Jeffrey C. Ollie jeff at ocjtech.us
Tue Jun 19 12:06:51 UTC 2007

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 00:37 -0500, David Douthitt wrote:
> Anand Capur wrote:
> > It has the pros/cons of CVS, Subversion, Mercurial, Bazaar-ng, and
> > git, also what we need in a system.
> I vote for Subversion - just from the standpoint that many people will
> know how to use it, and supporting it will be easier and finding people
> to support it will be just as easy.

Unfortunately, Subversion has two of the flaws that CVS has:

1) Merging is hard.

2) It's requires a centralized model of development that splits people
into "committers" and everyone else.  Non-committers have a much more
difficult time contributing.  Using a distributed SCM makes it much
easier for people without write access to the main repository to


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070619/c98521e7/attachment.sig>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list