From dchen at redhat.com  Wed Nov  4 07:20:10 2009
From: dchen at redhat.com (Ding Yi Chen)
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:20:10 -0500 (EST)
Subject: fedora-i18n im meeting today
In-Reply-To: <373968730.196511256619519554.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1019407329.1253011257319210971.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>

#start im meeting
<pravins> hi dychen 

<fujiwarat> hi

<Kaio> pong

 Kaio Kaio_strauss

<dychen> hi pravins, fujiwarat, Kaio.

<Kaio> dychen? hi

<fujiwarat> juhp: Should we fix 531696 ?

<dychen> Anything to talk about regarding input methods, ibus, and so on?

<pravins> dychen: 2nd hi ;)

<juhp> .bug 531696

<zodbot> juhp: Bug 531696 [abrt] crash detected in ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090917-2.fc12 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531696

<fujiwarat> juhp: As you know, the similar bug was fixed a few days ago.

<juhp> fujiwarat: well I was wondering how to fix - it needs changes to both ibus and ibus-anthy or ibus*??

 fujiwarat: yes I know

<fujiwarat> The previous fix was to ignore "panel" preference and this bug is related to "general" preference.

<juhp> ignore?

<juhp> dychen: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/InputMethods/Bugs

<juhp> fujiwarat: yeah I read the bug

 so how to fix it?

<pravins> .bug 531989

<zodbot> pravins: Bug 531989 [abrt] crash detected in ibus-rawcode-1.2.0.20090703-2.fc12 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531989

<fujiwarat> Currently I'm thinking to modify both ibus and ibus-anthy.

<juhp> pravins: yeah you seem to have a few abrt too...

 fujiwarat: ok and does it affect other IMEs too?

<pravins> hmm, its not crashing in f11 but yeah in f12 its yes

<juhp> ok

<fujiwarat> I think it's better that ibus sends another preference likes "ibus-frame" than "general".

<juhp> pravins: what's the difference?

 yup

<pravins> dont know exactly, but if one open oowrite and type using ibus-rawcode, and close the oowriter

<juhp> tagoh3: confused about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525376

<pravins> then rawcode crashes

<juhp> Alam added ibus to autostart??

<tagoh3> juhp: old feature in ibus

<juhp> pravins: aha hm

 tagoh3: ibus.desktop?

<tagoh3> juhp: right

<fujiwarat> juhp: Currently all the problem preferences should be ignored. So probably it doesn't effect other IMEs.

<juhp> fujiwarat: ok

<pravins> juhp: i think need to cross check once whether memory is leaking some where or not 

<juhp> fujiwarat: without crashing? :)

 pravins: ok

<fujiwarat> juhp: Yes, I mean once we setup the specification, ibus-anthy ignores the preferences. If abrt still reports something after the fix, it means the preferences should not be ignored.

<tagoh3> juhp: dunno if phuang disabled that feature completely from ibus or apply a patch for Fedora only though.

 juhp: you remember there were an option for that on the preference right.

<juhp> tagoh3: I only remember he didn't want to remove the desktop file ;)

 anyway basically agree we should drop it

 fujiwarat: ok

* juhp updates the summary

<juhp> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&field-1-0-0=bug_status&field-1-1-0=version&field0-0-0=component&query_format=advanced&remaction=&type-1-0-0=anyexact&type-1-1-0=anyexact&type0-0-0=regexp&value-1-0-0=NEW,ASSIGNED&value-1-1-0=rawhide&value0-0-0=^ibus.*

<dychen> Kaio: does ibus-table has similar problem?

<Kaio> dychen? crashing?

<dychen> Kaio: Right.

<Kaio> dychen? I thought it is ibus-table problem...

 dychen? ok it is ibus prob

<Kaio> I have same prob on ubuntu 9.10

<juhp> dychen: abrt?

<dychen> Mmm, maybe I should test with ibus-chewing. 

 juhp: Kaio: abrt? :-)

<Kaio> dychen? abrt? XD

<juhp> heh

<Kaio> it was not set by me

<juhp> dychen: what did you mean similar..........

<dychen> juhp: Just a thought. ibus-chewing use none of the message. :-)

<Kaio> my exp is: 30-45 mins using -> app freezed at first key pressed

<juhp> dychen: general, panel ??

<juhp> please specify

<Kaio> and the app back alive (melted) after like 30sec to 1 min

<juhp> Kaio: I think you are talking about something else?

<Kaio> but the same prob still there

 ok

<juhp> or I don't know what dychen is talking about :)

<dychen> juhp: That's right. ibus-chewing does not send/receive ibus-message actually.

<juhp> ok

 I dunno if ibus-table uses that

<Kaio> lidaobing said if no err messages to him, he couldnt fix that too

<Kaio> dychen? are you mentioning same prob I am talking about?

 Kaio Kaio_strauss

<dychen> Kaio: how about do some search against ibus-table and see if it use these messages?

<Kaio> dychen? ok

<Kaio> it crashes on author's latest source

* juhp diffed ibus-1.2.0.20091014 and ibus-1.2.0.20091024

<juhp> I think I will request releng to tag the newer build

 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3076

 there - not sure if releng will buy but anyway

 getting rather late

 juhp jassy

<dychen> juhp: So end of meeting?

<juhp> dychen: looks like it :)

<dychen> #end im meeting
-- 
Ding-Yi Chen
Software Engineer
Internationalization Group
Red Hat, Inc.

Register now for Red Hat Virtual Experience, December 9.
Enterprise Linux, virtualization, cloud, and more.
http://www.redhat.com/virtualexperience



From petersen at redhat.com  Tue Nov 24 04:51:47 2009
From: petersen at redhat.com (Jens Petersen)
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:51:47 -0500 (EST)
Subject: fedora-i18n meeting today
Message-ID: <1662099890.758281259038307222.JavaMail.root@zmail02.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>

Reminder there is a i18n meeting today starting shortly:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2009-11-24