Jigdo - A Professional Letter to Mike McGrath
Jeroen van Meeuwen
kanarip at kanarip.com
Fri Dec 7 15:39:46 UTC 2007
Mike McGrath wrote:
> This paragraph shows the savings we would make on the jigdo server.
How
> much would our storage needs increase by needing to keep all RPM's
> around on the mirrors?
>
For Fedora 8, per arch, at this moment that would be:
$ du -sch fedora-unity/releases/8/Everything/x86_64/ \
fedora-unity/updates/8/x86_64/
19G fedora-unity/releases/8/Everything/x86_64/
5.0G fedora-unity/updates/8/x86_64/
24G total
minus the updates in the normal tree already:
$ du -sch fedora/releases/8/Everything/x86_64/ fedora/updates/8/x86_64/
19G fedora/releases/8/Everything/x86_64/
3.9G fedora/updates/8/x86_64/
23G total
For Fedora 7, per arch, that'd be:
$ du -sch fedora-unity/releases/7/Everything/x86_64/ \
fedora-unity/updates/7/x86_64/
16G fedora-unity/releases/7/Everything/x86_64/
18G fedora-unity/updates/7/x86_64/
34G total
again minus the updates in the tree already:
$ du -sch fedora/releases/7/Everything/x86_64/ fedora/updates/7/x86_64/
16G fedora/releases/7/Everything/x86_64/
13G fedora/updates/7/x86_64/
28G total
So, roughly, 12GB per release per arch, not taking into account the ever
growing number of packages.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
P.S. For everyone wondering, yes this host archives every single bit
that ever hits the mirrors except for development/ and releases/test/.
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list
mailing list