(no subject)

[Bill Nottingham]

Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
References: <20080918191355.GA9683 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <48D2D94E.2020902 at redhat.com> <20080918231301.GA4734 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Jeremy Katz (katzj at redhat.com) said: 
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win
> 
> Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are
> set up to use LVM.  Which then requires an initrd.

Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.)

On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out
the initrd is getting the policy lodaed.

Bill