Any C coders want to help me with something?

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:54:42AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:03:55PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > We worked pretty closely with different LDAP teams and the way FAS works
> > > is just not very... ldapian.  Although it's only some internal stuff that
> > > we need (specifically related to our user/sponsor/admin bits in each
> > > group.
> >
> > Can't this be implemented with a FAS ldap schema that contains these
> > bits in ldap attributes?
> >
> > Or rephrased: Can't any SQL field in a table be always mapped onto
> > some (custom) ldap attribute? If you can map a problem onto an SQL
> > database it should be possible to go ldap IMHO.
> >
> 
> Seems like it should work that way, and we spent months trying to get it
> to work right (even working with the fedora-ds people) but it just ended
> up being very hacky and not very good.

Maybe if someone gives some detail on why the LDAP setup looked like
too hacky we could find a better solution and use LDAP?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20090501/634afbfc/attachment.sig>