From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 04:20:44 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 00:20:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] New: i18n im-switch message Message-ID: <200406010420.i514Ki8j001291@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 Summary: i18n im-switch message Product: Fedora Core Version: 2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: im-sdk AssignedTo: yshao ＠ redhat.com ReportedBy: ynakai ＠ redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-list ＠ redhat.com,fedora-ja-list ＠ redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ja-JP; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 Description of problem: im-switch is not gettextized Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): iiimf-x-11.4-43 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. im-switch in LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 2. English 3. Actual Results: English Expected Results: Japanese for ja_JP.UTF-8 Additional info: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 05:53:19 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 01:53:19 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 120494] wrong fonts are used on GUI Message-ID: <200406010553.i515rJ7a004713@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 01:53 ------- Dan, 1.1.1-5 looks better for CJK people, even if OOo uses the bitmap font again for Japanese. so could you push 1.1.1-5 for FC2 updates? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 05:55:31 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 01:55:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] i18n im-switch message Message-ID: <200406010555.i515tVRb004849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 petersen ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |translation ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 09:18:34 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 18:18:34 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040527.124226.129008105.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> References: <20040526192757.GA29063%sigematu2@fedora.jp> <"20040526.140657.03870545.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)"> <20040527.124226.129008105.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> Message-ID: <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> > で、解決する問題のようですね。（と言っても今の GIMLET は GNOME applet > なので KDE ではうごかないんですが） > > これも、systray にいれればいいし簡単！という提案が、 > 05/25 に Akira TAGOH さんから > [openi18n-im:00770] proposal: improvement of gimlet > として、また 5/27 に Jacky Lau から、 > [openi18n-im:00777] Re: proposal: improvement of gimlet > としてきてます。 これらについては以下のような疑問がわいてきます。 - GNOMEとKDE以外のデスクトップ環境は考慮しないのか? (たとえば、twmでは日本語を入力するなと言えるのだろうか) - GConfのない環境は考慮しないのか? GConfをシステムのデフォルトであると考えるべきかどうか - systrayのない環境は考慮しないのか? im-sdkがiconvを使わずにcscconvを使う理由とは、一見矛盾しているようにも思えます。 もちろん、何もないよりも実装があったほうがいいと言う考え方もあります。 いかがでしょう。 -- Nakai From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 09:20:13 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 05:20:13 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 107696] gkrellm text scrambled by default in Japanese environment Message-ID: <200406010920.i519KDKX014892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107696 wtogami ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From wtogami ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 05:20 ------- Please try gkrellm-2.2.0-1 from rawhide tomorrow. It now uses pango to render text, so this should theoretically be fixed. CLOSE or REOPEN after you have tested. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 11:10:50 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 07:10:50 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 107696] gkrellm text scrambled by default in Japanese environment Message-ID: <200406011110.i51BAoNl021590@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107696 ynakai ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 07:10 ------- The upstream source code works for me. date format is still wrong but this is another issue ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 11:26:44 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 20:26:44 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040526192757.GA29063%sigematu2@fedora.jp> References: <20040526192757.GA29063%sigematu2@fedora.jp> Message-ID: <200406011126.i51BQil31176@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> > 後、デスクトップに出ている Evolution にマウスカーソルを持っていくと、 > "の電子メール" と出ますね。--; > > これは、/usr/share/applications/redhat-email.desktop の修正じゃダメですね。 > どこ見てるんだろう。 こちらの環境では、そのファイルを修正するとなおりましたが、 どうでしょう。 -- Nakai From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 11:34:42 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 20:34:42 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040526192757.GA29063%sigematu2@fedora.jp> References: <20040526192757.GA29063%sigematu2@fedora.jp> Message-ID: <200406011134.i51BYgl31273@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> > > 後、デスクトップに出ている Evolution にマウスカーソルを持っていくと、 > "の電子メール" と出ますね。--; > > これは、/usr/share/applications/redhat-email.desktop の修正じゃダメですね。 > どこ見てるんだろう。 すいません、デスクトップとはどこのことを言っているのでしょう? ゴミ箱とかとおなじあたりでしょうか、それともGNOMEパネルのアイコンでしょうか。 パネルのメニューのものは、/usr/share/applications/redhat-email.desktopを編集すると 反映されます。ルートウィンドウのアイコンはパネルのメニューからコピーしなおせばOKの ように思います。 -- Nakai From hiura ＠ openi18n.org Tue Jun 1 15:33:44 2004 From: hiura ＠ openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura) Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> References: <"20040526.140657.03870545.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)"> <20040527.124226.129008105.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040601.083344.28505382.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)> > From: Yukihiro Nakai > - GNOMEとKDE以外のデスクトップ環境は考慮しないのか? > (たとえば、twmでは日本語を入力するなと言えるのだろうか) > - GConfのない環境は考慮しないのか? > GConfをシステムのデフォルトであると考えるべきかどうか > - systrayのない環境は考慮しないのか? > im-sdkがiconvを使わずにcscconvを使う理由とは、一見矛盾しているように > も思えます。 かなり初期から、GIMLET/GIMPET は、GUI/desktop 依存部分が pluggable な desktop 依存性の無いものを考えていたのですが、限られたリソースの問題で なによりもまずは GNOME desktop から、になってしまってます(^-^;; すくなくとも、いくつかの major desktop の applet/systray/standalone くらいの動作モード option はほしいと思ってます。（どなたかヘルプして いただけるボランティアの方いません？） また、現在の GIMLET の通信路の実装が X に依存しているのも元々の設計と は違っている、いうなればその場しのぎ的 hack で、それを直すのもなるべく 早くやりたいと思ってます。 （どなたかヘルプしていただけるボランティアの方いません？ ^-^） -- hiura@{freestandards.org,OpenI18N.org,li18nux.org,unicode.org,sun.com} Chair, OpenI18N.org/The Free Standards Group http://www.OpenI18N.org Architect/Sr. Staff Engineer, Sun Microsystems, Inc, USA eFAX: 509-693-8356 From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 15:47:14 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 11:47:14 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 107696] gkrellm text scrambled by default in Japanese environment Message-ID: <200406011547.i51FlE30012935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107696 ynakai ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 11:47 ------- Confirmed with gkrellm-2.2.0-1. Thank you! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 17:07:29 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 13:07:29 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124862] Update translation locally for Japanese Message-ID: <200406011707.i51H7Txk023594@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124862 twaugh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From twaugh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 13:07 ------- Do you have a patch to fix this? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 1 19:06:47 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 15:06:47 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese Message-ID: <200406011906.i51J6lD9001375@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From havill ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-01 15:06 ------- More helpful report for those whose native language isn't Japanese: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): lynx-2.8.5-15 1. Make sure you're running a FC system with JP fonts/etc installed correctly. 2. Make sure all locale catagories are in UTF-8 Japanese (set LANG and/or LC_ALL to "ja_JP.UTF-8", confirm with "locale(1)" command), and make sure gnome-terminal character encoding is set to UTF-8. 3. View a multi-page, plain text file (the GPL in /usr/share/doc is good) Actual results: -- 妾?妾 - (multi-language gibberish) Expected results: -- 次ページはスペースキーで -- ("Press space for the next page") Additional Info: The last two lines of help info are correct (although the character spacing could use some work; but that's not a lynx bug). Messages that are in colors (yellow foreground, blue background) seem to be consistently scrambled. Also, non-trival HTML pages (ex. www.yahoo.co.jp) in Japanese appear to segfault lynx. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 2 08:20:15 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 04:20:15 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124862] Update translation locally for Japanese Message-ID: <200406020820.i528KFO4028564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124862 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-02 04:20 ------- Created an attachment (id=100787) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=100787&action=view) diff for coreutils-5.2.1/po/ja.po Fix for date format ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 2 08:21:06 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 04:21:06 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124862] Update translation locally for Japanese Message-ID: <200406020821.i528L6dd028615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124862 ynakai ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-02 04:21 ------- Attached ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 2 08:26:33 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:26:33 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040601.083344.28505382.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> References: <"20040526.140657.03870545.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)"> <20040527.124226.129008105.