2.6.22 rebase.

[Nigel Cunningham]

Hi.

On Thursday 12 July 2007 02:25:45 Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:45:13AM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>  > On 07/11/2007 01:23 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > >  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247346
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > Problems start to appear when the hpet stuff for x86_64 went it, and 
did
>  > >  > not vanish when you disabled the forced-hpet for some of the recent
>  > >  > ICH's from Intel (which afaics [would need the lspci data to be 
sure]
>  > >  > are in both our machines).
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > /me will later update the bug with the lspci output when I'm in 
front of
>  > >  > my laptop again.
>  > > 
>  > > Yeah, I'm picking over that bug now.  Will try and find a box I can
>  > > reproduce this on tomorrow.
>  > 
>  > The Fedora 6 kernel doesn't boot either, at least on a Dell Workstation
>  > 490, without "nohpet".
> 
> Lets just drop the 64bit tickless stuff for now, it clearly isn't baked,
> and isn't going to get much better by the end of the week (which I want
> to get something into updates-testing by).
> 
>  > AND it requires a version of mkinitrd (6.something) that's not available
>  > for Fedora 6. (I installed with --nodeps and it seems okay but there's
>  > no 'symvers' file in /boot/grub for the new kernel.)
> 
> Oops, that part of the specfile update needs fixing.
> The require: in F6 went too far forward, and I probably pushed F7 back a 
rev.

Do you (or does anyone else) know if Thomas is aware of these issues? I 
haven't noticed anything on LKML.

Regards,

Nigel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/attachments/20070712/16e1392a/attachment.sig>