modsign vs build-id

[Jarod Wilson]

>> Roland McGrath wrote:
>>> This has nothing to do with the modsign issue.
>> Hrm... It didn't start happening (that I noticed) until after some of
>> the recent changes you'd made, so I thought you might have an inkling =
as
>> to what was going on.
>=20
> I do, but it's harmless and not related to the modsign issue.

My main point was to make sure it was going to get fixed, and if you
already know what's up, I presume you'll fix it and I don't need to
spend time looking into it. :)

>> However, the behavior of the resulting kernel build *does* appear to b=
e
>> related. I can't load any modules:
>>
>> # modprobe e1000
>> FATAL: Error inserting e1000 (/lib/modules/.../e1000.ko): Key was
>> rejected by service.
>=20
> The is the failure mode that revision 1.84 of kernel.spec fixed.
> Are you using the current spec?

That was from revision 1.87.

>> Best guess is that something goes haywire since I did this build
>> '--without debuginfo'.
>=20
> I can't see how that would break the fix for module signing.

Was just a guess and perhaps not even an educated one. I'll poke at it a
bit more.

--=20
Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/attachments/20070814/bb143542/attachment.sig>