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> <20040601.083344.28505382.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> Message-ID: <200406020826.i528QXl14857@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> うむうむ、ではもしGNOMEやXに非依存な実装があればオフィシャルに歓迎される ということですね。もしできたら連絡しますよ。 -- Nakai On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:33:44 -0700 (PDT) hiura ＠ openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura) wrote: > > From: Yukihiro Nakai > > - GNOMEとKDE以外のデスクトップ環境は考慮しないのか? > > (たとえば、twmでは日本語を入力するなと言えるのだろうか) > > - GConfのない環境は考慮しないのか? > > GConfをシステムのデフォルトであると考えるべきかどうか > > - systrayのない環境は考慮しないのか? > > im-sdkがiconvを使わずにcscconvを使う理由とは、一見矛盾しているように > > も思えます。 > > かなり初期から、GIMLET/GIMPET は、GUI/desktop 依存部分が pluggable な > desktop 依存性の無いものを考えていたのですが、限られたリソースの問題で > なによりもまずは GNOME desktop から、になってしまってます(^-^;; > すくなくとも、いくつかの major desktop の applet/systray/standalone > くらいの動作モード option はほしいと思ってます。（どなたかヘルプして > いただけるボランティアの方いません？） > > また、現在の GIMLET の通信路の実装が X に依存しているのも元々の設計と > は違っている、いうなればその場しのぎ的 hack で、それを直すのもなるべく > 早くやりたいと思ってます。 > （どなたかヘルプしていただけるボランティアの方いません？ ^-^） > > -- > hiura@{freestandards.org,OpenI18N.org,li18nux.org,unicode.org,sun.com} > Chair, OpenI18N.org/The Free Standards Group http://www.OpenI18N.org > Architect/Sr. Staff Engineer, Sun Microsystems, Inc, USA eFAX: 509-693-8356 From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 2 08:59:08 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 04:59:08 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124862] Update translation locally for Japanese Message-ID: <200406020859.i528x8C8030461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124862 twaugh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.2.1-11 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-02 04:59 ------- Thanks. Fixed in 5.2.1-11. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hiura ＠ openi18n.org Wed Jun 2 14:11:49 2004 From: hiura ＠ openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura) Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <200406020826.i528QXl14857@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> References: <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> <20040601.083344.28505382.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> <200406020826.i528QXl14857@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040602.071149.127138703.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)> > From: Yukihiro Nakai > うむうむ、ではもしGNOMEやXに非依存な実装があればオフィシャルに歓迎される > ということですね。もしできたら連絡しますよ。 # Nakai さんは committer ですから owner としてオフィシャルに歓迎する側(^-^;; これからしばらく、Nakai さんから「できた！」という連絡があったかどうか、 朝起きて真っ先に from/Nakai folder を確認する毎日が続きそうです(^-^)v -- hiura@{freestandards.org,OpenI18N.org,li18nux.org,unicode.org,sun.com} Chair, OpenI18N.org/The Free Standards Group http://www.OpenI18N.org Architect/Sr. Staff Engineer, Sun Microsystems, Inc, USA eFAX: 509-693-8356 From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 2 17:59:34 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 02:59:34 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040602.071149.127138703.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> References: <200406010918.i519IYl29451@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> <20040601.083344.28505382.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> <200406020826.i528QXl14857@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> <20040602.071149.127138703.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> Message-ID: <20040603025934.7ab76b78.ynakai@redhat.com> On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:11:49 -0700 (PDT) hiura ＠ openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura) wrote: > > From: Yukihiro Nakai > > うむうむ、ではもしGNOMEやXに非依存な実装があればオフィシャルに歓迎される > > ということですね。もしできたら連絡しますよ。 > > # Nakai さんは committer ですから owner としてオフィシャルに歓迎する側(^-^;; > > これからしばらく、Nakai さんから「できた！」という連絡があったかどうか、 > 朝起きて真っ先に from/Nakai folder を確認する毎日が続きそうです(^-^)v うは。 今年はIPAもスポンサーになってくれなかったので あまり期待しないでおいてください。w -- Nakai-- From hiura ＠ openi18n.org Thu Jun 3 16:47:10 2004 From: hiura ＠ openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura) Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 09:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCRnxLXDhsNEQ2LRsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040603025934.7ab76b78.ynakai@redhat.com> References: <200406020826.i528QXl14857@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> <20040602.071149.127138703.hiura@openi18n.org(HidekiHiura)> <20040603025934.7ab76b78.ynakai@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040603.094710.50026099.hiura@openi18n.org (Hideki Hiura)> > From: Yukihiro Nakai > 今年はIPAもスポンサーになってくれなかったので 2004年度オープンソースソフトウェア活用基盤整備事業は、まだ第２回 公募もありますってば(^-^ 「オープンソース・デスクトップ環境における、ウィンドウ・システム、 デスクトップ・システム非依存の多言語入力切り替え機構の開発」 とかっていうタイトルをでっち上げるのはいかがでしょ？ -- hiura@{freestandards.org,OpenI18N.org,li18nux.org,unicode.org,sun.com} Chair, OpenI18N.org/The Free Standards Group http://www.OpenI18N.org Architect/Sr. Staff Engineer, Sun Microsystems, Inc, USA eFAX: 509-693-8356 From shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp Fri Jun 11 08:24:32 2004 From: shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp (Shun Fukuzawa) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:24:32 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?b?TW96aWxsYRskQiROJW0hPCUrGyhC?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJWolPCE8JTclZyVzGyhC?= Message-ID: <40C96C40.7030705@jcom.home.ne.jp> ゆきちです。 本日、IRCでmoizlla foundationのAsa Dotzler 氏の呼びかけによりローカリ ゼーションミーテョングを行いました。その最中、Asa氏に「なんでFC2のUIは日 本語になっていないの?」と聞いたところ、「僕はよくしらない。今度、 Redhat.comの人とコンタクトをとってみます」とのお返事をいただきました。 #Mozilla FoundationとLinux Distributerって、コンタクトをとってないのです ね……。 ちなみに、ここでいうローカリゼーションとは、UIの現地語化は当然、ブック マーク、スタートページ、サーチエンジン、サイドバーなどを指しています。そ の点については、尽力する、というお話でした。ただし、一方でIMとの相性な ど、コードをいじる問題はローカリゼーションの対象とは考えられておりませ ん。従って、その点は、検討の対象外となる予定です。 #Mozilla Foundationは、コードをいじったものをオフィシャルビルドとしては 認めない方針なのです。 今日話したことは今後、ヨーロッパ方面の人を含め、Newsgroupで話を継続す る、とのことでした。 以上、報告します。 From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 3 01:15:19 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 21:15:19 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 123540] Japanese PDF scrambled with xpdf 3.00 Message-ID: <200406030115.i531FJaE012946@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123540 ------- Additional Comments From llch ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-02 21:15 ------- Comment 1 has a test pdf. Let me know if you need more. Cheers ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 3 09:23:31 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 05:23:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese Message-ID: <200406030923.i539NVRd001679@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 twaugh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 4 14:50:49 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:50:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 116094] Human unreadable messages in /var/log/messages Message-ID: <200406041450.i54EonSk025981@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116094 markmc ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting ＠ redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From markmc ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-04 10:50 ------- Notting, so is this realistically something that we can get fixed in syslog or should GConf stop localizing error messages ? GDM sends localized messages to syslog too AFAIR ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 4 19:30:45 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:30:45 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] New: Canna dictionaries are not mounted Message-ID: <200406041930.i54JUjvr015833@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 Summary: Canna dictionaries are not mounted Product: Fedora Core Version: 2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: im-sdk AssignedTo: yshao ＠ redhat.com ReportedBy: ynakai ＠ redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-list ＠ redhat.com,fedora-ja-list ＠ redhat.com >From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 Description of problem: Using Canna through IIIMF, it lacks Canna dictionaries significantly. When I restart htt_server manually as a user, it works correctly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): im-sdk-11.4-43 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Fresh install FC2 everything 2. Run as Japanese user 3. Run gnome-terminal 4. Press Control-Space 5. Input 'mizumoto' and convert it 6. '水本' is not in the candidate 7. sudo /etc/init.d/IIim stop 8. Run /usr/sbin/htt_server as a user, not root 9. Input 'mizumoto' and convert it 7. correct candidate is in the candidate window Actual Results: '水本' is not in the candidate window Expected Results: '水本' is in the candidate window Additional info: Sorry Mizumoto-san, for using your name as the example. But Fukushige-san has also same result. Tagoh-san's name is fine. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 4 20:12:24 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 116094] Human unreadable messages in /var/log/messages In-Reply-To: bugzilla-116094@redhat.com Message-ID: <200406042012.i54KCNN9018608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116094 notting ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |RESOLVED ------- Additional Comments From notting ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-04 16:12 ------- It's a syslogd bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112519 *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 7 06:20:51 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 02:20:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] Canna dictionaries are not mounted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406070620.i576KpJI019859@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 tagoh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |normal ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-07 02:20 ------- Please look at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-i18n-list/2004-May/msg00024.html if htt_server is running as root (or the users who has some privileges) or by yourself, it should works. but it seems to not working somehow so that usually htt_server is running as a htt user when it was realised by the init script. BTW severity "high" means "Problem due to crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak, etc.". this problem causes no crashes, no loss of data, no memory leak. just missing the function which should works, but there are a workaround. