather the user preference. However, it is a problem that preedit buffer is not restored and shown when focus back in, which haven't been solved yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300342.n0U3gkmw023576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Caius "kaio" Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300342.n0U3gLJl023473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #15 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-29 22:42:21 EDT --- Sample patch. Will modify sans and monospace if needed: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-common-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/cjkuni-fonts/cjkuni-fonts-compat-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 03:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:57:36 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 444814] Amharaic defaults to native input In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300357.n0U3vapE026152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444814 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-29 22:57:34 EDT --- I've now split the im modules off into a gtk2-immodules subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 05:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483181] msggrep segfaults when $ anchor is used In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300505.n0U55wfa012065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483181 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 00:05:57 EDT --- Here is a gdb backtrace: $ cat > /tmp/test.properties a=b $ sudo debuginfo-install gettext glibc $ gdb msggrep GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-29.fc10) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"... (gdb) set args -P -K -E -e ^a\$ ~/tmp/test.properties (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/bin/msggrep -P -K -E -e ^a\$ ~/tmp/test.properties Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. dfaexec (d=0x61a0c8, begin=0x61a8b0 "a", size=, backref=0x7fffffffd49c) at dfa.c:2833 2833 s = t[*p++]; (gdb) bt #0 dfaexec (d=0x61a0c8, begin=0x61a8b0 "a", size=, backref=0x7fffffffd49c) at dfa.c:2833 #1 0x0000000000404336 in EGexecute (compiled_pattern=0x61a0c0, buf=0x61a8b0 "a", buf_size=1, match_size=0x7fffffffd4f0, exact=false) at m-regex.c:362 #2 0x0000000000402425 in is_string_selected (grep_pass=, str=0x352873c4c8 "double free or corruption (fasttop)", len=6407344) at msggrep.c:672 #3 0x00000000004032fb in is_message_selected_no_invert (mp=0x61d8b0) at msggrep.c:703 #4 0x00000000004035cf in is_message_selected (mp=0x352896da00) at msggrep.c:807 #5 0x0000003529a0858b in message_list_remove_if_not (mlp=0x61a740, predicate=0x4035c0 ) at message.c:410 #6 0x0000000000402fb2 in process_message_list () at msggrep.c:824 #7 process_msgdomain_list () at msggrep.c:834 #8 main (argc=7, argv=0x7fffffffe708) at msggrep.c:465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 06:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300645.n0U6jsgT022431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 01:45:54 EDT --- 1. if you have different font families, surely they declare different family names (or apps would not be able to select one instead of the other) ? 2. if they declare different family names, just use those names in the package naming 3. no proportional-gothic is not too long -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 07:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300755.n0U7t1Pw001976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 02:55:01 EDT --- Thanks fixes the Japanese desktop problem for me. :) I still don't understand the discrepancy between monospace and sans... Behdad, any idea? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:09:59 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300909.n0U99xEN017561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #17 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-30 04:09:59 EDT --- If it didn't break some other things, then I'm going to build to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301132.n0UBWJcb016179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-30 06:32:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > 1. if you have different font families, surely they declare different family > names (or apps would not be able to select one instead of the other) ? > 2. if they declare different family names, just use those names in the package > naming > 3. no proportional-gothic is not too long well, author declares its family names, VL Gothic and VL PGothic though. just making a package name as vlgothic-vl-gothic-fonts and vlgothic-vl-pgothic-fonts is redundant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 11:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301142.n0UBgJGH027520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH 2009-01-30 06:42:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I could lower the ranking of uming (Chinese fonts) by increasing the number of > the .conf file. > > Which side would you prefer to make the changes? VL Gothic, Uming, or > fontconfig? No options for VLGothic-fonts at least because this issue doesn't happen without cjkuni-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 454121] static lib should be in a separate -static subpackage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301244.n0UCisZU009360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454121 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tagoh at redhat.com |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #4 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-01-30 07:44:53 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301333.n0UDX9EH013872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 08:33:08 EDT --- if you follow the documented naming rules you'll end up with vlgothic-fonts as srpm name and vlgothic-fonts vlgothic-p-fonts vlgothic-fonts-common as subpackage names (assuming you don't use a foundry prefix, you're the judge if one is necessary or what it can be) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301350.n0UDoRbo027557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) | --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 08:50:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) screenshot again Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. Note that this screenshot is taken with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11 With reverting to fontconfig-2.6.0-3.fc10 it goes _much_ better, however it does not remove this problem entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301403.n0UE3iKF031019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #49 from Baif 2009-01-30 09:03:43 EDT --- For KDE-LiveCD, the following .fonts.conf works! Caius, can you test it without the first part of "not_eq"? AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE true AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 8 12 false AR PL UMing CN AR PL UMing HK AR PL UMing TW AR PL UMing TW MBE 11 17 false -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:21:33 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301421.n0UELX60026253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-30 09:21:32 EDT --- For record: # rpm -qf /etc/fonts/conf.d/* | sort | uniq VLGothic-fonts-20081203-2.fc11.noarch VLGothic-fonts-proportional-20081203-2.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch cjkuni-uming-fonts-0.2.20080216.1-18.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-sans-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-lgc-serif-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-sans-mono-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch dejavu-serif-fonts-2.28-3.fc11.noarch fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11.i386 sazanami-gothic-fonts-0.20040629-6.20061016.fc11.noarch sazanami-mincho-fonts-0.20040629-6.20061016.fc11.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 14:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:44:05 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301444.n0UEi5cf031753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #50 from Baif 2009-01-30 09:44:04 EDT --- Replace 25-ttf-arphic-uming-bitmaps.conf this conf, check if the Chinese are not antialias within the range. BTW: qtconfig-qt4 will ignore the fontconfig ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 17:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:58:24 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] no autologin for liveuser after logging out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301758.n0UHwOn9026730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-30 12:58:23 EDT --- It is intentional. It would be hard to change the lang/keyboard if logging out would log you right back in... gdm autologin has always behaved in this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302038.n0UKc4rN029599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-01-30 15:38:03 EDT --- => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/ghostscript provided by: ghostscript-8.63-4.fc10.i386 /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-gulim-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-hline-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 20:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483327] New: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 Summary: baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: baekmuk-ttf-fonts AssignedTo: cchance at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs.michael at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, cchance at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora One or more directories are not included within this package and/or its sub-packages: => baekmuk-ttf-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.src.rpm => baekmuk-ttf-batang-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch (rawhide-development-i386) /usr/share/fonts/baekmuk-ttf [...] Further information: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories The script to find unowned directories is not complete yet, but still quite usable: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/dircheck-remote.py $ ./dircheck-remote.py -r rawhide -n ^baekmuk-ttf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:30:57 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302130.n0ULUvNc017479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 16:30:57 EDT --- 1. The -common subpackage is missing the %{_fontdir} line of the template 2. the gs stuff should probably be moved in a subpackage that depends on ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 21:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483327] baekmuk-ttf-fonts : Unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302132.n0ULWAjB017876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483327 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-01-30 16:32:10 EDT --- (more accurately the %dir %{_fontdir} line) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 04:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310454.n0V4s9r7008020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 04:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310453.n0V4rne5007942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-30 23:53:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) [details] > screenshot again > Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. What is the URL for that page? I could be wrong but it could be a Unihan issue with firefox not knowing what language the page is in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310501.n0V51bEc002681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-31 00:01:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Created an attachment (id=330464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330464) [details] [details] > > screenshot again > > Still seeing many Chinese glyphs. > > What is the URL for that page? Note that the glyph is wrong also on the other place (please look at gnome-panel in the picture: especially the glyph of "??" is apparently not Japanese) The URL is the same as the one in my comment 0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 05:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:03:48 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481256] no lang/kbd selection for Live System User after logout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310503.n0V53mTb003032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481256 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446451 Summary|no autologin for liveuser |no lang/kbd selection for |after logging out |Live System User after | |logout --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 00:03:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > It would be hard to change the lang/keyboard if logging out would log you right > back in... So how are people supposed to change lang/kbd after logging out? > gdm autologin has always behaved in this way. Did you try F10-i686-Live.iso? (Expected Results :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310622.n0V6MDdH019691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 01:22:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330518) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330518) another screenshot This is what it currently looks like for me, but I will try with a fresh rawhide install soon. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 06:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481750] description of "source" in bash in posix mode wrong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310624.n0V6OIrh019994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750 Jerry Amundson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium CC| |jamundso at gmail.com Severity|low |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 07:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310724.n0V7OApk007754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 02:24:10 EDT --- I just tried on a fresh rawhide install and it still looks good to me. Tasaka-san, perhaps could you try again? (Anyway unfortunately this fix/workaround won't be in F11Alpha anyway...