de-modularising for the win!
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at redhat.com
Fri Sep 19 00:34:13 UTC 2008
Chris Snook wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Chris Snook wrote:
>>> -CONFIG_EXT3_FS=m
>>> +CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
>>>
>>> I've been wondering for years why we weren't already doing this.
>> see above, but I can live with it. Will we add ext4 and xfs (and
>> reiserfs and jfs) too?
>
> Having one root-suitable filesystem built-in makes it easier to do a lot of
> atypical boot configurations, which are becoming rather interesting thanks to
> virtualization. If we're going to pick one, I think ext3 makes the most sense.
> I don't see a lot of benefit to building in xfs, reiserfs, or jfs, and I think
> we should definitely keep ext4 modular in its current stage of development.
>
> -- Chris
Yeah, I agree, that's fair. (I wasn't really too serious about linking
in every fs ...) Optimizing for the common case(s) makes sense.
-Eric
More information about the Fedora-kernel-list
mailing list