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 7 06:21:56 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 02:21:56 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] Canna dictionaries are not mounted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406070621.i576Lu3U019996@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 tagoh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mkhatto ＠ mx9.ttcn.ne.jp ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-07 02:21 ------- *** Bug 125356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 7 08:37:11 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 04:37:11 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] Canna dictionaries are not mounted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406070837.i578bBlt031475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ynakai ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |khirano ＠ transwift.net ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-07 04:37 ------- Running htt_server as root, it works. I've just now. #125356 shows a workaround, but the problem is that there is no chance for htt_server to refer $HOME/.canna . There's no workaround for that, isn't it? Current severity guide line does not refer i18n issues. If you don't want it to be set as high, you should define the level for i18n issues. And nowadays, customers specify 100,000 or more words in kana-kanji dictionary for bidding, so the dictionary failure is severe problem for all Japanese input users, even for open and free operating system. It's unbelievable that Red Hat recognize this issue as lower severity. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 8 03:06:47 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:06:47 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] Canna dictionaries are not mounted In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406080306.i5836lBE013412@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-07 23:06 ------- No, it's not what I said for a workaround. as I said, it works if htt_server is running as root/your user rather than a htt user. I mean, Canna LE already has the code to refer $HOME/.canna. but htt_server seems to need the privileges to fully support the multiple users. I said, htt_server is running as a htt user right now. htt user has no privileges. so htt_server gives LEs a htt user as current user. it's also a reason why htt_server works if it's running as your user. BTW severity is "normal". it's not lower severity, though. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 8 03:12:01 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:12:01 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] IIIMF needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406080312.i583C1e6014780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 tagoh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Canna dictionaries are not |IIIMF needs the privileges |mounted |to support the multiple | |users ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 8 03:12:28 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:12:28 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406080312.i583CSgY014928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 tagoh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|IIIMF needs the privileges |htt_server needs the |to support the multiple |privileges to support the |users |multiple users ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 8 13:15:23 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:15:23 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406081315.i58DFNDG026353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From yshao ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-08 09:15 ------- LEIF has desktop data structure to handle mutliple user, but i think Canna LE is not using it. This is an option, definitely not the best, I will try to include Hideki into the loop and see if he has any idea. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 9 08:13:56 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 04:13:56 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406090813.i598Dutw018777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 04:13 ------- Erm, Canna LE users it already. and it also uses setreuid(2) and setregid(2) to change the real user/group and the effective usr/group. since htt_server doesn't use fork(2), CannaLE may not uses it. it's easy fix for Canna LE then. However how about the library model's IM and it has the user specific dictionaries?-- even if the current design of IIIMF isn't changed, the server-client model's IM is possible to support the multiple users. it depends on the implementation, though-- LEs needs to be run with proper user. otherwise the library model's IM won't read/write the dictionaries and their configurations securely. htt_server has the authentication mechanism. but it's to connect to htt_server, but not to support the multiple users on *LEs*. so htt_server has to be run with the privileged user. otherwise IIIMF will needs to be changed the security design and LEIF design. this problem isn't Canna LE specific IMHO. That problem should be discussed with the upstream anyway, though ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 9 17:20:48 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:20:48 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406091720.i59HKmpc005817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 13:20 ------- Some thought: - I wonder how this is on other ATOKX distros. It should have user specific config with IIIMF. Running it as root, possibly. - When user add new words to the canna dictionary through IIIM, it would be going to add everybody's into the user htt's dictionary. So it is supposed as everybody shares the htt's custom user dictionary. Each user's dictionary should be treated as their own private data. So it's critical. Currently, CannaLE has no codes to add new words so this problem does not happen yet, but that will happen in the future. - I think now I understand Anthy/UIM guys' critics against IIIMF. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 9 17:54:02 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:54:02 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406091754.i59Hs2U8008932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 13:54 ------- The authors know the detail so I'm fine to wait the discussion in the upstream. But I think they will answer that htt_server has enough security for running as root: - Default setting allows access from 127.0.0.1 only. - LEs will lose root privilege at each startup. - LEs need to run as each user. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 9 18:24:52 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 14:24:52 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406091824.i59IOqa1011913@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 14:24 ------- I have another idea to fix this: Each users run htt_server. That is stupid but effective. Currently, many big processes are running as user. Bonobo, gconf, nautilus, rhn-applet-gui, etc... So nothing happen with another new service process. Most of memory of htt_server is assumed as the conversion tables of each LEs. So, to reduce memory size of htt_server, - Don't load unecessary LE. - bzip2-compressing the table data on the memory. And it'll get much improvement ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 00:01:14 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:01:14 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100001.i5A01EdU006937@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From yshao ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 20:01 ------- Or let htt server manage user specific information thru user htt, I think this could an option. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 00:18:48 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 20:18:48 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100018.i5A0Img4008090@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From llch ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-09 20:18 ------- Very good topic to talk in mailing list. Anyway, what does Sun do on this problem? Do they run htt as root? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 05:33:14 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:33:14 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for ja install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100533.i5A5XEvU025022@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 ------- Additional Comments From llch ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 01:33 ------- Debian had fixed it recently (0.1.18-1) for this problem. Can we have a look and test it? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 05:53:31 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:53:31 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100553.i5A5rVXU026521@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 01:53 ------- Hmm, ~/.canna is readable for anyone. $ LANG=C ls -lga ~/.canna* -rw-r--r-- 1 nakai 5542 May 25 16:16 /home/nakai/.canna And users dictionaries too. $ LANG=C ls -lga /var/lib/canna/dic/user/nakai/ total 16 -rw-rw-r-- 1 bin 54 Jun 1 18:28 #dics.dir drwxrwxr-x 2 bin 4096 Jun 1 18:28 . drwxr-xr-x 3 bin 4096 Jun 1 18:28 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 bin 79 Jun 1 18:28 dics.dir -rw-rw-r-- 1 bin 0 Jun 1 18:28 usr1.ctd So htt can read them. But Canna was developped when there is no networks, then no security holes, or users' privacies. But users' dictionaries are somewhat privates of users. Red Hat might need to decide the policy which categorize them to. And this issue is not Canna- or Japanese-specific, as you know. