Update-excuses report?
dick morrell
dick at webbedmail.com
Fri Apr 9 16:36:14 UTC 2004
Please don't hassle project managers of opensource projects - they give up
huge amounts of time free for the common good. When I started Smoothwall
I'd get people try this one and they soon stopped.
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 09 April 2004 05:36, John Dalbec wrote:
> > It would be nice if there were something like Debian's update-excuses
> > report that explained what was preventing various packages from being
> > moved to updates-testing (resp. updates). For example, I did a
> > verification on the "mutt" package, but it hasn't moved to "updates"
> > yet. Is my verification somehow unsatisfactory? Is Jesse waiting for a
> > corroborating verification?
> >
> > Also, is anyone updating the bug priorities? I don't know how those
> > should be set so I've been filing bugs with "normal" priority. I see
> > one "blocker", two "critical", and several "major" bugs. Are those
> > meaningful or were they just filed that way?
>
> The biggest excuse has been my lack of time. I had to get a couple
> chapters written for an upcoming book, then I had in-laws drop in
> unexpectantly. Thankfully though, after this weekend's visit to another
> set of inlaws I should have more free time before I need to start doing
> some tech editing for yet another book. There is also the issue of moving
> download.fedoralegacy.org. I don't want to make any changes to the
> current one as rsync is off and httpd is severely throttled. Once the new
> system comes online, then I can make the changes (push the updates) that
> need to happen. I plan on devoting my free time to Legacy work. There is
> a lot in the queue that needs to be released, so those are top priority.
> I am very sorry about the delay, wasn't expecting it. We also need to
> ramp up for RHL9 support. I'll be building the RHL9 tree on download when
> the new one comes up.
>
> - --
> Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
> GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
>
> Was I helpful? Let others know:
> http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAdrbz4v2HLvE71NURAssIAKDFG/LWV3CYdq75HYgKvtEcUJNv8gCaAuNs
> /BGSoE82nb1px3HzkODZK70=
> =96bB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
>
>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list