Public demo of amber and eventual production instance
mmcgrath at redhat.com
Wed Aug 13 06:49:47 UTC 2008
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
> > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow
> > > > to help if needed.
> > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
> > > admin.fedoraproject.org so that it can share cookies with our other
> > > applications.
> > >
> > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm
> > fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/ for stuff. But if this is
> > an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite
> > right.
> Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted
> at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything
from our repos and such?
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list