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 06:42:03 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:42:03 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 123540] Japanese PDF scrambled with xpdf 3.00 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100642.i5A6g3Au029479@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123540 wtogami ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami ＠ redhat.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 06:45:04 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 02:45:04 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] i18n im-switch message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100645.i5A6j4TL029659@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 wtogami ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO| |123268 nThis| | CC| |wtogami ＠ redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 02:45 ------- This should be fixed when im-switch is rewritten in python (?) to have GUI. The current version is a shell script, which would be quite ugly to i18nize. Target FC3, although may push it to FC2 updates sooner if we manage to implement it early. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 09:23:34 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 05:23:34 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406100923.i5A9NYfQ007525@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 05:23 ------- Comment #10: How? as Nakai said, your idea should works for Canna, because it's also the server-client model, and $HOME/.canna can be read from LE even if htt_server is running as a htt user. But, it won't work without the privileges on the library model like the dictionaries and the configurations are put under $HOME as 0600 mode. so LEs has to be run as the own user to prevent the security risk. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 10 11:56:08 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 07:56:08 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406101156.i5ABu8vx019315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 07:56 ------- FC2's $HOME is 0700. Oh-no- So there is no simple way to see it... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 01:03:32 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:03:32 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406110103.i5B13WVV027473@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From llim ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-10 21:03 ------- Created an attachment (id=101052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=101052&action=view) This is what it looks like when user logs into KDE with ja locale ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 04:07:22 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:07:22 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406110407.i5B47Mtn005304@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 wtogami ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |125270 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 07:10:13 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:10:13 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406110710.i5B7ADmn022798@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From llim ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-11 03:10 ------- Test Outcome for new patch. Version Number: -44.FC2.20040608.0 Actual Result: The Status Window on the Taskbar does not appear during the initial log in. However, running an application say kedit and minimise it causes the Status Window on the Taskbar to reappear. Also, the workplace switcher is still not working. Expected Result: 1) No Status Window on the Taskbar. 2) Workplace switcher work as normal Additional Information: If you kill httx and start httx again, this problem will be resolved. However, this alternative leaves the status window of an application open in the middle of the screen when the application is minimised. Very ugly. Also, this alternative also allow the workplace switcher to work again. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 07:47:24 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:47:24 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] i18n im-switch message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406110747.i5B7lO24026412@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-11 03:47 ------- Shell scripts can be gettextized. See initscripts. Rewritten in python with i18ned GUI is also fine. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 08:46:12 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 04:46:12 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406110846.i5B8kCBm031306@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-11 04:46 ------- did the status window appears with just minimizing the application window? and actually you didn't see the status window on the desktop anywhere, right? I did: 1. create a new user 2. log into the KDE with ja_JP.UTF-8 3. run kedit from the menu 4. minimized the window But I couldn't reproduce that problem. do you have any steps to 100% reproduce that problem? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 11 10:08:27 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 06:08:27 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122083] Update CMap in ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406111008.i5BA8R17005182@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083 tagoh ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|test3 |2 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-11 06:08 ------- and the updated CMap for Traditional Chinese is available -- ftp://ftp.oreilly.com/pub/examples/nutshell/cjkv/adobe/ac14.tar.Z It contains additional Map tables from UTF-8, UTF-16, and UTF-32. it should requires to improve/support full UTF-8 for the printing. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sat Jun 12 20:54:39 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:54:39 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406122054.i5CKsdiC032375@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From hiura ＠ openi18n.org 2004-06-12 16:54 ------- On all the other platforms, htt_server runs as root, especially with ATOKX, which needs root previledge. This shouldn't be a problem. In default htt_server only accepts connection from localhost, and will soon be changed to use UNIX domain socket in default. The feature of user dictionary uploading/downloading from $HOME is undergoing, so the problem of LE directly accessing $HOME will be resolved soon in the proper way. Also, the feature not ported between r10->r11, vmseparator is planned to be backported to r12, so that LEs needing root previledge can run beyond htt_server boundary which can run as non-root user. Running htt_server per user is also a valid option supported, for whom wants to do so, as the developpers usually do so during development. In r12, specific --user option is planned to be introduced for such paranoia, but mostlikely this option is not needed for most of the users. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 13 15:27:30 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:27:30 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406131527.i5DFRUU5000568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-13 11:27 ------- Sorry, yes we are the *** P A R A N O I A *** for securities. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 13 15:28:09 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:28:09 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406131528.i5DFS9NS000679@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-13 11:28 ------- So, yes we need the features... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ynakai ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 13 17:12:36 2004 From: ynakai ＠ redhat.com (Yukihiro Nakai) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 02:12:36 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?TW96aWxsYRskQiROJW0hPCUrGyhC?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJWolPCE8JTclZyVzGyhC?= In-Reply-To: <40C96C40.7030705@jcom.home.ne.jp> References: <40C96C40.7030705@jcom.home.ne.jp> Message-ID: <20040614021236.732e6195.ynakai@redhat.com> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 17:24:32 +0900 Shun Fukuzawa wrote: > ゆきちです。 > > 本日、IRCでmoizlla foundationのAsa Dotzler 氏の呼びかけによりローカリ > ゼーションミーテョングを行いました。その最中、Asa氏に「なんでFC2のUIは日 > 本語になっていないの?」と聞いたところ、「僕はよくしらない。今度、 > Redhat.comの人とコンタクトをとってみます」とのお返事をいただきました。 > > #Mozilla FoundationとLinux Distributerって、コンタクトをとってないのです > ね……。 地域化の状況までの連絡は取らないですね。 どちらかというと、distributorはMozillaをただで勝手に使っている に近いわけですし。 #こう書くと語弊があるかな? -- Nakai From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 13 19:15:19 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:15:19 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406131915.i5DJFJgA016100@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From hiura ＠ openi18n.org 2004-06-13 15:15 ------- Being paranoia for security is not a bad thing, and actually I am too. There are bunch of common methods to improve security, so many of them are implemented or in progress, but even before that, we should accurately identify what's the root cause of the problem, then design the solution for it, instead of jumping illogically onto per-user library/server is the solution. The cause of needing root previledge is not from IIIMF server itself, but from some LEs(typically from the library linked by it instead of the LE implementation itself). Some IM libraries assume simple "getuid()" or such sort work always fine to get user's identity. This assumtion forced to htt_server to run as root, but the optimal solution is to fix such library. We have vmseparator which could deal with such situation for some cases, and also improve security and stability. Note that any LEs directly accessing $HOME is NOT allowed (by design :-). even though it is doable technically if server is on local machine, but only client(and client libraries) should have an access to $HOME. So there is no need for IIIMF server/LEs to obtain root privilege to access $HOME(by design :-). