rpm or not rpm, that's the question

[Xose Vazquez Perez]

Martin Stricker wrote:

> This may be true on 8.0 and 9 - I don't use them, so do what you want on
> them. But as far as I can see the rpm of 7.3 works nicely, so there is
> no need to upgrade. Does it really help *that much* to maintain packages
> to risk breakage? I doubt it, but then I never had to build rpms for
> more than one version.
> 
> What would be the benefit of upgrading rpm on 7.3? From the current
> discussion I don't see any.

to be sure and to end with this uncertainty :

Can any guy ask it in the rpm ml ? or to rpm package maintainer
jbj at redhat.com (Jeff Johnson)

-thanks-

-- 
HTML mails are going to trash automagically