rpm-4.6.x & friends for RHEL5 (was: hosts for rawhide build chroots - different rpm versions?)

[Axel Thimm]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:14:24PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > >> we are running a version of rpm 4.6.0 on rhel5.  This is only
> > >> so mock can populate chroots with rpms with stronger hashes
> > >> rhel5's rpm doesnt support.  All srpm creation now takes place
> > >> in chroots so features of the target rpm are always available.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the explanation, Dennis. Can I get these tailored rpm rpms
> > > from somewhere? I just tried rebuilding rpm from rawhide on RHEL5 and
> > > the dependencies look endless.

> http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/builder-rpms/

This worked for quite a while including Bill's update to rpm, but
since the util-linux-ng update in F11 a couple of weeks ago yum/rpm on
the RHEL5 host fails on util-linux-ng with

[...]
Running Transaction
error: util-linux-ng-2.14.2-11.fc11: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature:
BAD, key ID d22e77f2
Warning: scriptlet or other non-fatal errors occurred during
transaction.
[...]

Other packages (even built later than util-linux-ng-2.14.2-11.fc11)
install fine, the keys are installed, and I even tried with
--nogpgcheck.

Shouldn't --nogpgcheck avoid the test in the first place, and why does
it fail (only) on util-linux-ng?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20091005/44de2cae/attachment.sig>