On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:08, seth vidal wrote: > > so I guess that a dependency of rpm 4.1.1 is satisfied by both 4.1-1.06 > > and 4.1.1-1.8x? > > > > too minor of an upgrade to trigger a dep error? > > look closely > 4.1.1 != 4.1-1 > > ver 4.1.1 > ver 4.1 > oops you are right. so was this a nodeps thing? Bret