hosting git conversion of Fedora CVS tree on fedora infrastructure?
seth vidal
skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Tue Nov 27 19:40:23 UTC 2007
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:39 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> tried this, its not an easy task. But adding an additional SCM for
> >> GIT which is JUST a copy of what's in CVS sounds like a waste of our
> >> resources. Why not also do SVN, BZR and Mercurial?
> >>
> >
> > IMHO, they're not as useful.
> >
> >
>
> And thats the real trick, I'd imagine the mercurial, svn and bzr guys
> would disagree with you.
>
> > If Fedora doesn't want to do this, I can probably set up
> > something independent and provide public git:// access.
> >
>
> If someone else wants to host it I'm all for it, we can certainly make
> it easier to get at the raw CVS repo. If the other officers disagree
> please let it be known, but this sounds more like a distraction/one off
> then something that adds value to our infrastructure.
>
I concur.
-sv
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list
mailing list