Improving QA test result submission and organization

Mike McGrath mmcgrath at redhat.com
Mon Mar 16 19:25:37 UTC 2009


On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > >       * Should the semantic performance impact be significant, is
> > > > >         hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semantic
> > > > enabled) a
> > > > >         possibility?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That is possible, for example we have a smolt wiki seperate from the
> > > > normal mediawiki install.  The question of performance is, does it
> > > > only
> > > > impact pages deciding to use semantic or everything?  We have lots of
> > > > way to test the actual impact of using it.
> > >
> > > Good question.  The feedback I have so far is it affects everything.
> > >
> >
> > I just did some speed tests against the laptop.org instance you linked to.
> > At this point I don't think thats a blocker but we may find something out
> > later.
>
> Package review in progress for both extensions ...
>
> mediawiki-semantic-forms  -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490171
>
> mediawiki-semantic - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490001
>
> I'm playing with the system locally to get more comfortable in this
> framework.  Is it possible to get a dump of a subset of content from the
> fedoraproject.org/wiki so I can get a better sense how things will look
> in production?
>

Yeah we can do that no problem.  Can it wait until after the beta launches
though?  (the 24th)  It'll just be easier that way.

	-Mike




More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list