A discussion on licensing and the AGPLv3
Tom "spot" Callaway
tcallawa at redhat.com
Tue Jul 28 16:13:40 UTC 2009
On 07/28/2009 12:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I take these two to answers to mean roughly:
>
> Configuration is not copyrightable. Therefore changes to configuration
> files and configuration within scripts is not something that needs to be
> provided under the AGPLv3. If we are still concerned about them, Red
> Hat Legal will help us write a license for the config files that makes
> clear that changes to them do not have to be distributed.
Yes, that's precisely how I interpreted this as well.
I did miss the other questions, and have just now sent them over to RH
Legal.
~spot
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list
mailing list