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 14 00:53:04 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:53:04 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406140053.i5E0r4s0006392@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-13 20:53 ------- Comment #18: interesting. on UNIX-like operating system, even vmseparator has to obey that rules and the specification on the filesystems. and it shouldn't assumes that the groups members and others can accesses to the files. so how is LEs allowed to access to such files by vmseparator without root privilege then? and vmseparator works if the server and the client works on the same machine, and it provides the facilities to access LEs to the $HOME files indirectly, right? does it mean that vmseparator which is running as another user processes the user-specific data? don't you assume that there is no malicious users on the same machine? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 14 05:32:08 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 01:32:08 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406140532.i5E5W8p0026640@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From hiura ＠ openi18n.org 2004-06-14 01:32 ------- There are several approaches to maintain so-called "privacy of user dictionary". Even if a LE saves user dictionary same uid, such as, say, "user canna" which is not readable by others, and canna maintains the user as "canna user" instead of "UNIX user", so-called "privacy of user dictionary" is maintained. This is not at all surprisingly insecure approach, such as subversion is using with svn+ssh method, for example. About vmseparator; No, it's not what you imagined. Even via vmseparator, No LEs should access $HOME directly comseptually :-). The approach of vmseparator allows htt_server to use "UNIX user" by running a separated LE instance in "real UNIX user id" to store such private data in real UNIX user id. To do so, in very small code to authenticate and change uid once to the target user id portion still has to run with root privilege, but such code only executes single extremelyl small static functionality, so it would be much secure than having entire server running in root privilege. About malicious users; Of cource I assume there could be malicious users on the same machine, but if such malicious user to take over controll of what the LE instance beyond vmseparator stored, they have to break the extremly small single function code to authenticate and change uid, or they have to already obtain the target user's UNIX id upfront. In the latter case, they already obtained the access to wherever the user can, including $HOME anyway :-). So I really don't buy the argument that storing users dictionary into $HOME BY ITSELF significantly improves so-called "privacy of user dictionary" as someone claims in loud. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 14 08:08:59 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 04:08:59 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406140808.i5E88x7J008932@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-14 04:08 ------- Comment #20: Yes, right. I'm not saying that Canna's approach is secure. For second comment, well, vmseparator will does something like ssh's privilege separation, right? and LEs can accesses the files under $HOME then? vmseparator needs the user authentication to allow the access. it sounds good. so does IIIMF always ask people about their password to allow the access? or is it stored somewhere? For last comment, I thought all of data passes through vmseparator. as you pointed out, I was misunderstanding. sorry. So what I'm worry right now is only the path of the password. using the plain text to authenticate it is worse you know. I would know your opinion about it. if the path is secure, the malicious users may not obtains the user. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 00:52:42 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:52:42 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] i18n im-switch message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406150052.i5F0qgoM011166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 llch ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |125997 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 00:52:51 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:52:51 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406150052.i5F0qpUO011265@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 llch ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |125997 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 00:53:00 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:53:00 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406150053.i5F0r0MU011387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 llch ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |125997 nThis| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 06:34:38 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 02:34:38 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406150634.i5F6Yce9021811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From llim ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-15 02:34 ------- Tagoh, I have tested your latest im-sdk -08 (orochi.tokyo) on FC2 and everything looks very good. :) The problem could be due to the different qt version on FC2 and RHEL4-alpha3. FC2 is using qt-3.3.2-2 RHEL4-alpha3 is using qt-3.3.2-5 Thanks, Lawrence ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 12:16:35 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:16:35 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 126020] New: Enable i18n translation for rhgb in CJK environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406151216.i5FCGZh9006221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126020 Summary: Enable i18n translation for rhgb in CJK environment Product: Fedora Core Version: 2 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: normal Component: initscripts AssignedTo: notting ＠ redhat.com ReportedBy: ynakai ＠ redhat.com QAContact: borgan ＠ redhat.com CC: eng-i18n-list ＠ redhat.com,fedora-ja-list ＠ redhat.com Description of problem: rhgb is i18ned but initscripts breaks it. /etc/init.d/functions set LC_MESSAGES=en_US for CJK locale, in the sake of console message. But that breaks rhgb i18n. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Translate rhgb.mo for CJK and install into the system locale dir. 2. Boot in ja_JP.UTF-8 or other CJK locales. 3. Message is English, not translated. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 12:17:40 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 08:17:40 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 126020] Enable i18n translation for rhgb in CJK environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406151217.i5FCHeOK006410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126020 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-15 08:17 ------- Created an attachment (id=101143) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=101143&action=view) Diff for initscripts-7.53. Trivial. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 15 18:05:44 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:05:44 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406151805.i5FI5iUp019737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From hiura ＠ openi18n.org 2004-06-15 14:05 ------- I noticed that all comments are from committers :-), I guess probablly as Leon suggested, we better move the discussion to openi18n-im :-). Anyway, Akira, your comments on passwd are very valid and fully agreed. The passwd will be stored only in encripted form whenever it needs to be stored.(Please don't be confused by FUD that IIIMF saves passwd in plain text. What someone trumpeted is not a passwd but a cookie created by a particular LE's helper process in confusingly named file, but not by IIIMF). About accessing user's dictionary in $HOME/, The proper method will be to use the user data upload/download mechanism(sorry, it's in progress yet. Hopefully be released soon), instead of accessing directly $HOME from LE even with vmseparator. So, for example, the code accessing $HOME/.canna should be modified to use this mechanism because htt_server and clients may run on different machines, so accessing $HOME/ from htt_server. The libiiimcf running in users UNIX ID will load $HOME/.canna on be half of CannaLE. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 16 10:05:22 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 06:05:22 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406161005.i5GA5MOH031564@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- Additional Comments From hiura ＠ openi18n.org 2004-06-16 06:05 ------- I need to correct one thing :-O. After confirming with the LE developper, it was inaccurate that I said > (Please don't be confused by FUD that IIIMF saves > passwd in plain text. What someone trumpeted is not a passwd > but a cookie created by a particular LE's helper process in > confusingly named file, but not by IIIMF) Actually, noone is using it, but some experimental junk code is creating such file. So it would be removed, and SSL based X.509 authentication will replace it. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 18 00:42:00 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 20:42:00 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406180042.i5I0g0di009710@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-17 20:41 ------- Created an attachment (id=101232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=101232&action=view) comparison of screenshots ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 18 15:47:14 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:47:14 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 89292] many UTF-8 symbols appear garbled in syslog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406181547.i5IFlEjf011569@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89292 tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-ja-list ＠ redhat.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp Fri Jun 18 15:50:49 2004 From: tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp (SEKINE Tatsuo) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 00:50:49 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 89292] many UTF-8 symbols appear garbled in syslog In-Reply-To: <200406181547.i5IFlEjf011569@www.beta.redhat.com> References: <200406181547.i5IFlEjf011569@www.beta.