Moin question

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 15:00:15 UTC 2007


On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:55 -0400, seth vidal wrote:

> I thought we got rid of the EditGroup requirement for certain sets of
> pages.

Really?  What sets?

I didn't realize we had or wanted any content on fp.o/wiki that wasn't
covered by the CLA.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070405/c7b41ea2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list