puppet and git

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Mike McGrath wrote:
> Sooooo.  We've been doing puppet wrong.  Not really wrong but there's a
> better way now using modules.
> 
> more info: http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetModules
> 
> Long story short, I (and probably kanarip if I can sucker  him into it :)
> will start converting some stuff that we've got to the more module format.
> Some benefits:
> 
>  * Easier to share with others
>  * Much better organization / easier to find stuff
>  * The standard actually involves writing a README file per module.  Thats
>    a good thing and can help explain some things better.
> 
> Before we go making a bunch of changes I'm going to make sure to keep
> everyone in the loop with whats going on.  One thing I did want to discuss
> is that puppet does have some native support for git now and people are
> using it.  I have to say I'm on the fence about it.  Fedora as an
> organization is moving more to git, the websites team already uses it.
> 
> What are the thoughts on this list?
> 
I don't see a benefit to using git in this situation but I also don't 
see how it will cause us any extra pain.  A big fat +0 from me.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20080707/1d8b295a/attachment.sig>