utrace is back

[Roland McGrath]

Is there an alternate Koji or some other means by which I can try
rawhide/ia64 rpm builds?

> This is caused by the change of
> #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK   5
> 
> to
> 
> #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK   22
> 
> Is there a need to change this bit from 5 to 22?  If that really is
> needed we are going to need to change entry.S to handle it (which I will
> need to find an ia64 asm expert for advice on this).

This is part of a cleanup that is not yet needed.  
I'll drop those patches from the series for now.

> So that we can continue to make ia64 progress can we %ifarch the utrace
> patch out in the spec file until utrace is complete on ia64?

That should be fine.  I don't think other patches need it to apply.

The hard 90% of the ia64 work (user_regset) has been done and posted
upstream by Shaohua Li <shaohua.li at intel.com>.  What would be best is
if you can lean on linux-ia64 upstream to incorporate those changes ASAP.
When the parts upstream has already seen get integrated, there will be
little enough left for ia64 utrace to work that I can get it going.


Thanks,
Roland