Nils Breunese nils at
Tue Jun 5 21:26:40 UTC 2007

Mike McGrath wrote:

> We're starting to get into backup needs that will include a lot of data
> thats not redundant so backuppc's pooling won't really benefit us that
> much.

Ok, fair enough. I thought there was talk of having static content on
multiple servers, that's where BackupPC's pooling feature could come in
pretty handy, but I have no idea about what amounts of data we're talking.

> Hopefully we'll be using both tape and disk backups.  Once our new disk
> tray gets in we'll have to prepare to backup a couple TB of Binary
> RPMs.  Some of our backups will be going to disk, some will be going to
> tape.  Additionally it seems that bacula is more efficient at backing
> things up.

Efficient in term of what precisely? And what backend are we using with
BackupPC right now?

Nils Breunese.

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list