atop?

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:47:34PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net) said: 
> > > These patches:
> > > 
> > > a) aren't upstream
> > > b) change the format of /proc/stat
> > > c) change process accounting in an incompatible way
> > > 
> > > So... no.
> > 
> > OK, fair enough (I wasn't aware of b) and c)).
> > 
> > Any other way then to achive the stated goals?
> 
> I haven't tried, but blktrace?

Very nice! One does get process -> I/O bandwidth. No filesystem info,
though, but I shouldn't be greedy ;)

If I find a minute I'll submit a package for this.

Thanks for pushing me to the right track!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/attachments/20070608/b77c8816/attachment.sig>