Bit flip

[Paul W. Frields]

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm thinking more like hours.  From the last release I monitored:
>>
>> http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/alphaMirrorRediness.html
>>
>> We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch.
>> I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the
>> outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right.
>>
>> Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of
>> mirrors are ready?  We currently don't check that prior to announce.
>>
>
> I went by Jesse's wording of "make sure at least a few mirrors are synced" 
> and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced.
>
> That's why I sent out the announcement then.
>
> That may be where the mixup was.

It didn't help that I had to stick my big fat nose in and "help" by
approving the message in the moderation queue.  Sorry I contributed to
the angst. :-(

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20090428/49190eb8/attachment.sig>