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 08:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:23:32 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310823.n0V8NWkX018630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-01-31 03:23:32 EDT --- Well, after some investigation, it seems that when I hide (i.e. add 'dot' to the file name) 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf (in baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch) it looks good now (even with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:15:04 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311015.n0VAF4Sn000827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:15:03 EDT --- would still appreciate some comment from Behdad... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 10:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311014.n0VAEUiL000443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-31 05:14:30 EDT --- Ah I see, thank you. Yes, baekmuk dotum is no longer installed by default, but sounds like a similar workaround is needed there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 12:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 475743] Japanese desktop defaulting to Chinese fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311207.n0VC7Hwi023073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 --- Comment #28 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-01-31 07:07:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (Anyway unfortunately this fix/workaround won't be in F11Alpha anyway...) I will push to F11 immediately when it is released. (In reply to comment #25) > Well, after some investigation, it seems that > when I hide (i.e. add 'dot' to the file name) > 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf (in baekmuk-ttf-dotum-fonts-2.2-17.fc11.noarch) > it looks good now (even with fontconfig-2.6.95-1.git.66.gb162bfb.fc11) Hmm, then I should also work on baekmuk then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 14:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:08:28 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483391] New: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Summary: [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: rbhalera at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: petersen at redhat.com, rbhalera at redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #202400 +++ Description of problem: following glyphs are not present in Lohit Telugu U+0C3D ? TELUGU SIGN AVAGRAHA U+0C58 ? TELUGU LETTER TSA U+0C59 ? TELUGU LETTER DZA U+0C62 ? TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC L U+0C63 ? TELUGU VOWEL SIGN VOCALIC LL U+0C78 ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ZERO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C79 ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7A ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7B ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR ODD POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7C ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT ONE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7D ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT TWO FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7E ? TELUGU FRACTION DIGIT THREE FOR EVEN POWERS OF FOUR U+0C7F ? TELUGU SIGN TUUMU Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10 Additional info: 1) http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-5.1/U51-0C00.pdf (chart showing new characters) 2) http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3116.pdf (proposal for adding these characters among others, that details the use of these characters) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 15:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311517.n0VFHNu6027254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 --- Comment #1 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-31 10:17:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330523) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330523) untested patch for Lohit-Telugu.sfd For reference, the Pothana2000 font from http://www.kavya-nandanam.com/dload.htm already has all these characters. I am put up with an old Mandriva distro with pango-1.10.0-3mdk and fontforge-1.0-0.20050809.1mdk. I used the Lohit Telugu font extracted from lohit-fonts-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm. I used the above fontforge (which cannot create or open the latest .sfd format), added some glyphs and created an old-format .sfd. Then I manually copied the changes to http://fedorahosted.org/lohit/browser/trunk/Lohit-Telugu.sfd and created the attached patch, which could hence be a bit unreliable. The changes made are: 1. Extra ligature rules in U0C1A_U0C4D.blwf and U0C1C_U0C4D.blwf for these glyphs to double-up as the below-base forms of U0C58 and U0C59. 2. New glyphs U0C58, U0C58_U0C3E.abvs, U0C58_U0C3F.abvs, U0C58_U0C40.abvs, U0C58_U0C46.abvs, U0C58_U0C47.abvs, U0C58_U0C4A.abvs, U0C58_U0C4B.abvs, U0C58_U0C4C.abvs, U0C58_U0C4D.haln created from the corresponding U0C1A_* glyphs by pasting the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf above them and trimming its length to match the extremities of the base character (ca/ja) in the glyphs. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf added above the glyphs only has integral coordinates in my patch. 3. New glyphs U0C59, U0C59_U0C3E.abvs, U0C59_U0C3F.abvs, U0C59_U0C40.abvs, U0C59_U0C46.abvs, U0C59_U0C47.abvs, U0C59_U0C4A.abvs, U0C59_U0C4B.abvs, U0C59_U0C4C.abvs, U0C59_U0C4D.haln, U0C59_U0C41.psts, U0C59_U0C42.psts created from the corresponding U0C1C_* glyphs by pasting the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf above them and trimming its length to match the extremities of the base character (ca/ja) in the glyphs. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the shape of U0C24_U0C4D.blwf added above the glyphs only has integral coordinates in my patch. 4. "GlyphClass:" lines of the new glyphs are fixed to reflect if the glyph is a "ligature" (3) per my patch (attachment 330034) to bug 476427. "MultipleSubs2:" lines are added to the new glyphs U0C58 and U0C59 based on the corresponding lines in U0C1A and U0C1C although they don't make sense to me. 5. New glyphs U0C62, U0C63 created by using the U0C32_U0C4D.blwf shape in the background, pasting the shapes of U0C0C and U0C61 and moving & resizing them so that the top-left portion of them almost coincides with the background, and removing the background. Note that the .sfd produced by my fontforge rounds the x/y coordinates of points to the nearest integer or sometimes multiple of 0.5. Hence the glyphs only have integral coordinates in my patch. 6. "GlyphClass:" lines of these 2 glyphs are set to reflect they are "mark"s (4) per my patch (attachment 330034) to bug 476427. The "Width:" lines of these 2 glyphs are set based on their right extremity, like some of the non-zero width below-base forms. The avagraha & fractional digits are unrelated to existing shapes, so with my zero knowledge of designing fonts I don't know how to create them with a look & feel consistent with other glyphs. Note that "VWidth:" lines have not been changed from 819 although some of the new glyphs are much taller than that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.