DNSSEC and Geodns

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Nothing's ever easy, is it?
>> >
>> > So I got pdns up and going this afternoon with it's geo back end.  It's
>> > working as expected and everything is good.  The problem is pdns's dnssec
>> > implementation is...  not particularly mature or really even usable AFAIK
>> > with geodns.
>> >
>> > Anyone out there doing both geo location and dnssec with their name
>> > servers?
>>
>> Not really. Most places I know do not do dns-sec (either waiting until
>> .com/.org is signed or until its required) or if they are doing
>> dns-sec aren't doing geoip. The solutions that comes to mind would be
>> to have the geoip code in an unsigned sub-zone. Its not great but
>> until 2011 I don't see it being much better.
>>
>
> Ugh, I really don't want to have to choose, nb did great work with getting
> dnssec going.

I would only do it for a subzone and not for the main one. Basically
have ns1/ns2 have the signed zones and the subzones on another one.



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning