Infrastructure SCM

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:19:43AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again.  Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> > with either git or mercurial.  Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> > people on this list as to a preference on each?  Remember, our needs in
> > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.  What do you
> > guys think?
> >
> >
> > git:
> >
> > mercurial:
> +1 i find it a little easier  though its really a coin toss

+1. There's also better intergration with other tools like trac, and
it's written in Fedora's favourite script language, so when something
comes up we'd be able to attack it instead of submitting feature
requests.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070702/e3fb76b6/attachment.sig>