Fw: Kernel Loading Sequence

Ahmad Al-Yaman ahmad221284 at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 6 21:53:23 UTC 2009


I just checked and quiet is not missing. As for the patches adding that output, I highly doubt it since none of them has an output and they're quite simple, they adjust a few things in some drivers, nothing major. Besides, the messages are displayed before "Welcome to Fedora init", if the problem was with the patches, shouldn't the messages come up after that?

Ahmad




________________________________
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
To: Ahmad Al-Yaman <ahmad221284 at yahoo.com>
Cc: fedora-kernel-list at redhat.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2009 12:17:46 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Kernel Loading Sequence

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 13:39 -0700, Ahmad Al-Yaman wrote:
> It's an F11 kernel + my patches. I obtained the SRPM from koji, added a couple of patches, and modified the config file to suit my hardware.

Either got quiet missing or some of the patches add output that doesn't
respect quiet.

Dave.

> 
> 
> 
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: Jarod Wilson <jarod at redhat.com>
> To: fedora-kernel-list at redhat.com
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 10:59:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Kernel Loading Sequence
> 
> On Monday 06 July 2009 11:57:47 Ahmad Al-Yaman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I came across a problem when trying to compile a custom kernel for F11: both the stock kernel and my custom kernel have i915 modesetting enabled by default. In the stock kernel the loading screen starts up immediately when the kernel starts loading, but using the custom kernel, some text is displayed before the loading screen starts up (the kernel finishes loading without problems). I'm trying to figure out the reason for this and if there's a way to fix it so that the user doesn't see this text. Could the reason be the order in which different parts of the kernel are loaded? If yes, how can I control which parts load first?
> 
> Is your 'custom kernel' an F11 kernel + your patches, or starting from
> an upstream tarball + your patches? (In which case, its lacking all the
> patches Fedora has added, and therein probably lies your answer to why
> things are behaving differently).
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list



      


More information about the Fedora-kernel-list mailing list