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040619.005049.105795917.tsekine@sdri.co.jp> 関根です。 Bug 116094 ですが 112519 と重複になったものの security 絡みなのでしょうか、私はアクセスできません。 というわけで代わりに 89292 の方で Cc: fedora-ja-list にしておきました。 From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 18 22:39:59 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:39:59 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406182239.i5IMdxIi017221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 dickey ＠ radix.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dickey ＠ radix.net ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-18 18:39 ------- The screenshot I made was for uxterm on Debian, using a copy of lynx which I built myself (linked with ncursesw of course). It would be nice to know if this screenshot looks correct (I don't read Japanese, but it does look different - from both - but that could be a font issue). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 20 00:24:29 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:24:29 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406200024.i5K0OTrd004942@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-19 20:24 ------- commit #3 screenshots is ja_JP.UTF-8 locale? Now I confirmed this bug happens on both gnome-terminal and uxterm in FC2. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 20 01:09:38 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 21:09:38 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406200109.i5K19cka007091@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-19 21:09 ------- yes, I used ja_JP.UTF-8 (to make lynx use the corresponding ja.po contents). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp Sun Jun 20 14:50:58 2004 From: shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp (Shun Fukuzawa) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:50:58 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMbKEI=?= =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCJUglaiVqITwlORsoQg==?= Message-ID: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> ゆきちです。 さざなみフォントというフォントがリリースされました。 http://slashdot.jp/article.pl?sid=04/06/19/042255&topic=104 リリース元 http://sourceforge.jp/projects/efont/files/?release_id=9934#9934 もともと、東風フォントの公開停止を受けて開発されたもので、いくつかのフォ ントデータを同時に含んでいるもののようです。FCはまだなのですが、Mac OS X に入れて見たところ、アンチエイリアスをかけた段階でも、かなりきれいなフォ ントになっています。少なくとも、東風代替よりかは、相当綺麗なものです。 で、できたら、次か、その次くらいのFCのリリースに入れたいのですが、どうい う手続きをとったらいいでしょう? 僕がやるかはともかく、方法を教えてください。Bugzillaに投げるほうが早いで すかね? From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 20 22:20:33 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:20:33 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406202220.i5KMKXkH012802@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-20 18:20 ------- Do the two (gnome-terminal and uxterm) produce the same result in FC2, or are they different from each other? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 20 22:28:11 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:28:11 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406202228.i5KMSBBd013132@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-20 18:28 ------- Created an attachment (id=101280) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=101280&action=view) This bug report in lynx, showing the bad/desired strings. In this screenshot, the text is displayed without color (since it is part of the regular text). Is that example uncorrupted? I notice that the characters shown are different from the screenshot I made with them in the blue/yellow message line. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Sun Jun 20 22:30:10 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:30:10 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406202230.i5KMUA4l013369@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-20 18:30 ------- If the second screenshot displays the characters properly, I may have enough information to debug this. (It's hard to debug this without knowing what the result should look like). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 21 04:02:01 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:02:01 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406210402.i5L421PG031141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From ynakai ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-21 00:01 ------- gnome-terminal and uxterm have the same result in FC2. To comment #8: That is the expected result. Broken string is pasted in this bug report to show the display result. Comment #3 screenshot is the correct Japanese. I can read it. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 21 08:02:00 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:02:00 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> References: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> Message-ID: <20040621.170200.1057494051.tagoh@redhat.com> たごうです． >>>>> On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:50:58 +0900, >>>>> "SF" == Shun Fukuzawa wrote: SF> ゆきちです。 SF> さざなみフォントというフォントがリリースされました。 SF> http://slashdot.jp/article.pl?sid=04/06/19/042255&topic=104 SF> リリース元 SF> http://sourceforge.jp/projects/efont/files/?release_id=9934#9934 SF> もともと、東風フォントの公開停止を受けて開発されたもので、いくつかのフォ SF> ントデータを同時に含んでいるもののようです。FCはまだなのですが、Mac OS X SF> に入れて見たところ、アンチエイリアスをかけた段階でも、かなりきれいなフォ SF> ントになっています。少なくとも、東風代替よりかは、相当綺麗なものです。 個人的にはkochi-substと同等かそれ以下だと思っているんですが， http://wiki.fdiary.net/font/?sazanami にもある通り，リリース された段階ですでに問題が見付かってます． このさざなみフォントですが，位置付けとしてはkochi-substの後 継に当たります．さざなみフォントでcommon lispベースの開発体 系に移行した都合，kochi-substのリリースはないと思います．ま た，フォントサイズなどの問題で両方入れるのは若干無理があるの で，完全に入れ換えとなってしまいますが，そうなるといくつか思 いあたるところで問題がでてきます． 例えば，フォント名を指定しているアプリケーション，fontconfig とかOOoとか，ghostscriptとかその他もろもろ．この辺りを一斉に 差し替えということになりますが，ものによってはひょっとしたら $HOMEの下の設定にもう書かれてあって，フォントを入れ換えた途 端に文字がでなくなるなんてこともあり得るかもしれません． いずれにしてもフォント単体の品質向上のためのテスト，および入 れ換えたことによる動作確認などをする必要があるわけですが，い きなりバチンと入れ換えてしまうのもどうかと思ってます． とりあえず別の場所に置いてテストするというのが当面よさそうと 思うのですが，どうでしょう? フォントまわりでおかしくなるのはかなり致命的です．FCと言えど もそこまでリスクをユーザが負う必要もないと思うんですが． -- Akira TAGOH From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 21 09:55:21 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:55:21 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406210955.i5L9tLqN020732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From llim ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-21 05:55 ------- In the ja locale, this situation does not appear anymore but in the zh_*, problem still exist. According to tagoh-san, it is because iiimf-le-xcin and iiimf-le-inpinyin does not have hiding the status window code. Will file a bug against each of them. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp Mon Jun 21 12:03:39 2004 From: shfukuzawa ＠ jcom.home.ne.jp (Shun Fukuzawa) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:03:39 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSBsoQg==?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJWolaiE8JTkbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20040621.170200.1057494051.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> <20040621.170200.1057494051.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <40D6CE9B.9080105@jcom.home.ne.jp> ゆきちです。 Akira TAGOH wrote: > たごうです． > > >>>>>>On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 23:50:58 +0900, >>>>>>"SF" == Shun Fukuzawa wrote: > > > SF> ゆきちです。 > SF> さざなみフォントというフォントがリリースされました。 > SF> http://slashdot.jp/article.pl?sid=04/06/19/042255&topic=104 > SF> リリース元 > SF> http://sourceforge.jp/projects/efont/files/?release_id=9934#9934 > > SF> もともと、東風フォントの公開停止を受けて開発されたもので、いくつかのフォ > SF> ントデータを同時に含んでいるもののようです。FCはまだなのですが、Mac OS X > SF> に入れて見たところ、アンチエイリアスをかけた段階でも、かなりきれいなフォ > SF> ントになっています。少なくとも、東風代替よりかは、相当綺麗なものです。 > > 個人的にはkochi-substと同等かそれ以下だと思っているんですが， > http://wiki.fdiary.net/font/?sazanami にもある通り，リリース > された段階ですでに問題が見付かってます． > そうですか。個人的にはmacでちょっと見ただけだったので。でも、東風代替で 見られたような、「有」の字のくずれなどが少なかったので、そこそこ評価はし ています。 > このさざなみフォントですが，位置付けとしてはkochi-substの後 (略) > 思うのですが，どうでしょう? > そうですね、おっしゃるとおりです。ただ、いつか、東風代替を捨てる時がくる はずなので、その時に慌てるよりかは、早めに候補となるものをテストしておき たいな、と思っています。なので、extraなリポジトリにおいておけたらな、と は思っています。 その場合は、どうやって手続きをとったらいいでしょう? #ちなみに、gentooは既に「本家に入れ」たそうです。その「本家に入れ」るの 意味がわかってないですけど。 http://www.madoro.org/nikki/?date=20040621#p02 From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 21 12:50:29 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:50:29 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <40D6CE9B.9080105@jcom.home.ne.jp> References: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> <20040621.170200.1057494051.tagoh@redhat.com> <40D6CE9B.9080105@jcom.home.ne.jp> Message-ID: <20040621.215029.476693836.tagoh@redhat.com> たごうです． >>>>> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:03:39 +0900, >>>>> "SF" == Shun Fukuzawa wrote: SF> そうですね、おっしゃるとおりです。ただ、いつか、東風代替を捨てる時がくる SF> はずなので、その時に慌てるよりかは、早めに候補となるものをテストしておき SF> たいな、と思っています。なので、extraなリポジトリにおいておけたらな、と SF> は思っています。 SF> その場合は、どうやって手続きをとったらいいでしょう? 現状ではtesting用の(公式な)repositoryはありません． まだ，ttfonts-jaのみの修正ですが，とりあえず http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/sazanami/ に置いてみました． yum readyです．テスト用のパッケージなのでkochi-substも入って います．テストについてはこのフォントを必要としている人が必ず しもfedora-ja-listを見てるとも限らないので，fedora-i18n-list とfedora-test-listに後で投げることにします． 個人的な考えとしては，FC3リリース前に変更の必要なパッケージ の洗いだしと修正を終えて，問題ないことを確認した後に， kochi-substを削除が一番被害を少なくできるかなあと思っていま す． -- Akira TAGOH From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 21 14:30:21 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:30:21 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122869] xinput script not run, needs to be renamed to xinput.sh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406211430.i5LEULmG015732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122869 tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-ja-list ＠ redhat.com ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp Mon Jun 21 14:53:00 2004 From: tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp (SEKINE Tatsuo) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:53:00 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122869] xinput script not run, needs to be renamed to xinput.sh In-Reply-To: <200406211430.i5LEULmG015732@www.beta.redhat.com> References: <200406211430.i5LEULmG015732@www.beta.