Mail lists for hosted
jason at 3dogs.us
Tue Dec 4 00:19:07 UTC 2007
On 12/3/07, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 4:33 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:24 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > Anyone know of any mail list software besides mailman that they've used
> > > and like? I ask because I'm not a huge fan of mailman. The hosted
> > > mailing list will probably have precedence and I think it is likely that
> > > whatever we do in hosted is what we'll end up doing with the rest of
> > > Fedora's mail lists when the time comes.
> > >
> > then we should stick with mailman, if only b/c it is definitely the path
> > of least resistance and it is what everyone knows.
> > alternatively you can look at the neverending perl-module-pain that is
> > sympa
> > -sv
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> > Fedora-infrastructure-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
> several projects are switching to google-groups for mailling lists. I
> am not sure I like the idea. It's certainly isn't open source, but I
> thought I'd throw it out there as an option.
What kind of pains are you having with Mailman? Google-groups is
nice, but I think Mailman edges out with a few more features. I
briefly looked Google-groups to replace Mailman that I use for my
personal mailing lists. Maybe it is that I am more familiar with
Mailman, but I felt that Mailman was more mailing list centric.
Whereas Google-groups leaned more towards a discussion group. There
is also the whole control argument, but I do not know if that applies
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list