(no subject)

[Eric Sandeen]

Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
>> Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
>> References: <20080918191355.GA9683 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <48D2D94E.2020902 at redhat.com> <20080918231301.GA4734 at nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>> In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel at aglarond.local>
>> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>>
>> Jeremy Katz (katzj at redhat.com) said: 
>>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>>> - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win
>>> Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are
>>> set up to use LVM.  Which then requires an initrd.
>> Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.)
>>
>> On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out
>> the initrd is getting the policy lodaed.
>>
> 
> But, won't we all be using btrfs instead of lvm in F11? ;-)

Aw crap, you mean F10 was my only fleeting chance to make ext4 the
default? :)

-Eric