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040621.235300.73831618.tsekine@sdri.co.jp> 関根です。 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:30:21 -0400 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122869 英語で文章書くのが苦手なのでここに日本語で文句垂れておきます。 誰か代わりに書き込んでおいてくれると助かります。 --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X --- 8X ---- (すべての)起動スクリプトの対象を *.sh に絞るのはいいことだと 思いますが、影響の大きさからして実現されるのは FC3 でしょう。 んで、とりあえずは /etc/X11/xinitrc/xinirtc(と /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession) については、/etc/rc と同様な ルールとして for file in /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc.d/* ; do [ -x ${file} ] || continue case "${file}" in *.rpmsave|*.rpmorig|*.rpmnew|*~|*.orig) continue ;; *.sh) ;; *) echo "warning: $file should be end in .sh extension" ;; esac . ${file} done とするのはどうでしょう? ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- X8 ---- これを英語で書こうとすると、参考書をめくるのび太君よろしく、 眠気が…zzZ -- SEKINE Tatsuo: tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp System Design & Research Inst. Co.,Ltd. tsekine ＠ ylug.org Yokohama Linux Users Group From ml ＠ elf.no-ip.org Mon Jun 21 15:01:11 2004 From: ml ＠ elf.no-ip.org (Tadashi Jokagi) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:01:11 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSBsoQg==?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJWolaiE8JTkbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <20040621.215029.476693836.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <40D5A452.6080107@jcom.home.ne.jp> <20040621.170200.1057494051.tagoh@redhat.com> <40D6CE9B.9080105@jcom.home.ne.jp> <20040621.215029.476693836.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <40d6f837.3109%ml@elf.no-ip.org> 上鍵です．こんにちは． Akira TAGOHさんの<20040621.215029.476693836.tagoh ＠ redhat.com>から >SF> その場合は、どうやって手続きをとったらいいでしょう? > >現状ではtesting用の(公式な)repositoryはありません． 相手にとって不本意かもしれませんが? Fedora Extras は? http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraDocuments のどこかに contributer になる方法が出ていたはずです． #ttfonts-ja-sazanami などと一旦作っておいて...ということになると思いま すが(それでいいのかどうかはちょっと判断できないですが) -- ----.----1----.----2----.----3----.----4----.----5----.----6----.----7 Tadashi Jokagi/Setagaya city mailto:elf ＠ elf.no-ip.org Fedora JP Project http://fedora.jp/ Fedora Project http://fedora.redhat.com/ Fedora and Red Hat are registered trademarks of Red Hat Inc. From tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp Mon Jun 21 15:39:43 2004 From: tsekine ＠ sdri.co.jp (SEKINE Tatsuo) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:39:43 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 89292] many UTF-8 symbols appear garbled in syslog In-Reply-To: <20040619.005049.105795917.tsekine@sdri.co.jp> References: <200406181547.i5IFlEjf011569@www.beta.redhat.com> <20040619.005049.105795917.tsekine@sdri.co.jp> Message-ID: <20040622.003943.79780928.tsekine@sdri.co.jp> 関根%bugzilla わからん%です メインのバグ ID は https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125679 のようです。RawHide では直ったようなので、 今さら Cc: は付けないでおきます。 ところで、bugzilla の正しい使い方としては 125679 depends on 89292 なのでしょうか…? From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 22 01:30:55 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:30:55 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 113910] boot.iso installer segfaults signal 11 for ja install In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406220130.i5M1UtTR010587@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113910 petersen ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |high ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From t-matsuu ＠ estyle.ne.jp Tue Jun 22 01:44:54 2004 From: t-matsuu ＠ estyle.ne.jp (MATSUURA Takanori) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:44:54 +0900 (JST) Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?UmU6IFtmZWRvcmEtamEtbA==?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?aXN0XSAbJEIkNSQ2JEokXyVVJSklcyVIJWolaiE8JTkbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: <40d6f837.3109%ml@elf.no-ip.org> References: <40d6f837.3109%ml@elf.no-ip.org> Message-ID: <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> 松浦です。 ここのMLでの投稿は始めてです。 よろしくお願いいたします。 On Tue Jun 22 00:01:11 JST 2004 Tadashi Jokagi wrote: > 相手にとって不本意かもしれませんが? Fedora Extras は? > > http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraDocuments > > のどこかに contributer になる方法が出ていたはずです． おそらく、 http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy ですね。 > #ttfonts-ja-sazanami などと一旦作っておいて...ということになると思いま > すが(それでいいのかどうかはちょっと判断できないですが) 私はたごうさんの意見に近いです。 現行のttfonts-jaで新しいbug報告を「Severity: enhancement」で行って、 ・「さざなみフォントって新しいフォントが出たからttfonts-jaに『追加』してほしい ・FC3からはさざなみフォントを主にしてほしい ・過去の互換性のため、kochi-substは残しておいてほしい ではいかがでしょう。 kochi-substを急いで削除する理由はないと思います。類似のフォントが重複 してパッケージングされるという問題はありますが、ユーザの混乱は抑えられ るのではないでしょうか。 # 個人的にはさざなみの「底」の字のバランスが気に入らない…。 松浦 Web: http://my.reset.jp/~t-matsuu/ nosrc.rpm配布中… From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 22 08:33:54 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:33:54 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> References: <40d6f837.3109%ml@elf.no-ip.org> <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> Message-ID: <20040622.173354.697544327.tagoh@redhat.com> たごうです． >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:44:54 +0900 (JST), >>>>> "MT" == MATSUURA Takanori wrote: MT> 松浦です。 MT> ここのMLでの投稿は始めてです。 MT> よろしくお願いいたします。 MT> On Tue Jun 22 00:01:11 JST 2004 MT> Tadashi Jokagi wrote: >> 相手にとって不本意かもしれませんが? Fedora Extras は? >> >> http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraDocuments >> >> のどこかに contributer になる方法が出ていたはずです． MT> おそらく、 MT> http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy MT> ですね。 Extrasに入れるのはやや時間がかかるようです．また，後々 replaceするフォントを別の名前のパッケージにするのは，面倒な ことになるので，それはあまりやりたくありません． 現時点ではあくまでテストをすることが目的なので． MT> 私はたごうさんの意見に近いです。 MT> 現行のttfonts-jaで新しいbug報告を「Severity: enhancement」で行って、 MT> ・「さざなみフォントって新しいフォントが出たからttfonts-jaに『追加』してほしい MT> ・FC3からはさざなみフォントを主にしてほしい MT> ・過去の互換性のため、kochi-substは残しておいてほしい MT> ではいかがでしょう。 むしろttfonts-jaにさざなみフォントを入れるのは簡単です．問題 は他のパッケージとの兼ね合いですかね．なので，その辺もすべて bugzillaでやろうとすると，ttfonts-jaにさざなみフォントをいれ てRaw Hideにでも突っ込んでしまわないといけなくなります．存在 しないものに対するバグを受け取ってもメンテナはバグを確認でき ませんし，直ったのかどうかの確認もできませんよね． それから，ちゃんとしたテストをするにはkochi-substが入ってい るといろいろと弊害もあります．例えばfontconfigはそのフォント にないglyphは別のフォントからとってきます．また，フォントが ないために動かない等の致命的なバグも隠蔽してしまうので，悩ま しいところです． フォントそのもののqualityを確認する場合には Sans,Serif,Monospaceといったaliasを使わずに直接Sazanami *を 指定するなどといった対策で回避可能ですが． MT> kochi-substを急いで削除する理由はないと思います。類似のフォントが重複 MT> してパッケージングされるという問題はありますが、ユーザの混乱は抑えられ MT> るのではないでしょうか。 というわけで，テスト用はあくまでテスト用ということで， kochi-substを抜きたいと思ってますが，どうでしょう? 問題なさそうなので，抜いてみたら後からいろいろでてきたとかで はしゃれになりませんし…． -- Akira TAGOH From hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp Tue Jun 22 14:42:52 2004 From: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp (Hirofumi Saito) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:42:52 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUglaiVqITwlORsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040622.173354.697544327.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <40d6f837.3109%ml@elf.no-ip.org> <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> <20040622.173354.697544327.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> 斉藤です。 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:33:54 +0900 (JST) Akira TAGOH wrote: > というわけで，テスト用はあくまでテスト用ということで， > kochi-substを抜きたいと思ってますが，どうでしょう? > 問題なさそうなので，抜いてみたら後からいろいろでてきたとかで > はしゃれになりませんし…． 現在、kochi-subst でなければならない部分に OOo のメニュー部分があります。 確か Raw Hide では直っているようなのですが、そこの部分の確認とかがあるか と思います。 あと、OOo でどうも kochi-subst しかフォントを認識しなかったと思います。 このあたりの確認がメインになるでしょうか。 OOo 1.1.1 です。 あとは Ghostscript まわりで問題が起きないかとかもあるかと思います。 # ちゃんと設定すれば問題ないでしょう。 ----- 斉藤 博文 (Hirofumi Saito) @ Fedora Core 2 Email: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 23 00:31:32 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:31:32 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124890] i18n im-switch message In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406230031.i5N0VWvh002780@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124890 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 23 00:31:39 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:31:39 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406230031.i5N0VdXe002866@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 23 00:31:49 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:31:49 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 125331] htt_server needs the privileges to support the multiple users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406230031.i5N0Vnue002987@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125331 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 23 05:37:21 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:37:21 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> References: <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> <20040622.173354.697544327.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> Message-ID: <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> たごうです． >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:42:52 +0900, >>>>> "HS" == Hirofumi Saito wrote: HS> 斉藤です。 HS> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:33:54 +0900 (JST) HS> Akira TAGOH wrote: >> というわけで，テスト用はあくまでテスト用ということで， >> kochi-substを抜きたいと思ってますが，どうでしょう? >> 問題なさそうなので，抜いてみたら後からいろいろでてきたとかで >> はしゃれになりませんし…． kochiを抜いたテストパッケージを http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/sazanami/ に置きました．yum & apt-get readyです． yumの方は [sazanami] name=Sazanami Font - Testing baseurl=http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/sazanami/ みたいなのを/etc/yum.confに追加してください． aptの方は rpm http://people.redhat.com/tagoh sazanami sazanami と書いたファイルを /etc/apt/sources.list.d/sazanami.list と でも保存してください． gpg keyは http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/pubkey.gpg です． HS> 現在、kochi-subst でなければならない部分に OOo のメニュー部分があります。 HS> 確か Raw Hide では直っているようなのですが、そこの部分の確認とかがあるか HS> と思います。 HS> あと、OOo でどうも kochi-subst しかフォントを認識しなかったと思います。 HS> このあたりの確認がメインになるでしょうか。 HS> OOo 1.1.1 です。 