PHX network

[Christian Iseli]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:01:43 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> 1-35 for Network appliances/devices nas, san, switches, kvms, etc.
> 36 - 169 for services i.e.  xen guests and physical hosts when needed for 
> example ppc builders
> 164-169  for existing boxes admin interfaces  these  would  most likely be 
> needed for a short term period  
> 170-199 for admin interfaces drac, ALOM, etc
> 200   is a nat pool ip id like to have it moved to 250
> 201 - 219 for test systems
> 220-249  for physical xen hosts
> 250-254  for gateways  to external networks 

Wouldn't it be more secure to have the interfaces you put in 1-35 and
170-199 in a separate, unrouted network (10.x.x.x) that can only be
accessed from a couple admin machines having dual ethernet ports ?

That would also leave more room in the /24 net...

It's a bit more trouble to manage two networks, but not that much.

					C