hosting git conversion of Fedora CVS tree on fedora infrastructure?

[seth vidal]

On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 13:39 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> tried this, its not an easy task.  But adding an additional SCM for
> >> GIT which is JUST a copy of what's in CVS sounds like a waste of our
> >> resources.  Why not also do SVN, BZR and Mercurial?
> >>     
> >
> > IMHO, they're not as useful.
> >
> >   
> 
> And thats the real trick, I'd imagine the mercurial, svn and bzr guys 
> would disagree with you.
> 
> > If Fedora doesn't want to do this, I can probably set up
> > something independent and provide public git:// access.
> >   
> 
> If someone else wants to host it I'm all for it, we can certainly make 
> it easier to get at the raw CVS repo.  If the other officers disagree 
> please let it be known, but this sounds more like a distraction/one off 
> then something that adds value to our infrastructure.
> 

I concur.

-sv