TTFかTTCとかそういう問題でしょうか? HS> あとは Ghostscript まわりで問題が起きないかとかもあるかと思います。 HS> # ちゃんと設定すれば問題ないでしょう。 CIDFnmap.jaはすでに変更済です． -- Akira TAGOH From hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp Thu Jun 24 15:13:50 2004 From: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp (Hirofumi Saito) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:13:50 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUglaiVqITwlORsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <20040622104454t-matsuu@estyle.ne.jp> <20040622.173354.697544327.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> 斉藤です。 On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:37:21 +0900 (JST) Akira TAGOH wrote: > > たごうです． > > HS> 現在、kochi-subst でなければならない部分に OOo のメニュー部分があります。 > HS> 確か Raw Hide では直っているようなのですが、そこの部分の確認とかがあるか > HS> と思います。 こちらは Bugzilla #120494 って、たごうさんの報告ですよね。 > HS> あと、OOo でどうも kochi-subst しかフォントを認識しなかったと思います。 > HS> このあたりの確認がメインになるでしょうか。 > HS> OOo 1.1.1 です。 > > TTFかTTCとかそういう問題でしょうか? そういうわけでもなさそうです。 市販の RHL9 に付属のフォントを /usr/share/fonts/ja/TrueType/ に入れても 認識されません。(前のマシンでの話) 時間があれば、再確認します。 ----- 斉藤 博文 (Hirofumi Saito) @ Fedora Core 2 Email: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Thu Jun 24 16:51:09 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:51:09 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 123540] Japanese PDF scrambled with xpdf 3.00 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406241651.i5OGp9SK014073@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123540 than ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From than ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-24 12:51 ------- i already added the patch into xpdf-3.00-5, it will show up in fc3 tree soon. Please test it again if this problem is fixed. Thanks ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 25 06:01:41 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:01:41 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> References: <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> Message-ID: <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> たごうです． >>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 00:13:50 +0900, >>>>> "HS" == Hirofumi Saito wrote: HS> あと、OOo でどうも kochi-subst しかフォントを認識しなかったと思います。 HS> このあたりの確認がメインになるでしょうか。 HS> OOo 1.1.1 です。 >> >> TTFかTTCとかそういう問題でしょうか? HS> そういうわけでもなさそうです。 HS> 市販の RHL9 に付属のフォントを /usr/share/fonts/ja/TrueType/ に入れても HS> 認識されません。(前のマシンでの話) HS> 時間があれば、再確認します。 「認識」がどこまでさしているのか分かりませんが，例えばSans, Serif, Monospaceといったエイリアスフォントとして見えるかどう かの話でしょうか? それともフォントのリストにでてこないとかそ ういう類の話でしょうか? 前者はsystem wideなら /etc/fonts/fonts.confとかlocal.confとか，1 userだけなら~ /.fonts.confに書き加えれば見えるようになります．後者は fc-cacheを実行してもダメということなんでしょうか? -- Akira TAGOH From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Fri Jun 25 08:01:36 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 04:01:36 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122083] Update CMap in ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406250801.i5P81aSI011402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083 ------- Additional Comments From twaugh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-25 04:01 ------- I'll look at this after we upgrade to 8. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp Fri Jun 25 16:49:31 2004 From: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp (Hirofumi Saito) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:49:31 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUglaiVqITwlORsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040626014931.3e3c360b.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> 斉藤です。 言葉が足りませんでした。 申し訳ありません。 On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:01:41 +0900 (JST) Akira TAGOH wrote: > > たごうです． > > 「認識」がどこまでさしているのか分かりませんが，例えばSans, > Serif, Monospaceといったエイリアスフォントとして見えるかどう > かの話でしょうか? それともフォントのリストにでてこないとかそ > ういう類の話でしょうか? 前者はsystem wideなら > /etc/fonts/fonts.confとかlocal.confとか，1 userだけなら~ > /.fonts.confに書き加えれば見えるようになります．後者は > fc-cacheを実行してもダメということなんでしょうか? 後者を指しています。 RHL9 の製品版のフォントを RPM から、 # rpm -ivh ttfonts-ja-ricoh-9.0-1.noarch.rpm # fc-cashe としましたが、Gnome, KDE, Mozilla などからはフォントのリストに出ますが、 OOo ではフォントのリストに表示されませんでした。 日本語は Kochi-subst のみ表示されます。 RHL9 のリコーフォントも TTF で、Kochi-subst も TTF です。 また、Gnome 上でアプリケーションのフォントに先ほどのリコーのフォントを選 択した際には、OOo のメニューの一部 (「ー」とか) が表示されなくなります。 OOo のメニューの文字化け (Bugzilla #120494 に該当) が発生します。 Kochi-subst のみ正常に表示されます。 まだ、さざなみフォントでは使用してませんが、単に置き換えるだけでは全てう まくいくわけではなさそうです。 ----- 斉藤 博文 (Hirofumi Saito) @ Fedora Core 2 Email: hi_saito ＠ yk.rim.or.jp From yu-neko1979 ＠ eos.ocn.ne.jp Sat Jun 26 03:59:00 2004 From: yu-neko1979 ＠ eos.ocn.ne.jp (Yuhei Matsunaga) Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2004 12:59:00 +0900 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJUglaiVqITwlORsoQg==?= In-Reply-To: <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> References: <20040622234252.0520fc30.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040623.143721.846836979.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20040626125900.60f61712.yu-neko1979@eos.ocn.ne.jp> 松永といいます。はじめまして。 以前、みかちゃんフォントというフォントのRPMを作成しました。 その時に知った事ですが 憶えている限りですが参考にしてください。 それに2年前くらいのデストリの話なのですが。 gtkやKDEのフォント管理とXのフォント管理は別です。 Xのフォントとして使うには font.dirへの登録が必要です。 このfont.dirはfont.scaleから生成します。 font.scaleの記述は面倒なのでみかちゃんフォントでは font.scaleの記述部分をみかちゃんフォントのパッケージに含めました。 font.scaleには他のフォントの情報もある可能性もあるので コマンドでfont.scaleに自由に記述、削除できるchkfontscaleというパッケージを用意し、利用しました。 希望としてはchkfontscaleに変わるものがあればいいんですけど。 openofficeはgtkではないので Xのフォントか自前のフォント情報を使用してると思います。 ------------------- Yuhei Matsunaga ------------------- From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 28 06:13:47 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:13:47 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 122083] Update CMap in ghostscript In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406280613.i5S6DlV1012776@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-28 02:13 ------- Could you make a testing package before upgrading it completely? although I haven't had a time to test it yet, I heard gs8 which is available under GPL breaks something for CJK printing. but AFPL version seems to be better than GPL version. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 28 06:19:43 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 02:19:43 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 121018] The status window has the decorated window and appears on the tasklist In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406280619.i5S6Jhb2013036@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121018 ------- Additional Comments From tagoh ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-28 02:19 ------- as Bug#126405 and Bug#126406 was closed, this problem should disappears anymore. Lawrence, could you confirm if this problem was fixed? we can close this then. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From tagoh ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 28 05:42:36 2004 From: tagoh ＠ redhat.com (Akira TAGOH) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:42:36 +0900 (JST) Subject: [fedora-ja-list] =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDUkNiRKJF8lVSUpJXMlSCVqJWohPCU5GyhC?= In-Reply-To: <20040626014931.3e3c360b.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> References: <20040625001350.7827035f.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> <20040625.150141.233850912.tagoh@redhat.com> <20040626014931.3e3c360b.hi_saito@yk.rim.or.jp> Message-ID: <20040628.144236.556023945.tagoh@redhat.com> >>>>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:49:31 +0900, >>>>> "HS" == Hirofumi Saito wrote: HS> 後者を指しています。 HS> RHL9 の製品版のフォントを RPM から、 HS> # rpm -ivh ttfonts-ja-ricoh-9.0-1.noarch.rpm HS> # fc-cashe HS> としましたが、Gnome, KDE, Mozilla などからはフォントのリストに出ますが、 HS> OOo ではフォントのリストに表示されませんでした。 HS> 日本語は Kochi-subst のみ表示されます。 HS> RHL9 のリコーフォントも TTF で、Kochi-subst も TTF です。 FC2のOOoでは再現できないので，この辺りは修正されたようです． 単にフォントをインストールした後でもフォントのリストにでてき ます． 以前のOOoはたしかxfsのconfigからFontPathをひろって…みたいな ことをしてたような記憶があります． HS> また、Gnome 上でアプリケーションのフォントに先ほどのリコーのフォントを選 HS> 択した際には、OOo のメニューの一部 (「ー」とか) が表示されなくなります。 HS> OOo のメニューの文字化け (Bugzilla #120494 に該当) が発生します。 HS> Kochi-subst のみ正常に表示されます。 HS> まだ、さざなみフォントでは使用してませんが、単に置き換えるだけでは全てう HS> まくいくわけではなさそうです。 ということで現時点ではfontconfigが一番大きな修正のようです． -- Akira TAGOH From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Mon Jun 28 21:59:15 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:59:15 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406282159.i5SLxFiu007313@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-28 17:59 ------- My concern in comment #8 was that (I'm viewing it with Opera), it is possible that the browser would render it different from lynx. So the #3 screenshot (thanks for the confirmation). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Tue Jun 29 04:23:40 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:23:40 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 126020] Enable i18n translation for rhgb in CJK environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406290423.i5T4NeJU007284@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126020 notting ＠ redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |7.58-1 ------- Additional Comments From notting ＠ redhat.com 2004-06-29 00:23 ------- Added, will be in 7.58-1. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla ＠ redhat.com Wed Jun 30 21:37:04 2004 From: bugzilla ＠ redhat.com (bugzilla ＠ redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:37:04 -0400 Subject: [fedora-ja-list] [Bug 124849] Application message is scrabmled in Japanese In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200406302137.i5ULb4CY032312@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124849 ------- Additional Comments From dickey ＠ radix.net 2004-06-30 17:37 ------- It is not related to color; the data returned by gettext is displayed by lynx+ncursesw just as if I echoed the string directly to the terminal. It occurs to me that the problem is that the message file ja.po uses EUC-JP charset. This issue came up in another message file (though it seems odd to me that gettext would have this limitation). I'll investigate further. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.