Photo gallery

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at
Fri Aug 8 00:53:50 UTC 2008

Martin Sourada wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Looks like the gallery2 would satisfy our needs
> pretty good. The only two issues I noticed is the missing integration
> with FAS (which might be already in progress, as noted by Ricky), and
> easy way to handle images sources (which is not a show-stopper for us,
> though it would be nice if we could implement that nicely as well).
> I guess we could set-up a test gallery2 implementation on one of our
> fedorapeople accounts and if it works well, ask for transferring it to
> here?
We also need to decide if we want to run the software in Fedora 

Searching for CVEs was somewhat hard since gallery is a common name for 
photo gallery software.  I found 5 CVE's against Menalto Gallery this 
year and 9 last year.  There are other CVE's that weren't picked up in 
my search as they did not identify gallery as "menalto" (I googled and 
found references...)  I'm not sure how this compares to other gallery 
software but it is less than phpnuke, drupal, and other things that I 
have been against.

We do not yet have SELinux turned on on our app servers (although 
lmacken and dwalsh have gotten us much closer recently).  I am pretty 
sure we do have mod_security deployed.  Do we feel comfortable with 
this?  What are the alternatives that fit the criteria and are they worse?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list