Any C coders want to help me with something?

Ricky Zhou ricky at
Thu Apr 30 05:56:40 UTC 2009

On 2009-04-29 11:23:55 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Can I reverse the question? Instead of a pam_fas module, what about
> creating a way to export FAS information as LDAP, such that all
> LDAP-consuming apps would "just work", albeit not able to access the
> FAS-specific information?
I agree with this approach.  In some distant future version of FAS, I'd
like to play with the idea of storing the data in LDAP while handling
our group sponsorship system in postgres.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list