Yum deltarpm

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 19:32 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote:
> One tiny thing I am facing is the naming convention to be used for the
> resulting drpms. This name needs to reflect both versions for which
> this delta was made. I am thinking I need to use something like:
> " name-VerNew-RelNew-VerOld-RelOld.arch.drpm"
> Not sure if this would cause any issues, I mean not using the standard
> rpm naming scheme. But then again, this is not a rpm, which is why I
> chose suffix .drpm instead of say .delta.rpm 
> Let me know what you guys think
> 
What does SuSE use when they generate delata-rpms?  (I do like drpm
better than delta.rpm).

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070203/b8c14ac1/attachment.sig>