Bit flip

Paul W. Frields stickster at
Tue Apr 28 21:50:22 UTC 2009

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> I'm thinking more like hours.  From the last release I monitored:
>> We didn't hit 80% success rate until 3 and a half hours after the launch.
>> I think mdomsch made some good changes since this graph that will make the
>> outcome better, but I still think that initial launch isn't right.
>> Perhaps we should wait to send the announcement out until a certain % of
>> mirrors are ready?  We currently don't check that prior to announce.
> I went by Jesse's wording of "make sure at least a few mirrors are synced" 
> and you said on irc that 3 mirrors in the US were synced.
> That's why I sent out the announcement then.
> That may be where the mixup was.

It didn't help that I had to stick my big fat nose in and "help" by
approving the message in the moderation queue.  Sorry I contributed to
the angst. :-(

Paul W. Frields                      
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717   -  -  -  - stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list