Don't know if I've mention you this one: <a href="http://mirrors.ludost.net/gentoo/experimental/ia64/livecd/">http://mirrors.ludost.net/gentoo/experimental/ia64/livecd/</a> ... but true, no news about ia64 for new release. I feel that it is up to HP at least just as much it is for Intel in this story, maybe even more - Digital's philosophy about OpenVMS and Tru64 on Alpha was similar, it is about having commitments to their own, highly controlled and stable platform, etc (but also their own highly controlled and stable market, etc) - they should maybe invest more into dedicated staff working on site with M$, SAP, Oracle and others (usual practice from my experience), and HP already invested billions of $ into Intel's ia64 development, anyway - I seriously doubt that this platform is "doomed", it just takes it's own pace and a way for specific stories like open source to align with it. ZP. <div class="gmail_quote">2009/2/11 Dave Bowman <<a href="mailto:ia64dave@gmail.com">ia64dave@gmail.com</a>> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I have been using F9 on ia64 for a while but I have not seen anything regarding F10 (or F11 for that matter). Is Fedora still being built on ia64? I have been playing around with "mock" to build packages and was considering trying to build a more recent Fedora myself. Anybody tried this? Dave -- Fedora-ia64-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com">Fedora-ia64-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ia64-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ia64-list</a> </blockquote></div>