[PATCH] Setup sigul bridge and client

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Jul 25 14:53:21 UTC 2009


On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 06:55 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Not necessarily related to enabling the builder repo: Is having the same
> rpm versions as the builders necessary?

Yes.  The bridge and server will be dealing with rpms that are being
built by koji, and will need to be able to understand the payloads and
checksums, as well as perform the larger signing.  As we make changes to
rpm and update the builders to handle those changes, we'll have to
update the signing and composing systems too.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20090725/97566c47/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list