arch fun.

[drago01]

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Part of the problem with that idea is that the Pentium M laptops without
>> PAE
>> aren't that old. This might upset quite a few people.
>>
>>
>
> Right -- and that's a good point to keep in mind.  IMO we shouldn't break
> *any* systems when we do this change.
>
> Given the other information coming through (about dynamic kernel PAE
> enable), should we really being doing this right now?
>
> Why not wait for the dynamic PAE stuff to settle upstream and then make the
> change?  Then we can properly (IMO) drop kernel-PAE.686 and stick with
> kernel.686.

dynamic PAE ?