Open archives?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 19:15 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Why is the archives of this list not public? If sensitive details are
> > being discussed in this list, the list membership itself should be
> > moderated which is not the case at present. If anyone can join the list,
> > I dont see any harm in letting search engines and other services index
> > the content.
> >
> 
> We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive
> things though its rarely used, last message was in early November.
> I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community.  Basically
> I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index
> the list?

I don't have a problem with infrastructure-list being viewable by all.
In fact, I probably would find it beneficial to have it available.  As
you say sysadmin-list exists if there's things that need to be discussed
in true privacy.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070123/67abadb2/attachment.sig>